Search

Background Asian carps are popular freshwater fish species in Hong Kong and served as an important protein source for infants. Grass carp parvalbumin was reported to have higher allergenicity than other commercially important fishes (salmon and cod) in terms of IgE reactivity. Objective To identify allergens in Asian carps and study the divergence pattern of allergens. Method Three complete Asian carps’ genomes were constructed by hybrid assembly approach. All the homologs of known and putative allergens were identified based on sequence homology at the genomic level. The gene structures, expression level and protein conformations of parvalbumin were revealed using bioinformatics tools. Results Parvalbumin is the major allergen in grass carp tested by indirect ELISA. Nine homologs of parvalbumin were identified in the genome of grass carp, in which Cid_PV2 exhibited highest sequence similarity to the reported group 1 allergen of grass carp, Cten i 1. Similarly, ten parvalbumin homologs were identified in the genome of bighead and black carp respectively, in which Mpi_PV7 and Hno_PV7 were identified as the putative allergenic homologs. The expression profile of parvalbumin revealed alternative usage of homologs in different tissues of Asian carps. Moreover, gene copy numbers of parvalbumin gradually expanded in bony fish and two gene clusters of parvalbumin were identified inside the genomes of Asian carps. Conclusion All the homologs of Asian carps’ parvalbumin were accurately identified and gene divergence contributed to the formation of allergenic homologs. Together with a comprehensive gene sequence profile of carps’ parvalbumin, those could be applied to achieve a more precise clinical diagnostic test and would ultimately assist the design of preventive treatment by immunotherapy of fish allergy.

Background: Combined treatment with probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) was shown to induce sustained unresponsiveness (SU) in a proof-of-concept randomized trial. Additional data on safety and long-term outcomes are needed. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and long-term effects of PPOIT in children with peanut allergy. Methods: Open-label study of 20 children aged 1-12 years with challenge-confirmed peanut allergy; all children received 18-months of PPOIT. Efficacy endpoints were desensitization, 8-week SU, and persistence of 8-week SU at 3-years post-treatment, assessed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (cumulative 4950mg peanut protein). Treatment emergent adverse events and relationship to study treatment were recorded. Immunologic measures and health related quality of life (HRQL) were evaluated at screening, end-of-treatment and 3-years post-treatment. Results: Sixteen children (75%) completed treatment. By intention-to-treat analysis, 75% (15/20) achieved desensitization and 60% (12/20) achieved 8-week SU. Ten of 12 participants with SU at end-of-treatment consented to the 3-year SU challenge; 6 (60%) had persistence of SU. PPOIT was associated with significantly reduced peanut skin prick test wheal size and serum peanut specific-IgE levels at end-of-treatment, 12-months and 3-years post-treatment. There were no serious adverse events. HRQL scores improved (exceeding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of 0.45) at 12-months post-treatment with benefit sustained at 3-years post-treatment. Conclusions: Eighteen months of PPOIT induced high rates of desensitization and SU, and SU persisted to 3-years post-treatment in a majority of initial responders. PPOIT led to long-lasting suppression of peanut sIgE and long-lasting clinically important improvement in HRQL.

Background: Anaphylaxis is a significant health burden in most Western countries but there is little published data on the incidence and pattern of anaphylaxis in Asia. We aim to determine the incidence rate and pattern of anaphylaxis over the past decade among the paediatric population in Hong Kong. Methods: Medical records of patients presenting with allergy-related symptoms during the period 2010 to 2019 were examined. Paediatric patients aged below 18 years who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis laid out by the NIAID/FAAN were analysed. Incidence rates were calculated using population statistics as the denominator. All information pertaining to the anaphylaxis events and patients’ characteristics were retrieved using standardized data collection forms. Results: The overall 10-year estimated incidence of anaphylaxis was 7.70 per 100,000 person-years, with a rising trend of anaphylaxis incidence across time. Food-induced anaphylaxis accounted for the majority of hospital presentation, of which peanut and shellfish were the top food triggers in our population. Comorbid asthma and young age were risk factors associated with wheeze at presentation. Misdiagnosis of anaphylaxis occurred in up to half the anaphylaxis cases and adrenaline was only utilised in 45% of cases. Conclusions: An increasing trend of anaphylaxis incidence over the past decade is evident in Hong Kong children, with a discrepantly low accuracy in diagnosis and suboptimal management of anaphylaxis. There is a pressing need to heighten public and physicians’ awareness of the distinctive features of anaphylaxis in the paediatric age group.