Search

Social determinants of health, including poverty, contribute significantly to health outcomes in the United States; however, their impact on pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes is poorly understood. We aimed to identify the association between neighborhood poverty and HCT outcomes for pediatric allogeneic HCT recipients in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. We assembled 2 pediatric cohorts undergoing first allogeneic HCT from 2006 to 2015 at age ≤18 years, including 2053 children with malignant disease and 1696 children with nonmalignant disease. Neighborhood poverty exposure was defined a priori per the US Census definition as living in a high-poverty ZIP code (≥20% of persons below 100% federal poverty level) and used as the primary predictor in all analyses. Our primary outcome was overall survival (OS), defined as the time from HCT until death resulting from any cause. Secondary outcomes included relapse and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) in malignant disease, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, and infection in the first 100 days post-HCT. Among children undergoing transplantation for nonmalignant disease, neighborhood poverty was not associated with any HCT outcome. Among children undergoing transplantation for malignant disease, neighborhood poverty conferred an increased risk of TRM but was not associated with inferior OS or any other transplantation outcome. Among children with malignant disease, a key secondary finding was that children with Medicaid insurance experienced inferior OS and increased TRM compared with those with private insurance. These data suggest opportunities for future investigation of the effects of household-level poverty exposure on HCT outcomes in pediatric malignant disease to inform care delivery interventions.

We developed a risk score to predict event-free survival (EFS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for sickle cell disease. The study population (n = 1425) was randomly split into training (n = 1070) and validation (n = 355) cohorts. Risk factors were identified and validated via Cox regression models. Two risk factors of 9 evaluated were predictive for EFS: age at transplantation and donor type. On the basis of the training cohort, patients age 12 years or younger with an HLA-matched sibling donor were at the lowest risk with a 3-year EFS of 92% (score, 0). Patients age 13 years or older with an HLA-matched sibling donor or age 12 years or younger with an HLA-matched unrelated donor were at intermediate risk (3-year EFS, 87%; score, 1). All other groups, including patients of any age with a haploidentical relative or HLA-mismatched unrelated donor and patients age 13 years or older with an HLA-matched unrelated donor were high risk (3-year EFS, 57%; score, 2 or 3). These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. This simple risk score may guide patients with sickle cell disease and hematologists who are considering allogeneic transplantation as a curative treatment relative to other available contemporary treatments.

There is marked paucity of data regarding late effects in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who undergo myeloablative conditioning (MAC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We evaluated late effects and survival in 826 1-year disease-free survivors of MAC HCT for AYA AML, with an additional focus on comparing late effects based upon MAC type (total body irradiation [TBI] vs high-dose chemotherapy only). The estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of subsequent neoplasms was 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-6%); 10-year cumulative incidence of nonmalignant late effects included gonadal dysfunction (10%; 95% CI, 8%-13%), cataracts (10%; 95% CI, 7%-13%), avascular necrosis (8%; 95% CI, 5%-10%), diabetes mellitus (5%; 95% CI, 3%-7%), and hypothyroidism (3%; 95% CI, 2%-5%). Receipt of TBI was independently associated with a higher risk of cataracts only (hazard ratio [HR], 4.98; P < .0001) whereas chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) was associated with an increased risk of cataracts (HR, 3.22; P = .0006), avascular necrosis (HR, 2.49; P = .006), and diabetes mellitus (HR, 3.36; P = .03). Estimated 10-year overall survival and leukemia-free survival were 73% and 70%, respectively, and did not differ on the basis of conditioning type. In conclusion, late effects among survivors of MAC HCT for AYA AML are frequent and are more closely linked to cGVHD than type of conditioning.

Plerixafor, a direct antagonist of CXCR4/stromal-derived factor 1, can safely and rapidly mobilize allografts without the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). We conducted a phase 2, multicenter, prospective study of plerixafor-mobilized HLA-identical sibling allografts for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in recipients with hematological malignancies. Donors (n = 64) were treated with subcutaneous plerixafor (240 µg/kg) and started leukapheresis (LP) 4 hours later. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of donors who were successfully mobilized: defined as collection of ≥2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells per kilogram recipient weight in ≤2 LP sessions. Recipients subsequently received reduced intensity (RIC; n = 33) or myeloablative (MAC; n = 30) conditioning. Sixty-three of 64 (98%) donors achieved the primary objective. The median CD34+ cell dose per kilogram recipient weight collected within 2 days was 4.7 (0.9-9.6). Plerixafor was well tolerated with only grade 1 or 2 drug-related adverse events noted. Bone pain was not observed. Plerixafor-mobilized grafts engrafted promptly. One-year progression-free and overall survivals were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36% to 71%) and 63% (95% CI, 46% to 79%) for MAC and 64% (95% CI, 47% to 79%) and 70% (95% CI, 53% to 84%) for RIC recipients, respectively. Donor toxicity was reduced relative to G-CSF mobilized related donors. This is the first multicenter trial to demonstrate that, as an alternative to G-CSF, plerixafor rapidly and safely mobilizes sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells from matched sibling donors for HCT. Engraftment was prompt, and outcomes in recipients were encouraging. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01696461.

We examined the risk of subsequent neoplasms (SNs) and late mortality in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for nonmalignant diseases (NMDs). We included 6028 patients (median age, 6 years; interquartile range, 1-11; range

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative treatment option for children and adolescents with non-malignant disorders. Continued advances in HSCT have led to a growing population of long-term survivors. For these survivors, late occurring chronic health conditions or so-called "late effects" remain a challenge. We examined the cumulative incidence of selected late effects at 5- and 10-years post-HSCT in pediatric and adolescent patients transplanted for non-malignant diseases. Methods: A retrospective analysis using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database was performed. Eligible patients (1 - 20 years) underwent HSCT between 1995 and 2012 for treatment of non-malignant disorders including marrow failure, red cell disorders, and immunodeficiencies (Table). Late effects evaluated were: avascular necrosis (AVN), cataracts, diabetes, growth hormone deficiency, hypothyroidism, gonadal dysfunction, renal failure requiring dialysis, and neurologic events (stroke and seizure). The cumulative incidence of each late effect was calculated at 5-years and 10-years from date of first report post-HSCT. Results: Median follow up was 94.1 months. A total of 5,858 patients from 230 centers were included. Median age at HSCT was 5.5 years. The majority (65%) of the patients were White race/ethnicity and 9% were Black, 60% were male. Diagnoses included: Marrow failure disorders, hemoglobinopathies, immunodeficiencies and immune-dysregulation syndromes (Table). The majority (62%) of the cohort received myeloablative conditioning (MAC), and a minority (16%) received total body irradiation (TBI). Among all patients, 19% had chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Cumulative incidence estimates at 5- and 10-years post-HSCT are presented in the Table. One-third (28%) of patients had at least one late effect. Cumulative incidence estimates at 10 years included stroke/seizures (11.2%), renal failure (7.7%), growth hormone deficiency/disturbance (7.6%), gonadal dysfunction (4.2%), hypothyroidism (4.1%), cataracts (2.9%), and AVN (1.4%). For AVN, renal failure, and stroke or seizures, incidence was stable between 5 and 10 years. For endocrine-associated late effects, incidence increased over time, nearly doubling from 5 to 10 years (Table). Across the cohort, the probability of growth hormone deficiency increased from 3.7% at 5-years, to 6.5% at 10-years. Similarly, hypothyroidism increased from 2.7% at 5-years, to 4.5% at 10 years. The cumulative incidence of treatment-associated diabetes was 3.1%, with most cases occurring in the first-year post-transplant. Finally, the probability of cataracts at 10 years was 2.9%, which was double the incidence at 5 years. Conclusions Among children and adolescents undergoing HSCT for non-malignant diseases, cumulative incidence of late effects was overall low, and did not exceed 12% at 10 years. The timing of late effect development differed, with the cumulative incidence of AVN, diabetes, renal failure, and seizure/stroke staying fairly stable after 5-years. Diabetes occurred most frequently in the first year, which may be a reflection of steroids or other medications to manage graft-versus-host-disease during the early-post transplant period. In contrast, the incidence of endocrine-associated late effects including growth disturbance, hypothyroidism, gonadal dysfunction and cataracts nearly doubled between 5 and 10-years post-transplant. Findings from this work further emphasize the need for long-term follow-up and screening for late effects, particularly diabetes, renal disease and neurologic symptoms early post-transplant, and cataracts and endocrinopathies over time. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hamilton: Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Equilium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schoemans: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: personal fees , Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants and personal fees; Gilead: Other: travel grants; CIBMTR: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants and personal fees , Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: personal fees; Takeda: Other: personal fees. Phelan: Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Introduction: It has been shown that racial/ethnic minorities have worse survival after matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation(allo-HCT) compared to Whites. Whether the racial disparity in allo-HCT outcomes persists in long-term survivors, and possibly may even be exacerbated in this population that frequently transitions back from the transplant center to their local healthcare providers, is unknown. In the current study we sought to compare long-term outcomes among one-year survivors, by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES), after allo-HCT reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Methods: The CIBMTR database was used to identify 5,473 patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) who received HCT between 2007-2017, who were alive and in remission for at least 1 year after allo-HCT. Study was restricted to patients transplanted in the United States. Cox regression model was used to determine association of ethnicity/race and SES with overall survival (OS), relapse, and treatment related mortality (TRM). Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated to compare mortality rates of the study patients to their general population peers matched on race/ethnicity, age and sex. Results: Patients were reported to be Non-Hispanic White (W) (n=4385), Non-Hispanic Black (B) (n=338), Hispanic (H) (n=516), and Asian (A) (n=234). Median follow up after 1 year allo-HCT (months): 69 W, 50 B, 59 H and 57 A (Table 1). Patient neighborhood poverty level was estimated from residential ZIP code at the time of allo-HCT. A ZIP code with ≥20% of persons below the federal poverty level was considered high poverty area. In multivariable analysis, we observed no significant differences in OS, relapse or TRM based on race or poverty level when adjusted for patient-, disease- and transplant-related covariates (Table 2). Conclusions: Our study highlights that among those who survived at least 1-year in remission after allo-HCT, previously reported disparities in post HCT outcomes based on racial/ethnic factors, are not evident in contemporary practice. This might suggest that previously recognized disparity in outcomes could be due to factors that mostly affect patients in their first year post HCT. Future studies are needed to identify these early adverse factors and implement strategies to mitigate them. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Blue: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; WebMD: Consultancy. Wood: Pfizer: Research Funding; Teladoc: Consultancy; Koneksa Health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Majhail: Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc: Consultancy. Saber: Govt. COI: Other.

Background There has been an increase in overall utilization as well as improvement in overall survival (OS) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for most hematologic disorders over time. It is not known if these changes have impacted racial/ethnic minorities equally. In this study, we describe changes in the volume and rate of autologous (auto) and allogeneic (allo) HCT and examine trends in survival in different racial/ethnic groups from 2009 to 2018. Methods Data were obtained from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) which collects patient data on most autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients in the US. We compared the number of auto and allo transplants in 4 different racial/ethnic groups: Non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), African Americans (AAs), Hispanics and 'Others' across five 2-year cohorts from 2009 to 2018. 'Others' included Asians, Pacific Islanders and Native Americans as well as non-US residents. Since numbers in individual categories were too low to be meaningful, they were grouped together as 'Others'. Multi race individuals and those with either race or ethnicity missing were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine trends in overall mortality after auto HCT in adult patients (for NHL, HD, and MM), and allo HCT among adult and pediatric patients (for AML, ALL, lymphoma including chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and MDS/MPD) in the 4 different racial ethnic groups over 5 study time periods. These models were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables (age, sex, Karnofsky/Lansky score, HCT-comorbidity index, disease, disease status, geographic region, insurance, marital status, education, distance to the transplant center, median income derived from patient's ZIP code). Graft type, donor, conditioning, GVHD prophylaxis, donor-recipient CMV match and donor-recipient sex match were included for allo HCT models. Results A total of 80,080 (59,666 NHWs, 10,683 AAs, 7,110 Hispanics) patients received an auto HCT and 60,412 (44,272 NHWs, 4,964 AAs, 7,826 Hispanics) received an allo HCTs from 2009 to 2018. The volume of auto and allo transplants increased overall, as well as within each race/ethnicity group, over the study periods. In addition, there was a significant change in the proportion of patients in each racial/ethnic group undergoing an auto HCT, with a lower proportion of NHWs and increased proportion of minorities over time (from 78%, 12% and 8% in 2009 -2010 to 71%, 15% and 10% in 2017-2018 for NHWs, AAs and Hispanics respectively; p There was no significant difference in overall mortality amongst the three main racial ethnic groups, though there was decrease in mortality over time for auto HCT and adult allo HCT patients. In the allo HCT pediatric group, AAs had higher overall mortality as compared to NHWs across all time periods. (Table 2) Figure 1 shows temporal trends in two-year survival by race and ethnicity. Conclusions This large population-based study shows an improvement in the rates and survival of auto and allo HCT in adults over time. Changes in the proportion of different racial/ethnic groups undergoing HCT are higher than rate of change of population growth (3% decline for NHWs, no change in AAs and 2% increase in Hispanics from 2010 to 2019 per William H. Frey analysis of census population estimates released June 25, 2020). Progress is reflected in higher rates of increase in racial/ ethnic minority groups and comparable survival across the racial ethnic groups in our cohort as compared to two prior registry studies (Baker et al. JCO 2005 and Baker et al. BBMT 2009) for most HCT patients. However, in pediatric patients undergoing allo HCT, the gap in survival between NHWs and AAs has continued to persist over the years. With increasing diversity of the US population, we need to strengthen our efforts for improving access to, and outcomes of HCT to narrow the gap for all patients requiring HCT, irrespective of their sociodemographic characteristics. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wood: Koneksa Health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Teladoc: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding. Ailawadhi: Karyopharm: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene, Ltd.: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Saber: Govt. COI: Other.

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the sole curative therapy for patients with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) leading to a 5-year disease-free survival of ~50%. Whether donor NK cell determinants (e.g., KIR mismatch, KIR A/B genotype) correlate with relapse and survival are unknown. We previously demonstrated that JMML stem cells, defined as Lin-CD34+CD38-, express ligands for NKG2D, NKp30, and NKp44 at levels equal or greater than AML stem cells and that colony-forming units were significantly reduced following incubation of JMML cells with NK cells. Based on these observations we hypothesized that NK cell-dependent mechanisms are a major component of protection from JMML relapse after HCT, and specifically that determinants of greater donor NK cell function (e.g. KIR Bx donors or KIR ligand mismatch) are associated with reduced relapse. We therefore investigated NK cell-related donor and recipient immunogenetics as determinants for outcomes in children transplanted for JMML. Methods: Patients (0 to < 19 years) who received a first allogenic HCT from an alternative donor between 2000 to 2017 and had available donor samples from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) repository were included in the study. Donor KIR typing was performed on pre-HCT samples and results were correlated with clinical data extracted from the CIBMTR database. The primary endpoint was disease free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints included relapse rate (REL), acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD), chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD), GVHD relapse free survival (GRFS) and overall survival (OS). Patient and transplant related variables included age (< 2 years vs ≥ 2 years), sex, race, performance score (< 90 vs >90), disease status, graft type (bone marrow, peripheral blood, and cord blood), HLA matching (8/8 vs others), conditioning intensity (myeloablative vs others), use of serotherapy, GVHD prophylaxis (calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)+ methotrexate (Mtx) ± others vs others) and year of HCT (2000-2007 vs 2008-2017). KIR models tested included KIR genotype (AA vs Bx), Donor KIR B content (0-1 vs ≥ 2), centromeric and telomeric region score (AA vs AB vs BB), donor KIR B content score (best, better, neutral), KIR composite score (2 vs 3 vs 4), activating KIR content, presence of activating KIR DS4, ligand-ligand (L-L) mismatch, KIR ligand (KIR-L) mismatch, and missing ligand. Proportional hazards were checked for all covariates in every model. Univariate analysis was performed for primary and secondary outcomes of interest. Covariates with overall p-value < 0.05 and pairwise comparisons with p-value < 0.05 were considered significant. L-L and KIR-L mismatch effects were studied for all outcomes in a subgroup of HLA-mismatched donors (high resolution match Results: 165 patients (113 males) with a median follow up of 85 (6-216) months met the study criteria. Of these, 111 received an unrelated donor transplant and 54 received cord blood transplants. This included 77 HLA-mismatched donor transplants. Almost all (161, 98%) received myeloablative conditioning. Half of the study cohort received ATG (91, 55%) and CNI + Mtx based GVHD prophylaxis (81, 49%). Based on donor KIR genotype, 43 patients received grafts from AA donors and 122 from Bx donors. On univariate analysis, there was no difference between AA vs Bx for the primary and secondary outcomes (Table 1). Considering the various KIR models, OS was significantly better for patients without L-L mismatch in the GVHD direction (HR 0.43 (95% CI: 0.20-0.91), p=0.027). Risk of grade II-IV aGVHD was lower in patients with Bx donors (HR 0.59 (CI: 0.35-0.99), p=0.047) and donors with B content score of ≥ 2 (HR 0.51 (0.29-0.89), p=0.017) (Table 2). Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first study analyzing NK determinants in pediatric JMML HCT recipients. OS and aGVHD were the only outcomes associated with NK cell immunogenetics, but not in expected directions. These unexpected findings may be due to our limited sample size or heterogeneity in graft sources or treatment regimens. Our study identifies a potential benefit of donor of KIR-B genotypes and absence of L-L mismatch in the GVH direction for pediatric JMML patients. These observations require further investigation for confirmation and understanding of mechanism. Disclosures Verneris: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bmogen: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Uptodate: Consultancy. Lee:Kiadis Pharma Netherlands B.V: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is curative therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD). Good outcomes have spurred an increase in the use of HCT for SCD, including an increasing number of trials using alternative donors. As survival improves, assessment of long-term outcomes and potential late effects (LEs) in this patient population is critical. We evaluated the data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) to study incidence and risk factors for LEs following HCT for SCD. Methods: Patients reported to the CIBMTR with a diagnosis of SCD who had undergone their first HCT between 1996 and June 2015 were included in this analysis. Patients with graft failure were excluded. We performed a descriptive analysis of patient, disease, donor, and transplant-related factors. The cumulative incidence (CI) of LEs was estimated at 1, 3, and 7 years post-HCT. The number of pre- versus post-HCT SCD-specific disease complications was computed. Overall survival (OS) probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors related to OS and LEs. Results: The study population consisted of 355 patients. The median age at HCT was 10 years (range 15 years of age was associated with significantly inferior OS (mortality HR 7.26, 95% CI 3.57-14.77). Multivariable analysis for LEs demonstrated an increased risk of diabetes (HR 7.29, 95% CI 2.94-18.08) and pulmonary abnormalities (HR 5.90, 95% CI 1.14-30.42) with unrelated donor, while older age at HCT was associated with avascular necrosis (HR 14.19, 95% CI 1.86-108.47), diabetes (HR 3.45, 95% CI 1.69-7.05), and congestive heart failure (HR 8.02, 95% CI 1.13-56.94). SCD-related symptoms overall decreased from pre- to post-HCT (Table 1), most notably acute chest syndrome, vaso-occlusive pain crises, and stroke. Conclusions: Patients with SCD who have undergone HCT for SCD in recent years have excellent OS, confirmed in this CIBMTR multicenter dataset, with diminished SCD-related symptom burden post-HCT. However, they remain at-risk for a myriad of LEs, with risk factors including older age at HCT and unrelated donor, necessitating systemic organ-based follow up post-HCT. Continued follow-up of this patient population is critical to provide appropriate counseling for medical providers, patients, and families considering HCT as a treatment option for SCD. Disclosures Shaw: Therakos: Other: Speaker Engagement.

Background: Return to full-time work after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is an important indicator of health recovery and overall function of survivors. Because young adult (YA) HCT patients are at a critical personal and professional developmental phase at the time of their illness, they face unique challenges potentially impacting their ability to work post-HCT. We aimed to assess the post-HCT work status of YA patients undergoing allogeneic HCT and examine pre-HCT factors associated with their work status at the 1-year time-point post-HCT. Methods: Using data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), we studied YA (18-39 years of age at HCT) survivors (alive ≥1-year post-HCT) of allogeneic HCT performed between 2008 and 2015 for malignant or non-malignant conditions. All conditioning regimens, stem cell sources, and donor types were included. Work status [full-time (FT), part-time (PT), unemployed, medical disability] was assessed at 6-months, 1-, 2-, and 3-years post-HCT. We performed a multivariable logistic regression to study the pre-HCT patient and disease related [patient age at HCT, sex, race/ ethnicity, pre-HCT education, pre-HCT work status, disease diagnosis, Karnofsky/ Lansky performance score, hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI), marital status], and HCT-related (year of transplant, stem cell source, donor type, conditioning regimen) factors associated with post-HCT work status at the 1-year time-point [dichotomized as employed (in FT/PT work) vs unemployed (unemployed, medical disability)]. Results: A total of 1,365 allogeneic HCT recipients met the selection criteria. Median age at HCT was 30.8 years (range 18-39; interquartile range 9.3). Forty-four percent were females; 89% received HCT for malignant diseases (myeloid diseases: 62%, lymphoid diseases: 35%) and the remainder for non-malignant diseases (severe aplastic anemia, inherited abnormalities of erythrocyte differentiation/ function, and disorders of the immune system). Forty three percent received total body irradiation (TBI) based myeloablative conditioning regimens. Median follow-up time from HCT was 60.6 months (range: 12-121). From 6-months to 3-years post-HCT, the percentage of survivors employed FT (18% to 51%) and PT (7% to 11%) increased, and unemployed (38% to 18%) and on medical disability (37% to 20%) decreased (Figure 1). Of patients in FT work pre-HCT, 50% were either unemployed or had medical disability status at the 1-year time-point (Figure 2). Of those unemployed pre-HCT, 19% were working at 1-year post-HCT. In the multivariable logistic regression, survivors' pre-HCT work status was significantly associated with the post-HCT work status at 1-year time-point. Compared to patients working FT pre-HCT, patients who were unemployed and on medical disability were significantly less likely to be employed at 1-year post-HCT [pre-HCT unemployment: odds ratio (OR) of FT/PT employment 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.48; pre-HCT medical disability: OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.30-0.71]. Females (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.37-0.69) and patients with an HCT-CI score of 2 (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.95), and ≥3 (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.36-0.76) also had a lower likelihood of employment. Compared to patients with high school or lower education, patients with graduate school level education had significantly higher likelihood of employment (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.72-3.71). Compared to patients treated with total body irradiation (TBI) based myeloablative conditioning, significantly higher odds of employment were seen in chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.28-2.56) (Table). Conclusions: In YA HCT survivors, the full-time and part-time work rates steadily improved post-HCT. Nonetheless, nearly 40% were still either unemployed or on medical disability even at 3 years post-HCT. Although there were limitations of the study including lack of post-HCT time-dependent covariates for the analysis and direct patient report for work status, our study findings provide an insight into the factors impinging on YA survivors' ability of returning to work and points to a need for return to work interventions. Disclosures Shaw: Therakos: Other: Speaker Engagement.

Risks of secondary solid cancers among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients who receive conditioning without total body irradiation are not well known. We evaluated the incidence and risk factors for solid cancers after HCT using high-dose busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning in 4318 recipients of first allogeneic HCT for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission (N = 1742) and chronic myeloid leukemia in first chronic phase (N = 2576). Our cohort represented 22 041 person-years at risk. Sixty-six solid cancers were reported at a median of 6 years after HCT. The cumulative-incidence of solid cancers at 5 and 10 years after HCT was 0.6% and 1.2% among acute myeloid leukemia and 0.9% and 2.4% among chronic myeloid leukemia patients. In comparison to general population incidence rates, HCT recipients had 1.4× higher than expected rate of invasive solid cancers (95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.79, P = .01). Significantly elevated risks were observed for tumors of the oral cavity, esophagus, lung, soft tissue, and brain. Chronic graft-versus-host disease was an independent risk factor for all solid cancers, and especially cancers of the oral cavity. Recipients of allogeneic HCT using busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning are at risk for developing solid cancers. Their incidence continues to increase with time, and lifelong cancer surveillance is warranted in this population.

Introduction: Outcome disparities related to race and area-based socioeconomic status (SES) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have been identified in adult patients [Baker et al. 2009]. The relationship between SES and outcomes in pediatric allo-HCT has not been previously described. Among a large cohort of pediatric allo-HCT recipients we sought to determine the impact of area-based poverty on 5-year outcomes of overall survival (OS), acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD, cGVHD); as well as the short-term outcome of infection through day 100 . Methods: We utilized the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database to examine the association of sociodemographic variables with outcomes in two cohorts of pediatric transplant recipients aged =20% households living below 100% federal poverty level (FPL)) versus low-poverty area ( Results: Fifteen percent (N=299) of children in Cohort 1 lived in a high-poverty area; 35% (N=711) were insured by Medicaid-only; 11% (N=227) were African-American and 20% (N=417) Hispanic. Median follow-up of survivors was 74 months. In multivariable analysis, there was no association between area-based poverty and OS; however, OS was inferior in children with Medicaid-only insurance compared to those with private insurance (HR 1.22 (95% CI 1.06-1.40), p=0.0037) and in Black children compared to Caucasian (HR 2.02 (95% CI 1.10-3.73), p=0.0234). For the secondary outcomes of aGVHD, cGVHD or infection through day 100, there were no associations between area-based poverty, insurance, race, or ethnicity in multivariable analysis. To further explore the independent association of insurance with OS, we performed an ad hoc univariate analysis that demonstrated that insurance-related differences in OS for malignant disease appear to be driven by differences in treatment-related mortality (TRM) (5-year TRM: Medicaid-only 25% (95% CI 22-28) versus 18% (95% CI 16-21) other). Thirteen percent (N=228) of children in Cohort 2 lived in a high-poverty zip code; 35% were insured by Medicaid-only (N=597); 20% (N=332) were African-American and 20% (N=344) Hispanic. Median follow-up of survivors was 74 months. In multivariable analyses, there was no association between area-based poverty, insurance, race or ethnicity and any outcome. Conclusion: Area-based poverty is not associated with disparate outcomes in pediatric allo-HCT for malignant or non-malignant disease. In the setting of malignant disease, insurance-a household-level measure of socioeconomic status-and Black race are independently associated with inferior OS. These results suggest that future prospective investigation of more refined measures of household-level socioeconomic status may identify risk-factors for treatment-related mortality in this population. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction Follow-up is an integral part of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) care which ensures accurate characterization of HCT-related outcomes as well as surveillance and intervention for complications. Despite the importance of follow-up of all HCT recipients at transplant centers, they may be lost to follow-up (LTFU). HCT recipients who are LTFU may be demographically or clinically distinct from HCT recipients who maintain regular center follow-up. Using population-based data from 17,550 adult and 4,279 pediatric HCT recipients from United States centers reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), we characterize the incidence of, and predictors for, becoming LTFU. Methods The study included 2-year (yr) survivors of first allogeneic (10,367 adults and 3,865 children) or autologous (7,183 adults and 414 children) HCT for malignant and non-malignant disorders in the United States from 2002-2013 reported to the CIBMTR. LTFU was defined as a patient having missed 2 consecutive follow-up reporting periods. CIBMTR follow-up forms are collected annually for the first 6 yrs post-HCT and bi-annually thereafter. The cumulative incidence of LTFU HCT recipients was calculated. Marginal Cox models allowing adjustment for center effect were fit to evaluate risk factors for becoming LTFU among adults and pediatric allogeneic and autologous HCT survivors. Risk factors evaluated included: sociodemographic (age at HCT, sex, performance status, race, distance to center, income, health insurance, marital status) and disease/HCT-related (disease type, yr of HCT) factors. Results Among 2-yr allogeneic HCT survivors, the median age at the time of HCT was 49 yrs (range, 18-81) and 7 yrs (range, Conclusions The incidence of LTFU is significantly higher in pediatric than adult patients, with no difference between autologous and allogeneic HCT patients, regardless of age. We identified risk factors for LTFU that differed by age and HCT donor type. A national, comprehensive, risk-based approach to long-term follow-up focusing on minimizing the attrition in high-risk groups such as adolescent and young adult-aged HCT survivors and HCT survivors with non-private health insurance is needed. Future studies incorporating patient reported outcomes may help describe reasons for lack of long-term follow-up. Collection of accurate and meaningful epidemiologic and clinical data from all survivors can help develop and refine strategies to improve long-term outcomes of this population. Disclosures Parsons: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Background Current literature suggests that the presence and quality of social support may provide meaningful benefits in overall survival of HCT recipients. Further, studies in general oncology and renal transplantation population suggest that married patients have favorable outcomes. Caregivers of HCT recipients are an important source of both instrumental and emotional support, and a reasonable surrogate for presence of social support. Using data from Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), we examined the potential influence of marital status (surrogate for caregiver) at the time of HCT on outcomes of HCT. Methods Patients, >40 years of age who underwent either autologous or allogeneic-HCT from 2008 to 2015 were included. Marital status was defined as either 1) Married, 2) Single, never married, 3) Separated/divorced, and 4) Widowed. The probability of OS at 5 years, Grade 2-4 acute GVHD at 100 days and chronic GVHD at 2 years were estimated as appropriate using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test used for univariate comparisons. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the association of marital status with these outcomes, while adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic variables. Results We identified 10,226 allogeneic and 5,714 autologous HCT patients; the median follow-up of survivors was 37 months (range 1-102 months) and 40 months (range 1-106 months) respectively. In the allogeneic population, there were n=7,999 married, n=741 single, n=1,175 separated/divorced and n=311 widowed patients. There were n=4,308, n=478, n=695 and n=233 respectively in the autologous population. The baseline characteristics amongst the 4 groups of marital status were comparable. In the allogeneic population, the 5-year probability of OS, 100-day Grade 2-4 acute GVHD, 2-year probability of chronic GVHD were 38% [95%CI (36-39%)], 16% [95%CI (15-17%)]and 46% [95%CI (45-47%)] respectively; while the 5-year probability of OS in the autologous population was 63% [95%CI (61-64%)]. When compared with married patients, single, separated/divorced and widowed patients were not at an increased risk of death [HR 1.09, 95%CI (0.98-1.2); HR 1.01, 95%CI (0.93-1.09); HR 1.09, 95%CI (0.98-1.2)] in the allogeneic setting. Similarly, there was no association of marital status and OS in the autologous setting [HR 1.10, 95%CI (0.92-1.33); HR 1.17, 95%CI (1.01-1.36); HR 1.08, 95%CI (0.86-1.37)] respectively. In contrast, marital status in the allogeneic setting was associated with an increased risk of grade 2-4 acute GVHD in patients who are divorced/separated as compared to married patients [HR 1.13, 95%CI (1.03-1.24)] but not chronic GVHD [HR 0.90, 95%CI (0.80-1.02); HR 0.94, 95%CI (0.86-1.04); HR 0.82, 95%CI (0.68-0.99)] respectively. We did not identify an interaction between marital status and gender. Conclusions Our data suggest the marital status in patients undergoing either autologous or allogeneic HCT is not associated with overall survival or chronic GVHD, while the risk of acute GVHD maybe increased in patients who are divorced/separated. Taken together, the effect of marital status on post-HCT outcomes is negligible when other patient, disease and transplant variables are considered. Alternatively, marital status maybe an imperfect marker for positive social support. Future research should consider measuring social support using validated scales and assess health related quality of life together with health care utilization outcomes to better appreciate the potential impact of social support. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background. Increasing numbers of adolescent and young adult (AYA) with acute leukemia (AL; acute myeloid leukemia [AML] and acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL]) are transitioning to long-term survivorship following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and are at risk for certain morbidities after HCT due to myeloablative conditioning (MAC) with total body irradiation (TBI) or non-TBI-based chemotherapy (CT). Using data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research (CIBMTR), we evaluated late effects (LEs) following MAC HCT and furthermore compared the effect of TBI vs. CT-based MAC on LEs and overall survival (OS) in a large cohort of one-year disease-free AYA survivors following HCT for AL. We hypothesized that the use of TBI, relative to CT-based MAC, would lead to equivalent long-term survival in this population but that TBI conditioning would be associated with significantly increased LEs following HCT. Methods. AYAs (ages 15-39 years at HCT) with AL who received first MAC HCT between 2000-2014 from a HLA matched sibling or 8/8 matched unrelated donor (MUD) and were alive and disease-free at one year following HCT were included. The cumulative incidence (CI) of LEs (avascular necrosis [AN], cataracts, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes [DM], gonadal dysfunction, growth disturbance, hypothyroidism, pancreatitis, renal failure requiring hemodialysis, and strokes/seizures) was estimated at 2, 5 and 10 years after HCT, with death as a competing risk. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models evaluated patient and HCT risk factors, including the main effect of TBI vs. CT-based MAC, for the most frequently occurring LEs (limited to AML cohort only as majority of ALL patients received TBI) and for OS. Results. The study population included 1,578 one-year disease-free AYA survivors of AML (n=936) or ALL (n=642) who received first MAC HCT with TBI (AML: 449; ALL: 607) or CT (AML: 487; ALL: 35). The median TBI dose was 1200 cGy (range, 550 - 1800). The median age at HCT for AML and ALL was 29 and 26 years, respectively. The majority were male (AML: 54%; ALL: 67%), transplanted in first complete remission (AML: 62%; ALL 59%) with MUD donors (AML: 56%; ALL 55%), and had GVHD prophylaxis consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor and methotrexate (AML: 83%; ALL 83%) without T-cell depletion. The most common TBI and CT-based MAC regimens were TBI/cytoxan and busulfan/cytoxan, respectively. Median follow-up (months) of survivors was 82 (range, 12-194) for AML and 92 (range, 12-194) for ALL. The estimated CI of LEs in AML and ALL patients are shown in Table 1. Multivariable analyses for individual LEs in the AML cohort showed that CT- based MAC was independently associated with a lower risk of cataracts (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.10 - 0.37). There was no significant association between TBI and secondary malignancies, DM, gonadal dysfunction, or hypothyroidism. cGVHD was independently associated with significantly increased risk of cataracts (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.58 -5.24), AN (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.25 - 4.07), and DM (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.05 - 7.73). Unadjusted long-term HCT survival outcomes for AYAs with AML and ALL did not significantly differ based upon TBI vs. CT-based MAC (Table 2) despite significantly higher disease relapse among the CT cohort (AML only). Limited and severe cGVHD occurred in 12% and 51% of AML patients, respectively, and 13% and 53% of ALL patients, respectively, and did not differ by conditioning. In multivariable analyses for OS, HCT in relapse (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.59 - 3.63), poor-risk cytogenetics (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.24 - 3.52), peripheral blood stem cell graft (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.07 - 1.97), cGVHD (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04 - 1.80), and a new malignancy post-HCT (HR 4.40, 95% CI 2.21 - 8.74) were associated with significantly inferior OS in AML. Undergoing HCT in CR2 (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09 - 2.07) or in relapse (HR 3.67, 95% CI 2.31 - 5.82), and a new malignancy post-HCT (HR 3.11, 95% CI 1.26 - 7.68) were associated with significantly inferior OS in ALL. Conclusion. AYAs with AL who are disease-free survivors at one-year have favorable long-term HCT outcomes. Long-term survival in this population appears unrelated to a TBI vs. CT-based MAC regimen. Development of cataracts is increased in long-term AYA AML HCT survivors receiving TBI-based MAC. Screening for LEs is important in survivors of AYA HCT for AL, regardless of the use of TBI or CT- based MAC regimens. Disclosures Muffly: Shire Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) are the two most common childhood leukemias. Novel drug therapies and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) have improved ALL and AML treatment outcomes over the past two decades. However, alloHCT may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality that results in increased healthcare utilization. To date, no multi-center comparative effectiveness studies have been performed specifically evaluating alloHCT in children with ALL or AML. This study uses a novel methodology to investigate the hypothesis that matched sibling donor (MSD) alloHCT has significantly lower healthcare utilization compared to unrelated donor (URD) and that among URD, umbilical cord blood transplants (CBT) will have higher initial utilization but lower long-term utilization. Clinical and transplant outcomes data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database were merged with inpatient resource utilization and standardized cost data from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database using a probabilistic merge methodology. This merged dataset contained U.S. patients age 1-21 years who received alloHCT for ALL or AML from 2004-2013 with comprehensive CIBMTR data at a PHIS reporting hospital. The primary outcomes of overall survival (OS), leukemia free survival (LFS), and inpatient resource utilization were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards, and unadjusted Poisson regression analysis. Cost and resource comparisons for all donor types were made through day+100 and focused on URD only comparisons up to 2-year follow-up. Donor procurement costs were not directly included in this analysis. A total of 797 patients (54% of CIBMTR eligible patients and 89% of CIBMTR patients at PHIS centers) were successfully identified in both CIBMTR and PHIS; 433 had ALL and had 364 AML. LFS for ALL at 3 years was 68% for MSD, 53% for MUD, and 53% for CBT. The LFS in ALL was significantly impacted by donor type, age, disease status, and CMV (Table). The associated total costs were significantly higher for well-matched unrelated bone marrow (MUD) vs MSD at 100d ($246,149 vs $147,547, p AlloHCT for AML had a 3-yr LFS of 56% for MSD, 46% for MUD, and 41% for CBT. LFS were significantly different by disease status and performance status (Table). The associated total costs were significantly higher for MUD at 100d than MSD ($259,293 vs $143,870, p This study recapitulates previously published outcomes of alloHCT for acute leukemia AND adds key findings on the impact of alloHCT on inpatient resource utilization and costs. Specifically, MSD and MUD alloHCT provide similar survival outcomes; however, MSD alloHCT has a significant advantage in cost and resource utilization for both ALL and AML. Among URD transplants, CBT does not show any substantial survival or resource utilization advantage over MUD. Ongoing research will need to be performed to determine if the difference among URD alloHCT becomes significant with a larger sample size and/or beyond the 2 years following alloHCT. Table Table. Disclosures Pulsipher: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Study Steering Committee; Jazz Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Medac: Other: Housing support for conference; Chimerix: Consultancy. Hahn:Novartis: Equity Ownership; NIH: Research Funding.

Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplant is an intensive procedure, offered in a limited number of medical centres. We sought to describe how sociodemographic variables impacted access to transplant across the United States, and if disadvantaged populations had inferior access to transplant. Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) was integrated to determine the rate of unrelated donor transplantation between 2000 and 2010 in each of the 612 counties included in the SEER registry. Patients under the age of 65 with AML, ALL, and MDS were included, and the analysis was restricted to unrelated donors due to limited availability of ZIP code in CIBMTR data. New incident cases were determined from SEER, and the number of transplants was determined from CIBMTR. The transplant rate was calculated (transplants performed divided by incident cases) for each county. County attributes (percent minority, rural/urban status, percentage below the poverty line, and median family size) were obtained from US Census data. Poisson regression was used to describe how county attributes impacted transplant rates. Transplant rates were calculated separately for AML, White residents, and pediatric ALL. Results: 3147 patients were identified in the CIBMTR dataset that met inclusion criteria. The estimated ZIP code completeness was 75%. There were 30,468 new incident diagnoses of ALL, AML, and MDS. For AML, patients from rural areas (less than 20,000 residents) and patients from areas with higher poverty levels had lower transplant rates (Table 1). Minority status and family size did not impact transplant rate. In regression models, higher levels of poverty remained associated with lower transplant rates, while rurality did not (Table 2). The results were similar among White residents. In contrast, in pediatric ALL, no county attributes (poverty, rurality, percent minority, and family size) were significantly associated with a difference in transplant rate (Table 1). However, numbers of transplants were smaller, limiting power. Discussion: Patients with AML from disadvantaged areas had lower rates of unrelated donor transplant. While patients from disadvantaged areas were also more likely to be non-White, and non-White Americans are less likely to have an available unrelated donor, this difference was also seen in White Americans from disadvantaged areas. This suggests the lower transplant rate is due impaired access to transplant. Poverty rate was the most important predictor of transplant rate. The results of this study suggest that improving access to transplant in disadvantaged populations should be a priority for health care administrators. Based on these results, approximately 2500 Americans do not undergo allogeneic transplant annually due to inferior access associated with higher poverty rates. Table 1 Univariate Analysis Table 1. Univariate Analysis Table 2 Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Regression Model * Metropolitan = county > 50,000 people, micropolitan = county > 20,000, rural county < 20,000. Table 2. Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Regression Model. / * Metropolitan = county > 50,000 people, micropolitan = county > 20,000, rural county < 20,000. Disclosures Hahn: Novartis: Equity Ownership; NIH: Research Funding.

Introduction: Current advances in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) may warrant a paradigm shift in managing children with sickle cell disease (SCD). This study characterizes the clinical outcomes and health care utilization (HCU) of alloHCT for pediatric SCD. We hypothesize that early alloHCT will have improved clinical outcomes, and decreased HCU. Methods: The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database was used to identify children 21 years or less with alloHCT for SCD in the United States. Patient data included comprehensive research forms (CRF) from 2000-13 and transplant essential data (TED) forms from 2000-11. CRFs provided clinical risk factors associated with overall survival, graft failure, grade III-IV acute GVHD, and GVHD related event free survival (GREFS) - the survival free of graft failure, chronic GVHD, or death. Risk factors included age, gender, performance status, year of alloHCT, prior SCD complications and therapy, CMV status, donor type, conditioning regimen, and GVHD prophylaxis. Due to low event rates and sample size, only univariate analysis of risk factors was performed. TED data was merged with Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) inpatient data using a probabilistic merging algorithm to determine risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with HCU. Available PHIS adjusted cost data was used to determine the total adjusted cost for all inpatient admissions per patient per hospital day. To standardize these costs, the total adjusted cost per 30 hospital days was calculated for each patient and used as the primary HCU outcome. HCU outcomes were analyzed for the alloHCT year, day 0 to day +365. Results: CRF data for 161 patients showed an overall survival at 2 years of 90% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 85-95%): 96% (95% CI 89-100%) for related and unrelated cord blood transplant (CBT), 94% (95% CI 86-98%) matched siblings (MSD), and 74% (95% CI 54-90%) matched unrelated donors (MUD, p=0.002). All deaths occurred among children with pre-alloHCT complications of SCD, and deaths were due to organ failure (37.5%), infections (25%), GVHD (6.25%). Risk of death was significantly higher for children ≥10 years old (HR 21, p=0.003) and MUD compared to MSD (HR 5.88, p=0.005) but lower with cyclosporine A (CSA) GVHD prophylaxis versus FK506 (HR 0.33, p=0.031). 75% of deaths occurred before day +42. Cumulative acute GVHD incidence at day 100 was 14% (95% CI 9-20%)and was associated with age ≥10yrs (HR 2.63, p=0.035). Chronic GVHD incidence was 31% (95% CI 23-38%) at 2yrs, and factors associated were age ≥10yrs (HR 1.92, p=0.034), MUD vs MSD (HR 2.53, p=0.017), and CSA vs FK506 prophylaxis (HR 0.48, p=0.018). Chronic GVHD risk increased significantly after 2006 (HR 2.81, p=0.018). The 2yr GREFS was 64% (95% CI 56-71%). Age ≥10yrs (HR 2.2, p=0.005), MUD (vs MSD, HR 3.00, p=0.002) and CSA prophylaxis (vs FK506, HR 0.49, p=0.011) were significantly associated with this outcome. Among the 175 patients with combined TED and PHIS data, the median total adjusted cost was $117,393 per 30 hospital days per patient (range: $36,244-$515,640) during the alloHCT year with a median of 53 hospital days per patient (range: 16-304). Age ≥10yrs and HCU were not significantly associated (p=0.775). MSD had the lowest HCU compared to CBT and unrelated transplants (p Conclusions: AlloHCT outcomes in children with SCD were linked to age and donor type suggesting that early alloHCT before age 10 years is preferred. Specifically, SCD severity and MUD alloHCT are associated with poorer outcomes and increased HCU. This supports the recommendation of early alloHCT, prior to onset of SCD complications, for children with SCD and an available MSD. Donor source and type had a significant impact on both outcomes and HCU. CBT outcomes were similar to MSD bone marrow; yet CBT had higher HCU suggesting additional analysis is needed to determine if the clinical benefit outweighs the cost. Further analysis is also needed to better understand and mitigate risk factors associated with poor outcomes and increased HCU following MUD alloHCT. Disclosures Arnold: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program: Other: award. Hahn:NIH/NHLBI: Research Funding; Novartis: Equity Ownership.

Introduction: Depression is associated with increased mortality among healthy individuals and patients with various medical conditions including cardiovascular disease and cancer. The impact of an existing diagnosis of depression prior to autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) on clinical outcomes including overall survival has not been studied. Methods: We analyzed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry to compare overall survival and hospital-length-of-stay during the first 100 days after autologous (n= 3786) or allogeneic (n = 7433) HCT for adult (≥ 18 years) patients with hematologic malignancies with an existing diagnosis of pre-transplant depression requiring treatment vs. those without pre-transplant depression. Data regarding an existing diagnosis of pre-transplant depression requiring treatment were collected from medical chart reviews and reported to the CIBMTR. Data for autologous and allogeneic HCT were analyzed separately. Using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for patient-, disease-(including the disease risk index for allogeneic HCT), donor-(for allogeneic HCT), and transplant-related variables, we compared overall survival between patients with or without pre-transplant depression. To account for early deaths, we compared the number of days alive and out of the hospital in the first 100 days post-transplantation using Poisson models adjusting for patient-, disease-, and transplant-related variables. Among patients undergoing allogeneic HCT, we also compared the risk of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD among patients with or without pre-transplant depression using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses controlling for significant confounders. Results: We included 1116 (15%) patients with pre-transplant depression and 6317 (85%) patients without pre-transplant depression who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2008 and 2012. Patients with pre-transplant depression were similar to those without pre-transplant depression with regards to age, disease distribution, disease risk index, time from diagnosis to transplant, conditioning regimen, receipt of total body irradiation, graft type, donor type, and donor source, but they were more likely to be female, white, divorced, less educated, not working full-time, and had lower performance status and higher number of comorbid conditions. In multivariable analyses, pre-transplant depression was associated with higher overall mortality (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.23, p = 0.004) and higher risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.14-1.37, p < 0.0001), but similar risk of chronic GVHD (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.96-1.16, p = 0.26). Pre-transplant depression was associated with fewer days alive and out-of-the hospital (Means Ratio (MR) = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, P = 0.004). Among patients undergoing autologous HCT, we included 512 (13.5%) patients with pre-transplant depression and 3274 (86.5%) patients without pre-transplant depression between 2007 and 2012. Patients with pre-transplant depression were similar to those without pre-transplant depression with regards to disease distribution, disease status prior to HCT, time from diagnosis to transplant, conditioning regimen, and year of transplant, but they were slightly younger, more likely be to female, white, divorced, less educated, not working full-time, and had lower performance status and higher number of comorbid conditions. Pre-transplant depression in autologous HCT recipients was not associated with overall survival in multivariable analyses (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.98-1.34, p = 0.096), but was significantly associated with fewer days alive and out of the hospital (MR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Pre-transplant depression was associated with higher mortality and higher risk of acute GVHD among patients undergoing allogeneic HCT. Moreover, pre-transplant depression is associated with a longer hospital-length-of stay during the first 100 days after autologous and allogeneic HCT. Therefore patients with pre-transplant depression represent a highly vulnerable population at risk for post-transplant mortality and complications, and they may benefit from more intensive interventions to mitigate the risk of depression on their post-transplant outcomes. Disclosures Chen: Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lee:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy. Hahn:Novartis: Equity Ownership; NIH/NHLBI: Research Funding.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially life-saving treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). About one-third of patients have a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched related donor (MRD), while the remaining two-thirds have either a fully HLA-matched (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 [8/8]) unrelated donor (MUD) or a MUD with a single HLA mismatch (7/8). Previous analyses by the CIBMTR have shown that MRD and MUD transplants produce similar survival outcomes for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (Blood 2012; 119(17):3908-16), while donor source was an important predictor of outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (Blood 2013; 122(11):1974-82). Given that ALL represents the second most common indication for HCT, and recognizing the disease-specific nature of the impact of donor source on post-HCT outcomes previously described, we performed an analysis of outcomes after MRD versus MUD HCT in 1458 patients with ALL who underwent allogeneic HCT from 2000-2011 (MRD n=440, 8/8 MUD n=729, 7/8 MUD n=289). Median age was 37 years (18-69). Thirty-four percent were Philadelphia chromosome positive.Ten percent received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). Twenty-three percent were transplanted in second complete remission (CR2).Seventy-four percent received peripheral blood stem cells. At 100 days post-HCT, the incidence of acute GVHD Grade B-D was significantly lower in MRD recipients than in 8/8 MUD or 7/8 MUD recipients (26%, 45%, 50%, respectively; p24 months post-HCT) (HR=2.13, p=0.003) compared to bone marrow transplants. Compared to MRD, 8/8 MUD recipients had superior relapse rates (HR 0.77, p=0.02), while 7/8 MUD recipients had no difference (HR 0.75, p=0.05). There were no differences in leukemia-free survival (LFS) comparing 8/8 MUD recipients (HR 0.95, p=0.55) and 7/8 MUD recipients (HR 1.20, p=0.07) to MRD recipients (Table 2, Figure 1).Differences in survival were likely due to higher rates of acute GVHD and TRM in the 7/8 MUD group. We conclude that MRD and 8/8 MUD recipients have similar survival outcomes post-HCT, while 7/8 MUD recipients suffer inferior survival, demonstrating that donor source plays a large role in the quality of outcomes. While MRD remains the ideal donor source due to its lower incidence of acute GVHD,HCT from an 8/8 MUD is a good alternative to MRD transplant, given its comparable long-term survival outcomes. Figure 1. 100-day Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHD; 5-year Cumulative Incidence of chronic GVHD, relapse, and TRM; 5-year Probabilities of LFS and OS in Adult ALL Patients Receiving MRD, 8/8 MUD, or 7/8 MUD HCT from 2000-2011 *Overall point-wise comparison † Point-wise pair-wise comparison Figure 1. 100-day Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHD; 5-year Cumulative Incidence of chronic GVHD, relapse, and TRM; 5-year Probabilities of LFS and OS in Adult ALL Patients Receiving MRD, 8/8 MUD, or 7/8 MUD HCT from 2000-2011 *Overall point-wise comparison † Point-wise pair-wise comparison Figure 2. Multivariate Analysis for Relapse, TRM, Treatment Failure (Inverse of LFS), and All-Cause Mortality (Inverse of Overall Survival) in Adult ALL Patients Receiving MRD, 8/8 MUD, or 7/8 MUD HCT from 2000-2011. Figure 2. Multivariate Analysis for Relapse, TRM, Treatment Failure (Inverse of LFS), and All-Cause Mortality (Inverse of Overall Survival) in Adult ALL Patients Receiving MRD, 8/8 MUD, or 7/8 MUD HCT from 2000-2011. Figure 3. Adjusted Overall Survival Estimatesfor Adult ALL Patients Receiving MRD, 8/8 MUD, or 7/8 MUD HCT Figure 3. Adjusted Overall Survival Estimatesfor Adult ALL Patients Receiving MRD, 8/8 MUD, or 7/8 MUD HCT Disclosures Sandmaier: Gilliad: Honoraria; ArevaMed: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Abmit: Research Funding; Bellicum: Research Funding.

Background: The association of clinical trial participation with outcomes in cancer patients is controversial, with some studies reporting better outcomes for trial participants while others do not. It is possible that the difference in outcomes is due to differences in baseline characteristics of participants and non-participants. The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 0201 trial was a large randomized, multi-center study comparing peripheral blood (PB) with bone marrow (BM) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-matched or 1 allele mismatched unrelated donors (URD) in patients with acute leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. The trial reported no significant survival differences between PB and BM; there was decreased risk of graft failure but increased risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with PB grafts (Anasetti et al NEJM 2012). Methods: We compared characteristics of BMT CTN 0201 study participants (n=494) with HCT recipients who did not participate on the trial (n=1384) but were potentially eligible by virtue of known characteristics. These patients received similar conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis as trial participants at 38 United States trial centers during the study time-period. Centers that had no eligible non-trial participants were excluded. Outcomes between patients on and off trial were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Data were obtained from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) that collects patient data on all trial and non-trial allogeneic HCT recipients through its registry function. Results: Approximately 29% [494/1878] of apparently eligible patients were randomized and analyzed as part of the trial. There were no significant differences between study participants and non-participants in age or sex distribution, disease types, HLA or sex matching, comorbidities, or interval from diagnosis to HCT. Higher proportions of non-participants were Hispanic, had a lower performance status and lower disease risk, and received myeloablative conditioning and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or Campath than the study participants. PB was used more commonly as the graft source in the non-participants as compared to the study participants (65% vs. 50%, p Conclusion: Approximately 29% of patients who appeared eligible and were treated with conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens allowed on the trial were enrolled. Despite some differences in clinical characteristics, most of the outcomes of non-trial participants were comparable to trial participants, suggesting that there is no definitive evidence that the outcomes of patients in a clinical trial are superior to those of the non-participants treated in a similar fashion. The comparable outcomes also indicate that the results of this trial were not seriously affected by selection bias and are therefore representative of the larger population. Figure 1: Adjusted overall survival in BMT CTN 0201 trial participants and non-participants Figure 1:. Adjusted overall survival in BMT CTN 0201 trial participants and non-participants Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the bone is a painful and debilitating complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) that is associated with significant morbidity and often requires surgery. Risk factors for its development in pediatric allogeneic HCT recipients are not well described. To assess risk factors for AVN in children and adolescents following allogeneic HCT, we conducted a nested case-control study with a matched cohort of 638 patients reported to the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research who were ≤ 21 years of age, received their first allogeneic transplant between 1990 to 2008 in the United States and had survived ≥ 6 months from HCT. Overall, 160 cases with AVN were identified. Each case was matched with up to 3 controls by same year of HCT, similar length of follow-up and by transplant center (478 controls). Cases and controls were confirmed via central review of radiology, pathology and/or surgical procedure reports. The median age for cases was 15 (range 2-21) years, 49% were male, 65% had acute leukemia, 65% had received high-dose total body irradiation (TBI) based conditioning regimen, and 65% had received unrelated donor HCT. Among cases, 18% had a history of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) while 56% had a history of chronic GVHD prior to development of AVN. Median time from HCT to diagnosis of AVN was 14 (range Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer have not experienced survival improvements over time to the same extent as younger and older patients. Studies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have identified differences in chemotherapy treatment approaches, adherence and possibly outcomes for AYAs treated in pediatric vs. adult settings. To determine if these same issues are operative in ALL patients treated with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), we compared outcomes among 2730 patients including 1008 children ( 40 years) receiving myeloablative allogeneic HCT for ALL at US centers over three time periods (1990-1995, 1996-2001, and 2002-2007). All patients were in first or second complete remission at HCT; Ph+ patients were included; umbilical cord blood transplant recipients were excluded. The proportions of patients receiving peripheral blood transplants and receiving HCT using well-matched unrelated donors increased over time in all three age groups. From 1996-2001 to 2002-2007, transplant volume increased by 7% in children, 50% in AYAs, and 180% in older adults. Our analysis demonstrated that 5-year overall survival varied inversely with age group, but survival for AYAs over time improved at rates comparable to survival in children (Figure). Multivariate analyses adjusting for important patient and disease characteristics confirmed that older age was associated with poorer survival (hazard ratio 2.2 for older adults and 1.7 for AYA vs. children, P Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 591 Background: Survival of patients with MM has improved over the past two decades, in part due to the use of AHCT. Increasingly, second primary malignancies (SPMs) are observed in MM survivors. Determining the baseline incidence and risk factors associated with SPMs after AHCT is important to assess risk and to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of newer therapies. Methods: We analyzed the incidence of SPMs in 3784 MM patients receiving (“upfront”) AHCT for MM within 18 months of diagnosis between 1990 and 2010 and reported to the CIBMTR. Cumulative incidence rates of SPMs were estimated taking into account the competing risk of death. For each transplant recipient, the number of person-years at risk was calculated from the date of transplantation until date of last contact, death, or diagnosis of SPM, whichever occurred first. Incidence rates for all invasive cancers in the general population were obtained from the SEER database. Age-, sex-, and race- specific incidence rates for overall SPMs and particular anatomical sites were applied to the appropriate person-years at risk to compute the expected numbers of cancers. Observed–to –expected (O/E) ratios were calculated, and Poisson distribution 99% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated. Poisson regression model was used to analyze risk factors for overall SPMs and AML/MDS. Results: Pre-transplant therapy included novel agents in 56% including thalidomide (35%), lenalidomide (9%), bortezomib (16%) or their combinations (11%). Majority (80%) received high dose melphalan conditioning. Post-transplant maintenance therapy included thalidomide (16%), lenalidomide (8%), bortezomib (9%) and interferon (6%). Median follow-up of survivors was 52 months (range 3 to 192 months).With 12707 person years of follow up, 153 new malignancies were reported with a crude rate of 1.2 SPM per 100 person years of follow up. Observed/Expected [O/E] ratio for all SPMs was 0.99 (99% CI, 0.80–1.22). Cumulative incidence of SPM overall was 2.48% (95% CI, 1.96–3.05) at 3 years and 6.0% (95% CI, 4.96–7.10) at 7 years [Figure 1]. Individual SPMs observed significantly more frequently than expected are summarized in Table 1. The cumulative incidence of MDS/AML was 0.5% (95% CI, 0.28–0.78) at 3 years and 1.3 (95% CI, 0.85– 1.9%) at 7 years. Majority had MM progression prior to diagnosis of SPM (65 of 102 patients overall and 15 of 23 patients for MDS/AML). In multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for development of SPMs included: obesity [Hazard ratio = HR 1.89(95%CI, 1.21–2.93), p=0.0047 for BMI>30 vs. BMI The low number of MDS/AML (33 events out of 3784 cases) limited the power of multivariate analysis. Increasing age was significantly associated with development of MDS (HR10.77, (95%CI,92.09–55.51), p=0.004 for 70+ year old vs. 40–49 year olds). Conclusion: In this large cohort of AHCT recipients for MM, the incidence of MDS/AML, melanoma and other skin cancers was significantly higher compared to age and sex matched general population. However the overall risk of SPM was similar to that expected for age and sex matched population. It was also similar to the placebo arms of recent reports by McCarthy Pl et al and Attal M et al (N Engl J Med. 10; 366(19):1770–91). Lenalidomide (8%) or thalidomide maintenance (16%) used in a small subset of patients with comparatively short follow up, was not associated with risk of SPM in the analysis of the overall cohort. Disclosures: Gale: Celgene: Employment. Brandenburg:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, BMS, Onyx, Merck all Consultancy. Krishnan:Celgene and Millennium: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Dispenzieri:Celgene and Millennium: Research Funding. Hari:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.