1. Combined Effects of pH and Sugar on Growth Rate of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii , a Bakery Product Spoilage Yeast
- Author
-
Jeanne-Marie Membré, Martine Kubaczka, Christine Chèné, Laboratoire de Génie des Procédés et Technologie Alimentaires (LGPTA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), and ProdInra, Migration
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Sucrose ,Food spoilage ,Zygosaccharomyces ,Models, Biological ,01 natural sciences ,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Laboratory flask ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,010608 biotechnology ,Growth rate ,Food science ,Sugar ,[SDV.EE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment ,0303 health sciences ,Ecology ,biology ,Strain (chemistry) ,030306 microbiology ,Chemistry ,Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ,biology.organism_classification ,Yeast ,Kinetics ,[SDV.EE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment ,Glucose ,Biochemistry ,Food Microbiology ,Food Technology ,Food Science ,Biotechnology - Abstract
The effects of citric acid-modified pH (pH 2.5, 2.75, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, and 5.5) and a 30% glucose–70% sucrose mixture (300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 875, and 900 g/liter) on an osmophilic yeast, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii , were determined by using synthetic medium. One hundred experiments were carried out; 50-ml culture flasks were inoculated with 10 3 CFU ml −1 by using a collection strain and a wild-type strain cocktail. The biomass was measured by counting cell colonies, and growth curves were fitted by using a Baranyi equation. The growth rate decreased linearly with sugar concentration, while the effect of pH was nonlinear. Indeed, the optimal pH range was found to be pH 3.5 to 5, and pH 2.5 resulted in a 30% reduction in the growth rate. Finally, we evaluated the performance of two nonlinear predictive models developed previously to describe bacterial contamination. Equations derived from the Rosso and Ratkowsky models gave similar results; however, the model that included dimensionless terms based on the Ratkowsky equation was preferred because it contained fewer estimated parameters and also because biological interpretation of the results was easier.
- Published
- 1999
- Full Text
- View/download PDF