Search

PURPOSE: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels are frequently completed for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with highly actionable gene variants have improved outcomes and reduced toxicities with the use of corresponding targeted agents. We sought to identify barriers to targeted agent use within the Veterans Health Affairs' National Precision Oncology Program (NPOP). METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients with NSCLC who underwent NGS multigene panels through NPOP between July 2015 and February 2019 was conducted. Patients who were assigned level 1 or 2A evidence for oncogenic gene variants by an artificial intelligence offering (IBM Watson for Genomics [WfG]) and NPOP staff were selected. Antineoplastic drug prescriptions and provider notes were reviewed. Reasons for withholding targeted treatments were categorized. RESULTS: Of 1,749 patients with NSCLC who successfully underwent NGS gene panel testing, 112 (6.4%) patients were assigned level 1 and/or 2A evidence for available targeted treatments by WfG and NPOP staff. All highly actionable gene variants were within ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, MET, RET, and ROS1. Of these, 36 (32.1%) patients were not prescribed targeted agents. The three most common reasons were (1) patient did not carry a diagnosis of metastatic disease (33.3%), (2) treating provider did not comment on the NGS results (25.0%), and (3) provider felt that patient could not tolerate therapy (19.4%). No patients were denied access to level 1 or 2A targeted drugs because of rejection of a nonformulary drug request. CONCLUSION: A substantial minority of patients with NSCLC bearing highly actionable gene variants are not prescribed targeted agents. Further provider- and pathologist-directed educational efforts and implementation of health informatics systems to provide real-time decision support for test ordering and interpretation are needed.

e14051 Background: Adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology in routine clinical practice has enabled the detection of genetic aberrations such as single nucleotide variants, copy number alterations, and gene fusions. Pathway and network analyses (PNA) are key components for evaluation of NGS data in a clinical setting to explain findings involving thousands of altered genes and proteins with a smaller and more interpretable set of altered processes. Though PNA have been applied to identify driver genes and pathways in cohort-based analyses, its application in precision oncology remains unexplored. We investigate the potential utility of the Watson for Genomics (WfG) pathway analyses tool in interpreting complex and multiple genomic alterations in individual cancers. Methods: DNA and RNA isolated from 70 patient tumors across 30 different cancer types were processed with Illumina’s TST170 NGS platform. WfG’s feature of pathway analyses was used to identify gene variants, signaling pathways, networks, and the drugs targeting these alterations based on evidence in the clinical literature and FDA drug databases. Results: Analyses defined 5 different pathway/network models: 1) downstream therapeutic targets, 2) synthetic lethality, 3) combinatorial downstream targets + synthetic lethality, 4) two or more pathways converging to downstream targets, and 5) complex profile analyses. The five PNA models are illustrated by the following unique cases. 1) A thyroid cancer case with HRAS variant and activated RAF1 downstream pathway showed MAPK1/3 were suggestive of relevant targets. 2) An acute myeloid leukemia case with BRCA1, BRCA2 and PTEN variants, targeting a common synthetic lethal partner PARP1 was ideal for therapy. 3) A penile carcinoma case with BRAF, CDKN2A and TP53 variants, targeting the BRAF downstream pathway in combination with either CDKN2A or TP53 were the likely choice for therapy. 4) A glioma case with activated PI3K and MEK downstream pathway, targeting a common downstream marker would block both pathways. 5) A breast carcinoma case with a complex pathogenic variant profile provided relevant clinical information and levels of evidence for multiple drug targets. Conclusions: We discovered that the integrated WfG pathway analyses tool is ideal for visualization of the variants with levels of evidence from clinical literature and FDA drug databases that can help inform treatment options and provides a holistic understanding of a specific tumor profile allowing the treating clinician to select personalized targeted therapy.

2005 Background: Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) gene panels are often completed to guide therapeutic decisions for patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with highly-actionable gene variants may experience improved therapeutic treatments and reduced toxicities with use of targeted agents. Ensuring appropriate prescription of targeted therapies is therefore of high importance. We sought to identify barriers to targeted agent use within the Veterans Health Affairs’ (VHA) National Precision Oncology Program (NPOP). Methods: A retrospective evaluation examined the cohort of NSCLC patients who underwent NGS multi-gene panels through NPOP between July 2015 and February 2019. A level of evidence for drug actionability was assigned to each observed oncogenic gene variant using an artificial intelligence offering (IBM Watson for Genomics: WfG). WfG level 1 and 2A evidence was reviewed by NPOP staff to exclude gene variants that did not conform to NPOP level 1 and 2A definitions. Anti-neoplastic drug prescriptions and oncology provider notes were obtained for all included patients from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse. Review of clinical notes of patients who did not receive targeted agents was performed to categorize the reason(s). Results: Of 1764 NSCLC patients who successfully underwent NGS gene panel testing, 156 (8.9%) received therapeutic level 1 (7.3%) or 2A (1.6%) options for targeted agents based on WfG evidence analysis. In total, 117 (6.6%) patients had NPOP level 1 and 2A gene variants, all within ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, MET, and RET. Of these, 49 (41.2%) patients were not prescribed available targeted agents. The three most common reasons were: (1) treating provider did not comment on NGS results (30.7%), (2) patient did not carry a diagnosis of advanced stage disease (18.4%), and (3) patient had begun an alternative systemic therapy prior to completion of sequencing (16.3%). No patient was denied access to a level 1 or 2A targeted drug due to utilization-management review. Conclusions: A substantial minority of patients with advanced NSCLC bearing highly-actionable gene variants are not prescribed available targeted agents. Further provider- and pathologist-directed educational effort are needed, as well as implementation of health informatics systems to provide near real-time decision support for test ordering and interpretation.

e13023 Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) in hematological tumors is increasingly shaping clinical treatment decisions at the point of care. While the impact of NGS panels in solid tumors is largely therapeutic, targeted sequencing in hematological tumors can additionally provide diagnostic and prognostic insights. Additional data generated in hematological tumor sequencing makes manual interpretation and annotation of variants tedious and non-scalable. In this study we compared hematological tumor variant interpretation using an artificial intelligence decision-support system, Watsonä for Genomics (WfG), with expert guided manual curation. Methods: Patients with hematological tumors at Hallym University, College of Medicine between December 2017 and December 2018, were sequenced using the 54 gene Illumina TruSight Myeloid Panel. WfG interpreted and annotated all patients’ sequencing results, a subset of which were assessed manually to ascertain concordance. Results: 54 South Korean patients with hematological malignancies were analyzed (23 Acute Myeloid Leukemia, 12 myeloproliferative neoplasm, 5 myelodysplastic syndrome, 5 multiple myeloma and 9 others). Comparison of manual and WfG interpretation of 10 randomly selected cases yielded 90% (9/10) concordance and identification of 9 clinically actionable variants (33%) not found in manual interpretation. In total, WfG identified that 71% (38/54) of all cases had at least one clinically actionable therapeutic alteration (a variant targeted by a US FDA approved drug, off-label drug, or clinical trial). 33% (18/54) of cases had genes that were targeted by a US FDA approved therapy including JAK2, IDH1, IDH2, and FLT3. In cases without therapeutic alterations, WfG identified diagnostic or prognostic insights in an additional 20% (11/54) of patients. 9% (5/54) had no clinically actionable information. Conclusions: WfG variant interpretation correlated well with manually curated expert opinion and identified clinically actionable insights missed by manual interpretation. WfG has obviated the need for labor-intensive manual curation of clinical trials and therapy, enabling our center to exponentially scale our NGS operations.

e14300 Background: Acral and mucosal melanoma are rare subtypes accounting for about 3% of all melanoma cases. The cutaneous melanoma genomic landscape is well defined; however, little is known about the acral and mucosal melanoma mutational spectrum. In this pilot study, we evaluated the genomic and neo-antigen profiles and tumor mutational burden (TMB) from acral and mucosal melanoma patients with the aim of designing personalized vaccines and longitudinally tracking patients’ clinical courses. Methods: Tumor whole exome sequencing and neo-antigen profiling of 5 acral and 3 mucosal melanoma patients at Shanghai Tenth Peoples Hospital, Tongji University, China between April 2018 and January 2019 was performed using YuceBio’s proprietary analytics platform. Watsonä for Genomics, an artificial intelligence decision-support system, was used for variant interpretation and annotation. A comparative analysis was performed on Chinese acral melanoma data with the published Caucasian acral cohort from the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) predominantly Caucasian cutaneous melanoma data set. Results: TMB in our acral/mucosal melanoma cohort was 2.26/Megabase (Mb) compared to over 20/Mb in published cutaneous melanoma studies. Tumor neo-antigen burden (TNAB) in our group was 1.03 neo-epitopes/Mb. Low TNAB levels were associated with low TMB levels in all tumors. Incidence of BRAF and NRAS mutant cases in our cohort was 0% (0/8) and 13% (1/8) respectively compared to 19% (5/27) and 7% (2/27) of the Caucasian acral population in the TGen dataset. Incidence of BRAF and NRAS mutations in the TCGA cutaneous melanoma dataset was 54% (237/440) and 28% (125/440), respectively. Conclusions: TMB was significantly lower in acral/mucosal than in cutaneous melanoma and may be a surrogate for TNAB. Detection of BRAF and NRAS mutations, the two most prevalent driver mutations in cutaneous melanoma, were significantly lower frequencies in both Chinese and Caucasian acral melanoma patients in this study, suggesting alternate cancer drivers may exist in this subtype. Strategies to address challenges of low TNAB in vaccine development are being explored.

e13025 Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) studies on various cancer types have revealed clinical insights on the molecular etiology of tumors and defined new treatment paradigms. However, the genomic landscape of a tumor type may be predicated on race. Application of broad-brush findings from one population to another may lead to erroneous treatment decisions. While the majority of published NGS cancer studies focus on Caucasian populations, few studies evaluate the molecular profiles of a tumor type between different demographies. In this study, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients of East Asian descent were sequenced at a South Korean hospital, interpreted, and compared with the Caucasian population from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Methods: 23 South Korean AML patients were sequenced in 2018 using the 54 gene Illumina TruSight Myeloid Panel at Hallym University, College of Medicine. Orthogonal testing for FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) was done by Sanger sequencing. Watsonä for Genomics (WfG), an artificial intelligence decision-support system, was used for variant interpretation and annotation. Additionally, 181 AML patients of Caucasian descent from the TCGA dataset were analyzed for comparison. Results: WfG identified at least 1 clinically actionable therapeutic alteration in 70% (16/23) of all Asian cohort cases. FLT3-ITD or tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations were reported in 27% (49/181) of cases in the TCGA cohort but only 9% (2/23) of the Asian cohort. DNMT3A mutations were detected in 25% (45/181) and 74% (17/23) of the TCGA and Asian cohorts, respectively. Other oncogenic mutations in AML including NRAS, IDH1, IDH2, CEBPA, TET2, and NPM1 were represented at comparable frequencies between the two populations. Conclusions: Tumor biomarkers that affect prognosis can be informative in the clinical setting. In our study, FLT3 and DNMT3A, predictors of poor prognosis in AML, demonstrated decreased and increased respective frequencies in South Koreans compared to Caucasians, suggesting that some mutational signatures that predict cancer outcome may vary by race.