Search

282 Background: Coordinating lung cancer screening requires risk assessment for patient selection. Optimal selection can reduce costs and improve efficiency of low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening of lung cancer. This study evaluated clinic-based spirometry as a tool to improve patient selection for lung cancer screening. Methods: Eligibility criteria for three large LDCT screening studies were retrospectively applied to the highest risk patients enrolled in the Princess Margaret Lung Cancer Screening Program who had received clinic-based research spirometry. The three studies were: Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLST), National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), and the Ontario Lung Cancer Screening Program (OLCS). Lung cancer incidence was compared between those who would were included by the screening study eligibility criteria (Group I), those who were excluded by the eligibility criteria but demonstrated obstruction on spirometry (defined as a Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second % Predicted (FEV1%) < 90%) (Group II), and those who did not meet eligibility criteria and had no obstruction (FEV1% ≥90) (Group III). Results: The 321 highest risk participants of the screening program had a mean age of 65 years and were 39% male. The median number of pack years in this group was 39. After undergoing spirometry, this cohort was screened using LDCT for a median of 3.3 years (range 1–8.1 years). Under DLST criteria, Groups I and II had virtually identical lung cancer incidences detected by screening at 13.1% and 13.6% of the individuals screened, respectively; Group III had a substantially lower incidence at 6.3%. Results were similar by NLST criteria where the incidence of screen-detected lung cancer were 13.7% for Groups I, 11.1% for Group II, and 8.6% for Group III. Under OLCS criteria, these values were 13.4% (Group I), 13.5% (Group II), and 8.2% (Group III). Conclusions: Individuals who were excluded from LDCT screening because they lacked other clinical eligibility criteria, but had a FEV1 < 90%, had similar lung cancer incidence as patients who had met screening study eligibility criteria. Coordinating care for screening of at-risk individuals could be improved by incorporating spirometric tools.

8559 Background: The prognosis of patients (pts) with MPM remains poor. Accelerated hemithoracic radiation followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy in ypN2 disease (SMART) provides encouraging results. The ability to administer systemic therapy (Tx) and response rate (RR) after recurrence remains unclear. We therefore examined subsequent lines of Tx and outcomes following relapse after SMART. Methods: A retrospective analysis of pts diagnosed with recurrent MPM following SMART was conducted at a single institution. OS was determined from date of relapse to death and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential prognostic variables were tested utilizing the log-rank test. Results: Out of 86 pts undergoing SMART from 2008 to 2016, 53 (62%) developed recurrent disease of which 36% had pathological confirmation. Two cases with initial epithelial subtype on surgical specimen relapsed with different histology (sarcomatoid and small cell). In 48% of pts, relapse was unclear at first imaging (n = 42) and a median of 98 days (range 6-966) lapsed between first suspicion and final diagnosis. The median age at relapse was 66 years (range 45-79), 47% had a performance status (PS) ≥2 (n = 45) and 64% were of epithelial subtype. After a median follow up of 7.6 mo, the median OS was 5.2 mo. PS ≥2 was associated with worse OS (2.8 vs 10.7 mo, p < 0.001). Of 42 pts followed after relapse, 36% received any Tx (19% 1 line; 12% 2 lines; 5% ≥3 lines). Tx was omitted in 62% of pts due to poor PS (26/42). First line Tx consisted of platinum doublet in 93% of pts (n = 15). Of 13 pts with response evaluable disease, RR was 15% (0 CR, 15% PR). Of note, 0/13 pts had neoadjuvant Tx and 3/13 pts had adjuvant Tx (10, 13 and 38 mo lapsed between end of adjuvant Tx and start of Tx in the relapsed setting). 6/15 pts discontinued Tx due to toxicity, 5/15 due to progression and median number of cycles was 4. Conclusions: Pts with relapsed MPM following SMART have poor prognosis and low RR to first line Tx. Poor performance status at relapse is a poor prognostic factor. Earlier detection, novel diagnostic markers of relapse and consideration of maintenance strategies should be investigated in future studies.