1. Prevention and Monitoring of Cardiac Dysfunction in Survivors of Adult Cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
- Author
-
Daniel J. Lenihan, Mariell Jessup, Michael S. Ewer, Saro H. Armenian, Pamela S. Douglas, Javid Moslehi, Carol J. Fabian, Bonnie Ky, Kevin C. Oeffinger, Christina Lacchetti, Susan Dent, Neelima Denduluri, Jean-Bernard Durand, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Ana Barac, Lee W. Jones, Louis S. Constine, Erica L. Mayer, Katharine Ray, Joseph R. Carver, and Melissa M. Hudson
- Subjects
Adult ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Heart Diseases ,Psychological intervention ,Disease ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Quality of life (healthcare) ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Neoplasms ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,Survivors ,Intensive care medicine ,Adverse effect ,business.industry ,Heart ,Guideline ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Observational study ,business - Abstract
PurposeCardiac dysfunction is a serious adverse effect of certain cancer-directed therapies that can interfere with the efficacy of treatment, decrease quality of life, or impact the actual survival of the patient with cancer. The purpose of this effort was to develop recommendations for prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult-onset cancers.MethodsRecommendations were developed by an expert panel with multidisciplinary representation using a systematic review (1996 to 2016) of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical experience. Study quality was assessed using established methods, per study design. The guideline recommendations were crafted in part using the Guidelines Into Decision Support methodology.ResultsA total of 104 studies met eligibility criteria and compose the evidentiary basis for the recommendations. The strength of the recommendations in these guidelines is based on the quality, amount, and consistency of the evidence and the balance between benefits and harms.RecommendationsIt is important for health care providers to initiate the discussion regarding the potential for cardiac dysfunction in individuals in whom the risk is sufficiently high before beginning therapy. Certain higher risk populations of survivors of cancer may benefit from prevention and screening strategies implemented during cancer-directed therapies. Clinical suspicion for cardiac disease should be high and threshold for cardiac evaluation should be low in any survivor who has received potentially cardiotoxic therapy. For certain higher risk survivors of cancer, routine surveillance with cardiac imaging may be warranted after completion of cancer-directed therapy, so that appropriate interventions can be initiated to halt or even reverse the progression of cardiac dysfunction.
- Published
- 2017