Search

The R-BAC regimen is considered among standard first-line treatment for elderly fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In the previous R-BAC500 FIL trial, patients with the blastoid variant and/or high Ki67 proliferative index (High Risk - HR-) had a significantly higher risk of progression (2-years PFS of 40%), as compared to classical histologies and low proliferative index (Low Risk -LR-). When treated with R-BAC, LR patients had excellent outcome (median PFS not reached after 7 years), although no maintenance therapy was delivered. For this reason we designed a phase 2 trial that enrolled patients from 35 centers of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL). At study entry, patients were centrally reviewed and stratified as "low risk (LR)", or "high risk (HR)", depending on morphology (blastoid versus others), Ki67 expression (≥30% versus others), TP53 mutation/TP53 deletions (present versus not). Patients with any of the three risk factors were classified as HR. The primary endpoint was 2-years progression-free survival (PFS) for the HR patients. Patients had to be aged ≥65 years and fit according to the geriatric CGA assessment, or age ≤64 years if not eliglible to high-dose chemotherapy plus transplantation. Asymptomatic patients with non-nodal disease were excluded. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles of R-BAC (rituximab 375 mg/m2 d 1; bendamustine 70 mg/m2 d 1,2; cytarabine 500 mg/m2 d 1,2,3) for LR patients. HR patients received abbreviated induction with a maximum of 4 R-BAC followed by consolidation (4 months, 800 mg/d), and maintenance (20 months, 400 mg/d) with venetoclax. First patient was included on the 3rd of september, 2018, and last patient on the 20th of july, 2021. Overall, 140 patients were enrolled, of whom 52 were HR (37%). Median age was 72 (range 57-79), and 75% were males. The prevalence of TP53 mutations and deletions in the whole series was 21%, and 13%, respectively; Ki67 was ≥30% in 24%, and the blastoid variant was diagnosed in 9%. Demographic characteristics of HR versus LR patients (127 patients with available data at the present time) are reported in Table 1A. Median follow-up was 9 months (range 0-34). The two groups (HR and LR) had similar age, gender, and MIPI, but differed for LDH, and SUVmax at diagnosis, both being significantly more elevated in the HR group. The VR-BAC trial represents the first prospective study that stratified patients with MCL to different frontline treatments according to centralized on-time evaluation of the risk profile. We have shown that almost 40% of elderly patients with MCL in need of treatment have HR features. Data on tolerance, and tumor response will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tisi: GILEAD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BWS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zilioli: Roche, Italfarmaco: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD, Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations; Takeda: Other: travel expenses, accommodation; Gentili, Takeda, Gilead, Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Corradini: AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Other: Travel and accommodation; Novartis; Gilead; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel and accommodations; Amgen; Takeda; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations; KiowaKirin; Incyte; Daiichi Sankyo; Janssen; F. Hoffman-La Roche; Kite; Servier: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Gilead/Kite, Amgen, AbbVie: Other: travel and accomodations. Musuraca: janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Puccini: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavallo: Servier: Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Merli: EUSA Pharma: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Science: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Celgene: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses. Ferreri: PletixaPharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Hutchison Medipharma: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Adienne: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genmab: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; x Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ospedale San Raffaele srl: Patents & Royalties; Pfizer: Research Funding. Santoro: AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Eli-Lilly: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Arqule: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zinzani: KYOWA KIRIN: Other, Speakers Bureau; SERVIER: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; SANDOZ: Other: Advisory board; TG Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Other, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; TAKEDA: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Other, Speakers Bureau; EUSAPHARMA: Consultancy, Other, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Other, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therap.: Other; Incyte: Other, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN-CILAG: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; GILEAD: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; CELLTRION: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; VERASTEM: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax is off-label in Italy in mantle cell lymphoma

The upper age-limit for patients with hematological malignancies eligible for allo-SCT progressed to 70-75 years. As a consequence, an increase of older patients submitted to allo-SCT has been observed worldwide and in Italy as well. This registry-based retrospective study on behalf of GITMO (GITMO AlloEld) describes the transplant activity among elderly patients in Italy, between 2000 and 2017. Thiry GITMO Centers participated to the Study. 2061 allo-SCTS in patients older than 60 years were exported from PROMISE database and 1996 first transplants were analysed. The median age of the patients at transplant was 63,5 years (59,5-77,8). The most commonly transplanted diseases were acute leukemias and myelodisplastic syndromes (67,5%). 28% and 27% of the patients showed a HCT-CI of 1-2 or grater than 3, respectively. The KPS was 100% in 27,2% and 90% in 42,9% of the cases. 32% of the patients received a myeloablative conditioning regimen and 55% of the patients received an in vivo T-cell depletion (either post transplant cyclophosphamide or ATG). With a median follow up of 10,4 years, the OS at 5 years significantly improved during time, moving from 28% between 2000-2005 to 37% between 2012-2017 (p=0,012). This was related to a significant reduction in RI (45% vs 30%, p The following significant differences were observed across the years of the present study: 1) a longer 5 years OS in patients younger than 65 years (34%) vs those older than 70 years (19%) between 2000 and 2011 only (p=0,003) (Figure 1A and 1B); 2) a longer 5 years OS (p3 between 2000-2011 only (Figure 2A and 2B); 3) a different 5 years OS according to donor type between 2000 and 2011 only (19% for haplo vs 31% for sibling vs 33% for mismatch UD and 38% for MUD; p 4) a reduction in the incidence of extensive cGVHD at 1 year (15,6% between 2000 and 2005 vs 10,3% between 2012 and 2017, p=0,004) (Figure 4). Comparing 2000-2005 vs 2012-2017, the major significant differences of the patients regard: the baseline disease (more AL/MDS: 40% vs 77%; p 3 moved from 10% to 30% (p By multivariate analysis MUD donor or UCB, no response at the time of SCT and male recipient significantly impaired OS, whereas HCT-CI These retrospective data showed that the transplant procedure for elderly patients became safer and more effective over time, for a reduction of the RI related to a better selection of patients (more acute leukemias in CR) and a better selection of conditionings (more MAC and more alkylators). Nowdays, the HCT-CI score is probably not sufficient for estimate elderly patients probability of OS and NRM. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Luppi: Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Gilead Science: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria. Ciceri: IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele: Current Employment.

Background Despite an improvement in treatment response, high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) experience early relapse and short disease-free survival. Together with more validated high-risk features, high levels of circulating plasma cells (high CPC) have been considered a marker of aggressive disease and poor outcome (F. Gay et al, ASH 2019; W.I. Gonsalves et al, Am J Hematol 2020). To date, there are no uniform data on the optimal cut-off predictive of clinical outcome. No prospective data on CPC are available in the setting of novel-drug clinical trials with comprehensive baseline evaluation and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. Aims 1) To identify the best cut-off for CPC to predict progression-free survival (PFS); 2) to assess the impact of high CPC levels on the clinical outcome of newly diagnosed (ND)MM pts in the context of concomitant risk features and MRD evaluation. Methods In the multicenter randomized FORTE clinical trial, 474 NDMM pts ≤65 years were randomized (R1) to receive either: carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) induction-autologous stem-cell transplant-KRd consolidation (KRd_ASCT); KRd for 12 cycles (KRd12); or carfilzomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (KCd) induction-ASCT-KCd consolidation (KCd_ASCT). Thereafter, pts were randomized (R2) to maintenance treatment with lenalidomide alone (R) or plus carfilzomib (KR). MRD was assessed by 2nd-generation multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC, sensitivity 10-5) in pts who achieved ≥very good partial response before maintenance and then every 6 months. At diagnosis, single-platform FC was used to sort and count CPC. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to define a cut-off based on PFS at 36 months as outcome. Correlations between high CPC and the most important baseline prognostic features (age, International Staging System (ISS), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), chromosomal abnormalities (CA) by FISH [(del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(11;14), amp1q, del1p, del13], Revised-ISS (R-ISS)) were explored. Hence, we performed a multivariate (MV) analysis to assess the impact of high CPC on the achievement of MRD negativity, on PFS and OS. Finally, we evaluated the impact of baseline CPC and MRD achievement. Results CPC analysis was performed in 401/474 pts at diagnosis; median follow-up was 44.2 months (39.6-47.9) and baseline features were similar to those reported in the overall FORTE population. Median CPC were 0.02% (IQR 0-0.14). The optimal CPC cut-off to predict PFS (ROC analysis) was 0.07% (5 cells/ul, 0.005 x109/l) and was consistent with a cut-off previously identified as a predictor of sustained MRD negativity (MRDsus12; L. Bertamini et al, EHA 2020). High-CPC pts (>0.07%) were 130/401 (32%), while 271/401 (68%) had low CPC (≤0.07%). The proportion of high-CPC pts was comparable among treatment arms. Baseline features significantly associated with high CPC in a MV analysis were: ISS II/III, high LDH, amp1q, t(4;14), t(14;16) and bone marrow plasma cells (>60%). Regarding PFS, in a MV analysis adjusted for R-ISS and R1 treatment, including all the baseline features, high CPC were associated with a lower PFS (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.76-3.51, P The impact of baseline CPC levels on PFS was consistent in all high-risk subgroups (Fig. 1C), except in those patients who achieved pre-maintenance MRD negativity [(neg); interaction P=0.03]. Low-CPC and MRD-neg pts showed the best outcome with a 3-year PFS of 84%. Low-CPC MRD-positive (pos) and high-CPC MRD-neg pts had similar 3-year PFS (70% vs 68%). High-CPC MRD-pos pts had a dismal outcome (3-year PFS 32%; Fig. 1D). Conclusion High CPC with a cut-off of 0.07% (5 cells/ul, 0.005 x109/l) is a strong and independent high-risk factor, predicting a shorter PFS and OS even in the context of other high-risk features. The achievement of MRD neg independently improved the poor prognosis of high-CPC patients. Figure 1 Disclosures D'Agostino: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Galieni:Janssen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Molica:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tacchetti:Oncopeptides: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Musto:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Gay:GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boccadoro:GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Research Funding. Oliva:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: The presentation includes discussion of off-label use of a drug or drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma (including carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide and dexamethasone).

Background: In multiple myeloma (MM), different clinical parameters and molecular prognostic factors can predict disease course and response to therapy. The classification of myeloma patients includes laboratory parameters associated with higher tumor activity, resistance to therapy and proliferative competence. Tumor circulating plasma cells (TCPC) in MM patients showed a strong correlation with a more aggressive disease. Aim: For the first time, we quantified the amounts of TCPC with single platform flow cytometric method and evaluated their relationship with patients' baseline characteristics and response to therapy before maintenance. Methods: Whole peripheral blood samples from 413 newly diagnosed MM patients ≤65 years enrolled in the UNITO-MM-01/FORTE trial were collected. Patients were randomized [1:1:1; stratification: International Staging System (ISS) and age] to ARM A: carfilzomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (KCyd) followed by melphalan 200 mg/m2 and autologous stem-cell transplantation (MEL200-ASCT) and consolidation with 4 KCyd; ARM B: carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) followed by MEL200-ASCT and 4 KRd; ARM C: 12 KRd cycles. Enrollment was completed in March 2017; data cut-off was November 30, 2018. For the single platform tube, the antibody combination CD38PC7/CD138PC5.5/ CD45KO/CD56PE/CD19PB was mixed with 100µL of EDTA peripheral blood, dispensed with reverse pipetting, and incubated for 15 min, added with 500µL of lysing solution and, after 15 min, 100µL of flow count fluorospheres were dispensed with reverse pipetting and cells acquired with Navios flow cytometer. Intracytoplasmic tube was set up to confirm the clonality of CPC. Results: Circulating plasma cells (CPC) were quantified in 413 samples, with median values of 0.03% (range: 0-51%) and 2.37/mm3 (range: 0-6272/mm3). White blood cells were 5710/mm3 (range: 1752-26102/mm3); total events acquired 1285000 (range: 40000-2000000); median CPC events were 58 (range: 0-441000); cellular events acquired were 190000 (range: 4428-1300000). In 390 out of 413 samples (94.4%), CPC were detected; 272 samples (66%) showed TCPC with a median of 1.24/mm3 (range 0.06- 6272/mm3). Patients were sorted according to different baseline characteristics and the medians of absolute TCPC were compared. The most statistically significant differences (p5.5mg/dL (16.47/mm3); lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≤upper limit of normal (ULN, 1.14/mm3) vs. >ULN (7.36/mm3); plasma cells (PC) in biopsy Finally, we compared the absolute number of TCPC and the quality of response at the end of consolidation therapy. Higher values of TCPC were related to worst response: Conclusions: Single-platform flow cytometry is a simple method to quantify TCPC, present in almost all peripheral blood from MM patients; a high number is related to poor clinical response to therapy and helps in identifying high-risk patients. Moreover, it allows the discrimination between normal and pathological plasma cell population in peripheral blood. However, a longer follow up is needed to evaluate how TCPC can affect survival in patients with MM. Disclosures Musto: Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Gay:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boccadoro:Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Research Funding. Omedé:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: This presentation includes discussion of off-label use of a drug or drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Background: Non-adherence to medications is recognized as one of the most important and costly worldwide healthcare problems in the 21st century; according to an EU report, non-adherence to therapies is responsible for 194,500 deaths and costs €125 billion annually. Taking into account those data, the use of adherence measurements in clinical trials could be extremely useful, in order to better understand patients (pts) behaviours and outcomes. The 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8, Morisky DE et al, J Clin Hypertens,2008 - Krousel-Wood MA et al, Am J Manag Care 2009- Morisky DE et al, J Clin Epidemiol. 2011) is a widely used questionnaire to asses indirectly pts adherence to medications. The first seven items are yes/no questions, and the last item is a five point Likert-scale. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is an oral JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of symptoms and/or splenomegaly in myelofibrosis (MF) pts. ROMEI (CINC424AIT04-Ruxolitinib Observational study in Myelofibrosis treated patients in Italy) is a prospective observational study focused on real life management of MF pts with RUX; the trial enrolled 215 pts and included a prospective evaluation of MMAS-8 as a secondary endpoint. To date, no data regarding MMAS-8 and RUX are available and here we show a descriptive analysis of MMAS-8 after 24 weeks (wks) of RUX treatment. Methods: After informed consent signature, pts started RUX according to Summary of Product Characteristics; MMAS-8 questionnaire was administered at wks 4, 8, 12 and 24 after RUX initiation. MMAS-8 were analysed only if pts provided all responses to the questionnaire; a score ˂ 6 indicates low adherence, a score between 6 and 8 indicates medium adherence, and a score = 8 suggests high adherence. As per protocol, only adherence classes (low-medium-high) assessment was scheduled and in case of low or medium adherence (ie suboptimal adherence), no action in term of target education or psychological interventions was planned. Results: Out of 215 enrolled pts, 188 were evaluable for MMAS-8. The MMAS-8 was completed by 163 pts (87%) at week (wk) 4, 156 pts (83%) at wk 8, 146 pts (78%) at wk 12 and 134 pts (71%) at wk 24. A total of 101 out of 188 eligible pts (54%) completed all 4 scheduled questionnaires. MMAS-8 total score seems to remain stable over the time. Mean MMAS-8 total score was 7.54±0.77 (min; max: 4.75; 8.00) at wk 4 and 7.67±0.70 (min; max: 4.25; 8.00) at wk 24, resulting in a mean change from wk 4 of 0.14±0.79 (min; max: -2.25; 2.25). Regarding adherence classes, the distribution between low, medium and high adherence over time is shown in table 1. Likewise, if we consider pts who completed all scheduled questionnaires, MMSA-8 total score remains stable over the wks, with total score of 7.53±0.79 (min; max: 4.75; 8.00) at wk 4, 7.60±0.71 (min; max: 4.75; 8.00) at wk 8, 7.69±0.69 (min; max 4.50; 8.00) at wk 12 and 7.67±0.73 (min; max: 4.25; 8.00) at wk 24, as well as adherence classes distribution (Fig 1). Regarding adherence classes in this subgroup of pts, seems that pts with high adherence at wk 4 are more prone to maintain the same class during time. Finally, we tried to perform an exploratory analysis relating spleen response according to IWG-MRT criteria with adherence classes at each time points: considering the small number of evaluable pts with complete information regarding both available parameters, no correlation between spleen responses and adherence classes was demonstrated (data available at the meeting). Conclusion: This is the first time of MMAS-8 applied in MF pts as well as those treated with RUX. Our analysis showed a not irrelevant percentage of pts (ranging from 25% to 40%) belonging to a low-intermediate adherence classes during treatment. Surprisingly overall approximately one third of patients could be exposed to a suboptimal treatment over time and probably clinicians underestimate the number of those pts in clinical practice. Although we did not find in our cohort a correlation between adherence classes and spleen responses, probably due to low number of evaluable pts for both variables, the knowledge regarding pts attitude to therapy, especially for long-term and chronic treatments, remains crucial from clinical and pharmacoeconomic perspectives. Standardized methods to assess pts adherence such as MMAS-8 should be implemented in prospective well-designed clinical trials and could be a precious tool guiding clinicians in the everyday practice. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cilloni:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Palumbo:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morelli:Novartis: Employment. Passamonti:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Breccia:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria.

Background: Ibrutinib is a first-in-class oral inhibitor of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) approved for the treatment patients with CLL who have received at least one prior therapy (R/R) or Treatment Naïve (TN) with del17p. Ibrutinib has been showed to improve progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) even in presence of del17p. Moreover there is a good tolerability profile such as to not lead to frequent and permanent interruption of therapy.Methods: In 131 CLL/SLL patients (including previously treated and untreated with del17) from eight different hematologic centers of REP (Rete Ematologica Pugliese) Ibrutinib 420 mg once daily was administrated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. PFS, OS and Overall response rate (ORR) were calculated. Kaplan Meier method was used to estimate PFS/OS and differences in survival times between groups were assessed with a log-rank test.Results: Among 131 pts, 9 (6.9%) received Ibrutinib as first line therapy (TN) and 122 (R/R) received prior therapies before Ibrutinib (39.7% BR, 18.3% FCR and other treatments); 90% (1-2) lines of therapy, 8% (3-4) lines and 2% more than 5. Median age of the 131 pts with CLL/SLL was 65 y (range, 28-84) with 50% ≥65 y.ECOG Performance Status was observed in 108 pts (0, 56%; 1, 40%; 2, 4%). FISH analysis was performed in 85/131 pts (65%) and some patients had more than one deletion. Among these, 42% had del17p (TN 100% and R/R 36%) and for the remaining R/R was 16% del13q, 4% del11q, 7% trisomy12 and in the others no abnormalities were found. Unmutated and mutated IGVH was performed in 78/131 patients (60%), 63% and 37% respectively. The ORR was 80% (complete response [CR], 10%) for all-treated pts (TN: 86%, R/R: 77%) and for R/R pts with del17p the ORR was 61%.With a median time on study of 17 months (range, 1-45), median PFS was not reached for all TN or R/R patients and the estimated PFS at 30 months was 66,7% for R/R patients. We exclude from our further analysis 9 TN patients because of the small sample size and the lack of events in a median follow up of 15 months (range, 3-24). In 122 R/R pts, median PFS was 39 months for pts with del17p and median PFS was not reached for pts without abnormality (overall logrank p=0.543). At 30 m the estimated PFS was 65.1% for del17p pts and 80.4% for no abnormality pts . Median OS was not reached for 122 R/R patients and the estimated PFS at 30 months was 72.7%. Median OS was not reached in pts with and without del17p (overall logrank p=0.807) with an estimated OS at 30 months of 81.7% and 90.2% respectively.In 47% of all treated patients adverse events (AEs) with grade ≥3 were neutropenia (16%), hypertension (12%), atrial fibrillation (3%), anemia (3%), diarrhea (2%). With a median follow up of 17 months 80% of pts remain on Ibrutinib treatment.Conclusions: In our real life experience with data from REP, Ibrutinib single agent demonstred to be effective. In R/R patients, with a median time on study of 17 months, the estimated PFS at 30 m was 66.7%. The differences in PFS between patients with and without del17p was not statistically significant (p=0.543) but at 30 months the estimated PFS was lower in del17p pts than in no abnormality pts (65.1% vs 80.4%).The treatment was well tolerated with AEs of grade ≥3 in a low percentage (36%) that did not result in treatment interruptions in the most of cases. Clearly, these results will require longer follow up time to be further confirmed. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background and Aims. Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection by PCR-based methods is a relevant outcome predictor in MCL, however it is not clear which might represent the most effective methodology (nested vs real-time quantitative PCR, RQ-PCR), the most informative tissue source (bone marrow, BM, vs peripheral blood, PB), the best timing of analysis (midterm vs post-therapy) and the added value of performing multiple MRD determinations. To address these issues a systematic MRD detection program was performed in the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) MCL0208 trial (NCT02354313), a prospective, randomized phase III trial comparing lenalidomide maintenance vs observation after an intensive citarabine containing chemo-immunotherapy (R-HDS) program followed by ASCT in 300 frontline MCL patients Disclosures Vitolo: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

From November 2012 to July 2014, brentuximab vedotin (BV) was available in Italy for patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) outside a clinical trial context based on a local disposition of the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA) issued according to a national law (Law 648/96: "medicinal products that are provided free of charge on the national health service"). A large Italian observational retrospective study was conducted on the use of BV in the everyday clinical practice to check if clinical trial results are confirmed even in a real life context. Primary endpoint was the best response; secondary endpoints were the overall response rate at the end of the treatment, duration of response, survival and the safety profile. BV was infused intravenously at the dose of 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks. A total of 234 HL patients were treated in 40. All patients had histologically documented CD30+ HL; 49% had relapsed and 51% had refractory disease. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 previous therapies (including autologous stem cell transplant [SCT] in the 69% of cases). Best response was observed after a median of 4 cycles in 140 patients (59.8%): 74 (31.6%) patients obtained a complete response (CR) and 66 (28.2%) achieved a partial response (PR); overall response rate at the end of the treatment was 48.3% (62 CR and 51 PR). The best response rate was higher in the elderly subset (>60 years): 14 (50%) CR and 5 (17.8%) PR. Disease free survival was 26.3% at 29 months and progression free survival 31.9% at 55 months. We identified 30 long term responders (patients with a response ≥ 12 months) of whom 18 are still in CR, 7 with a consolidative SCT and 11 without any consolidative procedure. Duration of response did not differ who achieved at least PR and then either did or did not undergo consolidative SCT. All patients were included in the safety profile for the analysis; in general, the treatment was well tolerated in everyday clinical practice and the toxicity profile was closely similar to the previously published data; no death has been linked to BV-induced toxicity. This preliminary analysis could indicate that BV displays a number of features favoring its use as a bridge to transplant in patients with active disease who achieve a suboptimal response to salvage treatment. Even in a real life context, BV induces clinical responses quite rapidly, i.e. within the first 4 cycles in most responders, thus permitting the timely application of the transplantation phase. BV displays a favorable toxicity profile, without overlapping toxicities with most of the agents employed in high-dose conditioning regimens. Furthermore, for HL patients ineligible for transplant or for who transplant failed, may represent a feasible effective therapeutic option. Disclosures Rusconi: Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Congress attendance; Teva: Consultancy, Other: Congress attendance; Takeda: Consultancy. Spina:Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee. Zinzani:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celegene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background Improving strategies for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who fail stem cell transplantation (SCT) or are unsuitable for the procedure remains an essential need. Lenalidomide and bendamustine are active and well tolerated as single agents in recurrent HL, with overall response rates (ORR) of 30% to 53% [Fenhinger, 2012; Corazzelli, 2012; Moskowitz, 2012].These agents independently frame different targets on tumor and microenvironment cells and may cooperate to override disturbed immunologic pathways and circumvent drug resistance in HL. In a Bayesian, multi-center, open label phase 1/2 study, we investigated for safety and efficacy the combination of continuous lenalidomide with weekly bendamustine (ClinicalTrials.gov # NTC01412307). Methods The study aimed at defining the optimal daily dose of continuous lenalidomide (10, 15, 20 or 25 mg) as combined, in a 28-day cycle, to weekly fixed-dose bendamustine (60 mg/m2; d 1, 8, 15). The dose-finding algorithm proceeded in cohorts of 3 pts, based on anticipated efficacy and toxicity pairs of probability (Thall & Cook, Biometrics 2004). Trade-offs between response [Cheson 2007 criteria] and dose-limiting toxicity [CTCv3.0 grade (G) >3 lasting >2 weeks] were assessed after 2 cycles (day +56) and pts were planned to receive up to 6 total courses, unless progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. ORR and progression-free survival (PFS) were additional endpoints. Results Thirty-six pts (69% male) with a median age of 31 yrs (r 19-75) were enrolled. The median number of prior therapies was 4 (r 1-9) and the median time from upfront treatment was 24 mo.s (r 7-118). Twenty-six pts (72%) had primary refractory disease after ABVD, 16 pts (44%) failed prior SCT [single (n=7) or tandem (n=3) ASCT, tandem ASCT/alloSCT (n=6)]. Fifteen pts (42%) had previously received a median of 5 cycles (r 2-8) of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and 3 pts were already given bendamustine (>3 courses). Overall, 23 pts (64%) were refractory to most recent therapy. Eff/Tox trade-offs at cycle 2 showed that 73% of pts had response w/o toxicity, 19% had no response w/o toxicity, 6% had response with toxicity and 2% had no response with toxicity. With such Eff/Tox profiles, the study algorithm did not prompt any dose escalation for lenalidomide after the first 18 pts and the initial dose level (10 mg) was adopted for the expansion phase. A total of 156 LeBen cycles were administered, and pts received a median of 4 courses (r 1-6). Overall, 16 cycles were delayed due to G3/G4 thrombocytopenia (n=6), G4 neutropenia (n=3), G3 pneumonia (n=3), G3 respiratory infection (n=2), G2 phlebitis (n=1), G2 supraventricular arrhythmia (n=1). Two patients discontinued treatment, while in PR and CR after 4 courses, due to protracted (>2 weeks) thrombocytopenia. No G4 extra-hematological toxicity was observed. The complete response (CR) rate was 44% (16/36) with an ORR of 75% (27/36; 95% CI, 59-86). Notably, substantial CR and PR rates were achieved after LeBen regardless of primary refractoriness, SCT and BV failure (Table). Most CRs (14/16) were obtained within the first 4 cycles; 6 responders (4 CRs and 2 PRs) underwent SCT. Median PFS was 3.2 mo.s (r 1.5-5.4) for pts with progressive (PD) or stable disease (SD) and 11.4 mo.s (r 4-31) for those achieving CR/PR. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 24 mo.s. Overall, complete responders (including 6 pts consolidated with SCT) had a 2-year disease-free survival of 41% (median, 14.3 mo.s). Conclusions The innovative schedule of the Leben combination is safe, yields high response rates in heavily pretreated and primary refractory HL pts, including SCT and BV failures, and steps over the 'single agent' activity of its components. Due to its immunomodulatory potential the Leben platform is amenable to further upgrading through lenalidomide maintenance, combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and BV. | Responses no. (%) | All pts | Refractory to upfront therapy | Refractory to most recent therapy | Failure after SCT | Failure after ASCT | Failure after AlloSCT | Failure after BV | Failure after SCT and BV | Failure after bendamustine | No BV | | ------------------------ | ------- | ----------------------------- | --------------------------------- | ----------------- | ------------------ | --------------------- | ---------------- | ------------------------ | -------------------------- | ------- | | (n=36) | (n=26) | (n=23) | (n=16) | (n=10) | (n= 6) | (n=15) | (n=8) | (n=3) | (n=21) | | CR | 16 (44) | 11 (42) | 8 (35) | 8 (50) | 6 (60) | 2 (33) | 5 (33) | 3 (37) | | 11 | | PR | 11 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | | 7 | | SD | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | PD | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | CR+PR | 27 (75) | 19 (73) | 17 (74) | 12 (75) | 8 (80) | 4 (66) | 9 (60) | 5 (62) | | 18 (86) | Table 1. Efficacy results Disclosures Pinto: Takeda, Celgene, Roche, TEVA: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding. Zinzani: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JJ Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

OBJECTIVES Aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI) in patients (pts) with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and to compare APL pts with patients affected by non promyelocytic acute myeloid leukemia (npAML) in order to evaluate factors potentially linked to IFI in these two subsets of acute myeloid leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2010 to April 2012 all pts with newly diagnosed AML were registered in 33 Italian participating centers. A minimum follow up of 90 days after 1st induction chemotherapy was requested for all pts. A prolonged follow up until June 2014 was made only for APL. Data were collected about age, gender, AML subtype, treatment and also about post chemotherapy risk factors for IFI (duration of neutropenia, mucosal damages, vomiting, diarrhea, presence of medical devices), antifungal prophylaxis, onset of IFI, level of certainty (possible/probable/proven), and antifungal treatment. Only for APL the survey was prolonged for at least 3 months in order to analyze if these pts have an IFI risk during other than first induction phases. RESULTS 1,192 consecutive newly diagnosed adult AML pts (npAML:1,086/APL:106) were enrolled in the study. Among npAML pts, those receiving low dose chemotherapy and/or palliative treatment were excluded from the analysis; in the remaining 881 pts 214 cases (24%) of IFI were recorded. Considering APL, 3 pts were excluded from the analysis due to early death (1 pt) or bad performance status (2 pts). The remaining 103 pts received APL treatment according to local protocols: all trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus chemotherapy (90 pts) or ATRA plus arsenic trioxide (ATO)(13 pts). Only 8 (8%) APL pts developed an IFI after the induction phase: 1 proven, 3 probable and 4 possible IFI. All cases were caused by molds. All APL were followed for a median follow up of 36 months (range 3-54). During this time only 2 other cases of IFI were observed: 1 possible IFI during consolidation at 16 weeks from APL diagnosis and 1 probable aspergillosis in a rare case of APL relapse at 132 weeks from APL diagnosis. All the IFI occurred in pts treated with ATRA plus chemotherapy. IFI was fatal in only 1 case (cerebral aspergillosis), all the other pts recovered after antifungal treatment. A comparison between npAML and APL was made in order to analyze the risk of IFI within 90 days after induction treatment among these 2 groups of patients (see table). A significantly lower number of overall IFI and systemic antifungal treatment was observed in the APL group, in spite of the fact that systemic anti mold prophylaxis was significantly less frequently utilized. | | || | | APL | npAML | p | | Number of pts | 103 | 881 | | | Mean age | 51 | 55 | 0.01 | | m/f | 50/53 | 448/433 | N.S. | | Performance status (WHO) 0-1 >1 | . 76 27 | . 284 597 | .

Introduction The role of bone marrow (BM) involvement as prognostic factor in untreated young patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at poor prognosis is still a matter of debate. Recent data showed an adverse prognostic role of BM involvement in DLBCL including patients both at low and high IPI score (Sehn L et al, J Clin Oncol 2011). On this basis, FIL analyzed the impact of BM involvement in the prospective randomized phase III trial DLCL04 (Vitolo U et al, Blood, ASH annual Meeting 2012) that included only young patients at high-risk age-adjusted IPI (aa-IPI) score 2 or 3. Patients and Methods Inclusion criteria were: age 18-65; untreated DLBCL or follicular grade IIIb; aa-IPI score 2 or 3. Patients were stratified according to aa-IPI and randomized at diagnosis to receive: R-CHOP14 x 8 cycles; R-MegaCHOP14 (1200 mg/sqm Cyclophosphamide, 70 mg/sqm Doxorubicin, standard dose Vincristine and Prednisone) x 6; R-CHOP14 x 4 + R-HDC (Rituximab + High Dose Cytarabine + Mitoxantrone + Dexamethasone) followed by BEAM and ASCT; R-MegaCHOP14 x 4 + R-HDC + BEAM and ASCT. BM biopsy and aspirate were mandatory at diagnosis; at the end of treatment, BM assessment was mandatory only in case of positivity at baseline. BM involvement was defined as concordant if marrow was involved by large B-cell and discordant if involved by small B-cells. Flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and/or molecular studies were utilized to confirm a clonal B-cell population. Results From June 2005 to September 2010, 399 patients were randomized to receive: 199 R-HDC+ASCT and 200 R-dose-dense chemotherapy without ASCT. All patients were evaluable for analysis. BM involvement was reported in 84 patients (21%): 39 (20%) in the R-HDC+ASCT group and 45 (22%) in the R-dose-dense chemotherapy group. Pattern of involvement was: concordant in 63 patients, discordant in 14 and not specified in 7 patients. Patients with BM involvement (BM positive: 84) compared to those without BM involvement (BM negative: 315) were significantly older (median age 53 years vs 47 years, p1 43% vs 45%, bulky 25% vs 33%, extranodal sites > 1 26% vs 33%, LDH higher than normal value 93% vs 89%). With a median follow-up of 49 months, 3-year PFS for the whole series of 399 patients enrolled in the trial was: 67% (95% CI: 62-72). Three-year PFS was significantly worse in BM positive vs. BM negative: 46% (95% CI:35-56%) vs. 73% (95% CI:67-77%) p Conclusions Bone marrow involvement, namely concordant pattern, is a strong adverse predictor of outcome in young patients with untreated DLBCL at poor prognosis treated with R-chemotherapy regardless of intensification with HDC+ASCT. New treatment approaches are needed for these high-risk patients at poor prognosis. Disclosures: Vitolo: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Introduction The standard treatment for elderly untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is RCHOP21, however up to 40% of patients experienced failures. Lenalidomide showed activity in heavily pretreated DLBCL and in vivo and in vitro data demonstrated a synergism with rituximab. In the phase I trial REAL07 (Chiappella et al, Haematol 2013), FIL demonstrated that the association of LRCHOP21 was feasible in elderly untreated DLBCL and identified 15 mg lenalidomide from day 1 to day 14 as the maximum tolerated dose in combination with RCHOP21. Patients and methods. The phase II trial REAL07 was designed based on Simon's two stage design to demonstrate an improvement of overall response rate (ORR) of 15% in LRCHOP21 compared to 70% of standard RCHOP21. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and to correlate outcome with cell of origin (COO) profile. Response was evaluated according to 2007 Cheson criteria. Inclusion criteria were: age 60-80 FIT at the comprehensive geriatric assessment; untreated CD20+ DLBCL; Ann Arbor stage II/III/IV; international prognostic index (IPI) at low-intermediate/intermediate-high/high (LI/IH/H) risk. Treatment plan was: RCHOP21 plus 15 mg lenalidomide from day 1 to 14 for 6 courses. All cases were centrally reviewed by expert pathologist; COO profile analysis was conducted with immunohistochemistry according to Hans' algorithm and with gene expression profile (DASL assay). Results. From April 2010 to May 2011, 49 patients were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were: median age 69 years (range 61-80); stage III/IV 43 (88%), IPI IH/H 30 (61%). At the end of 6 LRCHOP21, ORR was 92%. Complete remissions (CR) were 42 (86%) and partial remission 3 (6%); 3 patients (6%) did not respond and one (2%) died for homicide. At a median follow-up of 28 months, 2-year OS was 92% (95% CI: 79-97), 2-year PFS was 80% (95% CI: 64-89) and 2-years EFS was 70% (95% CI: 55-81); 2-year PFS for IPI LI was 89% (95% CI: 62-97) and for IPI IH 76% (95% CI: 47-90) and for IPI H 72% (95% CI: 36-90). Hematological and extra-hematological toxicities were mild, with no grade IV extra-hematological events and no toxic deaths during treatment. Of the 294 planned courses of LRCHOP21, 277 (94%) were administered; median dose of lenalidomide delivered was 1185 mg (94% of the planned dose); at least 90% of the planned dose of each drug was administered in 91% of the RCHOP21 courses. Median interval time between RCHOP21 courses was 21 days (range 19-48). All 49 cases underwent central pathology review and diagnosis of DLBCL was confirmed. Regarding COO analysis, tissue block or stained slides were collected in 40/49 (82%), of which 32 were adequate for analysis. At the time of this abstract, COO analysis was reported according to immunohistochemistry data; DASL analysis is ongoing. Clinical characteristics between germinal center (GCB, 16 patients) and non-GCB (16 patients) were superimposable, excepted for a majority of H IPI risk in non-GCB group (p 0.067). ORR for GCB and non-GCB were 88% (CR 81%) and 88% (CR 88%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 28 months, 2-year PFS was 71% (95% CI: 40-88) in GCB-group and 2-years PFS was 81% (95% CI: 51-93) in non-GCB-group (Figure 1). Conclusions. In conclusion, LRCHOP21 is effective, also in poor risk patients, namely in non-GCB subgroup. These encouraging data warrant a future phase III randomized trial comparing LRCHOP21 vs. RCHOP21 in untreated non-GCB DLBCL. Disclosures: Off Label Use: lenalidomide in first line DLBCL is off lable. drug provided free by Celgene. Vitolo:Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau.

Background Elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients are an heterogeneous population. Aging is associated with an increased frequency of co-morbidities, frailty and disability, with negative impact on treatment tolerance and outcome. A simple and reliable scoring system, based on geriatric assessment, has been developed to predict survival and used also to predict the risk of severe toxicities or treatment discontinuation in elderly newly diagnosed MM patients treated with lenalidomide-, bortezomib- or carfilzomib-based induction regimens. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed MM, ineligible for high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation due to age (≥65 years) or coexisting co-morbidities, enrolled in 3 prospective multicenter trials, were included in the analysis. Up-front dose reductions were performed according to patients age (full doses for patients ≤75 years and reduced for patients >75 years). Details on treatment regimens and results of these studies have previously been reported (Gay F et al EHA 2013, Larocca A et al EHA 2013, Bringhen S et al EHA 2013). At diagnosis, a geriatric assessment had been performed, to assess co-morbidities, cognitive and physical conditions. Results 869 patients were included in the analysis: 659 enrolled in the lenalidomide-based, 152 in the bortezomib-based and 58 in the carfilzomib-based trial. Median age was 74 years, and 44% of patients were older than 75 years. Median follow-up was 18 months. In univariable analysis, the risk of death was higher in patients aged 75-80 (Hazard Ratio, HR 1.37, p=0.11), and in patients older than 80 years (HR 2.75, p In a Cox's model, including ISS, gender and performance status, the HR compared to the fit category was 1.4 (p=0.18) and 2.9 (p Conclusions The use of a simple scoring system, based on geriatric assessment, allows the identification of groups of patients with different survival and risk of severe toxicities. Disclosures: Larocca: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Bringhen:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Merck Sharpe & Dohme: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy. Gay:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Byotest: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boccadoro:Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Palumbo:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Introduction The role of interim-PET (i-PET), after two cycles of chemotherapy, in advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma is well defined; the same role in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is still controversial. The Fondazione Italiana Linfomi planned a prospective randomized phase III trial, addressed to young poor prognosis DLBCL patients at the diagnosis, with a 2x2 factorial design aimed at investigating the possible benefit of intensification with R-HDC+ASCT after R-dose-dense chemotherapy delivered at two different level of dose (R-CHOP14/R-MegaCHOP14). During this study an ancillary study was designed to define the prognostic impact of i-PET on progression free survival (PFS) after two cycles of immunochemotherapy in all treatments arms. Patients and methods As described by Vitolo et al (oral communication, abs 688 ASH 2012), patients were stratified according to aa-IPI and randomized at diagnosis to receive: R-CHOP14 x 8 cycles; R-MegaCHOP14 (1200 mg/sqm Cyclophosphamide, 70 mg/sqm Doxorubicin, standard dose Vincristine and Prednisone) x 6; R-CHOP14 x 4 + R-HDC (Rituximab + High Dose Cytarabine + Mitoxantrone + Dexamethasone) followed by BEAM and ASCT; R-MegaCHOP14 x 4 + R-HDC + BEAM and ASCT. G-CSF support was mandatory. Seventeen centers agreed to participate in the study and enrolled patients. All evaluable patients had performed basal PET and i-PET. A visual dichotomous criteria, according to Deauville Criteria (First Consensus Conference, 2009), was used to define the i-PET result. The final response was identified according to 2007 Cheson response criteria. Results From June 2005 to September 2010, 399 patients were randomized in the overall DLCL04 study and 130 were enrolled for the ancillary PET study , 69 in the R-HDC+ASCT and 61 in R dose dense therapy respectively. The clinical characteristics, as in the overall DLCL04 study, were well balanced among the four arms of therapy excluding a selection bias in the group of patients studied with i-PET. The i-PET result was positive in 74 patients and negative in 56 patients, no differences were observed between negative and positive i-PET results according to clinical characteristics and group of treatment. In particular, in R-dose dense arm 27 were negative and 34 positive, in R-HDC+ASCT 29 were negative and 40 positive, according to immunochemotherapy scheme in R-CHOP14 29 were negative and 40 were positive, in MegaCHOP14 27 were negative and 34 were positive. With a median follow-up of 36 months, 3-year PFS and 3-year Overall Survival (OS) rates for the whole series were: 64% (95% CI:59-69) and 79% (95% CI:74-83) respectively. No differences in PFS was reported according to i-PET result. In particular 3-year PFS were 87%(95% CI:75-94) in i-PET negative patients and 76% (95% CI: 65-85) in i-PET positive patients respectively (p: 0.09 The 3-year PFS according to I- PET results in the different treatment arm were: in the R-HDT+ASCT group i-PET negative or i-PET positive patients had a 3-year PFS of 83% (95% CI:63-92) and 79% (95% CI:63-89) respectively; in the R-dose dense i-PET negative or i-PET positive patients had a 3-year PFS of 92% (95% CI:73-98) and 72% (95% CI:54-85) with a p value near the significance (0.07). According to OS, i-PET negative and i-PET positive patients had a 3-year OS of 89%(95% CI:76-95) and 83%(95% CI:72-90) respectively, p=0.219. Conclusions In our multicenter prospective study, addressed to young poor prognosis DLBCL patients at the diagnosis, i-PET, performed after two immunochemotherapy cycles and analyzed with a visual method, is not able to identify two different risk population. To confirm our data, we are planning in the near future a centralized revision of all evaluable PET. In conclusion, our feeling is that the i-PET after two cycles in poor prognosis DLBCL patients is too early to predict a chemorefractory disease and more parameters must be considered to define clinical response in these patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 50623 Background: Bone marrow karyotype in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is essential to define the prognosis and to guide treatment decisions, including targeted therapies. Due to the lack of an extensive national MDS registry in Italy, epidemiological data on MDS, including cytogenetics, throughout the territory is unknown. Objective: We evaluated the incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities amongst newly diagnosed MDS patients in in 2 southern Italian regions (Calabria and Puglia). Methods: A pilot project, denominated ANDROMEDA (ANalysis of cytOgenetics alteRatiOn in the MyEloDysplAstic syndromes) was developed in 17 centers to offer a service of conventional cytogenetic analysis for all consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic evaluation for cytopenia and suspected MDS between January 1 and December 31, 2011. The study conformed to the ethical standards set out in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by institutional review boards at each participating center. Patients were required to provide their written informed consent. Clinical characteristics of patients and bone marrow morphology, iron staining and histology were registered. Bone marrow samples were centralized for standard cytogenetic studies and fluorescence in situ hybridization to two dedicated genetics laboratories (one for each region), blind to patients' data. Results: Two hundred and thirty-five patients were evaluated and MDS diagnosis was confirmed in 220 cases (88. 3%), according to WHO criteria. The overall incidence of clonal chromosome abnormalities detected by conventional analysis was 36. 9%. Single abnormalities included +8 (13 cases, 5. 8%), del(5q) (12 cases, 5. 4%), –Y (11 cases, 5. 0%) and del(7)/-7 (4 cases, 1. 8%). Complex karyotypes were detected in 18 (8. 1%) cases. Among all cases only 10 (4. 5%) bone marrow samples were not evaluable for cytogenetic analysis. FISH revealed additional abnormalities not identified by conventional analysis only in 3 (1. 3%) out of 72 cases. Patients were classified in WHO subtypes: 39. 2% refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia (RCUD), 1. 5% refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS), 32. 5% refractory cytopenia with multilineage (RCMD), 10. 8% refractory anemia with excess of blast-1 (RAEB-1), 9. 3% refractory anemia with excess of blast-2 (RAEB-2), 4. 1% MDS with deletion 5q (MDS 5q-) and 2. 6% MDS unclassifiable (MDS-U). Conclusions: These preliminary results demonstrate that the incidence of abnormal karyotype patterns and WHO subgroups in MDS patients in Southern Italy is comparable with that described in other geographical areas. It is confirmed that conventional cytogenetic analysis is a standard in the diagnostic workup of MDS of patients with a suspected myeloid malignancy in order to identify primary abnormalities and prognostic models. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 4523 Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) is still an option for eligible patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM). High-dose melphalan (HDM: 200mg/m∧2) is the recommended conditioning before ASCT, but synergistic effects of Bortezomib (BOR) and HDM have been reported in vitro and in vivo. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated in 56 MM fit elderly patients (median age 65 yrs), the feasibility and efficacy (also in terms of evaluation of minimal residual disease: MRD) of a strategy, combining BOR, Cyclophosfamide (CY) and dexamethasone (DEX) as induction and mobilizing therapy (CY-BOR), for ASCT, with conditioning including BOR-HD-MEL. The patients achieving at least PR after 4 CY-BOR courses, were mobilized with BOR and DEX standard schedule with CY 3g/m∧2 (day 8). The pts collecting at least 2.5×10∧6CD34+/kg underwent ASCT with HD-MEL (day-1) and BOR (1.0mg/m∧2 on -6,-3,+1,+4), followed by thalidomide consolidation until Relapse/Progression. The MRD has been prospectively evaluated both by using 4 colour flow cytometry (FC), and by using patient-specific probes, by ASO-PCR. The percentage of plasma cells (PCs) has been evaluated both in in PBSC harvested and in bone marrow, with CD38, CD45, CD56, CD138, CD19, CD27, CD28, CD117, kappa and lambda, along different steps of therapy. RESULTS: Of 44 pts evaluable for response before ASCT, 32 (73%) achieved 3PR and 30 (68%) were mobilized: 29 (66%) collected3 2.5×106CD34+/kg and 25 underwent ASCT. Median time for PMN engraftment was 11 days (range 10–13) and 14 (range12–20) for PLT>=20.000/mcl. We observed grade 3 neuropathy in 3 patients and pneumonia during induction in 2 patients. At day +180 from ASCT 23 are evaluable for response and 21 for MRD: 3 pts have progressive disease (PD), 2 pts have a PR, 4 pts have a VGPR, 10 pts a nCR and 4 pts a CR. Four colour FC, in order to detect clonal plasmacells (cPCs) along several steps of treatment, showed that 3 pts (14%) achieved MRD negativity: 1/21 pts achieved MRD negativity at day +180 (cPC CONCLUSIONS: ASCT with HDM and BOR is feasible in older patients, with very high RRs and without major toxicities. We need a longer follow up and a larger number of pts to assess if these results will translate in a benefit in terms of outcome. Disclosures: Fragasso: Mundipharma: Honoraria.

Abstract 688 Introduction. The prognosis of young DLBCL patients at high risk treated with standard R-CHOP is still rather poor. The role of intensified HDC+ASCT in first line treatment is still a matter of debate in the Rituximab era. The FIL planned a prospective randomized phase III trial with a 2×2 factorial design aimed at investigating the possible benefit of intensification with R-HDC+ASCT after R-dose-dense chemotherapy delivered at two different level of dose (R-CHOP14/R-MegaCHOP14). Patients and methods. The primary end-point was to increase 2-year Progression Free Survival (PFS) from 50% of the standard dose-dense arm (R-dose-dense chemotherapy) to 65% in the experimental arm (R-dose-dense chemotherapy followed by R-HDC +ASCT). Secondary end-point was the comparison between two different schemes of dose dense chemotherapy, R-CHOP14 and R-MegaCHOP14. Inclusion criteria were: age 18–65; untreated DLBCL; age-adjusted IPI (aa-IPI) score 2 or 3. Patients were stratified according to aa-IPI and randomized at diagnosis to receive: R-CHOP14 × 8 cycles; R-MegaCHOP14 (1200 mg/sqm Cyclophosphamide, 70 mg/sqm Doxorubicin, standard dose Vincristine and Prednisone) × 6; R-CHOP14 × 4 + R-HDC (Rituximab + High Dose Cytarabine + Mitoxantrone + Dexamethasone) followed by BEAM and ASCT; R-MegaCHOP14 × 4 + R-HDC + BEAM and ASCT. G-CSF support was mandatory. Central nervous system prophylaxis was done according to the Italian Society of Hematology guidelines. Results. From June 2005 to September 2010, 412 patients were enrolled. Histology was centrally reviewed in 90% of cases. Thirteen patients were excluded because of different histological subtypes in 10 and active hepatitis HCV and HBV in 3. 399 patients were eligible and randomized: 199 to R-HDC+ASCT and 200 to R-dose-dense chemotherapy without ASCT; according to the type of chemotherapy 203 were randomized to RCHOP14 and 196 to R-MegaCHOP14. All patients were evaluable for analysis. Clinical characteristics were: median age 49 (range 18;65); stage II/III/IV 6/29/65%; LDH higher than normal value 89%; ECOG PS >1 43%; aa-IPI score 2/3 74/26%; all characteristics were well balanced between patients treated with or without ASCT. In the R-HDC+ASCT group, 151 patients (76%) completed the treatment and 177 (88%) in the R-dose-dense chemotherapy arms. Complete Remission (CR) was seen in 296 (74%) patients; CR was 76% in R-HDC+ASCT vs. 72% in the R-dose-dense chemotherapy arms. Overall 26 patients (7%) had a partial remission and 64 (16%) did not respond. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 13 (3%) patients: 8 (4%) in the R-HDC+ASCT arms vs. 5 (2.5%) in R-dose-dense arms. Grade III/IV extrahematological toxicities were reported in 85 patients (43%) in the R-HDC+ASCT vs. 38 (19%) in R-dose-dense arms. With a median follow-up of 36 months, 3-year PFS and 3-year Overall Survival (OS) rates for the whole series were: 64% (95% CI:59–69) and 79% (95% CI:74–83) respectively. Patients randomized to R-HDC+ASCT had a 3-year PFS of 70% (95% CI:63–76) compared to 59% of those treated with R-dose-dense only (95% CI:51–66); p = .010 (Figure 1) with a HR of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.46–0.91, p = .012). No difference in 3-year PFS was observed between R-CHOP14 and R-MegaCHOP14. According to aa-IPI, 3-year PFS in R-HDC+ASCT vs R-dose-dense arms were: aa-IPI score 2 74% (95%CI:65–80) vs. 63% (95%CI:54–71) p = .047; aa-IPI score 3 59% (95% CI:45–71) vs. 46% (95% CI:32–59), p= .121. At the time of this analysis, 3-year OS is 81% (95% CI:74–86) in R-HDC+ASCT vs. 78% (95% CI:70–83) in R-dose-dense chemotherapy patients, p= .556. In a Cox-model including the four arms and assuming R-CHOP14 as reference, the risk of relapse was significantly reduced in both ASCT arms with a major effect in the R-CHOP14+R-HDC+ASCT arm (HR=0.58, 95% CI=0.36–0.93, p= .025) and a slight minor HR reduction in the R-MegaCHOP14+R-HDC+ASCT arm (HR=0.68, 95% CI=0.42–1.09 p= .109). Moreover PFS in both arms (ASCT vs no ASCT) was further compared within pre-planned subgroups analysis according to the type of dose-dense chemotherapy, age, gender, aa-IPI and bone marrow involvement: the benefit of R-HDC+ASCT in PFS was maintained across all subgroups with no statistically significant interaction. Conclusions. R-dose-dense chemotherapy followed by R-HDC and BEAM with ASCT significantly reduced the risk of progression compared to standard dose-dense chemotherapy (R-CHOP14 or R-MegaCHOP14) in young patients with high-risk DLBCL. Disclosures: Vitolo: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zaja:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract 1606 Introduction. Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients at high-risk (age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aa-IPI) 2–3), had a dismal prognosis if treated with conventional chemotherapy. The introduction of intensive regimens and the addition of monoclonal antibody anti-CD20, improved prognosis, but some issues remain unresolved such as: the risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapses and the incidence of late toxicities. We analyzed a series of young DLBCL patients at high-risk consecutively treated in four prospective trials by the Italian Lymphoma Foundation (FIL) with the aim to assess the risk of CNS relapses and late toxicities in this series of patients with a prolonged follow-up Methods. From 1986 to 2006, 278 patients with DLBCL with aa-IPI 2–3 at diagnosis, were enrolled in four consecutive trials previously reported. Thirty-two into a phase II study, treated with 12 weekly infusion of MACOP-B; 39 into a phase II trial with eight weekly MACOP-B infusions followed by high-dose cytarabine, mitoxantrone and dexamethasone (MAD) plus standard BEAM and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); 95 in a phase III trial that randomized high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy plus ASCT (45 patients) vs six courses of dose-dense intensified CHOP (iCHOP) (50 patients); 112 into a phase II trial with four courses of iCHOP in combination with Rituximab followed by Rituximab-MAD + BEAM and ASCT. CNS prophylaxis was not mandatory in the four protocols. Updated data regarding of survival, CNS relapses and late toxicities were recorded on June 2011. Results. Clinical characteristics were: aa-IPI 2 in 55%, aa-IPI 3 in 45%, PS > 2 in 66%, LDH upper normal value in 89%, number of extranodal sites > 2 in 35%, bone marrow involvement in 27% of patients, with no statistical differences between the four trials. With a median follow-up of five years, 5-year Overall Survival (OS) was 63% (95% CI: 57–69%) in the whole series; 5-year OS by treatment was 41% (95%CI: 24–74%) in MACOPB, 54% (95%CI: 37–68%) in MACOPB+MAD+BEAM and ASCT; 53% (95%CI: 38–67%) in HDS+ASCT; 58% (95%CI: 43–70%) in iCHOP; 79% (95%CI: 70–86%) in R-iCHOP+R-MAD+BEAM and ASCT. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of death was significantly reduced in R-iCHOP+R-MAD+BEAM and ASCT (p Disclosures: Vitolo: Roche Italy: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jannsen-Cilag: Speakers Bureau.

Abstract 2257 Background: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) is an effective anti-tumor strategy in multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma patients. However, a significant proportion of patients cannot mobilize a sufficient number of CD34+cells to proceed to transplantation. Plerixafor addition to G-CSF significantly increases the proportion of lymphoma and MM patients, mobilizing ≥2×10106 /kg CD 34+ cells, considered the minimum dose safe for ASCT; however there are very few data about the use of Plerixafor after mobilizing chemotherapy (CHT). Patients and Methods: We report here 39 MM or lymphoma patients, candidate for ASCT, who received Plerixafor to collect peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) after CHT, followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF); 17 were affected by non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 16 by MM and 6 by Hodgkin's Lymphoma; 21 were male and 18 female and the median age was 58 years (20-72). In this population the PBSC collection was planned after disease-specific chemotherapy, followed by G-CSF. These patients were considered poor mobilizers (PM), and therefore eligible for Plerixafor addition, according to the following criteria: ì-previous failure of at least one mobilization attempt (proved PM); ìì- presence of factors predicting unsuccessful harvest (predicted PM), such as: advanced disease, extensive Bone Marrow involvement, previous treatment with extensive radiotherapy or previous prolonged treatment with stem cell poisons (Fludarabine, Alkylating agents, Lenalidomide); ììì- CD34+ cells count Results: Plerixafor administration was safe and no significant adverse events were recorded. Following Plerixafor we observed a 3,3 median fold-increase (range 0–20) of the circulating CD34+ cells, (median CD34+ peak: 31; range: 0–202/mcl) as compared to the day before Plerixafor (median CD 34+ peak: 5; range 0–32/mcl). In 30/39 patients we collected ≥2×106 CD34+ cells/Kg (median 3.7×106 /kg; range 0–15) after 1–3 leukaphereses (median 2). Twenty-five patients have been transplanted with Plerixafor-mobilized PBSCs, 24 of them showing a rapid and durable hematological recovery. The median time to reach PMN recovery (PMN≥500/mcl) was 13 days (9-23); median days to reach unsupported Platelet count ≥20.000/mcl and ≥50.000/mcl were 15 (89-88) and 22 (15-180) respectively. At present 22 patients are alive and maintain stable engraftment after ASCT; 1 died before engraftment while 2 died of disease progression. Our results suggest that “on-demand” addition of Plerixafor to G-CSF after disease-oriented-CHT is safe and may allow a satisfactory harvest in lymphoma and MM patients, considered to be proven or predicted PM, but still eligible for ASCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 2919 Poster Board II-895 Background: Flow cytometry (FCM) assessment of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has recently been known to increase the rate of positivity of occult leptomeningeal disease (LD) in comparison to conventional cytologic examination (CC). However it's still unknown its prognostic value. Patients and methods: The aim of this study was to compare CC vs FCM in a large cohort of patients with newly diagnosed aggressive NHL at high risk for LD (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) IPI 2-3 and elevated LDH with at least two extranodal sites or with bone marrow, testis, paranasal sinuses, orbit or paravertebral involvement; Burkitt lymphoma (BL); blastoid variant of mantle cell lymphoma (B-MCL); B-cell precursor lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-LL); HIV+ aggressive lymphoma patients). All patients were required to have no evidence or signs of neurological disease. All patients received intrathecal standard prophylactic therapy with 12 mg of methothrexate except for BL that were given prophylaxis with 50 mg of liposomial aracytin for a total of 4 doses. CFS samples were analysed both with CC and FCM. The incidence of positive test for occult LD with FCM and CC was compared using the McNemar test for paired data. Results: Between August 2004 and June 2008, a total of 159 consecutive patients were enrolled in 11 Italian centres and underwent evaluation of CSF. Out of these, 128 patients (80%) were considered at high risk of occult LD. Clinical characteristics were: median age 53 years (IQR:43-62); DLBCL 96 patients (75%); BL 21 pts (16%); B-MCL 6 pts (5%); B-LL 5 pts (4%); 26 pts (20%) were HIV positive. FCM was able to detect a clonal population in 17 out of 128 patients (13%) whereas CC detected abnormal cells only among 7 pts (5%)(p= 0.0002). Therefore, 10 patients (8%) were discordant: FCM+/CC-. Among the 128 patients, there was no association between the CFS total protein, glucose level and the presence of positive analysis of FCM, whereas the difference between the number of WBC cells in CSF was significantly higher in patients with positive versus negative FCM with a median value of 12 cells/ul (IQR: 3.5;40) versus 1.0 cells/ul (IQR: 0.0;3.0) (p=0.0120). Univariate and multivariate analyses, using logistic models, showed that abnormal LDH (OR 3.98, 95%CI: 1-15.92)(p=0.05) and number of WBC cells in CSF ≥5 (OR 4.57, 95%CI:1.37-15.33)(p=0.014) were the only predictive factors of a positive test performed by FCM. From date of diagnosis, overall median follow up of survivors was 14 months (IQR:8-22). We observed 39 (30%) systemic progressions, 6 (5%) CNS progressions (in 5 cases an isolated CNS progression whereas 1 pts experienced a CNS along with systemic progression). Thirty-two (25%) patients died and causes of deaths were as follows: 27 progressive disease, 1 infection, 1 treatment related toxicity, 1 hepatitis, 2 unknown. PFS at 1 year was 71% (95%CI:62-78) in the whole group of patients. The progression risk was significantly higher in patients both FCM+/CC+ compared with patients both FCM-/CC- (1-yr PFS 43% vs 74%) (HR 3.8 95%CI:1.6-9.0) (p=0.003). An higher but not significant risk of progression was found in pts discordant (FCM+/CC-) with respect to patients both FCM-/CC- (1-yr PFS 65% vs 74%) (HR 1.61, 95%CI:0.63-4.11) (p=0.315). In the univariate and multivariate analyses performed with Cox models, we found that the presence of ECOG PS≥2 (HR 2.14, 95%CI: 1.14-4)(p=0.018) and level of protein in CSF >40/ul (HR 1.83 95%CI: 1.01-3.29)(p=0.045) were prognostic factor of PFS. Conclusion: FCM assessment of CSF increase the rate of positivity of occult LD compare with CC but it's clinical relevance is still to be clearly defined. Our preliminary data suggest that patients both FCM+/CC+ have an higher risk of progression compared with those both negative, whereas discordant cases may have an intermediate prognosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 3887 Poster Board III-823 Background Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a non-hematologic side effect frequently reported in elderly patients treated with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP). To address this issue, both bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (VMPT) and VMP dosing regimens were changed; and bortezomib schedule was modified from twice weekly to weekly administration. Aims To determine incidence and risk factors of bortezomib-associated PN in twice weekly or weekly bortezomib infusion schedules. Methods Patients (N=511) older than 65 years were randomly assigned to receive VMPT followed by maintenance with bortezomib and thalidomide or VMP. Initially, patients were treated with nine 6-week cycles of VMPT (induction: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,4,8,11,22,25,29,32 in cycles 1-4 and days 1,8,22,29 in cycles 5-9; melphalan 9 mg/m2 days 1-4; prednisone 60 mg/m2 days 1-4 and thalidomide 50 mg days 1-42; maintenance: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every 15 days and thalidomide 50 mg/day as maintenance) or VMP (bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone at the same doses and schedules previously described without maintenance). In March 2007, the protocol was amended: both VMPT and VMP induction schedules were changed to nine 5-week cycles and bortezomib schedule was modified to weekly administration (1.3 mg/m2 days 1,8,15,22 in cycles 1-9). Baseline grade ≥ 2 PN was an exclusion criteria. Results 254 VMPT patients and 257 VMP patients were evaluated in intention-to-treat: 141 patients received twice weekly infusion of bortezomib and 370 once weekly. The overall incidence of PN was 37% in the VMPT patients and 27% in the VMP patients (p=0.01) while the grade ≥ 3 was quite similar (8% and 5%. p=0.19). When VMPT and VMP groups were combined, the incidence of PN was significantly higher in patients who received twice weekly infusion of bortezomib: the incidence of all grade PN was 45% in the twice weekly group and 27% in the once weekly group (p=0.0002), including a grade ≥ 3 PN incidence of 16% and 3% (p Conclusion The weekly infusion of bortezomib significantly decreased incidence of PN, discontinuation rate and dose-reduction rate without significant reduction of PFS. The addition of low-dose thalidomide to VMP did not increase the incidence of grade 3-4 PN. An update of these data and correlation between PN and clinical outcome will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Bringhen: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding, consultancy and advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding, consultancy and advisory committees; Pharmion: Research Funding, consultancy and advisory committees. Palumbo:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

PURPOSE: To provide long term follow-up results of HD9601 trial that compared ABVD vs MOPP-EBV-CAD (MEC) vs Stanford V (StV) regimens for the initial treatment of patients with advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) PATIENTS AND Methods: Patients with stage IIB–III or IV were eligible for randomization among 6 cycles of ABVD, 6 cycles of MEC and 12 weeks of StV; treatment had to be consolidated with optional Involved Field radiotherapy on Bulky or slow responding sites. For the long term, follow-up analysis study database was updated with most recent follow-up data and with information on long-term toxicity. Results: Between 1996 and 2000, 355 patients were registered into the trial and were randomly assigned to one of the three arms (ABVD 122 pts, MEC 106 pts, and StV 107 pts). Radiotherapy was administered to 62%, 47%, and 66% of cases in the 3 arms respectively. As previously described response rates at the end of treatment program were 89%, 94%, and 76% in the 3 arms, respectively. Initial results were published in 2005 with a median f-up of 61 months. Median follow-up of current analysis is 86 months. Compared with previous data we observed 2 additional relapses, both in StV arm. Moreover, we observed 7 additional deaths in patients who had achieved a CR after initial treatment. Overall, 20 patients died after achievement of CR with 7 additional events compared with our previous report (Gobbi et al. JCO 2007). Overall analyzing data by study arm we observed 4 (+3), 11 (+3), and 5 (+1) deaths in CR patients randomized toABVD, MEC, and StV, respectively. Additional deaths in CR from previous report were further analyzed and were caused by pulmonary embolism (3 cases: 2 ABVD, 1 MEC), sepsis (2 cases: 1 MEC, 1 StV), LMA (1 MEC), and second cancer NOS (1 ABVD). No additional significant longterm toxic event was recorded. Long-term analysis resulted in 8-yr OS of 88%, 84%, and 77% for ABVD, MEC, and StV, respectively without differences among study arms (P=0.337). Conclusions: The long-term analysis of HD9601 trial confirmed the results of the initial analysis. Few additional events observed were mostly represented by deaths in CR patients but these events did not substantially modify survival rates of the three arms.

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 90Y-Zevalin® combined with high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is gaing increasing importance for the treatment of relapsed or refractory non Hodgkin Lymphoma (nHL). We evaluated the feasibility and the clinical results of the addition of 90Y-Zevalin® at standard dose to BEAM regimen (Z-BEAM) in nHL pts who failed to achieve complete remission (CR) after previous chemoimmunotherapy. Methods. Between October 2005 and June 2008, 53 patients were enrolled in 11 italian centers. The treatment strategy is shown in figure 1. Salvage treatment consisted of 2 courses of R-DHAP. PBSCs were collected after mobilization with DHAP and G-CSF plus in vivo purging with Rituximab. Patients’ characteristics are shown in table 1. Results. The median CD34+ cells infused was 5.5 x10^6/Kilograms (range 2.55–34). All patients engrafted. The median number of red blood cell and platelet transfusion were 4 (1–7) and 6 (1–8), respectively. The median time to platelet and neutrophil counts higher than 20x10^9/L and 0.5x10^9/L were 14 (range, 9–60 days) and 10 days (range, 8–20), respectively. Mucosites occurred in all pts (grade III in 20 and grade IV in 5 patients). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 39 pts (74%). Eight pneumonitis and 12 blood stream infections, mainly by Gram+, were documented. One patient developed an atrial fibrillation. Five pts were not evaluable for response because too early. The 90-day overall response rate was 86% with 74% of CR. Three relapses (relapse rate 9%) and four progression were documented at a median follow-up of 247 days post Z-BEAM (range, 125–818). The potential factor to predict CR was: at last PR before Z-BEAM (p=0.06). Fourthy patients are alive at a median follow-up of 175 days post HST (range, 6–590): thirty pts in CR (57%), three pts in PR (5.5%), three pts in progressive disease (PD, 6%)(fig. 2). Fourtheen pts died (26%): 5 deaths due to TRM before day 90, 1 for ARDS (+230), 1 TRM post a subsequent RIC allotransplant (+95) and 6 due to PD (median follow-up 110 days, range 97–150). The Kaplan-Meyer estimated 3y-EFS is 64%. Five early deaths before day-90 occurred: 2 due to septic shock (day +6 and +39), 1 to pneumonitis (+22), 1 for BK viral encephalites (+61) and 1 to MOF (+14). The Kaplan-Meyer estimated Treatment Related Mortality (TRM) is 9.3%. Two statistically risk factors for 90-day TRM (p Conclusion. In pts with different histology nHL, who failed to achieve CR after previous immuno-chemotherapy, RIT integrated with high-dose chemotherapy (Z-BEAM) is capable to induce 86% of ORR, 74% of CR and 3 ys EFS of 64%, with sustained engraftment and an acceptable extra-haematological toxicity, mainly restricted to pts older then 65 ys. The power of this program needs to be assessed in a larger series of patients and in a randomized fashion. Table 1: Patient Characteristics and 90-day response post HST Figure. 1 Treatment Plan Figure. 1. Treatment Plan

Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the testis (PTL) is a rare presentation of extranodal lymphoma at poor prognosis with a 5-yr overall survival of 40-55%. Contralateral testis, CNS and extranodal sites relapses are the main cause of failures. IELSG 10 study is a prospective phase II international trial for patients with stage I or II PTL and was designed to define a standard treatment for PTL. It aims to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of a combined treatment of R-CHOP, intrathecal methotrexate and prophylactic scrotal radiotherapy (RT) with the addition, in stage II, of loco-regional RT. The trial was conducted by IELSG and Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi. Patients and methods: From June 2001 to June 2006, 50 pts with stage I-II PTL were enrolled from 26 centres. Treatment plan was: R-CHOP21 (R 375mg/m2, Ctx750 mg/m2, Doxo50 mg/m2, Vcr1.4 mg/m2 day 1 and Pdn40 mg/m2 days 1–5) for 6 courses and 2 additional ones in stage II patients with slow response; intrathecal methotrexate (IT MTX) 15mg for 4 doses during courses 1 and 2; at the end of chemotherapy 30 Gy scrotal RT to contralateral testis was planned to all pts and 30–36 Gy nodal loco-regional RT for those with stage II disease. Results: To date 45 pts who completed the treatment are evaluable. Median age was 64 (range 22–80); 36 stage I and 9 stage II disease; 3 had bilateral testicular involvement; 4 LDH>normal and 2 B symptoms. All received R-chemotherapy as planned. Forty-two (93%) pts received adequate CNS prophylaxis (at least 4 IT MTX); 3 less than 4 IT MTX because of poor tolerance or toxicity. Scrotal RT was given to 40 pts (89%) as planned; 5 did not performe it (3 refusal, 1 progressive disease and 1 bilateral orchiectomy). Forty-four patients (98%) achieved a CR and one progressed after 4 R-CHOP courses. With a median follow-up of 28 months, 3-yr OS, 3-yr PFS and 3-yr EFS were: 88% (95% CI 69–96%), 82% (95% CI 63–92%) and 78% (95% CI 58–89%). Seven patients relapsed or progressed: 2 in nodal sites, 3 in extranodal ± nodal sites and 2 in CNS (1 isolated meningeal and 1 eningeal + nodal relapse). The actuarial risk of CNS relapse at 3 years is 2.5% (95% CI 0–7%). No contralateral testis relapses were observed. Five patients died: three because of DLBCL; one of peripheral T-cell lymphoma and one of ANLL 21 months off therapy while in CR. No toxic death occurred during treatment. Main grade 3–4 toxicities were: hematological 27% and neurological 15%. Conclusions: Although the follow-up is short, these results compare favorably with those previously reported in IELSG retrospective study in PTL (Zucca et al J Clin Oncol 2003). Contralateral testis relapses has not been observed and the incidence of CNS relapse seems to be reduced. If these results are confirmed with a longer follow-up, a combined treatment of R-CHOP, IT MTX and prophylactic scrotal RT ± nodal RT in stage II patients would improve the prognosis of these pts and should be regarded as the standard treatment in localized stage PTL. However, if further relapses are observed there will be a need for innovative strategies to address the issues of systemic and CNS relapse.

Introduction: the efficacy of Rituximab (R) with standard chemotherapy in DLBCL is well known. We investigated efficacy and safety of Rituximab as adjuvant to dose-dense and HDC as part of first line treatment in untreated pts with aa-IPI at Intermediate-High (IH) or High (H) risk with DLBCL. Patients and methods: 77 previously untreated pts Results: median age was 45 yrs (19–60); 47% were at H risk; 31% had bone marrow involvement, 78% had LDH level >normal and 35% extranodal sites>1. Complete Response at the end of the treatment was achieved in 60 pts (78%), PR in 2 (3%) and 11 pts (14%) did not response. Four pts (5%) died of toxicity during treatment. Few severe early toxicities (WHO grade 3–4) were reported and late toxicity was minor, with no MDS or ANLL or solid tumour. With a median follow-up of 39 months, 3-yr FFS and 3-yr OS rates were: 71% and 78%. These results were compared to those ones achieved into 41 pts, with the same clinical characteristics, enrolled in a previous phase II clinical trial with up-front HDC and ASCT but without R. Treatment in HDC control group consisted in an induction treatment lasting two months with MACOPB chemotherapy × 8 weekly infusions followed by the same intensified and HDC regimens (MAD× 2 courses + BEAM and ASCT). Three-yr FFS and OS in control group were: 46% and 54%. To properly evaluate the efficacy of R-HDC therapy, a Cox’s model was performed to adjust the effect of treatment for competing risk factors (age, IPI, BM involvement, number of extranodal sites). In this multivariate analysis the risk of failure and death was confirmed as significantly reduced in R-HDC group: adjusted hazard ratio (R-HDC vs HDC) was 0.56 (95% CI=0.30–1.01, p=.05) for FFS and 0.42 (95% CI=0.21–0.88, p=.02) for OS. PBSC harvest and time to engraftment were similar into two groups, with no statistically significant differences: all pts in both groups collected more than 2×106 CD34+/kg; median time to neutrophils engraftment (neutrophils >500/mm3) was 9 days in R-HDC group and 10 days in HDC group and median time to platelets engraftment (platelets >50000) was 15 vs 16 respectively. Conclusions: these results suggest that Rituximab as adjuvant to dose-dense and HDC may improve the outcome of DLBCL at poor prognosis. This promising new treatment strategy need to be compared to Rituximab dose-dense chemotherapy without HDC as R-CHOP14. Such a randomized trial is currently undergoing conducted by Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi.