Search

TPS3167 Background: Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is an emerging target for cancer treatment. MTAP homozygous deletion occurs in 15% of cancers and often coincides with deletion of the tumor suppressor gene CDKN2A, leading to buildup of its substrate MTA. MTA shares close structural similarity to S-adenosyl methionine (SAM), the substrate methyl donor for PRMT5. By competing with SAM, MTA partially inhibits PRMT5. Thus, MTAP-null cancers are susceptible to further PRMT5 inhibition (Kryukov Science 2016). Current direct/indirect PRMT5 inhibitors (PRMT5i) showed preliminary anticancer activity, albeit with considerable toxicities due to their indiscriminate activities. AMG 193 is an MTA-cooperative PRMT5i that preferentially targets the MTA-bound state of PRMT5 that is enriched in MTAP-null tumors and represents a novel strategy to increase the therapeutic margin of this class of inhibitors. AMG 193 potently inhibits MTAP-null cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts. Methods: NCT05094336 is a first-in-human (FIH), multicenter, open-label, phase 1/1b/2 trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of AMG 193 in patients with advanced MTAP-null solid tumors. Eligible patients (≥ 18 years) with histologically confirmed locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors not amenable to curative treatment with surgery and/or radiation, homozygous MTAP and/or CDKN2A deletion (by local next generation sequencing), or MTAP protein loss in tumors (by central immunohistochemistry), measurable disease, ECOG PS 0‒1, adequate hematopoietic, renal, liver, pulmonary, cardiac, coagulation function and glucose control will be included. The study will be conducted in 3 parts, each with subparts. Here, we describe Part 1a/b (dose exploration). Five dose levels are planned. Treatment continues until progression or withdrawal. The primary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of AMG 193 monotherapy; endpoints include dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, electrocardiograms, laboratory abnormalities, and vital signs. Secondary objectives include the characterization of the PK parameters of AMG 193 including Cmax, Tmax, and AUC after single or multiple doses. This study is expected to enroll approximately 30 patients in Part 1a/b. This is the first FIH trial open for enrollment for this new class of PRMT5i and enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05094336.

7032 Background: Blinatumomab (blin), a bispecific T-cell engaging antibody construct, has shown improved overall survival vs SOC in pts with r/r ALL in a randomized phase 3 study ( Haematologica 2016;101:S129). To better evaluate safety, we compared AEs of blin vs SOC after adjusting for varying treatment exposure times. Methods: Adults ≥ 18 yrs with r/r ALL (refractory, 1st relapse < 1 yr, ≥ 2 relapses or relapse after transplant) were randomized to receive blin or SOC (1 of 4 predefined regimens). Blin was dosed by continuous infusion (4 wks on/2 wks off) for up to 5 cycles (9 µg/d on d1−7 in cycle 1, then 28 µg/d); up to 4 maintenance cycles (4 wks on/8 wks off) were allowed for ≤ 12 mo. Exposure-adjusted (exp-adj) event rates were calculated as no. of events*100/total exposure time (Table). Results: Median (range) no. of cycles were 1 (1−4) for SOC and 2 (1−9) for blin. The highest exp-adj rates (per 100 pt-yrs) were for pyrexia (507 SOC vs 376 blin), anemia (987 vs 229), thrombocytopenia (750 vs 126) and neutropenia (351 vs 121), all lower in blin. Febrile neutropenia (365 vs 93) and infections (1216 vs 436) were also both lower in blin (p < 0.0001). Exp-adj rates for neurologic events were 743 SOC vs 472 blin, with median time (range) to onset of 7 (1−43) d and 7 (1−190) d, respectively, and gr ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) rates were 0 SOC vs 10 blin. The most frequent AEs in both cycles 1 and 2 were pyrexia, nausea and anemia in both arms; CRS events decreased in the blin arm between cycles 1 and 2 (14% vs 2%). Most fatal AEs were related to infection in both arms. Conclusions: Here blin showed an AE profile consistent with that previously reported for r/r ALL, including similar rates of manageable CRS and neurologic events. Exp-adj AE rates were generally higher in SOC vs blin, including for cytopenias and infections. Clinical trial information: NCT02013167. [Table: see text]