Search

A study of the assumptions involved in the ultimate bearing capacity equation indicates the shortcomings of that equation and load test data confirm these shortcomings. A new approach using a normalized load settlement curve is proposed to alleviate these shortcomings and to obtain the complete load settlement curve for a footing in sand. The normalization consists of plotting the mean footing pressure divided by a measure of the soil strength within the depth of influence of the footing versus the settlement divided by the footing width. It is shown that the normalized load settlement curve for a footing is independent of footing size and embedment. It is proposed to obtain the normalized curve point-by-point from a soil test. Because the deformation of the soil observed under full-scale footings during loading indicates a barreling effect similar to the soil deformation around a pressuremeter probe, the preboring pressuremeter curve is used to obtain the footing curve. The new method consists of transforming the preboring pressuremeter curve point-by-point into the footing load settlement curve. Load tests and numerical simulations are used to propose a method for a rectangular footing near a slope subjected to an eccentric and inclined load. The new method gives the complete load settlement curve for the footing and alleviates the problems identified with the bearing capacity equation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This note studies settlement ratio, Rs, of pile groups in sandy soils, defined as the ratio of the settlement of a pile group to that of a single pile at the same average load per pile. 31 cases of field pile-group load tests and the corresponding field single-pile load tests were collected for this study. More than one-half of the cases consist of 3-diameter spaced, 9-pile groups. Based on the field test data, statistical analyses of Rs at different load levels were conducted for pile groups with cap-ground contact (PGCs) and pile groups with freestanding caps (PGFs), respectively. The mean of Rs decreases with the load level for both PGCs and PGFs, whereas the coefficient of variation of Rs increases with the load level. The influence of cap-ground contact on Rs does not appear to be significant based on a comparison of the mean Rs values of these PGCs and PGFs. In addition, a comparative study on Rs and group resistance ratio Rr, which is defined as the ratio of the average resistance of a pile in a group to that of a single pile at the same settlement, was conducted to clarify possible misunderstanding between Rs and pile group efficiency factor η for driven pile groups in sandy soils. The value of Rs compares settlement at the working load and is often larger than unity. The value of η compares failure loads, which occur at different settlements for pile groups and their respective single piles. η is usually larger than unity due to soil densification and additional contributions from the cap-ground contact for PGCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditional bearing capacity theories for the ultimate capacity of shallow foundations assume that the thickness of the bearing stratum is infinite. The presence of a hard layer within a certain depth below the foundation can significantly influence the unit load supported by the soil. Therefore the original bearing capacity equations should be modified to account for this condition in determining the ultimate bearing capacity. In order to evaluate this phenomenon further, model square and circular footing tests were performed on a bed of well-graded sand. Test beds were prepared at three different relative densities corresponding to loose, medium, and dense conditions: Dr=24, 57, and 87%, using five different sand layer thicknesses, H; H/B values of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4, where B is the footing width. Results of the model scale footing tests show that the bearing capacity factor, Nγ, should be modified up to H/B=3, instead of H/B=1, as previously suggested. The footing shape factor, sγ, should account for both shape and finite layering. This technical note gives a description of the test methods and material used and presents the test results in comparison to previous results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]