1. Value of Donor–Specific Anti–HLA Antibody Monitoring and Characterization for Risk Stratification of Kidney Allograft Loss
- Author
-
Olivier Aubert, Xavier Jouven, Adriana Zeevi, Clément Gosset, Christophe Legendre, Denis Glotz, Carmen Lefaucheur, Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen, Dewi Vernerey, Denis Viglietti, Carol Bentlejewski, and Alexandre Loupy
- Subjects
Graft Rejection ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Urology ,Anti-HLA antibody ,030230 surgery ,Risk Assessment ,Antibodies ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Clinical Research ,HLA Antigens ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Kidney transplantation ,Kidney ,Clinical events ,business.industry ,Mean fluorescence intensity ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Kidney Transplantation ,Confidence interval ,Tissue Donors ,body regions ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,surgical procedures, operative ,Nephrology ,Risk stratification ,Female ,business - Abstract
The diagnosis system for allograft loss lacks accurate individual risk stratification on the basis of donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (anti-HLA DSA) characterization. We investigated whether systematic monitoring of DSA with extensive characterization increases performance in predicting kidney allograft loss. This prospective study included 851 kidney recipients transplanted between 2008 and 2010 who were systematically screened for DSA at transplant, 1 and 2 years post-transplant, and the time of post-transplant clinical events. We assessed DSA characteristics and performed systematic allograft biopsies at the time of post-transplant serum evaluation. At transplant, 110 (12.9%) patients had DSAs; post-transplant screening identified 186 (21.9%) DSA-positive patients. Post-transplant DSA monitoring improved the prediction of allograft loss when added to a model that included traditional determinants of allograft loss (increase in c statistic from 0.67; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62 to 0.73 to 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.77). Addition of DSA IgG3 positivity or C1q binding capacity increased discrimination performance of the traditional model at transplant and post-transplant. Compared with DSA mean fluorescence intensity, DSA IgG3 positivity and C1q binding capacity adequately reclassified patients at lower or higher risk for allograft loss at transplant (category-free net reclassification index, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.67; P
- Published
- 2016