Search

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major obstacle to successful bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from matched unrelated donor (MUD). Currently available HLA-A, -B, and -DR serologic testing may not be sensitive enough to detect clinically relevant donor/recipient (D/R) nonidentity. Better HLA matching of D/R pairs using molecular typing for class II antigens in combination with intensive GVHD prophylaxis may potentially reduce the incidence of GVHD and lead to an improved outcome of MUD transplantation. Between July 1991 and August 1993, thirty consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies underwent MUD transplantation from donors who were identical for HLA -A, -B, and -DR by serologic typing. Twenty-five D/R pairs were matched for DRB and DQB by molecular typing (restriction fragment-length polymorphism and sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe hybridization analyses), whereas five were allele mismatched at either DRB or DQB. All patients also received GVHD prophylaxis with the combination of cyclosporine (CSA), methotrexate (MTX), and prednisone (PSE). The median age was 35 years (range, 15 to 50). The diagnoses were: chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) (16), CML in more than CP (3), acute leukemia in more than first complete remission (CR) (8), acute leukemia in first CR (1), and advanced high-grade lymphoma (2). The preparative regimen consisted of 1,320 cGy fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) and 60 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (CY) daily for 2 days in 17 good-risk patients (CML/CP and acute leukemia first CR); and 1,320 cGy FTBI in combination with 60 mg/kg etoposide and 20 to 60 mg/kg CY in 13 patients with advanced leukemia and lymphoma. All patients received CSA, PSE, and MTX on days 1, 3, 6 for GVHD prophylaxis, and 10 patients also received day +11 MTX. All patients engrafted except one who died early of regimen-related toxicity. The incidence of grade III or IV acute GVHD was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 44%) and that of extensive chronic GVHD was 65% (95% CI, 43% to 84%). At a median follow-up of 13.6 months, 57% of the patients are alive in remission with a median Karnofsky performance status of 90%. The cumulative probability of 2-year disease-free survival for all patients was 53% (95%) CI, 33% to 71%); for good-risk patients, 71% (95% CI, 46% to 87%) and for the poor-risk group, 34% (95% CI, 13% to 64%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Abstract 606 Background: alloHCT is offered with curative intent to patients with hematologic malignancies, and conventionally-computed survival estimates are offered for prognosticating outcomes. However, conventionally-computed survival estimates do not take into account elapsed time (and changing hazards with time survived); conditional survival overcomes these limitations, by calculating the probability of survival after having already survived a certain period of time – such data are unavailable for alloHCT recipients. We describe cause-specific (relapse-, GvHD-, treatment-related) conditional survival after alloHCT, providing clinically relevant information for patients who have survived 6 mos, 1, 2, and 5y after alloHCT. Methods: From 1976 to 2006, 2,427 consecutive patients received alloHCT for a hematologic malignancy at a single institution (median age: 34.7y [0.6–72.5]). Vital status and cause of death were determined using National Death Index, Social Security Death Index and medical records. Results: As of 12/31/2007, a total of 1413 deaths (58% of the cohort) were observed; 39% attributed to recurrent disease; 34% to GvHD; 12% to infection; 5% to cardiopulmonary disease; 2% to subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMNs); and 8% to other causes. Conventionally-computed probability of survival was 44.6% at 5y and 41.2% at 10y from alloHCT. On the other hand, conditional on survival for 6 mo, 1, 2, and 5y after alloHCT, 5-y survival rates were 62%, 75%, 83%, and 93%, respectively (Figure A). The cohort was at a 40-fold increased risk of any death compared with the general population (95%CI=38.2–42.4); at a 25.6-fold increased risk of death due to pulmonary complications, 3.3-fold risk due to SMNs, and 2.3-fold risk due to cardiovascular complications. Among patients followed for 15+y after HCT, the risk of all-cause mortality was 2.6-fold that of the general population (95%CI=1.8–3.7). Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and cause-specific conditional mortality rates by primary diagnosis are summarized in the Table. Individuals who survived the first 5y had negligible (≤5%) risk of relapse- and GvHD-related mortality over the subsequent 5y. Treatment-related mortality increased over time; among those who survived 5y, treatment-related mortality rates exceeded relapse-related mortality (Figure B). After adjustment for demographics, underlying diagnosis and treatment era, individuals with chronic GVHD (cGVHD) had a significantly lower risk of relapse-related mortality (RR=0.43, 95%CI=0.4–0.5) compared to those without cGVHD. Conclusions: The projected 5-y survival rates improve conditional on time survived from alloHCT; 5-y survival exceeds 93% for those who have already survived 5y. However, alloHCT recipients who have survived 15+y continue to remain at increased risk of death compared to the general population. cGVHD is associated with decreased risk of relapse-related mortality. Both relapse-related and GvHD-related mortality rates decline with time, such that, among those who have survived 5y, treatment-related mortality exceeds relapse-related mortality. Conditional survival estimates provide clinically relevant prognostic information, helping inform preventive and interventional strategies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 2399 The quality and depth of response particularly achievement of complete remission (CR) have been associated with significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant. Achievement of CR is considered a valid surrogate endpoint for survival in clinical trials for patients with multiple myeloma. We performed a phase II study investigating the role of sequential bortezomib/dexamethasone followed by thalidomide/dexamethasone as maintenance therapy post single autologous PSCT. The objectives were to examine the feasibility, toxicities, CR, PFS and overall survival rates. Within 4–8 weeks of autologous PSCT using melphalan 200mg/m2, pts received weekly bortezomib (bor) at 1.3mg/m2 /wk × 3 weeks with 1 week rest and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/d × 4 d for 6 months, followed by thalidomide (thal) at 50 –200mg/d and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/dx4 d for 6 more months. Single agent thalidomide was then continued until disease progression. Between March 2008 and June 2010, forty-five pts were enrolled. Median age was 54 years (29-71). Median time from diagnosis was 6.1 mo. (3.5 – 145.9). Disease stage at diagnosis; by Salmon-Durie (I/II/III 2/8/34/1 not available) and by ISS (I/II/III 18/14/8/ 5 not available). Pts received prior induction treatment with thal/dex (15), bortezomib based (27) and lenalidomide based regimens (10). Median B2M at enrollment was 1.8 mg/L (1.05 -5.3). Disease status at enrollment included complete remission (CR) (11), very good partial response (VGPR) (11), partial response (PR) (23). Six pts had chromosome 13 abnormalities (1 pt by karyotype and 5 pts by FISH), 2 pts had t 4;14 (one with concurrent ch 17 p del) and 3 pts had complex cytogenetic abnormalities. Results: Forty-five pts have been enrolled and undergone transplant. Five pts were unable to start planned maintenance therapy due to development of grade II or more neuro toxicities (4), and persistent thrombocytopenia (1) after PSCT. Thirty nine pts started maintenance bor/dex within 4–8 weeks of PSCT. One pt is too early for maintenance therapy. Twenty-five pts have completed the planned 6 months of bor/dex. Ten pts stopped bor/dex because of low WBC (2), PN (4), diagnosis of adrenal cancer (1), myocardial infarction (MI) (1), and relapse (2). Six pts are still receiving maintenance bortezomib. With a median F/U of 8.5 mo. (0.2 -24.0) twelve of 44 evaluable pts (27%) have achieved CR post PSCT and 17 of 33 evaluable pts (51%) have achieved CR after bor/dex on an intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Fifteen of 25 pts (60%) who have completed 6 months of bor/dex have achieved CR. Nine of 25 pts (36%) have upgraded their response with bor/dex. Eight pts (24%) could not complete bortezomib due to toxicities. At one year post PSCT fourteen of 28 evaluable pts (50%) remain in CR. Six pts have relapsed of whom 2 died of relapsed myeloma (leptomeningeal disease 1 pt). One pt experienced MI while receiving bortezomib (grade IV). Grade III toxicities have occurred in 17 pts; low platelet (1), asthenia (2), mood alteration (1), GI (severe constipation due to partial bowel obstruction on thalidomide) (1), skin rash (1), hyperglycemia (1), lymphopenia (10), sinus bradycardia (1), elevated triglyceride (1), DVT (1), low phosphate (3), leukopenia (1), edema (1). Sixteen pts had peripheral neuropathy (PN) grade I prior to start of bortezomib. Only 8 pts have developed new PN on the study and all are grade I-II. No patient has experienced grade III-IV PN. Median bortezomib dose is 1.3 mg /m2 per week. Conclusion: Prolonged weekly bortezomib maintenance therapy is well tolerated and can upgrade response post single autologous PSCT with no severe peripheral neuropathy. Fifty one percent of pts have achieved CR and 36% have upgraded their response after six months of bortezomib/dexamethasone therapy suggesting this is an active maintenance strategy post PSCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia has a poor prognosis in adults, with a two-year survival rate of 35–40% despite aggressive therapy (American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2008 Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2008). Reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) relies mainly on graft versus leukemia (GVL) for its efficacy; however, the role of GVL in ALL is less well-defined. Between 5/7/02 and 6/15/07, 25 adult ALL patients were uniformly treated with fludarabine 25mg/m2 daily for 5 days and melphalan 140mg/m2 followed by ALLO-SCT using peripheral blood stem cells. The indications for the reduced intensity regimen were: ≥ 50 years (10 pts) (40%), decreased organ function (9 pts) (36%) and previous ALLO-SCT (6 pts) (24%). Patient demographics include: median age, 47 years (range, 23–68 yrs.), remission status at ALLO-SCT: first complete remission (CR) (12 pts) (48%), first relapse (3 pts) (12%), second CR (5 pts) (20%), >second CR (4 pts) (16%), induction failure (one pt) (4%), t(9;22) or Philadelphia positive (Ph+) ALL(9 pts) (36%). Donor source was matched sibling in 9 pts (36%), and matched unrelated in 16 pts (64%). Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis: was cyclosporine (CSA)/+ mycophenylate (MMF) (3 pts) (12%), CSA/MMF/methotrexate (MTX) (8 pts) (32%), CSA/MMF/ATG (one pt) (4%), tacrolimus/sirolimus (7 pts) (28%) and tacrolimus/sirolimus/MTX (6 pts) (24%). With a median follow-up for surviving patients of 28.5 months (range: 12.8–72.5 months), the two year cumulative probability of overall survival and disease-free survival were both 59% (95% CI: 46–69.2%). The relapse rate was 16% (95% CI: 6.4,–37.4%),. Incidence of acute GVHD was 60% for grade II–IV and 20% for grade III–IV. Of the patients at risk for chronic GVHD, 8% developed limited chronic GVHD and 60% developed extensive chronic GVHD. The 100-day, one year and two year non-relapse mortality rates were 12% (CI: 4.6–29.3%), 24.2% (CI: 14–39.9%) and 29.3% (CI: 18.4–44.6%), respectively. There was no difference in survival outcomes based on donor source. The results of this study show that reduced intensity ALLO-SCT using fludarabine/melphalan based conditioning with primed peripheral stem cells from a matched related or unrelated donor provides a curative option for patients with high risk ALL who are not eligible for full intensity transplant. Figure Figure

Despite improvement in the proportion of patients achieving durable remission with dose intensive consolidation strategies, leukemic relapse still occurs in 40–70% of patients who achieve an initial remission. Studies utilizing ASCT for AML in CR1 have reported relapse free survival between 34–80% based on cytogenetic risk stratification. We report a 15 year experience of ASCT following high dose cytarabine (Ara-C) ± idarubicin (IDA) consolidation in 168 patients (intent to transplant, ITT) in CR1 treated between 3/89 and 6/03. The treatment consisted of a): consolidation with high dose Ara-C ± IDA followed by marrow (M) harvest (n=64) or collection of G-CSF primed stem cells (PSCs) (n=73), b) ASCT using FTBI 12Gy, Etoposide 60mg/kg, Cytoxan 75mg/kg (n=97) or Busulfan targeted to 1st dose AUC 700–900, FTBI 1200Gy and Etoposide 30mg/kg (n=40), and c) IL-2 9x106 IU/m2/24 hrs days 1–4 and IL-2 1.6 x 106 IU/m2/24 hrs days 9–18 beginning at hematologic recovery post ASCT (from 1995-present). Patient characteristics at ITT were median age 40.8 yr. (16.3–60.9); cytogenetics (SWOG criteria) favorable = 42(25%) (including 11 M3 pre 1993), intermediate=70(42%), unfavorable=16(10%), indeterminate and unknown=40(23%); WBC

We report a retrospective comparison of peripheral blood (PBSC) versus bone marrow derived stem cells for allogeneic transplant in a cohort of similarly treated patients based on eight year data from a single institution. Over the period 1995 to 2003, a total of 151 patients with AML or ALL in first CR underwent allogeneic matched sibling donor transplant, 98 AML patients and 53 with ALL. The source of stem cells was bone marrow in 69, G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 82. Of the AML patients, 40 (58%) received marrow, 58 (71%) received PBSC. Of the ALL patients, 29 (42%) received marrow, 24 (29%) got PBSC. The age of patients receiving marrow was 32.7 ± 13.6, and for those getting PBSC was 36.1 ± 16.1. The conditioning regimen was fully ablative (TBI/VP-16) in all but five patients (Fludarabine/Melphalan in 1 marrow and 4 PBSC pts). GVHD prophylaxis was with cyclosporine/methotrexate in patients receiving ablative conditioning, and CSP/MMF in the flu/mel patients. The time to achieving an ANC >1000 was significantly shorter (P value=.0001) in the PBSC group, 18.2 ±6.6 days vs. 27.2 ±48.7 in the marrow group. Time to achieving a platelet count greater than 25K was significantly shorter (P value=2x10−11) for the PBSC group, 20.9 ± 8.5 vs. 31.8 ± 11.2 for marrow. This was true as well for time to reach platelet counts greater than 100K (P value=10−8), 29.7 ± 28 days for PBSC, 55.8 ±55.6 for marrow. In fact there was a significant increase (P=.0001) in the number of patients, 29 (42%) of marrow recipients vs 11 (13%) of PBSC, who did not at any time achieve a platelet count of >100K. There was no significant difference in survival at 2 years or 4 years between marrow or PBSC-Kaplan-Meier survival probability at 2 and 4 years respectively for AML was.66 and.54 for marrow, and.67 and.54 for PBSC. In ALL, the 2 and 4 year K-M survival probability was.72 and.65 for marrow;.69 and.69 for PBSC recipients. There was no significant difference in acute GVHD, with grade I-II described in 19 (28%) of the marrow pts, 29 (35%) in the PBSC pts, and grade II-IV in 8 (12%) marrow pts and 11 (13%) receiving PBSC (p value =.57), or chronic GVHD (P value=.62). Interestingly, in a subset analysis of patients who were diagnosed with acute GVHD, there was a significant difference in disease free survival at 5 years (see graph), suggesting that there is a qualitative difference between acute GVHD observed as a result of bone marrow versus PBSC as a source of stem cells. Figure Figure

In a phase I/II study, 47 patients (median age, 24 years) with hematologic malignancies (33 patients with acute leukemia not in first remission and 14 patients with other advanced malignant hematologic disorders) were treated with total body irradiation and high doses of etoposide (VP16–213) followed by bone marrow transplantation. At the time of analysis, 21 patients were alive, and 19 of them were in continued complete remission for 101 days to greater than 40 months (median, 12 months). The actuarial disease-free survival rate of the 33 acute leukemia patients is 43% (2 SEM, 18%) and the actuarial relapse rate is 32% (2 SEM, 20%). Five of the 14 patients with the other hematologic malignancies are alive, and four of them continue to be free of disease for 8 to 27 months. Pharmacokinetic studies established a strong correlation between the administered drug doses and their plasma levels and also demonstrated complete drug clearance prior to marrow grafting. An etoposide dose of 60 mg/kg body weight was found to be the maximum tolerated dose. This new preparatory regimen was well tolerated and was not associated with specific acute or long-term regimen-related toxicities. Our data suggest that total body irradiation with high-dose etoposide presents a viable alternative to other preparatory regimens. The role of this novel combination remains to be defined by future prospective randomized trials.

We report the treatment outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in ten patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Six patients are alive and well for 6 to 30 months (median 19 months) after transplantation. Four patients died with transplant related complications. In view of the poor prognosis associated with this disease, marrow ablation followed by allogeneic or syngeneic marrow grafting may be the preferred treatment modality if a suitable marrow donor is available.