Search

9016 Background: For patients (pts) with resectable stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) with 3 cycles cisplatin (cis)/docetaxel (doc) followed by surgery is an accepted standard of care leading to a 1-year (yr) event-free survival (EFS) of 48% and a 5-yr overall survival (OS) of 37%. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have recently shown to lead to high response rates in resectable NSCLC. Methods: SAKK 16/14 is an open-label single-arm phase II study including 68 pts with resectable NSCLC stage IIIA(N2) (T1-3 N2 M0), irrespective of histological subtype, genomic aberrations or PD-L1 expression status. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of 3 cycles of cis 100 mg/m2 and doc 85 mg/m2 q3w followed by 2 cycles of durvalumab 750 mg q2w. Durvalumab was continued after surgery q2w for 1 yr. The primary endpoint is EFS at 1 yr. The statistical hypothesis is to improve EFS at 1 yr from 48% based on the SAKK 16/00 study to 65%. Here, we report the primary endpoint and response data from 67 evaluable pts included in the study. Results: 68 pts were included from 06/16 to 01/19 and 67 pts (35 males, 32 females) were evaluable. Median age was 61 yrs (range, 41-74). 52 pts (77.6%) had a WHO PS of 0. 95.5% were current or former smokers. The majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma (55.2%) followed by squamous cell histology (32.8%). Clinical stage T1, T2 and T3 were present at diagnosis in 22.4%, 49.3% and 28.4%, respectively. 81.1% of pts underwent resection. The main reason for not undergoing surgery was disease progression (33.3%). Pneumonectomy was performed in 5 pts (9.1%), 43 pts underwent lobectomy and 7 pts bilobectomy. 30-day postoperative mortality was observed in one patient (1.8%). One patient died due to a bleeding complication after surgery most likely not related to neoadjuvant therapy. Radiographic response was 44.8% (95%CI: 32.6-57.4) after neoadjuvant chemo and 59.7% (95%CI: 46.4-71.9) after additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy. 1-yr EFS was 73.3% (90%CI: 62.5-81.4). Results for pathologic remission rate as well as correlation with PD-L1 status will be presented during the meeting. Conclusions: We report on treatment outcomes of the largest cohort of pts with resectable stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC receiving perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The addition of perioperative durvalumab to standard of care cis/doc is safe and leads to a high response rate and a very encouraging 1-yr EFS rate that appears substantially higher than with chemo alone. Clinical trial information: NCT 02572843.

Purpose To evaluate the effect of single-agent rituximab given at the standard or a prolonged schedule in patients with newly diagnosed, or refractory or relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients and Methods After induction treatment with the standard schedule (375 mg/m2 weekly × 4), patients who were responding or who had stable disease at week 12 from the start of treatment were randomly assigned to no further treatment (arm A) or prolonged rituximab administration (375 mg/m2) every 8 weeks for four times (arm B). Results The trial enrolled 104 patients. After induction, clinical response was 27% with 2% complete responses. Among patients with detectable t(11;14)-positive cells in blood and bone marrow at baseline, four of 20, and one of 14, respectively, became polymerase chain-reaction–negative after induction. Anemia was the only adverse predictor of response in the multivariate analysis. After a median follow-up of 29 months, response rate and duration of response were not significantly different between the two schedules in 61 randomly assigned patients. Median event-free survival (EFS) was 6 months in arm A versus 12 months in arm B; the difference was not significant (P = .1). Prolonged treatment seemed to improve EFS in the subgroup of pretreated patients (5 months in arm A v 11 months in arm B; P = .04). Thirteen percent of patients in arm A and 9% in arm B presented with grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity. Conclusion Single-agent rituximab is active in MCL, but the addition of four single doses at 8-week intervals does not seem to significantly improve response rate, duration of response, or EFS after treatment with the standard schedule.

Purpose: A multicenter, phase II trial investigated the efficacy and toxicity of neoadjuvant docetaxel-cisplatin in locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and examined prognostic factors for patients not benefiting from surgery. Patients and Methods: Ninety patients with previously untreated, potentially operable stage IIIA (mediastinoscopically pN2) NSCLC received three cycles of docetaxel 85 mg/m2 day 1 plus cisplatin 40 mg/m2 days 1 and 2, with subsequent surgical resection. Results: Administered dose-intensities were docetaxel 85 mg/m2/3 weeks (range, 53 to 96) and cisplatin 95 mg/m2/3 weeks (range, 0 to 104). The 265 cycles were well tolerated, and the overall response rate was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55% to 75%). Seventy-five patients underwent tumor resection with positive resection margin and involvement of the uppermost mediastinal lymph node in 16% and 35% of patients, respectively (perioperative mortality, 3%; morbidity, 17%). Pathologic complete response occurred in 19% of patients with tumor resection. In patients with tumor resection, downstaging to N0–1 at surgery was prognostic and significantly prolonged event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS; P = .0001). At median follow-up of 32 months, the median EFS and OS were 14.8 months (range, 2.4 to 53.4) and 33 months (range, 2.4 to 53.4), respectively. Local relapse occurred in 27% of patients with tumor resection, with distant metastases in 37%. Multivariate analyses identified mediastinal clearance (hazard ratio, 0.22; P = .0003) and complete resection (hazard ratio, 0.26; P = .0006) as strongly prognostic for increased survival. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant docetaxel-cisplatin is effective and tolerable in stage IIIA pN2 NSCLC. Resection is recommended only for patients with mediastinal downstaging after chemotherapy.

269 Background: TTFields are alternating electric fields delivered to the region of the tumor by means of non-invasive transducer arrays. TTFields interfere with mitotic spindle formation, thus having an anti-mitotic activity. In pancreatic cancer, TTFields decreased proliferation and clonogenic potential in vitro, and reduced tumor volume in vivo. The PANOVA trial was designed to test TTFields, combined with chemotherapy, in pancreatic cancer. Methods: Twenty patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospective, single arm study of TTFields at 150 kHz, concomitant with standard weekly gemcitabine. All patients had histologically-confirmed unresectable tumors, with an ECOG performance score of 0-1 and no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was incidence and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), PFS rate at 6 months, overall survival (OS) and response rate. Results: The median age was 73 (range – 49-81) and 60% of the patients were females. Most patients (80%) had an ECOG score of 1. Twelve patients (60%) had distant metastases, while the others had locally advanced disease. Median compliance with TTFields was 78% (14 hours/day), with median duration of 5 months. Fourteen patients (70%) had serious (grade 3-5) AEs during the study period. Six patients (30%) had hematological, 45% gastrointestinal and 15% pulmonary AEs. Ten patients (50%) had treatment-related skin toxicity, of which only 2 were grade 3, both resolved with appropriate treatment. No TTFields-related serious AEs were reported. The median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 4.3, 10.3). PFS rate at 6 months was 56%. Of the evaluable tumors, 30% had partial response and another 30% stable disease. The median OS was 14.9 months and 1-year survival rate was 55%. Conclusions: TTFields concomitant to gemcitabine are tolerable and safe for advanced pancreatic cancer patients. The efficacy results are promising and support further research in this indication. An extension of the PANOVA protocol, including 20 additional patients who receive gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel and TTFields is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01971281.

7503 Background: For stage III/N2 NSCLC neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by radical surgery is one standard treatment approach. In our previous trial, this strategy led to a median survival of 33 months (Betticher et al. JCO 2003). We now investigated whether the addition of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) would improve outcome. We report the results of a planned interim analysis on data of the first 219 patients (pts). The trial was closed to accrual in December 2012 due to futility after enrollment of 232 of 240 planned pts. Methods: Pts with pathologically proven, resectable stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC, performance status 0-1, adequate heart, kidney, liver and bone marrow function were randomized 1:1 to receive 3 cycles of NCT (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and docetaxel 85 mg/m2 d1, q3weeks) followed by accelerated concomitant boost RT (44 Gy/22 fractions in 3 weeks) or NCT alone, with subsequent surgery for all pts. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Results: 23 centers included 219 pts. Median age was 60 years. Pts characteristics were well balanced. Toxicity to CT was substantial, but 91% completed 3 cycles of NCT. RT-induced grade 3 esophagitis was seen in 5 pts, grade 3 skin toxicity in 2 pts. One pt in each treatment arm died during NCT, there was one postoperative death (arm NCT alone). The efficacy results are summarized below, all comparisons are statistically non-significant. Conclusions: This is the first completed phase III trial to investigate the value of the addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy to CT and surgery. RT did not improve EFS or survival, nor did it reduce the local failure rate. Nevertheless, the overall survival rates of our neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy confirm our previous report, and are among the best results reported to date in a multicenter setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00030771. [Table: see text]

3503 Background: Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is a standard option for first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We assessed whether no continuation is non-inferior to continuation of bevacizumab after stop of first-line chemotherapy. Methods: In an open-label, phase 3 multicenter study conducted in Switzerland, patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer having non-progressive disease after 4-6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to continuing bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or no treatment. CT scans were done every 6 weeks between randomization and disease progression. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). A non-inferiority limit for hazard ratio (HR) of 0.727 was chosen to detect a difference in TTP of 6 weeks or less, with a one-sided significant level of 10% and a statistical power of 85%. Results: The per-protocol population comprised 262 patients. Median follow-up is 28.6 months (range, 0.6-54.9 months). Median TTP was 17.9 weeks (95% CI 13.3-23.4) for bevacizumab continuation and 12.6 weeks (95% CI 12.0-16.4) for no continuation; HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.92). Median progression free-survival and overall survival, both measured from start of first-line treatment, was 9.5 months and 24.9 months for bevacizumab continuation and 8.5 months (HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 - 0.94)) and 22.8 months (HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.64 – 1.18)) for no continuation. Median time from randomization to second-line treatment was 5.9 months for bevacizumab and 4.8 for no continuation. Grade 3-4 adverse events in the bevacizumab continuation arm were uncommon. Conclusions: Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. The 95% confidence intervals for the TTP HR indicate superiority of bevacizumab continuation after stop of first-line chemotherapy. The median differences in TTP and in time between randomization and start of second-line treatment were of moderate magnitude being less than 6 weeks. The results of an accompanying cost analysis will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT00544700.

e18012 Background: TTF therapy is a novel, non-invasive treatment modality for solid tumors recently approved by FDA for recurrent GBM. It uses intermediate frequency alternating electric fields to inhibit tumor growth, by mitotic spindle and plasma membrane integrity disruption during cytokinesis. Pemetrexed is a folate antimetabolite used as a first/second line and as a maintenance therapy for non-squamous NSCLC patients. Preclinical studies in NSCLC models demonstrated that TTF therapy and pemetrexed had additive efficacy, with no increase in toxicity. The current trial tested TTF therapy concomitant to pemetrexed in NSCLC patients. Methods: A single arm, multi-center, prospective trial was performed in 42 stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) and IV NSCLC patients, following progression after at least one prior chemotherapy. Patients received continuous 150 KHz TTF therapy (12 h/day) using the NovoTTF-100L system (NovoCure, Israel), concomitant to pemetrexed (Alimta™, Eli Lilly) q3w, until progression. Pemetrexed was in use for squamous histology when the study opened. Results: The trial included 35 patients with non-squamous histology and 7 patients with squamous histology. TTF Therapy was well tolerated by all patients enrolled in the trial, with high compliance (11 h/day). No TTF-related adverse events were reported apart from dermatitis caused by the application of transducer arrays. Median progression free survival was 22.7 and 10.3 weeks for non-squamous and squamous histology, respectively. Median overall survival was 12.4 and 13.8 months for nonsquamous and squamous histology, respectively. One- and two- year-survival was 53% and 27%, respectively. Conclusions: TTF therapy concomitant to pemetrexed was well tolerated and safe for patients with advanced NSCLC, of all histologies. Efficacy indices are promising, in view of the poor outcome previously reported for similar populations. This first clinical trial involving TTF as a treatment for NSCLC patients suggests that it should be further studied in larger clinical trials for squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC.

e18500 Background: TTFields (tumor treating fields) are low intensity, intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields which slow the growth of solid tumors in-vivo, and have shown promise in pilot clinical trials in patients with advanced solid tumors. TTFields are a regional treatment which acts both by interfering with microtubules polymerization and by physical disruption of the cell structure during cytokinesis. It has been shown previously that TTFields sensitize non-small cell lung cultures to Pemetrexed. In-Vivo, TTFields did not increase pemetrexed related toxicity. Methods: A prospective trial was performed in 14, pretreated, stage IIIb-IV, NSCLC patients. Patients with brain metastases were excluded, as were patients with abnormal marrow, kidney, liver or cardiac functions. Patients with history of clinically significant arrhythmias or those having pacemakers were excluded as well. Patients received Pemetrexed 500mg/m2 IV q3w together with daily TTFields (12 h/day) using a portable medical device (NovoTTF-100L). The device generated 2 direction (AP and Lat), 150 kHz TTFields. Patients were followed every three weeks and had a lung CT every 9 weeks. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of the NovoTTF-100L device in combination with pemetrexed. Results: The 14 patients received an average of 4 courses of pemetrexed (Range 1–9) and a cumulative TTFields treatment time of 182 weeks. The device was well tolerated as indicated in the device log files which showed an average daily use of 11±1 hours. There were no device-related, nor pemetrexed-related SAEs. In addition, no unexpected abnormalities were evident in the lab tests or EKGs, done every 3 weeks for all patients. There were no reports of arrhythmias. The only device related AE seen in all patients was dermatitis under the electrodes. This improved with meticulous skin care, topical steroid use and in extreme cases oral steroids. One patient (7.6%) had a CR, 1 a PR (7.6%), 9 SD (69.2%) and 3 PD (23%). 77% of patients were progression free at 12 weeks and the 6 month survival was 89%. Conclusions: TTFields are well tolerated when given together with pemetrexed. The excellent safety profile and initial efficacy results reported here justify further clinical testing. [Table: see text]