Search

Water-resources planners use regional water management models (WMMs) to identify vulnerabilities to climate change. Frequently, dynamically downscaled climate inputs are used in conjunction with land-surface models (LSMs) to provide hydrologic streamflow projections, which serve as critical inputs for WMMs. Here, we show how even modest projection errors can strongly affect assessments of water availability and financial stability for irrigation districts in California. Specifically, our results highlight that LSM errors in projections of flood and drought extremes are highly interactive across timescales, path-dependent, and can be amplified when modeling infrastructure systems (e.g., misrepresenting banked groundwater). Common strategies for reducing errors in deterministic LSM hydrologic projections (e.g., bias correction) can themselves strongly distort projected climate vulnerabilities and misrepresent their inferred financial consequences. Overall, our results indicate a need to move beyond standard deterministic climate projection and error management frameworks that are dependent on single simulated climate change scenario outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reliable information about the wetted dimensions of soil under drip irrigation helps designers to determine optimal emitter flow rates and spacings to reduce system equipment costs and provide better soil water conditions for the most efficient and effective use of water. This study presents a new empirical formula that predicts soil wetted dimensions around a drip emitter. The coefficients were obtained by using regression analysis on the results of field experiments done on the Pardis Agricultural Farm of Tehran University in Karaj, Iran. These data were also used to evaluate the semiempirical model of Zur and Schwartzman, the empirical model of Amin and Ekhmaj, and the analytical model WetUp. Statistical comparisons (mean error, root mean square error, and model efficiency) are made of the simulated data with the observed data. To evaluate the models, published experimental data by Risse et al. and Li et al. were also used. The results demonstrate that the suggested equations can be used for a wide range of discharge rates and soil types. The best result was obtained from the new empirical model proposed in this investigation. The lowest mean error for the wetted radius and wetted depth was 8.21 and 8.62 cm, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]