Search

Cosmic voids are a powerful probe of cosmology and are one of the core observables of upcoming galaxy surveys. The cross-correlations between voids and other large-scale structure tracers such as galaxy clustering and galaxy lensing have been shown to be very sensitive probes of cosmology and among the most promising to probe the nature of gravity and the neutrino mass. However, recent measurements of the void imprint on the lensed Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) have been shown to be in tension with expectations based on LCDM simulations, hinting to a possibility of non-standard cosmological signatures due to massive neutrinos. In this work we use the DEMNUni cosmological simulations with massive neutrino cosmologies to study the neutrino impact on voids selected in photometric surveys, e.g. via Luminous Red Galaxies, as well as on the void- CMB lensing cross-correlation. We show how the void properties observed in this way (size function, profiles) are affected by the presence of massive neutrinos compared to the neutrino massless case, and show how these can vary as a function of the selection method of the void sample. We comment on the possibility for massive neutrinos to be the source of the aforementioned tension. Finally, we identify the most promising setup to detect signatures of massive neutrinos in the voids-CMB lensing cross-correlation and define a new quantity useful to distinguish among different neutrino masses by comparing future observations against predictions from simulations including massive neutrinos., Comment: 34 pages, 15 figures

We examine the efficacy of the halo mass function as a probe of $f(R)$, symmetron and DGP gravity. We develop an excursion-set method to generalise a range of popular HMF fitting functions from GR to screened MG, considering the HMF dependence on the critical density parameter $\delta_{c}$. In particular, we propose a variety of new methods to account for the environmental dependence of chameleon screening and compare their accuracy to existing ones via $N$-body data. Finally, using the nested sampling routine MultiNest, we examine two possible interpretations of the MG $N$-body results: whether they can be interpreted as $\Lambda$CDM HMFs and whether the MG HMFs display any universality. We find that the effects of MG can be interpreted as a change in best-fit parameters in the $\Lambda$CDM HMF---i.e. can be mistaken for GR---for all of the fitting functions. Alternatively, the relation can be inverted to judge the universality of the HMF---not in terms of its purported invariance to $z$, $H_{0}$, $\Omega_{m}$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ as in GR, but its independence on the underlying theory of gravity. Although we found no completely universal HMF, the parameter values did cluster according to the type of screening mechanism. The results suggest that a single, best-fit HMF might be used for each type of screening, independent of the parameters in the MG model. This demonstrates that the additional complexity of the gravitational collapse in screened MG theories cannot always be accounted for using the techniques developed in GR. However, the variations are small enough that it is unnecessary to develop new fitting functions and calibrate them on a case-by-case basis., Comment: 61 pages, 21 figures Replaced introduction. Added background detail on excursion set theory. Shifted technical aspects to appendices. Results unchanged but explained with clearer references to figures