1. Dopamine versus noradrenaline in septic shock
- Author
-
Bo Xu and Oziemski Peter
- Subjects
endocrine system ,septic ,lcsh:R5-920 ,Septic shock ,business.industry ,Dopamine ,Review Article ,General Medicine ,bacterial infections and mycoses ,medicine.disease ,Bioinformatics ,norepinephrine ,Sepsis ,Norepinephrine (medication) ,sepsis ,Anesthesia ,medicine ,noradrenaline ,In patient ,business ,lcsh:Medicine (General) ,hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists ,medicine.drug - Abstract
BackgroundThe ‘Surviving Sepsis’ Campaign guidelines recommend theuse of dopamine or noradrenaline as the first vasopressor inseptic shock. However, information that guides clinicians inchoosing between dopamine and noradrenaline as the firstvasopressor in patients with septic shock is limited.ObjectiveThis article presents a review of the literature regarding theuse of dopamine versus noradrenaline in patients with septicshock.ResultsTwo randomised controlled trials (RCT) and two largeprospective cohort studies were analysed. RCT data showeddopamine was associated with increased arrhythmic events.One cohort study found dopamine was associated with higher30-day mortality. The other cohort study found noradrenalinewas associated with higher 28-day mortality.DiscussionData on the use of dopamine versus noradrenaline in patientswith septic shock is limited. Following the recent SOAP IIstudy, there is now strong evidence that the use of dopaminein septic shock is associated with significantly morecardiovascular adverse events, compared tonoradrenaline.ConclusionNoradrenaline should be used as the initial vasopressor inseptic shock to avoid the arrhythmic events associatedwith dopamine.
- Published
- 2011