Search

Introduction: several barriers remain in the hepatitis C care cascade, which need to be removed in order to eliminate chronic hepatitis C. These barriers include deficiencies in screening and confirmatory diagnosis as well as difficulties in accessing treatment., Aims: to identify factors associated with the non-referral of patients with positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies and to identify factors associated with loss of follow-up or non-attendance of these patients to specialist consultation after referral., Methods: observational and retrospective single-center-study, including all positive HCV serology tests performed between January 2013 and May 2018, in the Virgen Macarena health area (Seville, Spain) before implementing the one-step diagnosis. Non-referred patients and patients who were lost to follow-up after being referred were identified., Results: a total of 54 (77.4 %) patients diagnosed in Primary Care (PC) and 54 (22.2 %) from hospital specialists were not referred (p < 0.001). Predictors for non-referral were: stay in prison/institutionalization (p = 0.04), suffering chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p = 0.07), a normal AST value (p = 0.034) or test requested by Primary Care physician (PCP) (p = 0.004). Patients referred from PC were more likely to be lost to follow-up than those referred from hospital specialists (p < 0.001). Predictors of follow-up loss included: opioid replacement therapy (p = 0.034), absence of high blood pressure (p = 0.039) and test requested by PCP (p = 0.049)., Conclusions: a high percentage of patients with positive HCV serology were not referred or were lost to follow-up, mainly those belonging to high risk social groups or those with associated comorbidities. Patients with average values of transaminases or those diagnosed in PC were also less frequently referred.

We present the case of a 71-year-old male with a medical history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and acute myocardial infarction in 2007 who was taking low-dose aspirin and bemiparin 3500 IU every 24 hours. He was admitted to the Urology Service with recurrent hematuria 14 days after radical prostatectomy, which ceased after continuous bladder irrigation.

Introduction: patients with advanced chronic liver disease (CLD) may be at an increased risk of a severe course due to cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of CLD in COVID-19 patients and to analyze the course of the infection, compared with patients with non-liver disease., Materials and Methods: this was a retrospective single center study of all patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test from March 23rd to April 30th, 2020. Clinical and biochemical data of patients with and without CLD and COVID-19 were collected from the medical records., Result: four hundred and forty-seven patients with a SARS-CoV-2 positive PCR were included, 6.3 % had CLD; 69.7 % of patients with CLD were male, with a median age of 65.5 years and active alcohol consumption and smoking; 75 % had non-advanced liver fibrosis and most had non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The hospital admission rate (92.9 % vs 47.7 %, p < 0.001), concomitant comorbidities (diabetes 38.5 vs 16.5 %, p = 0.011; obesity 30.8 vs 8.5 %, p = 0.033; cancer 23.1 vs 5 %, p = 0.027; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 19.2 vs 9 %, p = 0.009) and concomitant antibiotics treatment (19.3 vs 5 %, p = 0.018) were higher in patients with CLD than in those without CLD. In-patient hospital mortality rates were similar in both groups (30.8 vs 19.6 %, p = 0.289). The presence of CLD was not associated with mortality (OR = 1.06; 95 % CI = 0.35-3.18; p = 0.924). However, patients with CLD and COVID-19 who were male, obese or under concomitant antibiotic treatment had the highest risk of mortality according to the univariate analysis., Conclusion: patients with CLD had a higher risk of hospital admission, with worse outcomes during the COVID-19 infection associated to other concomitant comorbidities and a suspicion of bacterial co-infection.

Introduction: endoscopy plays an essential role in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), as it allows us to visualize and assess the severity of the disease. Different scores have been devised to standardize the findings because such assessments are not always objective., Aims: the aim of this study was to assess the interobserver variability between the Index of Mayo Endoscopy (IME) and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity (UCEIS), analyzing the severity of the endoscopic lesions in patients with UC. The secondary aim was to analyze if the cathartic preparation affected the degree of concordance amongst the endoscopists., Material and Methods: this was a single-cohort observational, comparative study in which a colonoscopy was performed in patients with UC, as the normal clinical practice. The results were classified according to the IME and the UCEIS by three endoscopic specialists. In order to assess the degree of interobserver correlation, the Kappa index for IME was used and the intraclass correlation coefficient was used for UCEIS., Results: sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The average age was 51 (SD ± 16.7) and the average Mayo Clinic index was 3.07 (SD ± 2.54). The weighted Kappa index between endoscopists A and B for the IME was 0.8, 0.52 between A and C and 0.49 between B and C. The intraclass correlation coefficient for UCEIS was 0.922 between the three endoscopists (95 % CI: 0.832-0.959). A better interobserver correlation was found when the cathartic preparation was ≥ 8 based on the Boston Scale., Conclusions: there was a higher correlation between the different endoscopists for the UCEIS than for the IME. Thus, this should be considered to be the best index to use in the clinical practice. A good cleansing preparation is important to improve the interobserver correlation.

Neuroendocrine tumors rarely occur in the esophagus because the neuroendocrine system is not well developed in the esophagus. The case of a neuroendocrine esophageal tumor developed in a patient with Barret's esophagus is presented. It was successfully trated by endoscopy.

Introduction: between 30 % and 40 % of patients treated with infliximab lose response during maintenance. Therapeutic drug monitoring could be used to optimize management in these situations. However, infliximab serum levels are not well defined. The aim of this study was to determine the cut-off range of infliximab serum levels in Crohn's disease patients in remission in the clinical practice., Methods: an observational retrospective study was performed from 2016 to 2017. Patients were included with established Crohn's disease, who had been on a maintenance dose schedule of infliximab. Infliximab levels and antibodies to infliximab were measured at least twice in all patients, after induction and after six months of treatment. Clinical remission was defined as ≤ 4 using the Harvey-Bradshaw index. Cluster analysis was used to analyze the results., Results: one hundred and five Crohn's disease patients were included in the study; 57.1 % were male with a mean age of 39 years (SD ± 12.9). The median (range) time of the disease was eleven years (7-15) and the median (range) time of follow-up was 32 months (22-38). Patients who achieved remission had infliximab serum levels between 4.26-8.26 ug/ml versus 0.06-1.43 ug/ml in patients who did not achieve remission after induction. Infliximab serum levels were 2.84-7.75 ug/ml and 0.05-2.69 ug/ml in patients who achieved remission versus those who did not achieve remission after six months of treatment. Overall, 4.26-8.26 ug/ml was found to be the best cut-off range for remission., Conclusions: in our clinical practice, serum levels of infliximab in Crohn's disease patients should be higher than 4 ug/ml to achieve clinical remission.

Background and Aims: infliximab has changed the natural history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The advent of biosimilar treatments such as CT-P13 will hopefully improve the availability of biological therapies. Data with regard to drug switching are currently limited. The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of switching from the reference product (RP), infliximab, to CT-P13 in patients with IBD., Methods: this was a multicenter prospective observational study in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). All patients had switched from infliximab RP (Remicade®) to CT-P13 treatment and were followed up for 12 months. The efficacy endpoint was the change in clinical remission assessed at 0 and 12 months, according to the Harvey-Bradshaw score and partial Mayo score for patients with CD and UC, respectively. Adverse events were monitored and recorded throughout the study., Results: a total of 167 patients (116 CD/51 UC) were included; 88.8% (103/116) of patients with CD were in remission at the time of the drug switch and 69.7% were in remission at 12 months. The Harvey-Bradshaw (HB) score significantly changed at 12 months (p = 0.001); 84.3% (43/51) of patients with UC were in remission at the time of the drug switch and 76.7% were in remission at 12 months. No significant changes in the median partial Mayo score (p = 0.87) were observed at 12 months. Serious adverse events related to medication were reported in 12/167 (7.2%) cases., Conclusion: switching from infliximab RP to CT-P13 is safe and effective at 12 months. The loss of efficacy at 12 months was 15.7%.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic collections has replaced surgery as the first line of treatment due its accuracy and safety profile. A higher success rate and fewer adverse events has been observed using fully covered metal stent for the drainage. However, complications of EUS-guided drainage can appear. We present a case of late migration of the stent.

We present a case of ileocecal endometriosis as a cause of infrequent ileocolic intussusception in an adult patient. It is reviewed as published by the authors Sanchez Cifuentes, A et al. 2016, emphasizing the rarity of the location of endometriosis, and its association as a cause of intussusception.

Background: The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease is increasing in Europe and in Spain. However, there is no recent data from Southern Spain., Objectives: To determine the evolution of the hospital incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in Southern Spain., Material and Methods: A retrospective study was performed in two hospitals in Southern Spain. Data was collected from inflammatory bowel disease patients, divided into two periods (1995-2000 and 2001-2014) and compared. The reference population from both areas was 1,011,555 inhabitants., Results: A total of 430 patients were registered during the first period (1995-2000); 50% (215) had Crohn's disease that resulted in a cumulative incidence rate of 7.08 cases/100,000 inhabitants per year. The overall inflammatory bowel disease incidence was 3.54 cases/100,000 inhabitants per year. During the second period (2001-2014), 2,089 patients were collected; 51.7% had ulcerative colitis (1,081). The rate of cumulative incidence of inflammatory bowel disease was 14.7 cases/100,000 inhabitants per year (7.6 cases of ulcerative colitis/100,000 inhabitants/year and 7.1 cases of Crohn´s disease/100,000 inhabitants/year)., Conclusions: The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in Southern Spain has doubled in the last decade and is similar to that of the rest of the country and Europe.