Search

Background: Cyclosporine is a rescue treatment alternative to avoid colectomy in corticosteroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of cyclosporine therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis patients., Methods: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (basal Lichtiger score > 10) patients who did not respond to 40 mg intravenous methylpredniso- lone therapy after 3-5 days were included in the study. The presence of clinical response and remission was assessed at 1st week, 1st, 6th, and 12th month according to the Lichtiger index., Results: In this study, 40 patients, whose steroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis and basal Lichtiger score > 10 points were enrolled. The median disease duration was 49.3 months (2-204). All patients received cyclosporine for 132 ± 78 days (7-270). Clinical response was obtained on seventh day in 82.5%. The clinical response rates of the first and sixth months were 72.5% and 62.5%, respectively. A total of 17/40 (42.5%) patients underwent colectomy within 1 year. In the patients who underwent colectomy, the basal LS (14.2 ± 1.9 vs 12.3 ± 1.7) (P = .002) was higher and the basal hemoglobin value (11.8 ± 2.3 vs 10.1 ± 1.5) (P = .037) was lower than those who did not undergo colectomy., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that cyclosporine treatment may be successfully and safely used in steroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis patients. Cyclosporine is a drug that has recently started to come up again with the introduction of new maintenance treatments. Especially in patients who develop a loss of response to infliximab therapy, or where infliximab therapy is contraindicated, or who have azathioprine intolerance, or are unresponsive.

Background/aims: Recently, mucosal inflammation has been proposed to be one of the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); however, there are controversial results regarding this hypotheses. Our aim was to evaluate immune cell infiltration in rectal and ileal biopsy specimens of patients with IBS and to compare it with those of healthy controls., Materials and Methods: In total, 36 patients with IBS (15 with diarrhea and 21 with constipation) and 16 healthy volunteers were enrolled. Ileocolonoscopy and ileal/rectal biopsies were performed. Rectal and terminal ileal biopsy specimens were evaluated for mucosal immune cell infiltration using immunohistochemical analysis. Serotonin positivity as well as counts of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) and CD4+, CD8+, CD20+, and CD3+ cells were determined by a single pathologist who is an expert in the gastrointestinal system., Results: CD3+ and CD4+ cell counts in rectal and terminal ileal biopsy specimens were lower in the IBS group than in the controls. Conversely, there was no statistically significant difference between the IBS and control groups in terms of serotonin positivity as well as counts of IEL and CD20+ and CD8+ cells. Comparison between the IBS subgroups revealed a higher number of IEL in rectal biopsy specimens of the diarrhea dominant group. In the IBS subgroups, immune cell counts in terminal ileal and rectal biopsy specimens showed a positive correlation., Conclusion: IBS and its subgroups showed lower immune cell counts than the controls in our study. These results indicate that there is no significant mucosal inflammation in homogeneous groups of patients with IBS. Rectal biopsies may be sufficient for the evaluation of inflammation in IBS.