1. SIRveNIB: Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Versus Sorafenib in Asia-Pacific Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Author
-
Wei Ming Liew, Maung Win Khin, Ho-Seong Han, Pierce K. H. Chow, Ganesh Lekurwale, Yun Won Jong, Boon Koon Yoong, Su Pin Choo, Rolley Rey Lobo, Tjakra Manuaba, Rheun Chuan Lee, Brian K. P. Goh, Mihir Gandhi, Richard Hoau Gong Lo, David Chee Eng Ng, Adam Bartlett, Janus P. Ong, Catherine Teh, Cheng Yuan Peng, Albert S. C. Low, Chiong Soon Law, Kenneth Y.Y. Kok, Yun Hwan Kim, Kiang Hiong Tay, Val Gebski, Khee Chee Soo, Kieron Lim, Ian Homer Y. Cua, Anthony S. W. Goh, Chien Fu Hung, Chanisa Chotipanich, Hyun-Ki Yoon, Si Hyun Bae, Po-Chin Liang, Ariunaa Khasbazar, Aloysius Raj, Peng Chung Cheow, Kenneth Seck Wai Mak, Say Beng Tan, Choon Hua Thng, and Laurentius A. Lesmana
- Subjects
Sorafenib ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Population ,Selective internal radiation therapy ,medicine.disease ,Gastroenterology ,Portal vein thrombosis ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,Hepatocellular carcinoma ,Carcinoma ,Medicine ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,Prospective cohort study ,education ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Purpose Selective internal radiation therapy or radioembolization (RE) shows efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) limited to the liver. This study compared the safety and efficacy of RE and sorafenib in patients with locally advanced HCC. Patients and Methods SIRveNIB (selective internal radiation therapy v sorafenib), an open-label, investigator-initiated, phase III trial, compared yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres RE with sorafenib 800 mg/d in patients with locally advanced HCC in a two-tailed study designed for superiority/detriment. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 and stratified by center and presence of portal vein thrombosis. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses in the treated population. Results A total of 360 patients were randomly assigned (RE, 182; sorafenib, 178) from 11 countries in the Asia-Pacific region. In the RE and sorafenib groups, 28.6% and 9.0%, respectively, failed to receive assigned therapy without significant cross-over to either group. Median OS was 8.8 and 10.0 months with RE and sorafenib, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4; P = .36). A total of 1,468 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported (RE, 437; sorafenib, 1,031). Significantly fewer patients in the RE than sorafenib group had grade ≥ 3 AEs (36 of 130 [27.7%]) v 82 of 162 [50.6%]; P < .001). The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were ascites (five of 130 [3.8%] v four of 162 [2.5%] patients), abdominal pain (three [2.3%] v two [1.2%] patients), anemia (zero v four [2.5%] patients), and radiation hepatitis (two [1.5%] v zero [0%] patients). Fewer patients in the RE group (27 of 130 [20.8%]) than in the sorafenib group (57 of 162 [35.2%]) had serious AEs. Conclusion In patients with locally advanced HCC, OS did not differ significantly between RE and sorafenib. The improved toxicity profile of RE may inform treatment choice in selected patients.
- Published
- 2018