1. International single-arm phase II trial of pazopanib in advanced extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma: A Collaborative Spanish (GEIS), Italian (ISG) and French (FSG) Sarcoma Groups study
- Author
-
Sarah Dumont, Antoine Italiano, Javier Martin Broto, Josefina Cruz, M. Angeles Vaz, Daniel Bernabeu, Emanuela Palmerini, Enrique de Alava, Jean-Yves Blay, Giovanni Grignani, Antonio Gutierrez, Andrés Redondo, Nicolas Penel, Stefano Ferrari, Anna Maria Frezza, Dominique Ranchère-Vince, Paola Collini, Antonio Lopez-Pousa, Nadia Hindi, Silvia Stacchiotti, Silvia Stacchiotti, Stefano Ferrari, Andres Redondo, Emanuela Palmerini, Nadia Hindi, M. Angeles Vaz, Anna Maria Frezza, Antonio Gutierrez, Antonio Lopez-Pousa, Giovanni Grignani, Antoine Italiano, Sarah Dumont, Jean-Yves Blay, Nicolas Penel, Daniel Bernabeu, Enrique de Alava, Dominique Ranchère-Vince, Paola Collini, Josefina Cruz, and Javier Martin Broto
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,business.industry ,Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma ,medicine.disease ,Pazopanib ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma ,medicine ,Cancer research ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Sarcoma ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
11062 Background: Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is an exceedingly rare sarcoma, marked by a specific translocation involving the gene NR4A3 that can be rearranged with different partners. Preliminary retrospective data suggest that sunitinib is active, but no formal prospective studies are available. We report on a multicentric European prospective, investigator-driven, Phase 2 study on pazopanib (P) in NR4A3+ advanced EMC patients (pts), carried out by the Spanish, Italian and French Sarcoma groups. Methods: From June 2014 to November 2016, 24 advanced EMC pts entered this study (median age: 64 yrs - disease extent: metastatic 77%, locally advanced 23% - prior medical treatment: 18 (86%) naive; 2 (9%) 1 line, 1 (5%) > 1 line). Path diagnosis and NR4A3 rearrangement (FISH and/or real-time PCR analysis) were centrally confirmed. Pts received P 800 mg/day (relative dose intensity = 0,82%, 658 mg/day), until progression or toxicity. The primary study end-point was response rate as per RECIST 1.1. Secondary end-points were overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) (RECIST CR+PR+SD≥6mos). An exploratory evaluation of the correlation between the rearrangement subtype and the outcome is ongoing. Results: 20/24 pts were evaluable for response (1 early death; 3 too early). One patient (5%) had a partial response, 17 (75%) stable disease, 2 (10%) progression as their best RECIST responses. At the time of this analysis, 12 pts were still under treatment, while 12 interrupted P (10 progression, 1 toxicity, 1 other). At a 13-month median follow-up, the median PFS was 13 months (range 1.6-25.1), with 29% pts progression-free at 18 months and a 65% CBR. Median OS was not reached. Conclusions: This Phase 2 study is formally negative since the target of at least 3/21 RECIST responses was not reached. However, looking at PFS, P was associated with a prolonged disease stabilization in a significant proportion of pts. This suggests to further explore the use of P in EMC. Clinical trial information: NCT02066285.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF