Search

The project aims to develop and implement a computerized interactive assistance system for the diagnosis and treatment of CML / MPN and MDS. The system is based on modulated, established medical guidelines with reference to the individual patient information. The user is navigated through the complex recommendations of current guidelines and decision trees of the CML/MPN and MDS, similarly to a car navigation system. The system was developed in cooperation between the Steinbeis Institute for Clinical haematooncology and the Fraunhofer IOSB in Karlsruhe. In addition to the guidelines, recommendations on current evidence-based research results will be incorporated into the expert system. The medical user is hereby offered a systematic decision support. In addition, the decisions are documented and visualized in an intuitive user interface. The expert system is also able to point to currently recruiting therapy studies. The future system is planned to be self-learning by weighing the decision criteria. It will adjust the decision criteria by increasing usage and possibly readjusted criteria. Technical implementation and advantages of this solution: From a technical perspective, the knowledge-based system should be implemented as a client-server architecture. The server acts as a central data storage, for example, in the form of a database. As a client, for example, Internet browsers can be used. So it is possible to centrally reproach the accumulated knowledge and to present the current results to each user. The advantage of such a technical solution compared to guidelines-books is rapidly adaptable knowledge on new research results, as well as the implementation of a self-learning system. The system design has to pay particular attention to an intuitive user interface. On the server's side, the knowledge of guidelines and interviews with experts have to be formalized in an appropriate manner. There are approaches based on an ontological or logic-based modeling. On the client's, side the system suggests the user appropriate decision for the diagnosis and further treatment of diseases. The underlying methodology is based on approaches from artificial intelligence, such as the Bayesian inference or machine learning methods. Disclosures Hempel: Novartis and Celgene: Research Funding.

131 Introduction. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after cytoreductive induction is considered standard of care for younger patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). The previous standard of induction, the Vincristin-Adriamycin-Dexamethasone (VAD) combination, achieves inferior results compared with induction regimens which combine the proteasome inhibitor Velcade (V = Bortezomib) with Dexamethasone (D)(=VD) and a cytostatic drug such as Doxorubicin (PAD = VD plus Doxorubicin). Velcade-based induction therapy was shown to translate into better myeloma control after high dose melphalan and to lead to prolonged progression-free survival. In order to find a more efficacious and safer drug combination for induction therapy in MM, we tested the combination of Velcade with Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (VCD). Methods. This trial was designed as an open, prospective, multi-center, uncontrolled, combined phase II/III study. As previously reported (Kropff M et al., Ann Hematol 2009), in the first 30 pts the optimal dose of iv Cyclophosphamide in combination with V and D was defined as 900 mg/m2 on d1. Between 03/2006 and 03/2009 we enrolled an additional 370 pts up to 60 years of age with untreated MM to receive three 3-week cycles of induction treatment with V 1.3 mg/m2 iv d1,4,8,11; D 40 mg/d orally d1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12; and C 900mg/m2 iv d1 before scheduled high dose melphalan and ASCT. The primary endpoint of the study is response rate on day 63 after 3 cycles of VCD according to EBMT and IMWG criteria. Results. Final data from 400 pts from 39 German centers will be presented at the meeting. In the currently evaluable 300 pts (mean age 52.3 years; 1.7% stage I, 21.3% stage II, 77.0% stage III) molecular cytogenetic analysis showed a prevalence of 13q- in 38%, of t[4;14] in 13% and of 17p- in 12% of pts (no changes in 35%). All 300 pts (88.3% of whom completed three cycles) were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Overall response rate (ORR = CR+PR) was 84%, with 10% CR and 74% PR, 5.7% MR, 7.3% NC and 2.3% PD. The negative prognostic impact of 13q- or t[4;14] was abrogated (ORR normal 87.3%, 13q- 83.7%, t[4;14] 90.0%), the unfavorable influence of p53 loss in the 17p- subgroup was still detectable (ORR 69.2%) but this did not reach statistical significance. VGPR rates will be reported at the meeting. Serious adverse events were documented in 78/300 (26.0%) patients. Death rate was remarkably low (1.3%, of which one was not related to the trial medication). 155/300 (52%) of pts experienced grade 3/4 non-serious AEs and of these leucopenia (93/300 pts= 31%), thrombocytopenia (7%), neutropenia (6%), anaemia (5%) were the most frequent events. 80 AEs grade 3 or 4 and 45 SAEs were of infectious origin and occurred in 47/300 pts. 80/130 SAEs (61.5%) were at least possibly related to Velcade. 101/300 pts (34%) developed episodes of peripheral neuropathy. PNP was grade 1 in 62/300 pt (20.7%), grade 2 in 31/300 pt (10.3%) and grade 3 in 7/300 pts (2.3%). Conclusion. This analysis demonstrates that proteasome inhibition by Velcade in combination with Dexamethasone and iv Cyclophosphamide (VCD) is an induction regimen for newly diagnosed MM which is highly effective in a short period of time, has a rather low toxicity profile and is feasible for administration in an outpatient setting. Based on these characteristics, VCD qualifies to become a new standard for MM induction therapy. | Response to VCD | % | |:---------------:| --- | | ORR | 84 | | CR | 10 | | PR | 74 | | MR | 5.7 | | SD | 7.3 | | PD | 2.3 | Table 1: Response to study therapy (intent-to-treat set, according to investigator, n=300) | | Responding patients (≥ PR) | |:-------------------:| -------------------------- | ---- | | n | % | | No FISH abnormality | 69/79 | 87.3 | | 13q- | 72/86 | 83.7 | | t(4;14) | 27/30 | 90 | | 17p- | 18/26 | 69.2 | | Other | 68/77 | 88.3 | Table 2: Response by result of cytogenetic analysis (intent-to-treat set, according to investigator, n=300) Disclosures: Einsele: OrthioBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bortezomib is licensed as monotherapy for use in relapsed/refractory MM and in combination with melphalan/Prednisone in the first-line treatment of MM pts ineligible for HD-MEL and ASCT. . Liebisch: OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Langer: OrthoBiotech: Consultancy. Kropff: OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kroger: OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Ostermann: OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Mugge: OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Wolf: OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Gramatzki: OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Maschmeyer: OrthoBiotech: Travel Grant. Sezer: OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Heidemann: OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Jager: OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Dechow: Celgene: Research Funding. Simon: OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Straka: OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fingerle-Rowson: orthoBiotech: Employment. Knop: OrthoBiotech: Honoraria.