Search

2015 Background: Treatment-related imaging changes are often difficult to distinguish from true tumor progression. Treatment-related changes or pseudoprogression (PsP) subsequently subside or stabilize without any further treatment, whereas progressive tumor requires a more aggressive approach in patient management. Pseudoprogression can mimic true progression radiographically and may potentially alter the physician’s judgment about the residual disease. Hence, it can predispose a patient to overtreatment or be categorized as a non-responder and exclude him from the clinical trials. This study aims at assessing the potential of radiomics to discriminate PsP from progressive disease (PD) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 304 GBM patients with new or increased enhancement on conventional MRI after treatment, of which it was uncertain for PsP versus PD. 149 patients had the histopathological evidence of PD and 27 of PsP. Remaining 128 patients were categorized into PD and PsP based on RANO criteria performed by a board-certified radiologist. Volumetrics using 3D slicer 4.3.1 and radiomics texture analysis were performed of the enhancing lesion(s) in question. Results: Using the MRMR feature selection method, we identified 100 significant features that were used to build a SVM model. Five texture features (E, CS, SA, MP, CP) were found to be most predictive of pseudoprogression. On Leave One Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 97%, 72%, and 90%, respectively. Conclusions: 3D radiomic texture features of conventional MRI successfully discriminated pseudoprogression from true progression in a large cohort of GBM patients.