Search

394 Background: In the dose-confirmation phase of this multicohort trial (NCT02720068), the anti-LAG-3 antibody favezelimab had a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, confirming preliminary RP2D. Here we present results on the safety of favezelimab (fave) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) in all treated pts and efficacy in pts with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: In this phase 1b trial eligible pts aged ≥ 18 years were enrolled into 7 cohorts across 3 tumor types: Cohorts A (3L+ CRC), B (1L/2L CRC), C (PD-1 naïve HNSCC), D (PD-1 refractory HNSCC), E (PD-1 naïve gastric cancer), F (all solid tumors), and G (PD-1 naïve 3L CRC). Pts with gastric cancer in cohort E received either 200 mg fave + 200 mg pembro, or 700 mg fave + 200 mg pembro Q3W up to 35 cycles. Treatment continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or pt withdrawal. Primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of fave + pembro. Secondary endpoint was ORR per RECIST 1.1 by investigator assessment. Exploratory endpoints were PFS per RECIST 1.1, and OS. Data cutoff date was March 21, 2022. Results: At data cutoff, 397 pts were enrolled: 38 to fave, 368 to fave + pembro including 9 who crossed over from fave alone. Of these, 80 pts had gastric cancer; 50 (62.5%) of which had ≥2 lines of treatment, and 48 (60.0%) had PD-L1 CPS≥ 1. Among 368 pts treated with fave + pembro, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 232 (63.0%) with fave + pembro. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 66 (17.9%) pts with fave + pembro. There were no grade 5 TRAEs. Immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) occurred in 121 (32.9%) pts with fave + pembro. Grade ≥3 immune-mediated AEs occurred in 27 (7.3%) pts with fave + pembro. No grade 5 immune-mediated AEs occurred. In pts with gastric cancer, the overall ORR was 11.3% (95% CI, 5.3-20.3 [3.8% CR; 7.5% PR]) with fave + pembro. In 2 arms, higher dose of fave (700mg) showed increased ORR and 12 months PFS rate. The table summarizes antitumor activity in the gastric cancer cohort. Conclusions: Favezelimab alone or in combination with pembrolizumab had an acceptable safety profile. The combination therapy showed antitumor activity in line with other checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer though higher antitumor activity was seen in PDL1 CPS≥ 1 tumors, particularly at higher dose. Clinical trial information: NCT02720068 . [Table: see text]

TPS2672 Background: AFM24 is a first-in-class, tetravalent, bispecific, fragment crystallizable-silenced antibody that targets epidermal growth factor receptor-expressing (EGFR+) solid tumors. Of its 4 binding sites, 2 are specific for EGFR, and 2 are specific for CD16A, the Fcγ receptor expressed by natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages. The primary mode of action of AFM24 is not to inhibit EGFR signaling, but to redirect NK cells and macrophages to EGFR+ tumor cells to induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), respectively. Preclinical studies showed AFM24 induced killing of EGFR+ tumor cell lines, and the activity was independent of EGFR cell surface expression level. A favorable safety profile was also demonstrated in cynomolgus monkeys. Therefore, AFM24 may utilize the patients’ innate immunity to redirect and activate immune cells, overcoming resistance to current therapies and offering a favorable safety profile. An ongoing Phase 1/2a, first-in-human study (NCT04259450) is evaluating AFM24 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic, treatment refractory solid tumors that are known to express EGFR. The Phase 1 dose escalation study was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose and/or the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of AFM24 and evaluated the safety, efficacy, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses. AFM24 was administered intravenously once weekly until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or termination at the investigator’s discretion. AFM24 had a well-managed safety profile and the RP2D was established. Methods: In parallel to the continuing dose escalation phase, the Phase 2a dose expansion study was initiated, and the first patient was enrolled in January 2022. This study will assess AFM24 at the RP2D of 480 mg in patients with different EGFR-expressing tumors and will follow a Simon’s two-stage design; the trial will progress to the second stage unless the null hypothesis, that the true tumor response rate is below a specified value, is confirmed at the end of stage one. Eligible patients must have positive histological or cytological staining of EGFR in > 1% of tumor cells. The primary endpoint is to establish the overall response rate (assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1) in three disease-specific cohorts. These comprise patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer (KRASwt CRC), and EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRmut NSCLC). Secondary endpoints include treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, PK, PD, and immunogenicity. Clinical trial information: NCT04259450.

e21552 Background: IL-2R agonists that are well tolerated and can selectively enhance immune activation may improve outcomes of patients with cancer. ANV419 is a potent and highly selective IL-2Rβγ binding agonist, consisting of an antibody specific for the IL-2Rα-binding domain of IL-2, fused to native hIL-2. It is currently being investigated in a phase I/II dose finding study in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced solid tumors (ANV419-001). The primary objective of ANV419-001 is to describe the safety and tolerability of ANV419. Methods: ANV419 is administered intravenously over 15 minutes every 2 weeks, without premedication. Thirteen patients with melanoma (cutaneous (n = 3), uveal (n = 2), mucosal (n = 2), choroidal (n = 1)), renal cell carcinoma (n = 1), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1), colorectal cancer (n = 1), esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 1) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 1) have been dosed in six cohorts. Patients received 3mcg/kg (n = 1), 6mcg/kg (n = 1), 12mcg/kg (n = 1), 24mcg/kg (n = 4), 48mcg/kg (n = 3) 72mcg/kg (n = 3) and 108 mcg/kg (ongoing) of ANV419. Results: ANV419 is well tolerated, all related AEs are Grade 1 or Grade 2 and no DLTs have been observed. Most patients experienced chills (G1), with or without low-grade fever (G1), 2-4 hours after post- infusion, which resolved with antipyretic treatment. Two G2 AEs related to ANV419 have been reported in two patients. One patient was reported to have G2 Cytokine Release Syndrome (hypotension (G2), fever (G1), chills (G1)) and one patient experienced transient, self-limiting G2 elevation of liver function tests. Four Serious Adverse Events were reported in three patients (urinary tract infection, lethargy, thoracic pain and abdominal pain), none of which were considered related to ANV419. Pharmacodynamic evaluation on day 4 post-dosing, showed an effector cell selective, dose dependent increase of Ki-67 positive CD8 T cells (2%, 14%, 37%, 62%, 62%, vs. baseline mean (BLM) 2%) and NK cells (30%, 62%, 75%, 85%, 80%, vs BLM 6%) with a dose independent frequency of Ki67+ Tregs ranging from 4% to 25% (BLM 7%) at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 mcg/kg doses respectively. At 72mcg/kg mean CD8 T cell and NK proliferation was 70% and 51% respectively, while the mean Treg proliferation increased to 48%. Pharmacokinetic data (including patients treated with up to 24 mcg/kg ANV419) show a dose proportional increase of the ANV419 plasma concentration. The estimated half-life at the 24mcg/kg dose is 17.6 hrs. Four patients continue to receive ANV419. Of the 11 patients who received at least two cycles of ANV419, 4 were assessed to have stable disease. One patient progressed after 24 weeks of confirmed stable disease. Conclusions: Overall, ANV419 is well tolerated and selectively induces expansion and proliferation of CD8 T cells and NK cells, but not Tregs up to a dose of at least 48mcg/kg. Updated data will be shared during the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04855929.

6080 Background: Alterations in RET are targetable oncogenic drivers in TC. Pralsetinib is a highly potent, selective RET inhibitor, with demonstrated efficacy in pts with RET-altered TC. In a previous analysis of the Phase I/II ARROW trial (NCT03037385; data cutoff: 22 May 2020), overall response rates [ORR; measurable-disease population] with pralsetinib at 400 mg once daily (QD) were 60% (33/55) and 71% (15/21) in pts with RET-mutant medullary TC ( RET-mutant MTC) who had received prior multikinase inhibitors cabozantinib and/or vandetanib (C/V), and those who were treatment naïve, respectively, and 89% (8/9) in pts with previously treated RET fusion-positive TC ( RET-fp TC). Here we report an updated analysis of these cohorts in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Methods: Adult pts with RET-altered locally advanced/metastatic TC who had enrolled in ARROW and initiated pralsetinib at 400 mg QD, were included. Phase II primary endpoints: ORR (by blinded independent central review, per RECIST v1.1) and safety. Efficacy endpoints for this analysis were assessed in the ITT population. Safety was assessed in all pts with RET-altered TC who initiated pralsetinib at 400 mg QD. Enrolment cutoff: 23 August 2020 for the ITT population; data cutoff: 12 April 2021. Results: The ITT population comprised 145 pts with RET-mutant MTC (with or without prior systemic therapy, including C/V) and 22 pts with RET-fp TC, 21 of whom had received prior systemic therapy (including multikinase inhibitor[s] and/or radioactive iodine). In pts with RET-mutant MTC who had received prior C/V (n = 67), ORR was 51% (34/67; 95% CI 38–63; 2 complete responses [CR]; 32 partial responses [PR]), median duration of response (DoR) was 25.8 months (95% CI 18.0–not reached [NR]) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 24.9 months (95% CI 19.7–31.2). In treatment-naïve pts with RET-mutant MTC, ORR was 72% (48/67; 95% CI 59–82; 4 CR; 44 PR), and median DoR and median PFS were not reached. In pts with previously treated RET-fp TC, ORR was 86% (18/21; 95% CI 64–97; 3 CR; 15 PR), median DoR was 17.5 months (95% CI 16.0–NR) and median PFS was 19.4 months (95% CI 13.0–NR). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in any of the cohorts. The safety population comprised 172 pts with RET-altered TC treated at 400 mg QD. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (n = 67; 39%), anemia (n = 60; 35%), hypertension (n = 57; 33%) and decreased white blood cell count (n = 52; 30%). Serious TRAEs were reported in 27 pts (16%); the most frequent was pneumonitis (n = 5; 3%). Nine pts (5%) discontinued pralsetinib due to a TRAE and one patient ( < 1%) died due to a TRAE ( pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia) following 44 days ( < 3 cycles) on pralsetinib. Conclusions: In this updated analysis including more pts, pralsetinib continues to be efficacious with a manageable safety profile in pts with RET-altered TC. Clinical trial information: NCT03037385.

2502 Background: SOT101 (previously SO-C101) is a fusion protein of IL-15 and the IL-15 receptor α sushi+ domain. Synergistic effects of SOT101 and an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody have been validated in various tumor mouse models inducing a protective memory response. Methods: In this phase 1 study, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of increasing doses of SOT101 administered subcutaneously were investigated in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors as monotherapy (Part A) and in combination with pembrolizumab every 3-week cycle (Part B). Dose escalation followed a standard 3+3 design. Data cut-off was 26 January 2022. Results: Overall, 51 pts were treated: 30 in Part A monotherapy at 0.25 to 15 μg/kg SOT101 and 21 in Part B combination therapy (Tx) at 1.5 to 12 μg/kg SOT101. The median (range) number of previous lines of Tx was 3 (1-9) in Part A and 2 (1-6) in Part B. In Part A, 19 (63.3%) pts had previous check-point inhibitor (CPI) Tx, of whom 9 (30 %) were refractory, 5 (16.7%) relapsed. In Part B, 11 pts (52.4%) had previous CPI Tx, and the outcome was 9 (42.9%) pts relapsed, 1 (4.8%) refractory. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were transient, and included pyrexia, chills, lymphopenia, anemia, transaminase elevation and vomiting. Most TEAEs were ≤ Grade 2. No treatment-related death was reported. For both monotherapy and combination Tx, the recommended phase 2 dose of SOT101 was determined to be 12 μg/kg. In Part A, in 13 pts at 6 to 12 μg/kg SOT101, the observed clinical benefit rate was 38%. A partial response (PR) was confirmed in 1 pt with skin squamous cell carcinoma, CPI refractory, PR duration 46 days (d), on treatment 154 d. Four pts (all CPI pretreated) had stable disease (SD), range 33-183 d. Final median duration on treatment was 84 d, range 43-183 d. The median duration of clinical benefit was 190 d. In Part B, the observed clinical benefit rate across all SOT101 doses was 63%. A complete response (CR) was confirmed in 1 pt with mesothelioma, CPI naïve, starting at the first tumor assessment, and the pt is ongoing in cycle 5. Three pts, 2 CPI pretreated, had a PR, range 51-232 d, 2 ongoing with PR, and 1 Tx discontinuation while still on PR. Five pts, 3 CPI pretreated, had SD, range 92-340 d, 2 ongoing with SD. The 3 CPI pretreated pts had SD range 41-340 d, 1 pt ongoing. The preliminary median duration on combination Tx was 113 d, range 7-429 d. The preliminary median duration of clinical benefit was 131 d. Conclusions: SOT101 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab showed a favorable safety profile. Highly promising efficacy signals with one ongoing CR and several long-lasting PRs were reported in CPI-naïve and CPI pretreated pts, including CPI-resistant tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT04234113.

TPS2670 Background: Tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (TNFR2) is expressed on effector CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, T regulatory cells, natural killer cells, and myeloid cells. Targeting TNFR2 is anticipated to yield effective anti-tumor immunity by stimulating T-cell and NK-cell activation and proliferation in the tumor microenvironment. HFB200301 is a first-in-class anti-TNFR2 agonistic monoclonal antibody that triggers both innate and adaptive immune stimulation by binding to a specific epitope on TNFR2. HFB200301 has demonstrated dose-dependent anti-tumor activity in human TNFR2 knock-in mice bearing MC38 and Hepa1-6 syngeneic tumors. Methods: HFB200301 is being evaluated in a first-in-human, open-label, multi-center, dose escalation and expansion study in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. A single-cell immune profiling platform, DIS, was deployed to identify unique tumor-infiltrating T cell signatures that could help optimize patient selection for HFB200301 treatment. It is hypothesized that the presence of an effector T cell subpopulation that express both TNFR2 and CD8A in solid tumors may represent a tumor microenvironment favorable to TNFR2 agonism. The following cancer indications have been identified based on the prevalence of a TNFR2 high/CD8 high signature: Epstein-Barr Virus positive (EBV+) gastric cancer, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), cutaneous melanoma, testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT), soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and PD-L1+ cancers: cervical cancer, pleural mesothelioma, lung adenocarcinoma, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The escalation portion of the study explores increasing doses in cohorts of up to six patients, utilizing mTPI-2 design to determine recommended dose(s) for expansion (RDE(s)). Based on pharmacokinetic modeling to maximize HFB200301 activity, 60-minute intravenous infusions of HFB200301 are administered every 4 weeks. Once RDE(s) is determined, expansion into three indication-specific cohorts is planned to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Key eligibility criteria include histologically documented advanced or metastatic solid tumors in the above listed indications. Patient enrollment opened in February 2022 in the USA, with plans for additional clinical sites in Spain and China. The primary objective is to identify the RDE, characterize safety and tolerability of HFB200301, and determine RP2D. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetic parameters, preliminary evidence of anti-tumor efficacy (e.g., ORR, DCR, DOR) and pharmacodynamic evaluation (e.g., T cell subsets) in the blood and in the tumor. Furthermore, a potential predictive biomarker signature derived based on the DIS single-cell immune profiling approach will be investigated retrospectively. Clinical trial information: NCT05238883.

2510 Background: VIGex is a 12- gene GES classifier initially developed on the Nanostring platform and validated for RNA-seq. VIGex classifies samples into Hot, intermediate-Cold (I-Cold) and Cold subgroups. The Hot subgroup as defined by VIGex has been associated with better (PFS) in patients (pts) treated on phase 1 ICT trials at Vall D’Hebron Hospital (VH) (ESMO2020). We investigated the performance of VIGex in pts treated with Pembrolizumab (P) in the INSPIRE clinical trial (NCT02644369) at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) and compared VIGex with other predictive ICT biomarkers. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors were treated with P 200 mg IV Q3wks. RNA-seq from baseline biopsies was performed using the Illumina NextSeq550 platform. Tumor RNA-seq data were transferred from PM to VH and classified by the VIGex algorithm blinded to clinical data. Bespoke circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was assayed at baseline (B) and start of cycle 3 (C3) using a pt-specific amplicon-based NGS assay (Signatera). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was defined as the number of non-synonymous mutations per megabase and PD-L1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry (22C3). Hot subgroup (HOT) was compared to I-Cold + Cold (COLD). We defined 4 groups based on the combination of VIGex subgroups and the change in ctDNA at cycle 3 from baseline (ΔctDNA). Survival times were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional-hazard models were constructed. Results: Out of 76 pts, median age was 55y (range 21-81y), M:F 31:45, all ECOG 0-1, 16 High-grade serous ovarian, 12 triple negative breast, 12 head and neck, 10 melanoma and 26 other. Median no. of P cycles was 3 (range 1–35); follow up was 14m (range 1-67); Median PFS 10.9m and median overall survival (OS) 14m. Overall response rate (RECIST 1.1) was 24% in HOT and 10% in COLD (p = 0.22 two-sided Fisher's exact test). The HOT subgroup was significantly associated with higher OS and PFS when included in a multivariate model adjusted by tumor histology, TMB and PD-L1 (HR 0.43; 95%CI 0.23-0.81; p = 0.009) and (HR: 0.48; 95%CI 0.25-0.95; p = 0.036) respectively. A total of 57 pts had both VIGex and ΔctDNA data. The addition of ΔctDNA further improved the predictive performance of VIGex for OS (Table). Conclusions: VIGex maintained its predictive power for ICT outcomes when applied to an independent external dataset using RNA-seq. The predictive information provided by VIGex was independent of PD-L1 and TMB. Our data indicates that the addition of ΔctDNA to baseline VIGex may refine prediction for ICT outcomes. [Table: see text]

e15091 Background: CDK 8 /CDK19 are kinases involved in transcriptional control of embryonic development and cellular homeostasis via the mediator complex. They are also described to maintain tumor dedifferentiation and stem cell properties. A variety of cancer cells hijack the mediator complex and targeting cancer-specific gene transcription via CDK8/19 inhibition has potential for treatment of solid tumors. RVU120 (SEL120) is a selective CDK8/19 inhibitor with preclinical efficacy in hematologic malignancies and a variety of solid tumor types (Rzymski et al. 2017). RVU120 showed strong anticancer activity in preclinical triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) models, especially in the mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) molecular subtype (Rzymski et al SABCS 2021). Methods: A Phase I/II clinical trial of RVU120 in solid tumors is currently ongoing (NCT05052255). Patients with metastatic or advanced solid tumors without available treatments receive increasing doses of RVU120 as a single oral dose every other day (QOD) for a total of 7 doses on Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, in a 3-week treatment cycle. Primary objectives of the study are safety / tolerability of RVU120 as single agent and determination of the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) via a 3+3 dose escalation design. Secondary objectives include objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST criteria v1.1) and PK of RVU120. Results: As of 11FEB 2022, 5 pts have been enrolled into the trial: 3 into cohort 1, 75 mg dose, 2 into cohort 2, 100 mg. None of the pts experienced a DLT, SAEs or > Grade 3 AE. Treatment-related AEs were all G1 except for G2 diarrhea and weakness. Cohort 1 patients had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment. A 62 YO patient, stage IV esophago-gastric junction carcinoma, metastases to the liver, retroperitoneum, adrenal gland and portocaval lymph nodes, progressing after 4 lines of previous therapy, achieved a SD with a +4% change of target lesion size and progressed in cycle 6. A 65 YO patient, stage IV adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea, metastases to the lung and refractory to antiandrogens and radiotherapy, achieved a SD with -4% change of target lesion size after 3 cycles and is currently ongoing in cycle 5. A 43 YO pt stage IV thymic carcinoma, metastases to the lung, mediastinum, pleura and lymph nodes, progressing under cisplatin/etoposide, stopped study drug at the end of cycle 3 for PD in non-target lesions, target lesions increased by 11%. Cohort 2 patients, a 65 YO pt with pancreatic cancer stage IV, metastases to liver and lung, and a 55 YO pt with TNBC stage IV, metastases to the lung, will be evaluated end of cycle 3. Conclusions: In the first dose escalation level with single agent RVU120, no DLTs or ≥G3 AEs were observed in patients with previously progressive solid tumors. Initial assessments in 3 pts demonstrated stable disease in 2 patients. Collection of further data at higher doses is ongoing with 2 patients enrolled at 100 mg. Clinical trial information: NCT05052255.

TPS3166 Background: The forkhead box family transcription factor FOXP3 is essential for T regulatory cells (Tregs) development and immune suppressive function. Tregs are an integral component of the adaptive immune system and contribute to maintaining tolerance to self-antigens and preventing autoimmune diseases. In the context of cancer, however, Tregs contribute to tumor progression by suppressing antitumor immunity. To date inhibition of Treg-mediated immunosuppression tested in the clinic has lacked specificity. Targeting FOXP3 provides a selective approach to impair the immunosuppressive function of Tregs but targeting transcription factors has been a challenge using conventional drug modalities. AZD8701 employs next-generation antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) technology (Ionis Pharmaceuticals) to bind mRNA with high affinity and selectively reduce human Foxp3 mRNA expression levels. Foxp3-specific ASOs promote potent dose-dependent reductions in Foxp3 mRNA and protein in vitro. In preclinical models, AZD8701 induced Foxp3 knockdown results in Tregs with a reduced immunosuppressive capacity, loss of immunosuppressive markers, and increased markers of activation on CD8+ T-cells. AZD8701 reduces tumor growth as monotherapy in preclinical models and increased tumor inhibition is obtained by combining AZD8701 with a PD-L1 inhibitor. Methods: This is a Phase I multicenter study of AZD8701 alone or in combination with durvalumab in participants with selected advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients must have ECOG performance status 0 or 1, measurable target lesion per RECIST v1.1 and be diagnosed with selected tumor types as described below. Monotherapy and combination dose escalation phase is open for participants with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), gastroesophageal cancer, melanoma, cervical cancer, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and/or solid tumors that have demonstrated a response to prior programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-[L]1) treatment (as defined by duration of response > 18 weeks). Participants with NSCLC, HNSCC, TNBC, and ccRCC will be included in the pharmacodynamic cohort at the selected monotherapy dose and/or disease expansion cohorts. The primary objectives are to assess safety and tolerability and to determine the preliminary antitumor activity of AZD8701 (objective response rate) when administered as monotherapy or in combination with durvalumab. Secondary endpoints include, disease control rate, duration of response, progression free survival and overall survival, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (including changes in Foxp3 mRNA in paired tumor samples). The trial is currently recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT04504669.

2519 Background: Resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) can manifest as disease progression either at the initiation of treatment (primary resistance) or after some initial response (acquired resistance). To better understand the mechanisms underlying acquired resistance, the imCORE Network is conducting a study (NCT03333655) to examine changes in tumor biology from pre-treatment to disease progression across cancer types. Methods: Eligible patients included those experiencing clinical benefit on ICB (defined as objective response or stable disease longer than 6 months) and had evaluable tissue samples from both pre-treatment and within 30 days of progression. Samples were subjected to whole exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Whole blood samples or adjacent normal tissue were used as a reference for tumor variant calling. Results: As of December 3rd, 2021, 24 enrolled patients have complete sample pairs. Of those, melanoma, bladder, and lung were most common (n = 7, 6 and 5 pairs, respectively), but our cohort also included patients with breast cancer, squamous head & neck, and renal cell carcinoma. IHC data unexpectedly showed a modest, but consistent increase in tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells at progression. In addition, IHC evidence of a decrease in MHC-I proteins (HLA-A and B2M) suggest that in 5 out of 24 cases, key proteins needed for antigen presentation are lost. Global differential gene expression analysis showed that immune gene expression was significantly increased at progression, including numerous chemokines and significant enrichment in gene sets responsible for antigen presentation machinery. Protein-altering mutations at progression appeared in B2M in one patient, and CXCL9 in another. However, in most cases it is unclear what genetic alterations are responsible. We do not observe evidence of consistent IFNγ and Jak/stat signaling loss or antigen presentation loss. Conclusions: While ICB resistance is thought to be associated with a lack of immune response within the TME, we found that acquired resistance is usually associated with either maintenance or an increase in immune infiltration. Multiple alterations that are unique to individual patients also continue to emerge. Our data shows ICB resistance is multifactorial and associated with dynamic changes to markers amid immune activation and inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT03333655.

3584 Background: Patients (pts) with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed on ≥2 prior therapies have limited treatment options, with median OS ranging from 6-9 months (mo). In the dose-escalation phase of this first-in-human multicohort study (NCT02720068), the anti-lymphocyte activation gene (LAG)-3 antibody favezelimab (fave) was well tolerated alone and with pembrolizumab (pembro) across all dose levels (Lakhani, SITC, 2018, abstract O26). Here, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of fave alone or in combination with pembro in pts with advanced MSS CRC from the dose confirmation phase. Methods: Eligible pts with MSS PD-1/PD-L1-treatment-naïve mCRC that progressed on prior standard-of-care (3L+) were enrolled (cohort A) to receive the RP2D of 800 mg fave alone (Arm 1), 800 mg fave + 200 mg pembro (Arm 2C), or 800 mg fave + 200 mg pembro (MK-4280A) co-formulation (Arm 5), all Q3W. Treatment continued for 35 cycles or until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator/pt decision. Pts with confirmed progression per irRECIST v1.1 on fave alone could crossover to 800 mg fave + pembro. Safety was assessed in all treated pts; efficacy in the full analysis set (FAS) of all treated pts with baseline scan. Objectives included safety (primary), ORR (RECIST v1.1 by investigator [secondary]), and DOR, PFS, and OS (exploratory). Interim analysis data cut-off was: Oct. 23, 2020. Results: A total of 20 pts received fave (Arm 1); 89 pts (including 9 crossover) received fave + pembro (Arms 2C+5); 12 pts (Arm 1) and 36 pts (Arms 2C+5), had PD-L1 CPS ≥1 tumors. At data cut-off, median follow-up was 5.8 months (mo) in Arm 1 and 6.2 mo in Arms 2C+5. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were 65% with fave (Arm 1) and 65.2% with fave + pembro (Arms 2C+5). Grade ≥3 TRAEs were 15% (Arm 1), and 20% [Arms 2C+5]). No grade 5 TRAEs were reported. Common TRAEs (≥15%) included fatigue (20.0%), nausea (15%) with fave, and fatigue (16.9%) with fave + pembro. Confirmed ORR was 6.3% (4PR, 1CR) with fave + pembro (Arms 2C+5). No pt receiving fave alone responded. In Arms 2C+5, median DOR was 10.6 mo (range, 5.6-12.7). ORR, OS and PFS by PD-L1 status are reported in the Table. Conclusions: Favezelimab alone or in combination with pembrolizumab had a manageable safety profile, with no treatment-related deaths. Promising antitumor activity was observed with combination therapy, including with MK-4280A, compared with monotherapy most notably in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02720068. [Table: see text]

TPS2658 Background: Growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is a TGF-β superfamily member physiologically expressed mainly in placenta and linked to feto-maternal tolerance. Under pathophysiologic conditions, prevention of excessive immune cell infiltration during tissue damage and cachexia induction have been ascribed to GDF-15. A recent study [Haake et al. AACR2020; Abstract #5597] elucidated a mechanism by which GDF-15 inhibits LFA-1 activation on CD8+ T cells, thus interfering with effector T cell recruitment to tissues. Importantly, several cancer entities secrete high levels of GDF-15, correlating with poor prognosis and reduced overall survival [reviewed in Front Immunol 2020 May 19;11:951]. To block this effect the GDF-15 neutralizing antibody CTL-002 was generated. In preclinical models CTL-002 demonstrated potent effector T cell shifting into tumor tissue by neutralizing GDF-15. Methods: This is a phase 1, first-in-human (FIH), two-part, open-label clinical trial of intravenous (IV) administration of CTL-002 given as monotherapy and in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody in subjects with advanced-stage, relapsed/refractory solid tumors who relapsed post or were refractory to a prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Eligible subjects have exhausted all available approved standard treatments. Further key eligibility criteria include having received at least one prior anti-PD1/-PD-L1 treatment and having relapsed on or after it or having been refractory to it, and presenting with a biopsy-accessible tumor for serial biopsy taking. The trial is termed GDFATHER, for “GDF-15 Antibody-mediaTed Effector cell Relocation”. Main endpoints are safety of CTL-002 monotherapy and CTL-002 combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (e.g. degree of GDF-15 neutralization achieved and change in immune-cell number and composition in the tumor tissue) as well as preliminary clinical efficacy (tumor mass reduction; anticachexia effect) In part A of the trial (dose escalation) up to 24 subjects will receive escalating doses of CTL-002 IV (0.3 – 20 mg/kg) in a „mono-followed-by-combination“-design with CTL-002 given as monotherapy and followed by combination with an anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor. In part B (expansion) up to 5 cohorts with up to 25 subjects per cohort with defined tumor entities expected to be GDF-15 dependent will be treated to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and further evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of CTL-002 monotherapy and the combination. The study was initiated in December 2020 and enrolled the first patient on Dec 09, 2020. Cohort 1 has been completed without DLT and enrollment for cohort 2 began in February 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04725474.

2524 Background: The phase I GATTO study explored the feasibility, tolerability and preliminary activity of combining gatipotuzumab (GAT), a novel humanized monoclonal antibody binding to the tumor-associated epitope of mucin-1 (TA-MUC1) and an anti-EGFR antibody. Preclinical evidence suggests a complex interaction between TA-MUC1 and EGFR on the cell surface of epithelial tumors driving carcinogenesis processes and synergistic antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity activity with the dual targeting. Methods: Initially the study enrolled in a primary phase (PP) 20 patients with EGFR positive metastatic solid tumors, for whom no standard treatment was available. The first 6 patients were enrolled into a safety run-in phase and the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) was evaluated, in order to de-escalate the doses if needed. Patients received GAT administered at 1400 mg Q2W in combination with the glyco-optimized anti-EGFR antibody tomuzotuximab (TOM) at 1200 mg Q2W. Due to the risk of infusion related reactions (IRR), the first dose of TOM was reduced to 720 mg split over 2 consecutive days and three cycles of TOM monotherapy were given before start of treatment with GAT. As this regimen was proven safe, no DLT was observed and the initial dose remained unchanged, the study was amended to enroll in an expansion phase (EP) 30 additional patients with refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck and breast cancers. TOM and GAT were given at the same doses and GAT treatment started already one week after the first dose of the anti-EGFR antibody. Additionally investigator had the choice to use a commercial anti-EGFR antibody in place of TOM. Results: By the time of the final analysis in January 2021, 52 refractory patients were enrolled and 50 received at least one dose of both GAT and anti-EGFR antibodies. Panitumumab (PAN) was used in 9 CRC patients. Because of the difference in treatment schedule, results are summarized separately for the 20 and 30 patients in PP and EP. Overall, the combined treatment was well tolerated and no DLT was observed in the whole study, nor related SAE or death. There were no treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to dose interruptions or reductions in the PP and 2/30 (6.7%) patients in EP stopped both TOM and GAT. 16 IRRs were reported in 8/20 (40%) PP patients, and 40 IRRs in 10 (33.3%) EP patients. Only one event of chills was severe and only 6 events were related to GAT in the EP, all others to TOM. Other frequent TEAEs were those commonly observed with anti-EGFR treatment such as skin toxicity in 17 (85%) PP and 26 (86.7%) EP patients and hypomagnesemia in 10 (50%) PP and 7 (23.3%) EP patients. Conclusions: Combination of TA-MUC1 and EGFR targeting antibody is safe and feasible. Future studies should test this combination together with chemotherapy Clinical trial information: NCT03360734.

6081 Background: Treatment selection based on actionable alterations (AAs) is an appealing strategy for pts with R/M SGT. The GEMS-001 study (NCT02069730) at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) and the Vall D´Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) pre-screening program facilitate the identification of AAs for R/M SGT pts and treatment selection. Methods: We analyzed R/M SGT treated at PM and VHIO from 2015 to 2020. Clinicopathological features, molecular alterations and treatment modalities were correlated with outcomes. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined by pts with partial response or stable disease ≥4 months. Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were assessed as per institutional molecular tumor boards or investigators. Pts were opportunistically matched to available therapies from each center. Results: In total 206 pts were enrolled. On IHC, HER2 overexpression was present in 9%, Androgen Receptor (AR) 33%, Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor (ER/PR) 11% and ALK overexpression 0%. On NGS, PIK3CA mutation (mut) was in 9%, NTRK fusion 6%, NOTCH1-3 mut 5%, HRAS mut 6%, ERBB2/3 alterations (alt) 4% and FGFR1-4 alt 3%. Up to 92 pts (45%) displayed at least 1 AA and 36 pts (18%) had ≥2 AAs. A total of 60 pts (29%) were matched to AAs. Of those matched, median age was 60 years (range 33-84), M:F 21:39, 95% ECOG≤1 with a median number of prior treatment lines 0 (range 0-3), and their AAs included 26 AR, 9 HER2 or ERBB2 overexpression, 9 PIK3CA mut, 3 NTRK fusion, 3 FGFR1-3 alt and 10 other AAs (2 ER/PR overexpression, 2 EGFR mut, 1 c-kit mut, 1 BAP1 mut, 1 Non-V600 BRAF mut, 1 CDKN2A mut, 1 CHEK2 mut and 1 PTCH1 mut). Overall, ORR was 27% for the matched population. See table for outcomes. Conclusions: In our cohort, almost one third of the population received therapies matched to AAs. Our results suggest that targeted therapies have promising activity in pts with R/M SGT supporting comprehensive molecular and IHC profiling in treatment determination.[Table: see text]

2542 Background: Detection of ctDNA is a promising tool for managing pts in oncology. Most methods require whole-genome sequencing of tumor samples followed by the design of personalized panels for tracking purposes. In this work, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of total ctDNA quantification, using shallow whole-genome sequencing (shWGS) exclusively from plasma samples, in a prospective cohort of pts treated with ICIs in early clinical trials. Methods: IchorCNA pipeline was used to quantify ctDNA of shWGS from plasma ctDNA samples of pts treated with ICIs in phase 1 trials, collected at baseline and prior to cycle 2 (prec2). We investigated the association and correlation of ctDNA levels with surrogate markers for tumor burden (LDH levels, summatory of target lesions (TL), liver metastasis) using Spearman and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) of pts with baseline detectable ctDNA levels versus undetectable ctDNA were calculated. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, including continuous classical prognostic factors (LDH, albumin, hemoglobin, derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelets, number of metastases sites, ECOG PS) and ctDNA was performed. An estimate of progression free survival (PFS) of pts with ctDNA increase levels in preC2 versus a non-increase group was evaluated. Results: Since January 2018, 113 pts with no standard-treatment options were included. Median (m) follow up was 14.8 months (mo). Baseline ctDNA levels correlated significantly with baseline TL (R = 0.4, p < 0.001) and LDH levels (R = 0.61, p < 0.001). Pts with liver metastasis had higher levels of ctDNA (11,68 ng/ml) versus pts with no liver disease (2,31 ng/ml) (p < 0,001). In the survival analysis pts with detectable baseline ctDNA (74 pts) had significantly shorter OS compared with pts with undetectable ctDNA (39 pts); median 9.6 m (8.4 – 16.4) and NA m (13.6-NA), respectively (HR = 2.25 [1.18-4.29] p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, only ctDNA and albumin levels maintained the impact in OS (HR = 1.03, p < 0.05 and HR = 0.22, p < 0.05, respectively). Pts with early increases in ctDNA had a shorter PFS compared with those with a stabilization or decrease, median 1.9 m (1.6 – 4.0) and 3.0 m (2.6 – 3.8), respectively (HR = 2.19 [1.31-3.67], p < 0.01). Conclusions: Quantification of baseline ctDNA using shWGS is a strong independent prognostic factor. Early dynamic changes of ctDNA could be a useful tool to predict PFS outcomes.

TPS2657 Background: T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) is an inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor expressed on subsets of T cells and NK cells. SEA-TGT is an effector-function enhanced human mAb that targets TIGIT with pico-molar affinity and blocks TIGIT’s interaction with CD155 and CD112. SEA-TGT was developed to have amplified binding to and engagement of Fcγ receptors. Enhanced effector function increases TIGIT+ T-regulatory cell depletion, enhances innate immune cell activation, and augments naïve and memory CD8+ T-cell responses. Preclinically, SEA-TGT elicits superior anti-tumor immune responses compared to other TIGIT mAbs without effector-enhanced backbones, with curative anti-tumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with other immune-modulators. Methods: This phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation/expansion study (NCT04254107) is assessing the safety, tolerability and preliminary activity of SEA-TGT monotherapy in up to 205 adults (≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed relapsed, refractory, or progressive metastatic solid tumors (non-small cell lung, gastric/GE junction carcinomas, cutaneous melanoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, ovarian cancer or triple-negative breast cancer) or lymphomas (classical Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, or peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified). SEA-TGT will be infused on Day 1 of 21-day cycles. In Part A, the safety and tolerability of SEA-TGT will be assessed in ̃25 subjects to identify the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In Part B, the safety and antitumor activity of the RP2D will be assessed in ̃180 subjects in disease-specific expansion cohorts. Primary endpoints are adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, dose-limiting toxicities, and dose-level safety and activity. Secondary endpoints are objective response (OR) rates, duration of OR, complete response, progression-free survival, overall survival, PK, and antidrug antibodies. Exploratory biomarkers of SEA-TGT-mediated pharmacodynamic (PD) effects, PK-PD correlations, and correlative analyses of predictive and PD measurements with response, toxicity, and resistance will be explored. The study was opened April 2020 and is enrolling across sites in North America and Europe. Clinical trial information: NCT04254107.

9089 Background: RET fusions are targetable oncogenic drivers in 1–2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ARROW (NCT03037385) supported the US FDA approval of pralsetinib, a highly potent oral selective RET inhibitor for RET-altered NSCLC and thyroid cancer. Here, we present updated results for a larger population of patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC enrolled in ARROW. Methods: ARROW is a phase 1/2 open-label study conducted at 84 sites in 13 countries. Phase 2 expansion cohorts included patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC. Initially, all treatment-naïve patients were not candidates for platinum-based therapy, a requirement removed by protocol amendment in July 2019. Primary objectives are overall response rate (ORR; blinded independent central review [BICR] per RECIST v1.1), assessed for patients with baseline measurable disease, and safety. Results: Updated analyses were completed as of Nov 6, 2020 (data cut-off), for patients who initiated pralsetinib 400 mg QD by May 22, 2020 (enrollment cut-off). Efficacy results, including analyses for treatment-naïve patients enrolled after eligibility criteria were revised to allow candidates for platinum-based therapy, are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Pralsetinib showed rapid, potent, and durable clinical activity in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC (regardless of prior therapies), including poor prognosis patients not eligible for platinum-based therapy. Overall, pralsetinib was well-tolerated. These data highlight the need for RET testing early in the course of disease to identify candidates who may benefit from treatment with pralsetinib. Clinical trial information: NCT03037385. [Table: see text]

2597 Background: In order to improve the expected response rate (ORR) of less than 10% in cold tumors, several ICI combinations are being evaluated in clinical trials. However, most of these trials don’t require any biomarker and pts are included based solely in histology. We aimed to assess the benefit of ICI combinations in pts with unselected cold tumors included in early CT. Methods: ICI naïve pts with cold tumors treated from 2015 to 2021 with ICI combinations in early CT at VHIO were reviewed. Clinico-pathological data and anti-tumor activity were extracted from a prospective database. ORR was defined as per RECIST v1.1 and clinical benefit rate (CBR) as complete/partial response (CR/PR) + stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months (m). Kaplan Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and a Cox model according to LIPI (Lung Immune Prognostic Index = baseline LDH and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio) was constructed. Immune-related adverse events (irAE) were classified as per CTCAE v.4.03. Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) was evaluated using RECIST v1.1 (Matos et al, 2020). Results: Out of 97 pts, median age was 62y, 61% had ECOG 0 and 29.8% had LIPI 0 (good prognostic score). Most pts had microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (60.8%) or ovarian cancer (14.4%). Regimens included anti-PD1/L1 + another ICI in 69% (most commonly anti-LAG3 [26,8%] and CD40 agonist [20.9%]), anti-PD1/L1 + other molecule in 21.7% (most commonly SHP2 inhibitor [33.3%] and anti p53-HDM2 [28.5%]) and bispecific antibodies in 9.3% (anti-PD1/L1 + anti-LAG3 or CD137 agonist). No patient achieved a response. CBR was 15.3% (11 pts with MSS colorectal cancer, 2 ovarian cancer, 1 olfactory neuroblastoma, 1 paraganglioma). 33 pts (34%) presented irAE, 15 pts (15.5%) had irAE ≥ G2, 4 pts (4.1%) had G3 irAE (dry mouth, hypertransaminasemia, myocarditis and neutrophils count decreased) and 1 patient (1%) had G4 hyperglicemia. 58 pts (59.7%) had progressive disease (PD) as best response, 19 of these pts (32.7%) presented irAE. Overall, 20 pts (20.6%) met definition of HPD, representing 34.4% of pts with PD as best response. Median PFS for overall and CBR population were 1.9 m (CI95% 1.7-2.0) and 5.9 m (5.4-NR), respectively. Median OS for overall population was 7.6 m (5.9-9.5), with a trend for improved OS if LIPI good score vs. others (12.6 m vs. 6.2 m, hazard ratio 1.9, (CI 95% 1.1-3.3), p = 0.02). Among hyperprogressors, median OS was 5.33 m (3.39 - NR) and significantly worse LIPI scores (intermediate [1] or poor [2]) were observed as compared to pts with CBR (75% vs 53.3% p = 0.001). Conclusions: ICI combinations demonstrated very limited activity in pts with unselected cold tumors. However, the risk for irAE and HPD remain substantial. Further drug-biomarker co-development strategies are urgently needed to increase the risk benefit ratio for these pts.

2557 Background: The development of human intratumoral therapy (HIT-IT) has surged as a promising strategy to overcome resistance to checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), promoting a stronger tumor-specific immune response while reducing systemic exposure. A broad variety of agents (i.e: oncolytic viruses, toll-like receptors agonists) administered both in superficial- and deep-seated lesions are being currently tested in clinical trials (CT). Due to the local intervention on tumors, radiological assessment by standard RECIST is challenging and new methods of response that capture and integrate the local and systemic response to HIT-IT are needed. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of itRECIST (Goldmacher et al., 2020) in patients (pts) treated with HIT-IT in early phase CT. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of pts with different solid tumor types enrolled in CT including HIT-IT in our institution between August’18 and January’21. Clinical characteristics were collected. Efficacy in target-injected (T-I) and target-non-injected (T-NI) lesions was assessed by objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), as per itRECIST. Overall disease ORR and DCR were assessed per RECIST 1.1/iRECIST. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed with CTCAE v.5.0. ORR was calculated with Clopper-Pearson method. Survival analysis was made using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 37 pts were included. Median age was 66 years, 19 pts (51%) were male, all pts had ECOG 0-1. 24 pts (65%) were CPI-naïve. Median previous lines of therapy was 2 (range [r]: 0-11). All pts (100%) received minimum 1 dose of HIT-IT. 6 pts (16%) were treated with monotherapy and 31 pts (84%) in combination with CPI. Median HIT-IT and CPI doses administered were 4 (r: 1-9) and 2 (r: 1-13), respectively. Injected lesions: cutaneous (16.2%), subcutaneous (21.6%), lymph node (32.4%), liver (29.7%). Median size of T-I lesions was 40 mm (r: 19-260). At data cutoff, 32 pts were evaluable. Median follow-up was 14.4 weeks (r: 1.0-81.1). Per RECIST 1.1, overall ORR was 6% (95% CI, 5-7) and DCR was 38% (95% CI, 21-56). Per itRECIST, ORR was 19% (95% CI, 7-36) and DCR was 63% (95% CI, 44-79) in T-I lesions (n = 32), and 10% (95% CI, 22-27) and 48% (95% CI, 29-67) in T-NI lesions (n = 29). Mean decrease in responding T-I and T-NI lesions was -47% (r: -21 to -100) and -41% (r: -26 to -59), respectively. No non-target (NT) lesion was injected. Median progression-free survival was 7.4 weeks (95% CI, 6.6 – 8.2). Median overall survival was 10.0 months (95% CI, 2.3 – 17.7). Incidence of TRAE was 58% (grade 1-2 IT-related pyrexia 43%; grade 3-4, 5%). No treatment-related deaths were recorded. Conclusions: ItRECIST is feasible to implement and adds precision to the radiological assessment of local and distant anti-tumor activity of HIT-IT. No safety issues were detected in our cohort.

3078 Background: PM14 is a new chemical entity that forms DNA adducts which specifically inhibit RNA synthesis and block active transcription of protein-coding genes. Antitumor activity has been demonstrated in vitro in several cell lines (e.g. lung, kidney, prostate), and in vivo in mice bearing xenografted human-derived tumors (soft tissue sarcoma, small cell lung cancer, ovarian, gastric, breast and renal cancer). Methods: Open-label, dose-escalating, phase I trial of PM14 administered as a 3-hour infusion i.v. every 3 weeks (q3wk) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, adequate organ function and ECOG PS score of 0-1. Two schedules were explored: Schedule A (Day 1 [D1], Day 8 [D8]) and Schedule B (D1). Results: 37 pts were treated (Schedule A/B: 28/9 pts). Baseline characteristics of pts (A/B): median age 56/47 years; male 57%/56%; ECOG PS 0: 57%/56%; median of prior lines (range): 3 (1-8)/4 (1-10). Most common tumor types (A + B): STS (n=7 pts), ovarian (n=6), pancreatic (n=4), prostate cancer (n=3). The maximum tolerated dose was 4.5 mg/m2 for A (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs]: D8 omission due to lack of recovery of lab parameters for re-treatment [n=2 pts]) and 5.6 mg/m2 (DLTs: G4 febrile neutropenia [n=1], G4 transaminase increase [n=1]) for B. The recommended dose (RD) was 3.0 mg/m2 on D1,D8 (A), and 4.5 mg/m2 on D1 (B). No DLTs were present at the RDs. Most common toxicities were hematological abnormalities and transaminase increase. Main toxicities at the RDs are shown below. Antitumor activity comprised stable disease ≥4 months in 7 heavily pretreated pts (6 in A; 1 in B) at all dose levels. Linear pharmacokinetics were observed for PM14 at tested doses (0.25-5.6 mg/m²), with geometric mean (CV%) total plasma clearance 5.9 L/h (88%), volume of distribution 128 L (81%) and median (range) terminal half-life 15.9 h (7.5-34.3 h). Less than 1.6% of administered dose was recovered in urine. Conclusions: RDs were determined for two PM14 schedules in pts with advanced solid tumors. At the RDs, PM14 is well tolerated and has a manageable safety profile. An expansion phase in specific tumor types, with an optional Bayesian continual reassessment method for RD fine-tuning, is ongoing with both schedules.[Table: see text]

3020 Background: CB-103 selectively inhibits the CSL-NICD interaction leading to down-regulation of CSL-NICD mediated oncogenic pathway activation downstream of NOTCH receptor/ligand signaling, and has shown potent anti-cancer activity as single agent and in combination with targeted/chemotherapies in preclinical models. The aim of this dose escalation/expansion phase 1/2a study is to assess safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), preliminary activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CB-103. Methods: Eligible were adult patients (pts) with advanced or recurrent selected solid tumors. Tumor tissue, where available, was retrospectively tested for NOTCH pathway activating mutations and surrogate tissues were evaluated for gene expression of related target genes. CB-103 was given orally in 28 days cycles at escalating doses until disease progression or toxicity. In a dose confirmatory cohort, NOTCH activation will be prospectively assessed to determine eligibility. Results: Forty-one pts (19 adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), 16 colorectal and 4 breast cancer, 2 prostate cancer) were assigned to increasing dose levels starting from 15mg once daily (OD). Median age was 55 years (range 25-76). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 0-7). Thirty-two pts in 8 escalation groups completed the 28-day DLT window. One DLT (asymptomatic grade (G) 3 GGT increase) was observed at the highest dose (600mg). Related treatment emergent adverse events (AE) occurring in >10% of pts were nausea (24%), diarrhea (20%), dyspepsia (15%), fatigue (12%) and vision blurred (12%), all G 1/2. No discontinuations occurred due to treatment-related AEs. The MTD has not been reached. Several pts reported vision changes that improved over time and were fully reversible after stopping the drug. Median time on treatment for all pts was 52 days (range 5-249). Best response was stable disease (SD). For ACC pts, preliminary median PFS was 21.7 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 13.7-22.4 weeks) and disease control rate (DCR) was 79% at week 8 and 58 % at week 20. Three pts with ACC harboring activating NOTCH alterations had radiologically confirmed stable disease (SD) > 6 months. Importantly, in 3 pts with NOTCH positive disease a temporary stop of tumor growth was observed. One pt showed a reduction in size of a liver lesion up to 25% before progression due to new lesions. Mechanistically, strong on-treatment downregulation of NOTCH target genes was observed. The dose of 600mg CB-103 OD was declared the RP2D. Conclusions: CB-103 is the first drug to effectively control the CSL-NICD transcription complex. CB-103 is well tolerated in pts with advanced tumors and, as expected on the basis of mechanistic studies, in the absence of the typical toxicities associated with Notch targeting GSIs or mABs. The RP2D has been established for advancing clinical development into phase 2. Clinical trial information: NCT03422679.

2522 Background: The phase I GATTO study explored the feasibility, tolerability and preliminary activity of combining Gatipotuzumab (GAT), a novel humanized monoclonal antibody binding to the tumor-associated epitope of mucin-1 (TA-MUC1), and an anti-EGFR antibody. Preclinical evidence suggests a complex interaction between TA-MUC1 and EGFR on the cell surface of epithelial tumors and synergistic antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity activity with the double targeting. Methods: Initially 20 patients with refractory metastatic disease were treated with GAT administered at 1400 mg Q2W in combination with the glyco-optimized anti-EGFR antibody Tomuzotuximab (TOM) at 1200 mg Q2W. Due to the risk of infusion related reactions, three cycles of TOM were given before start of combined treatment with GAT. After this regimen was proven safe and no DLT was observed, 30 additional patients including colorectal cancer (CRC) already treated with anti-EGFR antibodies, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck and breast cancers received TOM and GAT administered at the same doses, with GAT treatment starting already one week after the first dose of the anti-EGFR antibody. As allowed in the study expansion, Panitumumab (PAN) was used in place of TOM in 9 CRC patients at investigator’s choice. Results: By the time of the final analysis in January 2021, 52 patients were enrolled, and 50 received at least one dose of both GAT and anti-EGFR antibodies. Safety was overall good and results are reported in a separate abstract. Because of the difference in treatment schedule, activity results of the two parts of the study are summarized separately. There were 2 and 4 RECIST partial responses in the first and second part of the study, all in CRC patients. In the expansion phase, the median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of CRC patients who received TOM (10) and PAN (9) was 1.9 and 5.5 months, respectively. There were 2 responses in each subgroup and the duration of response was 3.8 and 7.2 months in patients receiving TOM and PAN, respectively. The PFS for NSCLC was 5.3 months and 2 heavily pretreated patients achieved a prolonged control of disease of 10.6 and 9.4 months. The trial was accompanied by a comprehensive translational research program for identification of biomarkers, including soluble TA-MUC1 in serum. In the extension phase patients with baseline values above median appeared to have improved PFS and overall survival; this was not the case for patients of the first part of the study who received GAT only after 3 doses of TOM. Conclusions: Combination of TA-MUC1 and EGFR targeting antibody is safe and feasible. Interesting anti-tumor activity was observed in heavily pretreated CRC and NSCLC patients. Levels of soluble TA-MUC1 may have predictive value and potentially be a companion biomarker for further development of the combination Clinical trial information: NCT03360734.

9515 Background: Pralsetinib is an investigational, highly potent, selective RET kinase inhibitor targeting oncogenic RET alterations. We provide the registrational dataset for pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC with and without prior treatment from the global ARROW study. Methods: ARROW (75 sites in 11 countries; NCT03037385) consists of a phase I dose escalation to establish recommended phase II dose (400 mg once daily [QD] orally) and phase II expansion cohorts defined by tumor type and/or RET alteration. Primary objectives were overall response rate (ORR; blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1) and safety. Efficacy analyses are shown for response-evaluable pts (REP) with RET fusion+ NSCLC who initiated 400 mg QD pralsetinib by July 11 2019 and safety for all pts (regardless of diagnosis) treated with 400 mg QD. Results: As of November 18 2019, 354 pts with advanced solid tumors had received pralsetinib at starting dose of 400 mg QD with median follow-up 8.8 months. ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and % of pts with tumor size reduction are shown in the table for pts with metastatic RET fusion+ NSCLC (n=116; 72% KIF5B; 16% CCDC6; 12% other/fusion present but type unknown) and with prior platinum treatment (n=80) or without prior systemic treatment (n=26). ORR was similar regardless of RET fusion partner, prior therapies, or central nervous system involvement. Overall there were 7 (6%) complete responses, 4 (5%) in prior platinum pts and 3 (12%) in treatment naïve pts; median time to response overall was 1.8 months and median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (95% CI, 11.3–NR). In the safety population (n=354), most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1-2, and included increased aspartate aminotransferase (31%), anemia (22%), increased alanine aminotransferase (21%), constipation (21%) and hypertension (20%). 4% of pts in the safety population (all tumor types) discontinued due to TRAEs. Conclusions: Updated, registrational, centrally reviewed data demonstrate that pralsetinib has rapid, potent, and durable clinical activity in pts with advanced RET fusion+ NSCLC regardless of RET fusion genotype or prior therapies, and QD oral dosing is well-tolerated. Clinical trial information: NCT03037385 . [Table: see text]

TPS3151 Background: Basket trials with targeted agents can show high response rates for tumors with specific molecular profiles, granting extension of the label of some drugs. In other cases, study results were disappointing, likely due to the rarity of molecular alterations, limits in trial design and the difficulties in applying molecular tumor profiling in the clinical setting. Methods: Basket of Baskets (BoB), NCT03767075, aims to bridge the gap between Academic Genomics and clinical applications (ready-to market multi-marker Companion Diagnostics) by providing a sustainable and adaptable (to new technologies, markers, and therapeutic agents) platform for co-development of drug/companion diagnostic. BoB is a novel platform trial from Cancer Core Europe, a recently established sustainable European network for innovative cancer research. This protocol has two parts: (1) Part A includes a molecular profiling program for subjects with advanced solid tumors (iPROFILER), a variant annotation tool, and a molecular tumor board to select the most appropriate treatment. It also enables testing/developing companion diagnostics linked with the therapeutic part (part B). (2) Part B includes iBASKET, a modular multi-arm basket trial for subjects with tumors harboing selected molecular alterations. Each module is focused on a certain molecular pathway or on certain molecular alterations that may confer sensitivity to the study drug or study drug combination evaluated in that module/arm. The current version of iBASKET (Module 1- Atezolizumab in genomically-selected patients) is open for enrollment for patients with advanced neoplasms bearing one of the following alterations: Arm 1A: BRCA1 or BRCA2; Arm 1B: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2; Arm 1C: POLE, POLD1 mutations; Arm 1D: hypermutated tumors; Arm 1E: other mutations in DNA-repair genes; Arm 1F: PDL1 gene amplification. All patients enrolled in Module 1 will receive single-agent atezolizumab. New Modules for genomically selected populations can be added through amendments. Our final aim is to achieve drug repurposing of treatments, co-develop multi-marker companion diagnostics and a large database of knowledge in Precision Medicine. Clinical trial information: NCT03767075.

6018 Background: RET alterations are targetable oncogenic drivers in ~90% of advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and 20% of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), yet no selective RET inhibitors are approved. BLU-667 is an investigational highly potent and selective RET inhibitor targeting oncogenic RET alterations including those that confer resistance to multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). We provide an update on the expanded experience of BLU-667 in RET-altered thyroid cancer from the registration-enabling ARROW study (NCT03037385). Methods: ARROW is a global DE (30-600 mg daily [QD or BID]) and dose expansion (DX; 400 mg QD) study in pts with advanced solid tumors. Primary objectives are response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1) and safety. Results: As of 19Dec2018, 60 pts with RET-mutated MTC (M918T [37], C634R/S/W [8], V804M [4], other/pending [11]) and 5 pts with RET-fusion+ PTC (NCOA4 [3], CCDC6 [2]) received BLU-667 (37 DE, 28 DX). 58% had prior MKI therapy. Among 49 response-evaluable MTC pts, ORR is 47% (95% CI: 33, 62; 2 complete and 21 partial responses (PR); 4 PR pending confirmation; 25 stable disease; 1 progressive disease). 96% (22/23) of responding pts continue treatment; 15 with response duration ≥ 6 months. 2/4 evaluable PTC pts had PR; all 5 enrolled PTC pts continue treatment at 8-11 months. Responses in MTC occur regardless of MKI resistance (prior cabozantinib/vandetanib: ORR 46% (12/26)) or RET genotype (PR in 2/3 evaluable pts with V804M). Disease control rate in MTC pts is 98%. Rapid plasma clearance of RET variants and marked reduction in CEA and calcitonin is observed. Treatment-related toxicity in MTC/PTC pts, generally low-grade and reversible (28% had grade 3 events, no grade 4/5 events, no events requiring discontinuation), includes decreased WBC (23%), increased AST (17%), increased ALT, blood creatinine, and phosphate, hypertension, and decreased neutrophils (all 15%). Conclusions: BLU-667 demonstrates potent, durable and broad antitumor activity and is well tolerated in MTC/PTC pts regardless of MKI resistance and may significantly improve outcomes for pts with RET-altered thyroid cancers. Enrollment of the expansion is ongoing with registrational intent. Clinical trial information: NCT03037385.

2580 Background: There have been important changes in early drug development units with an unprecedented increase of immune-oncology (IO) trials. Currently at the Vall d’Hebron Institute Oncology (VHIO) close to 50% of our Phase 1 trials (Ph1t) portfolio includes IO drugs, while from 2011 to 2015 more than 80% of our trials assessed targeted agents (TA). We wanted to investigate whether this swift had a positive impact on patient (pts) outcome. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the pts treated with IO and TA at VHIO Ph1t Unit from Jun’11 to May’18. Only patients treated with IO in ≥ 2nd line were included (and without an approved IO therapy as per standard-of-care) and those with TA classified as tiers II-III-IV by the ESMO scale for clinical actionability of molecular targets ESCAT (which also represents unapproved indications). The aim of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) for the two cohorts. Given the non-randomized nature of the study a propensity score weighting (PSW) was used to control for selection bias in treatment effect estimation. Results: Out of 545 eligible pts, 281 (51.5%) received TA and 264 (48.5%) IO, with unadjusted median OS (mOS) of 7.7 months (m) and 9.2m, respectively. In univariate analysis, OS was associated with tumor type, number of previous treatment lines, regimen (monotherapy vs combination), and clinical-laboratory prognostic factors (Vioscore: albumin < 3.5 g/dl; LDH > upper limit of normal; neutrophil/[leukocytes minus neutrophils] ratio (dNLR) > 3; more than 2 sites of metastasis; and presence of liver metastasis) (p < 0.05). After adjusting for these factors in a PSW model, the IO group showed statistically significant longer OS with HR = 0.75 (CI95% 0.65 – 0.86, p < 0.0001). The In a stratified analysis by tumor type we found no significant heterogeneity in the relative benefit of IO over TA. Conclusions: In real world data from our Ph1t population, treatment with IO was associated with longer OS than treatment with TA, even after adjusting for known prognostic factors and treatment selection biases. These results suggest that the likelihood of patient benefit with IO therapies in Ph1t is increasing.

3032Background: HPD with ICIs has been recently described as progression disease (PD) by RECIST with a ≥ two-fold increase in tumor growth rate experimental vs. reference. However, the implementati...

TPS2606Background: MEN1309/OBT076 is a DM4-loaded Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC), directed against CD205/Ly75, a type I transmembrane surface protein belonging to the macrophage mannose receptor fam...

TPS2596Background: TO (CetuGEX) is a second-generation anti-EGFR antibody that specifically binds to EGFR and acts as a competitive antagonist at the ligand binding site. GAT (PankoMab-GEX) is a no...

4071Background: GC is the third cause of cancer death worldwide. Treatment options are limited and a molecular classification on top of HER2 may help to guide therapy. To date, the reported molecul...

e14029 Background: A usual inclusion criterion for phase I trials is life expectancy of more than 3 months. Prediction of early mortality (EM), in the first 90 days after starting treatment, is thus a challenge. Predictive scores may help to select more adequate patients (pts). Our main objective was to generate a predictive score in a training set of phase I pts and to confirm it in a validation score. Secondly, we figured out if our score also predicts overall survival (OS). Methods: Consecutive pts treated in our phase I unit between 2008 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. We collected 35 clinical and analytical characteristics at base line. Stepwise regression was used to correlate pts characteristics with EM and generate a predictive score. Log-rank regression and Kaplan Meier curves were used to study survival. Results: We identified 438 pts. Median age was 61 yr (18-87) and 52.7% were male. More frequent tumor types were gastrointestinal (37%), thoracic (17%), and breast (12%). Pts treated with chemotherapy were 32%, targeted therapy 36%, combination 29%, and immunotherapy 3%. Response rate was 12.4%. Median progression free survival (PFS) and OS were 2.6 and 8.5 months respectively. Most common causes of discontinuation were tumor progression (87.2%) and toxicity (5.7%). EM rate was 20.5%. We randomly included 243 pts in the training score. In multivariate stepwise regression, 6 features were related to EM: ECOG PS 2 (vs 0-1), gastrointestinal or thoracic tumors (vs other types), red cell counts below 4*106/ml, LDH above 600 U/L, calcium below 8.6 mg/dL, and ratio neutrophil/lymphocyte above 5. An EM score was generated ranging 0-7 (2 points for ECOG PS and 1 point for each other characteristic). Using cut off value of 0-2 vs 3 or more, we would reduce EM90 rate to half (11%) and avoid inclusion of 60% pts with EM. Our EM score was validated in the second cohort; we reduced EM rate to 10.5% avoiding undesirable inclusion of 59% pts. Applying score to all pts, median OS was 16, 8.4, 4.4, and 3 months for score 0, 1, 2, and 3-7 respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our score can avoid inclusion of 60% of pts who would die before 90 days, reducing EM rate from 20 to 10%. This score can identify four prognostic groups with different median OS.

2581 Background: Several FGFR and ligand (11q) alterations have been described in cancer. While FGFR fusions are recognized biomarkers of response to FGFRinh, it is still unclear to what extent FGFRamp, FGFR mRNA high expression (mRNAh) or FGFRmut predict sensitivity in the clinic. Methods: Retrospective analysis of pts with molecularly-selected FGFRamp/mRNAh/mut tumors treated with FGFRinh in phase 1 trials at our institution. Mut were detected with IlluminaÒ or Foundation OneÒ. FGFR1-2amp were analyzed by in situ hybridization and mRNA levels by qRT-PCR or nCounterÒ. Clinical benefit (ClinBen) was defined as any tumor shrinkage plus disease control for ³ 4 months (m). Time to progression (TTP) was defined as time between start of FGFRinh and end for any cause. Results: From 2011 to 2016, 36 pts with FGFRamp(25)/mRNAh(5)/mut(6) received an FGFRinh (irreversible- [11 cases (c)] or reversible-FGFR1-4inh [23 c], isoform-specific FGFRinh [3 c] or combo with PI3Kinh [1 c]). Median age 55 yrs (34-76); median prior palliative lines was 3 (0-8); tumor types: breast (17), colorectal (3), esophagus (3), liver (3), lung (3), others (7). Median TTP was 1.67 m (CI 95%; 1.40-2.87). In the FGFRamp/mRNAh population (30), 7 pts achieved ClinBen (23%). 4 out of these seven pts had mRNAh (1 FGFR2amp breast with FGFR2 mRNAh, 1 bladder FGFR3 mRNAh and 2 liver FGFR4 mRNAh without known amp), and 2 pts harboured 11q co-amplification (1 FGFR2amp breast, 1 FGFR2amp head and neck). There was no correlation between ClinBen and level of FGFRamp in the overall population (p = 0.51) or in the breast cancer group (p = 0.29). Of 6 FGFRmut pts, one with bladder cancer had ClinBen (clonal oncogenic FGFR3 S249C). The remaining 5 unresponsive FGFRmut pts had subclonal events, some of these FGFRmut were of unknown functional significance, and had coexisting oncogene mut in MAPK or PI3K pathways. Conclusions: Our results suggest that ClinBen with FGFRinh in the FGFRamp setting is enriched in pts with high mRNA expression and/or ligand co-amplification, and in the FGFRmut population may be dependent on clonality and functionality of the event and co-existence of driver mut.

8530 Background: The majority of SCLC cases are diagnosed as ED, for which there is a poor prognosis and no curative treatment (Tx). V, a potent PARP inhibitor, has been shown in preclinical studies to enhance the antitumor activity of platinum-based agents and E against SCLC. The presented phase 1 dose-escalation (NCT02289690) evaluated V combined with Cb/E. Methods: Pts (≥18 years) with ED SCLC or other advanced/metastatic solid tumors with ≤1 line of prior cytotoxic therapy and ECOG performance score 0/1 were included. This study followed a 3+3 design. V starting dose and schedule were 80 mg BID PO administered on days (D) –2 to 5 in combination with Cb AUC 5 mg/mL•min administered on D 1 and E 100 mg/m2 administered on D 1 to 3 via intravenous infusion in 21-D cycles. V schedules of D –2 to 12 and continuous dosing were also explored. Primary objectives were to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for V combined with Cb/E, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between V and E. Results: Thirty-nine pts (n = 24 ED SCLC; n = 15 other solid tumors) with median age of 62 years (range 43–79) received study Tx. Most common adverse events (AEs; ≥40%) were nausea (54%), fatigue (51%), alopecia (46%), and anemia (44%); grade 3/4 AEs (≥30%) were decreased neutrophil count, neutropenia (31% each), and anemia (26%). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 1 pt (n = 1 grade 3 fatigue) at V 240 mg BID D –2 to 5. The MTD was not reached; RP2D for V was set at 240 mg BID on D –2 to 12 based on long-term tolerability. Continuous dosing of V 240 mg BID with Cb/E resulted in unacceptable Cb/E dose delays due to hematologic toxicity. Coadministration of V (80 to 240 mg BID) with Cb/E exhibited dose-proportional kinetics with no impact on the E PK. Confirmed responses: ED SCLC 63% (15/24 pts) across all dose levels and in 83% (5/6) at RP2D; other tumor types: 13% (2/15) across all dose levels. Conclusions: V + Cb/E had an acceptable safety profile in pts with ED SCLC, with an RP2D of 240 mg BID D –2 to 12. Coadministration of V with Cb/E had no effect on E PK. Responses were seen across all dose levels. A phase 2 study of V with Cb/E in ED SCLC is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02289690.

2500Background: Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway dysregulation can co-occur in tumors. In this study (NCT01928459), safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity of the pan-FGFR (BGJ398) + α-specific PI3K (BYL719) inhibitors were evaluated and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established in pts w/ advanced solid tumors w/ PI3K catalytic subunit (PIK3CA) mutations ± FGFR alterations. Methods: Pts w/ solid tumors received once-daily (QD) BGJ on D1-D21 of each 28-D cycle (C) and BYL continuously during escalation (PIK3CA-mutant ± FGFR-altered) and expansion (arm 1, PIK3CA-mutant [n = 15]; arm 2, PIK3CA-mutant + FGFR-altered [n = 10]; arm 3, PIK3CA-mutant + FGFR-altered breast cancer [n = 10]). Results: Of 62 pts enrolled, 44% had ≥ 4 prior therapies. The MTD, 125 BGJ + 300 BYL, was determined based on 32 evaluable pts’ data during escalation. C1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 4 pts (table). During expansion, 24 pts in arms 1 (n = 12), 2 (...

e23059Background: RAS/RAF/PIK3CA mutations are frequent drivers of secondary drug resistance to cetuximab in mCCR, which typically occurs within 3-12months from the start of therapy. The emergence ...

e15126Background: There is a need to develop biomarkers to predict the outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with chemotherapy (Ch) plus Bevacizumab (B). It has been r...

4109Background: nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine is approved for the treatment of metastastic pancreatic cancer. So far, few studies have investigate this regimen in patients with nonmetastatic disease...

2511 Background: Every cancer has its unique set of molecular changes and the knowledge of such alterations is enabling an individualized approach to cancer treatment. The great intellectual challenge lies in linking confirmed mutations to protein function. Methods: Using massive parallel sequencing we performed whole exome sequencing analysis of 30 patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors to identify putatively actionable tumor-specific genomic alterations. We used 2 in silico methods (Polyphen and SIFT) to estimate the functional significance of a given confirmed mutation. Avatar models generated by direct engraftment of tumor samples from the patients into immunocompromised mice were used as an in vivo platform to test proposed treatment strategies. Results: Successful exome sequencing analyses has been obtained for 28 pts. Tumor specific mutations (Muts) and copy number variations were identified ranging from 5 to 952 and 0 to 956 respectively. All samples profiled contained relevant genomic alterations. Some of the most relevant actionable alterations were: CHEK1, FGFR2, IGF1R, MET, BRCA1, XPC, NOTCH, CREB3LB, GNA11, SMAD4, NF1, PTPRC, PI3KA, DDR2 and EGFR. An Avatar model was generated for 15 patients. In occasions actionable alterations such as muts in NF1, PTPRC, PI3KA and DDR2 failed to provide any benefit when a targeted drug was tested in the Avatar and accordingly treatment of the pts with these drugs was not effective. So far 13 pts have received a personalized treatment: two, as expected based on the avatar model, did not response; 5 resulted in durable partial remissions. Eight pts are currently on treatment with at least disease stabilization. Bench testing of candidate treatments in Avatar models correlated with clinical response and helped to select empirical treatments in patients with no actionable mutations. Conclusions: The use of full genomic analysis for cancer care is promising but presents important challenges that will need to be solved for broad clinical application. Avatar models are a powerful investigational platform for therapeutic decision making and help to guide cancer treatment in the clinic. While limitations still exist, this strategy should be tested in prospective randomized clinical trials.

2600 Background: The increasing trend to incorporate molecular assays as part of selection assessment in Ph1 trials is based on the potential to observe early antitumor activity. Nonetheless, its impact has been almost negligible to date and might affect time to achieve a recommended dose. We assessed the impact on recruitment of pursuing central mandatory molecular assessment of tumor samples on a state-of-the-art Ph1 unit. Methods: Two first-in-human Ph1 studies, requiring central laboratory biomarker assessment as inclusion criterion (DS6 IHC and FGFR mut/ampl, respectively), and a consecutive series of pts in our program for central tumor mutation screening (OncoCarta Panel v1.0) to participate in molecularly-driven Ph1 studies, were reviewed. Results: 13 (4.8%) out of 267 pre-screened pts were able to receive treatment within a targeted Ph1 trial. Conclusions: A vast majority of pts trying to participate in molecularly-driven trial central biomarker screening are not included due to negative results. Still 71.1% pts who were initially eligible and were positive in the central review fail to participate due to clinical and/or analytical deterioration during the time of central molecular assessment. New strategies including local sample pre-screening allowance, as well as anticipated massive molecular profiling in the conventional setting, are needed to reduce this time and improve feasibility of these trials. The derived current “impoverishment” of studies with non-targeted drugs (that lack patients with tumors with “hot” mutations) and of those with targeted drugs (that miss patients with nonmutated tumors) within the same Ph1 Programs, and the need of a joint approach to co-finance for wide-spectrum molecular profiling for different studies, would be discussed as well. [Table: see text]

e14574 Background: Tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a mayor clinical challenge. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway has been linked to hepatocarcinogene...

e19639 Background: Palliative chemotherapy (CT) is the mainstay in the management of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PaC). To assess the efficacy of different gemcitabine regimens in the day to...