Search

Current irrigation scheduling is based on well-established crop coefficient and reference evapotranspiration procedures to estimate daily crop evapotranspiration (ETc). Effective irrigation scheduling and efficient irrigation water use can occur when ETc is calculated with crop coefficients representative of actual crop water use conditions. The objective of this research was to evaluate irrigation scheduling using two approaches to estimate the basal crop coefficient (Kcb) during wheat experiments conducted in 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 at Maricopa, Arizona. Each Kcb approach (main treatment) included six subtreatment combinations (three plant densities and two N managements) imposed to create spatial and temporal variations in water use among experimental plots. The first approach (NDVI treatment) estimated Kcb separately for each plot based On normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data obtained by frequent canopy reflectance measurements. The second approach (FAO treatment) estimated Kcb uniformly for all plots based on a Kcb curve developed for standard wheat conditions. The Kcb estimates were incorporated within the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient procedures to calculate daily ETc and root zone soil water depletion (Dr). Plot irrigations were provided when the predicted Dr reached 45% of the available soil water During both wheat experiments, considerable variations in measured soil water depletion were observed for subtreatments due to differences in crop water use rates. For the FAO treatment, mean absolute percent difference (MAPD) for predicted Dr was 27% and 40% for 2003-2004 and 2004-2005, respectively. Prediction of Dr was improved significantly for NDVI for both experiments where treatment MAPD was 17% (2003-2004) and 18% (2004-2005). Although mean irrigation application efficiency for NDVI (89%) and FAO (88%) was similar for 2003-2004, it was significantly higher for NDVI (86%) than FAO (77%) for 2004-2005. Differences for irrigation scheduling resulted in significantly lower seasonal irrigation water use for the NDVI than FAO treatment, 8% (2003-2004) and 13% (2004-2005), but did not result in appreciable treatment differences for seasonal ETc, final grain yield, and crop water use efficiency (yield per unit ETc). Consequently, a primary outcome for both experiments was significantly higher irrigation water use efficiency (yield per unit irrigation water) for NDVI than FAO. Incorporating Kcb estimates based on NDVI within existing crop coefficient algorithms provides an opportunity to improve wheat irrigation scheduling strategies for conserving irrigation water while maintaining grain yield potentials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A method widely used for irrigation management determines crop evapotranspiration (ETc) from reference evapotranspiration (ETo) calculations and estimated crop coefficients. However, standard time-based crop coefficients may fail to represent the actual crop water use, for example, when deviations in weather or agronomic constraints appreciably change crop development patterns from typical conditions. In this study, the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient procedures were applied during experiments with wheat to calculate the estimated ETc for irrigation scheduling. The objective of this research was to determine whether basal crop coefficients (Kcb) determined from a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI treatment) improve the prediction of ETc over a standard application with a locally developed time-based Kcb curve (FAO treatment). The experiments conducted for two seasons in central Arizona included subtreatments, equally replicated within the NDVI and FAO treatments, of three plant densities (typical, dense, and sparse) and two nitrogen levels (high and low) to provide a range of crop development and water use conditions. The effects of plant density and N level resulted in significant differences in measured seasonal ETc. Large variations that occurred in the observed Kcb and ETc trends between subtreatments were better correlated with the NDVI than the FAO treatment. The mean absolute percent difference for predicted ETc was significantly smaller for NDVI than FAO during both seasons. The treatment difference was 5% for the first season, but 10% for the second season when an unexpected early decline in ETc and Kcb was effectively predicted by the NDVI treatment but not by the FAO treatment. NDVI appears to be a robust approach for Kcb estimation of wheat, able to reliably predict actual ETc for both typical and abnormal water use conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]