Search

e20676 Background: Elderly and patients with ECOG PS ≥ 2 often present with medical and physiological characteristics that make the selection of their treatment more challenging. Single-agent vinorelbine improves survival and quality of life compared with best supportive care. At constant effectiveness between two treatments formulations patient preference must be taken into account. Methods: Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients candidates to receive a first line chemotherapy with Vinorelbine alone due to age ≥ 70 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status ≤2 or age ≤ 70 but ECOG PS ≥ 2, could enter the study. Patients were randomized to receive: • Arm A: first cycle of IV vinorelbine (30 mg/m2) and second cycle of oral vinorelbine (60mg/m2) • Arm B: first cycle of oral vinorelbine followed by a second cycle of IV vinorelbine. In both arms vinorelbine was administered at day 1 and day 8 every 3 weeks. From the third cycle onwards patients had to choose to continue with oral or intravenous vinorelbine. The dosage of oral vinorelbine could be subsequently increased to 80 mg/m2 at physician’s choice. Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or patient refusal. The primary objective of the study was the patient preference for oral or intravenous vinorelbine. Results: Ninety-three patients entered the study and were randomized. Sixty-two were able to complete the first two cycles and to express a preference (32 in Arm A and 30 in Arm B). Forty-five out of 62 were males and 17 females. Median age was 80 (72-89). Nineteen patients had an ECOG PS of 0, 39 a PS of 1 and 4 a PS of 2 (30.7%, 62.9% and 6.4% respectively). Eighteen patients (29%) decided to continue with IV vinorelbine while 44 patients (71%) expressed a preference for oral vinorelbine p = 0.001 (Gart's test). Regarding secondary enpoints, median OS was 5.7 (4.7-7.7) and 5.5 (3.8-9.1) months and median PFS was 3.5 (2.4-4.4) and 3.5 (3.5-5.0) for arm A and arm B respectively. Conclusions: The study has clearly demonstrated that elderly or frail patients with NSCLC prefer to receive an oral rather than an intravenous chemotherapy. The reasons for the choice were expressed in a questionnaire still in evaluation. Clinical trial information: nct01848613.

352 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from alcoholic cirrhosis, associated or not with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, is a particularly severe liver disease. Scanty and inconsistent data concerning the efficacy of sorafenib in patients (pts) with this disease are available. Methods: Since February 2009 we screened 26 Child-Pugh liver function class A pts bearing the above characteristics. Sixteen of them (61.5%), 15 males and 1 female with median age of 69 years (range 54-79), received 400 mg sorafenib b.i.d. Predominant cause of HCC was alcohol consumption in 13 pts (81.2%), associated with chronic HCV infection in 2 pts (12.5%), and hemosiderosis in 1 pt (6.2%). All pts suffered from multiple comorbidities, and 3 had been previously treated for Burkitt lymphoma, bladder and breast cancer. One pt with prostate cancer was on treatment with androgen blockade. Median number of concomitant medications was 4 (range 2-9). Four pts never received locoregional treatment, and none had received previous antineoplastic therapy. Results: Twelve pts (73%) discontinued sorafenib after a median time of 2 months (range 2-6). The reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (4 pts), liver function deterioration (5 pts), and mild gastrointestinal adverse events (2 pts): 1 pt refused sorafenib treatment after 15 days. 2/4 patients still on treatment with sorafenib at 7, 8, 11, and 18 months showed partial response (RECIST criteria). Seven pts (40%) died because of disease progression at a median time of 5.5 months (range 2-9) and at a median overall survival time of 36 months from diagnosis (range 2-84). Conclusions: Treatment with sorafenib in pts affected by HCC and alcoholic cirrhosis seems effective and well tolerated with high-level compliance. The most common cause of discontinuation was progression of disease and liver function deterioration. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

14525 Background: Patients with LM from CRC have a poor prognosis with survival rates of 31% at 1 year and 2.6% at 3 years. Surgery is feasible in a minority of patients and most them received systemic chemotherapy. Irinotecan (IRI) is an active drug in the treatment of advanced CRC. The advantage of delivering chemotherapy by hepatic arterial infusion is the achievement of high-dose of the drug in the target . TACE is a combination of local drug infusion with selective embolization of the feeding arteries of the liver metastases. DC bead is a new embolic microsphere product that can be loaded with IRI before administration in TACE. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of this new embolic microspheres IRI loaded and administered as TACE in patients with LM from CRC. Methods: 35 patients with LM from CRC Stage II-III Pettavel Classification pretreated were observed from Nov 2005 to Dec 2006. 25 gave their written consent to be treated with one o more cycles of TACE. Imaging was performed before, immediately and 4 weeks after TACE to determine response and the need for further treatment. Each patient received i.v hydration, antibiotics, analgesics and medications against nausea before TACE. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 60 cycles were administered. We observed a Response Rate of 80% by RECIST criteria. A month after TACE we had a reduction of +50% of CEA in 60% of patients. A reduction of the lesional contrast enhancement of the metastases was observed in 80% of patients. 22 patients are alive, with a median survival of 9.5 months (range 6–13). Median duration response was 16 weeks (range 12–25). 14 cases experienced WHO Grade 2 right upper quadrant pain (RUQP) and 11 cases Grade 3 lasting 12 hours (range 3–30). All patients had 2 days Grade 2 fever (range 1–7), ten had 3 days Grade 3. 20 have had Grade 2 nausea and vomiting for 6 hours (range 4–29). No alopecia or marrow toxicity was reported. Conclusions: DC bead -TACE was feasible and effective in patients with LM from CRC. RUQP seems the most significant toxic event and needs analgesic therapy. No survival data are conclusive because the follow up is short. DC bead of IRI 100 mgr-TACE myght be an appropriate palliative therapy for these patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.