Search

RATIONALE: Home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) is an alternative to polysomnography (PSG) for sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) diagnosis. However, therapeutic decision-making is a different process than diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the agreement between HRP and in-hospital PSG for therapeutic decision-making in a large sample. METHODS: Patients with an intermediate or high SAHS suspicion were included in a multicenter study (eight sleep centers) and assigned to home and hospital protocols in a random order. Therapeutic decisions (continuous positive airway pressure, no continuous positive airway pressure, or impossible decision) were made by an investigator in each center, based on using either HRP or PSG and a single set of auxiliary clinical variables. Patients and diagnostic methods (HRP and PSG) were assessed in random order using an electronic database. After a month the same therapeutic decision-making procedure was repeated with the same method. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 366 randomized patients, 348 completed the protocol. The 'impossible decision' case was not observed with either PSG or HRP. Therapeutic decisions using HRP had a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 77%, and an agreement level (sum of true positives and negatives) of 76%. Patients with higher HRP apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scores (>= 30; 41% of the total sample) had a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 44%, and the agreement level was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: The HRP-based therapeutic decision was adequate when AHI was high, but deficient in the large population of patients with mild to moderate AHI. Therefore, both selecting patients with a high suspicion and severity of SAHS and future prospective cost-effectiveness studies are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RATIONALE: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the current treatment for patients with symptomatic obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Its use for all subjects with sleep-disordered breathing, regardless of daytime symptoms, is unclear. Objectives: This multicenter controlled trial assesses the effects of 1 year of CPAP treatment on blood pressure (BP) in nonsymptomatic, hypertensive patients with OSA. METHODS: We evaluated 359 patients with OSA. Inclusion criteria consisted of an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) greater than 19 hour(-1), an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score less than 11, and one of the following: under antihypertensive treatment or systolic blood pressure greater than 140 or diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg. Patients were randomized to CPAP (n = 178) or to conservative treatment (n = 181). BP was evaluated at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean (SD) values were as follows: age, 56 +/- 10 years; body mass index (BMI), 32 +/- 5 kg x m(-2); AHI, 45 +/- 20 hour(-1); and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, 7 +/- 3. After adjusting for follow-up time, baseline blood pressure values, AHI, time with arterial oxygen saturation less than 90%, and BMI, together with the change in BMI at follow-up, CPAP treatment decreased systolic blood pressure by 1.89 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -3.90, 0.11 mm Hg; P = 0.0654), and diastolic blood pressure by 2.19 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -3.46, -0.93 mm Hg; P = 0.0008). The most significant reduction in BP was in patients who used CPAP for more than 5.6 hours per night. CPAP compliance was related to AHI and the decrease in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score. CONCLUSIONS: In nonsleepy hypertensive patients with OSA, CPAP treatment for 1 year is associated with a small decrease in BP. This effect is evident only in patients who use CPAP for more than 5.6 hours per night. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00127348). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is a cause of secondary hypertension. Objectives: To explore the long-term effects of OSA and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on blood pressure (BP) in patients with ACS. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the ISAACC study (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Obstructive Sleep Apnea; NCT01335087) included 1,803 patients admitted for ACS. Patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], ⩾15 events/h) were randomly assigned to receive either CPAP or usual care and were seen in follow-up for 1-5 years. Office BP was determined at each visit. Results: We included 596 patients without OSA, 978 patients in the usual care or poor CPAP adherence group, and 229 patients in the good CPAP adherence group. At baseline, 52% of the patients were diagnosed with hypertension. Median (25th to 75th percentile) age and body mass index were 59 (52.0 to 67.0) years and 28.2 (25.6 to 31.2) kg/m 2 , respectively. After a median (25th to 75th percentile) follow-up of 41.2 (18.3 to 59.6) months, BP changes were similar in the OSA and non-OSA groups. However, we observed an increase in BP in the third tertile of the AHI (AHI, >40 events/h), with a maximum difference in mean BP of +3.3 mm Hg at 30 months. Patients with OSA with good CPAP adherence (⩾4 h/night) reduced mean BP after 18 months compared with patients with usual care/poor CPAP adherence, with a maximum mean difference (95% confidence interval) of -4.7 (-6.7 to -2.7) mm Hg. In patients with severe OSA, we observed a maximum mean difference of -7.1 (-10.3 to -3.8) mm Hg. Conclusions: In patients with ACS, severe OSA is associated with a long-term increase in BP, which is reduced by good CPAP adherence. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01335087).

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Conversely, OSA has not been shown to increase recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This lack of homogeneity could suggest that the deleterious effect of OSA and its contribution to CVD could depend on specific patient profiles. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of OSA on cardiovascular risk for patients with different ACS phenotypes. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the ISAACC (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients with ACS and OSA) study, including 1,701 patients admitted for ACS (NCT01335087). To evaluate the presence of OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events · h -1 ), all patients underwent polygraphy. Patients were followed up for a minimum period of 1 year. We performed nonsupervised clustering using latent class analysis to identify subgroups of patients on the basis of 12 clinical factors associated with cardiovascular risk. The effect of OSA on recurrent cardiovascular event risk was evaluated for each phenotype identified. Measurements and Main Results: Two phenotypes were identified: patients without previous heart disease and without previous ACS ("no-previous-CVD" phenotype; 81%) and patients with previous heart disease and previous ACS ("previous-CVD" phenotype; 19%). The median (interquartile range) at follow-up was 2.67 (3.8) years. For the no-previous-CVD phenotype, the effect of OSA showed an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.54 (1.06-2.24; P value = 0.02), whereas for the previous-CVD phenotype, the effect of OSA showed an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.69 (0.46-1.04; P value = 0.08). Conclusions: For patients with ACS and a specific phenotype, OSA is associated with an increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. These patients are mainly characterized by no previous heart disease and admission for a first ACS occurrence.

Rationale: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) has been associated with cardiac dysfunction. However, randomized trials assessing the impact of long-term noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on cardiac structure and function assessed by echocardiography are lacking. Objectives: In a prespecified secondary analysis of the largest multicenter randomized controlled trial of OHS (Pickwick Project; N  = 221 patients with OHS and coexistent severe obstructive sleep apnea), we compared the effectiveness of three years of NIV and CPAP on structural and functional echocardiographic changes. Methods: At baseline and annually during three sequential years, patients underwent transthoracic two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. Echocardiographers at each site were blinded to the treatment allocation. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear mixed-effects model with a treatment group and repeated measures interaction to determine the differential effect between CPAP and NIV. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 196 patients were analyzed: 102 were treated with CPAP and 94 were treated with NIV. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 40.5 ± 1.47 mm Hg at baseline to 35.3 ± 1.33 mm Hg at three years with CPAP, and from 41.5 ± 1.56 mm Hg to 35.5 ± 1.42 with NIV ( P  < 0.0001 for longitudinal intragroup changes for both treatment arms). However, there were no significant differences between groups. NIV and CPAP therapies similarly improved left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and reduced left atrial diameter. Both NIV and CPAP improved respiratory function and dyspnea. Conclusions: In patients with OHS who have concomitant severe obstructive sleep apnea, long-term treatment with NIV and CPAP led to similar degrees of improvement in pulmonary hypertension and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01405976).

Rationale: The incidence of obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) may be increasing in parallel with the present obesity epidemic. Despite extensive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use in patients with OHS, information regarding efficacy is limited., Objectives: We performed a large, multicenter randomized controlled study to determine the comparative efficacy of NIV, CPAP, and lifestyle modification (control group) using daytime PaCO2 as the main outcome measure., Methods: Sequentially screened patients with OHS with severe sleep apnea were randomized into the above-mentioned groups for a 2-month follow up. Arterial blood gas parameters, clinical symptoms, health-related quality-of-life assessments, polysomnography, spirometry, 6-minute-walk distance, dropouts, compliance, and side effects were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using intention-to-treat analysis, although adjustments for CPAP and NIV compliance were also analyzed., Measurements and Main Results: In total, 351 patients were selected, and 221 were randomized. NIV yielded the greatest improvement in PaCO2 and bicarbonate, with significant differences relative to the control group but not relative to the CPAP group. In the CPAP group, PaCO2 improvement was significantly different than in the control group only after CPAP compliance adjustment. Additionally, clinical symptoms and polysomnographic parameters improved similarly with NIV and CPAP relative to the control. However, some health-related quality-of-life assessments, the spirometry, and 6-minute-walk distance results improved more with NIV than with CPAP. Dropouts were similar between groups, and compliance and secondary effects were similar between NIV and CPAP., Conclusions: NIV and CPAP were more effective than lifestyle modification in improving clinical symptoms and polysomnographic parameters, although NIV yielded better respiratory functional improvements than did CPAP. Long-term studies must demonstrate whether this functional improvement has relevant implications. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01405976).