Search

Purpose Lenalidomide is a novel immunomodulatory agent with antiproliferative activities. Given its efficacy in a wide range of hematologic malignancies, we conducted a phase II trial (NHL-001) of single-agent lenalidomide in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients and Methods Patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL were eligible, with no limit on the number of previous therapies. Oral lenalidomide 25 mg was self-administered once daily on days 1 to 21 of every 28-day cycle for up to 52 weeks as tolerated, or until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary end points of duration of response (DR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results Forty-three enrolled patients were assessable for response and safety. Patients received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range, 1 to 17) and half were refractory to last therapy. ORR was 23% (10 of 43), including a 7% complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR rate. Twenty-seven percent (six of 22) of patients with follicular lymphoma grade 1 or 2, and 22% (four of 18) with small lymphocytic lymphoma responded to therapy. Median DR was not reached, but was longer than 16.5 months with seven of 10 responses ongoing at 15 to 28 months. Median PFS for the whole group was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 10.4 months). Adverse events were predictable and manageable; the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30% and 16%, respectively) and thrombocytopenia (14% and 5%, respectively). Conclusion Oral lenalidomide monotherapy produces durable responses with manageable adverse events in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL, warranting further investigation of treatment for indolent NHL.

Purpose Patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have profound immune defects and limited treatment options. Given the dramatic activity of lenalidomide in other B-cell malignancies and its pleotropic immunomodulatory effects, we conducted a phase II trial of this agent in CLL. Patients and Methods Patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell CLL (B-CLL) were eligible if they required treatment as per the National Cancer Institute Working Group 1996 guidelines. Lenalidomide was administered orally at 25 mg on days 1 through 21 of a 28-day cycle. Response was assessed after each cycle. Patients were to continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete remission. Rituximab was added to lenalidomide on disease progression. Results Forty-five patients were enrolled, with a median age of 64 years. Sixty-four percent of the patients had Rai stage III or IV disease, and 51% were refractory to fludarabine. The overall response rate was 47%, with 9% of the patients attaining a complete remission. Fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were the most common adverse effects noted in 83%, 78%, and 78% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion Lenalidomide is clinically active in patients with relapsed or refractory B-CLL. These findings are encouraging and warrant further investigation of this agent in the treatment of this disorder.

PURPOSE: Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is the most common AIDS-related malignancy. Pulmonary involvement by KS (PKS) has carried a poor prognosis with median reported survival ranging from 3 to 10 months. We studied whether the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART; triple antiretroviral therapy including a protease inhibitor and two reverse transcriptase inhibitors) has been associated with improved survival for AIDS patients with PKS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 37 consecutive patients with PKS and human immunodeficiency virus infection in the tumor registry at a large municipal hospital in New York City between 1994 to 1997. There were 16 patients from 1994 to 1995 (pre-HAART period) and 21 patients from 1996 to 1997 (post-HAART period). The primary end point was survival, which was defined as time from start of chemotherapy until death from any cause. RESULTS: Patients were analyzed by the date of diagnosis (pre- v post-HAART period) and whether or not they received HAART. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly better survival in patients diagnosed in the post-HAART period (P = .0025). Additional Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients on HAART had substantially better survival (P < .0001). Cox multivariate analyses showed that HAART therapy was associated with a reduced risk of death (hazard ratio = 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.69). CONCLUSION: In patients with AIDS-associated PKS and undergoing chemotherapy, administration of HAART was associated with increased survival.

8573 Background: Small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) is an indolent B-cell neoplasm that is histologically and immunophenotypically identical to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but has less periph...

8066 Background: Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, is approved in the US for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndromes associated with a deletion 5q[31] cytogenetic abnormality. Lenalidomide also has activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL with measurable disease after at least 1 prior treatment regimen were eligible. Patients received 25 mg lenalidomide orally once daily on Days 1–21 every 28 days and continued therapy for 52 weeks as tolerated or until disease progression. Response and progression were evaluated using the IWLRC methodology. Results: As of enrollment cut-off, 43 patients received drug and 27 were evaluable for response. The median age was 63 (43–82) and 12 were female. Histology was small lymphocytic lymphoma [SLL] (n=12), follicular center lymphoma grades 1,2 [FCL] (n=12) and nodal marginal B-cell lymphoma [NML] (n=3). Median time from diagnosis to lenalidomide was 4.3 (0.4- 24) years and median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (1–17). Seven patients (26%) exhibited an objective response (2 complete responses (CR), 1 complete response unconfirmed (CRu) and 4 partial responses (PR)), 9 had stable disease (SD) for a tumor control rate (TCR) of 59% and 11 progressive disease (PD). Responses were produced in each of the indolent histologic subtypes studied: SLL (3/12), FCL (3/12) and NML (1/3). Since most responses develop at ≥ 4 months, additional responses may be seen in early SD patients with longer follow-up. Five patients (12%) exhibited Grade 4 neutropenia, and Grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (16%) and thrombocytopenia (14%). Conclusion: Lenalidomide oral monotherapy is active with manageable side effects in relapsed/refractory indolent NHL. [Table: see text]

8052 Background: Lenalidomide (Revlimid), an immunomodulatory drug of the IMiDs class, is approved in the US for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndromes associated with a deletion 5q[31] cytogenetic abnormality. Lenalidomide also has activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL with measurable disease after at least 1 prior treatment regimen were eligible. Patients received 25 mg lenalidomide orally once daily on Days 1–21 every 28 days and continued therapy for 52 weeks as tolerated or until disease progression. Response and progression were evaluated using the IWLRC methodology. Results: As of enrollment cut-off, 50 patients were enrolled and 49 received drug. Forty-one patients were evaluable for response. The median age was 65 (46–84) and 18 were female. Histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL] (n=21), follicular center lymphoma grade 3 [FL] (n=3), mantle cell lymphoma [MCL] (n=14) and transformed [TSF] (n=3). Median time from diagnosis to lenalidomide was 3.2 (0.4–32) years and median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (1–7). Fourteen patients (34%) exhibited an objective response (5 complete responses unconfirmed (CRu) and 9 partial responses (PR)), 12 had stable disease (SD) for a tumor control rate (TCR) of 63% and 15 progressive disease (PD). Responses were seen in each of the aggressive histologic subtypes studied: DLBCL (5/21), MCL (6/14), FL (2/3), and TSF (1/3). Five of 11 patients (45%) with a prior stem cell transplant responded. Progression free survival although ongoing is currently > 239 (>191 - >373) days in patients experiencing CRu and > 160 (>54 - >251) days in patients with PR. Most common Grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (8.2%) and thrombocytopenia (8.2%) while most common Grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (22%), leukopenia (14%) and thrombocytopenia (12%). Conclusion: Lenalidomide oral monotherapy is active with manageable side effects in relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

6517 Background: Tumor microenvironment (ME) is critical in CLL pathogenesis. Targeting the ME is a novel approach in CLL therapeutics. Lenalidomide (Revlimid, L) is an immunomodulating agent (IMiD), approved for pts with transfusion-dependent low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome with deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality. Its antitumor activity is possibly mediated through (a) downregulation of cytokine(s) - TNF-α, VEGF, PDGF and IL-6 and/or (b) activation of immune effector cells (T & NK cells). We investigated its antitumor activity in rel/ref CLL pts. Here we present the final results of the first cohort of pts treated with 25mg daily dose of L. Methods: Oral L was given at 25mg/day for 21 out of a 28 day cycle. Anti-leukemic effects were recorded after each cycle using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Treatment was continued until molecular complete response (mCR) or progressive disease (PD). Those with PD were then treated with L in combination with rituximab (reported separately). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for immunoglobulin heavy chain gene was used to determine molecular remission (mCR). Results: Twenty-nine pts (median age 64 years; range: 47–75) have been enrolled. Toxicity is reported on all, while response on 19 evaluable pts. Nine pts are inevaluable (2 withdrew consent and 5 received < 2 months of therapy due to toxicity). Major response was noted in 13 of 19 evaluable pts (68%) with 3 CR (2 mCR) and 10 PR. Toxicity: Most common grade 3/4 adverse effects (AE) were neutropenia (60%) and thrombocytopenia (55%). Another common AE was tumor flare (79%); characterized by tender swelling of lymph nodes and/or rash, noted in almost all pts. Conclusions: L at 25mg/day dose given on days 1–21 in a 28 day cycle yields high ORR including mCR in rel/ref CLL. Hematologic toxicity was the most common AE requiring dose reduction. Overall safety profile was predictable and manageable. A slow dose escalation schema, starting at 15mg is being investigated. [Table: see text]