Search

46 Background: Genomic biomarkers can identify patients that harbour aggressive disease. The utility of these biomarkers is uncertain due to genomic variation between prostate biopsy specimens. To quantify the robustness of genomic biomarkers, we performed spatio-genomic characterization of distinct tumor foci. We scored three validated DNA-based biomarkers of early biochemical recurrence: percentage of genome with a copy number aberration (PGA), a 100-loci biomarker, and an optimized 31- loci biomarker derived from the previous. For each biomarker, we determined their robustness to intratumoral heterogeneity in association with predicting early biochemical recurrence (eBCR; ≤18 months) and long term control (LTC; ≥48 months). Methods: We queried a registry of 1054 patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent a radical prostatectomy (RP). We developed a cohort (n = 42) risk matched by clinicopathologic prognostic indices. Half of the patients had eBCR, while the other half had LTC. We profiled multiple tumor foci per patient, analyzing 119 tumor foci. For each focus, CNA profiles were generated, and three biomarker scores were calculated. For each patient and biomarker, we calculated the score of the lowest-score region, the highest-score region, or sampling of all foci and use the mean score. Results: All three biomarkers distinguished LTC from eBCR. PGA scores separated the two groups with an area under the receiver operator curves (AUC) ranging from 0.75-0.80. The 100- and 31-loci signatures, had AUCs ranging from 0.76-0.85 and 0.76-0.80 respectively. Using Cox proportional hazards modeling, we found that PGA was associated with LTC (Hazard ratio (HR) range: 2.56-6.22; p < 0.05. This was replicated for the 100-loci signature (HR range: 3.55-5.23; p < 0.05). The 31-loci detected associations with eBCR independent of how different foci were summarized (log-rank p-value range: 5.1 x 10-4- 5.9 x 10-3). Conclusions: Despite divergence in biomarker scores, all three predicted eBCR. Our study suggests that genomic biomarkers can overcome intratumoral heterogeneity, making discrete samples potentially adequate in patients with high-risk disease to determine the risk of eBCR after radical treatment.

68 Background: Recently, NCCN adopted the Zumsteg-Spratt subclassification to define NCCN favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa). NCCN unfavorable disease is recommended to receive combination androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy. To determine if genomics could help identify a subset who may safely avoid ADT, we evaluated the Decipher genomic classifier (GC) in IR-PCa treated with dose-escalated image-guided radiotherapy (DE-IGRT) alone. Methods: Our cohort comprised of 121 patients with NCCN favorable (N = 49, 40%) and unfavorable (N = 74, 60%) IR-PCa, who received 78 Gy without ADT. Diagnostic needle biopsies with the highest Gleason score (GS) and %tumor involvement were macrodissected for RNA extraction. GC scores were determined from the Decipher prostate cancer classifier assay (GenomeDx Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Primary clinical endpoint was biochemical relapse ([BCR], PSA nadir + 2ng/ml) post-DE-IGRT. We compared association with BCR against known clinicopathologic prognostic indices and the NCCN risk strata. Results: With a median follow up of 7.5y, 24 (19%) patients experienced BCR. Individual clinical indices did not predict BCR-free survival rate (BFS). NCCN risk strata was however associated with a small but significant difference in BFS (5-y 93%, favorable vs 88%, unfavourable, P = 0.046). GC scores stratified 85 (70%), 19 (16%), and 17 (14%) men into low, intermediate, and high risk of recurrence; 5-y BFS were 95%, 89%, and 59%, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a hazard ratio of 4.71 (95% CI 1.81-12.28, P = 0.0015) for BCR was observed for the GC high risk group compared to low/intermediate; NCCN risk strata and intraductal variant did not achieve significance. Conclusions: In IR-PCa men treated with DE-IGRT monotherapy, Decipher GC was an independent predictor of BCR. While most men in this our cohort were stratified as NCCN unfavorable IR-PCa, the majority were GC low risk with excellent outcomes from DE-IGRT alone. In contrast, a minority with GC high risk had suboptimal outcomes, and may benefit from ADT intensification.

26 Background: Spatial intra-tumoral heterogeneity of prostate cancer is secondary to genomic diversity and multi-clonality. These unique features potentially promote resistance to treatment. Here, we investigated if clonal selection or adaptation of new clones dominates in prostate cancer at the time of recurrence following radiotherapy. Methods: We identified 11 patients with biopsy-proven multifocal recurrent prostate cancer following radiotherapy. Copy number aberration (CNA) profiling was performed on 33 anatomically distinct tumor foci with 11 matched-normals. 4 cases had matched pre-radiotherapy tumors for CNA profiling to assess for clonality. We evaluated for recurrent gene amplifications and deletions, and determined genomic instability by percent genome aberration (PGA). We also compared these genomic indices against 373 sporadic prostate cancers from the Canadian Prostate Cancer Gene Network. Results: We observed large intra- and inter-patient variation (p

8518Background: Recent clinical studies using immune checkpoint inhibitors in mesothelioma (MM) have shown promise in shifting treatment paradigms. However, the immune environment and targets of th...