Search

This study determined the pharmacokinetic disposition of cefonicid. A single dose of 7.5 mg/kg of body weight was administered to five healthy volunteers as a 5-min intravenous infusion. Multiple plasma and urine samples were collected for 48 h. Peak plasma concentrations ranged from 95 to 156 micrograms/ml and fell slowly (mean plasma half-life, 4.4 +/- 0.8 h), so that levels after 12 h were in the range of 6 to 12 micrograms/ml. Urinary concentrations were high but variable and ranged from 100 to 1,000 micrograms/ml for the first 12 h after the dose and averaged 84 micrograms/ml between 12 and 24 h. Plasma and renal clearances were 0.32 +/- 0.06 and 0.29 +/- 0.05 ml/min per kg, respectively. An average of 88 +/- 6% of the dose was excreted unchanged in the urine over 48 h. The mean steady-state volume of distribution was found to be 0.11 +/- 0.01 liters/kg.

One hundred seven patients with community-acquired pneumonia thought to be of bacterial etiology by the admitting physician but whose initial sputum Gram stain was inadequate to direct specific therapy were randomized to receive either intravenous ampicillin or cefamandole as empiric therapy. Patients were excluded if the initial sputum Gram stain was highly suggestive of infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, or an enteric gram-negative bacillus. The two study groups had comparable demographic and presenting clinical features. The mean age of the patients evaluable for determination of clinical efficacy was 69 years, and greater than 75% had at least one serious underlying medical disorder. In the 90 evaluable patients, there were 11 therapeutic failures (12%), including 5 deaths (5%). Cefamandole, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, was not more efficacious than ampicillin in producing a satisfactory clinical response or in shortening the duration of parenteral therapy. Patients received an average of only 4 days of intravenous antibiotics before changeover to oral therapy and were hospitalized for a mean of 7 days. No patient experienced a relapse of pneumonia following successful completion of parenteral drug therapy. We conclude that cefamandole is not a more effective agent than ampicillin for empiric therapy of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia of uncertain etiology.

Twenty patients with skin and soft-tissue infections were treated with parenteral cefonicid. Cultures obtained in cellulitis cases from an aspirate of a leading edge of inflammation were positive in 42% of these patients. Pathogens isolated were Staphylococcus aureus (six strains), Proteus mirabilis (one strain), and Streptococcus agalactiae. Adverse effects were pain on intramuscular injection (two patients), rash (one patient), and positive Coombs test (one patient). All side effects were mild and none required discontinuing antibiotic therapy. A single treatment failure occurred in a patient with an undrained perirectal abscess. Cefonicid may be a useful drug in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. The long half-life of cefonicid (4.8 h) is a valuable advantage and may facilitate patient compliance and convenience.

Ceftazidime and cefamandole were compared in the treatment of pneumonia. The median MIC of ceftazidime for all Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 17) and Haemophilus influenzae (n = 10) isolates was 0.125 microgram/ml. All other isolates were inhibited by less than 0.5 microgram of ceftazidime per ml, with the exception of a group B streptococcus (MIC = 4 micrograms/ml). Satisfactory clinical responses were observed in 91% (20 of 22) of cefamandole-treated patients and 85% (17 of 20) of ceftazidime-treated patients.

Thirty-one adult patients with infections due to anaerobic bacteria were treated with cefamandole. Bacteroides fragilis group (17) and Bacteroides melaninogenicus (13) were the most frequent anaerobes isolated. Duration of therapy varied from 2 to 49 days. Results were judged satisfactory in 26 cases, and unsatisfactory in 1 case. Four cases could not be evaluated. Adverse reactions occurred in 16 patients and included positive direct Coombs' test without hemolysis, transient liver function abnormalities, phlebitis, reversible neutropenia, fever, eosinophilia, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. The more significant reactions were associated with prolonged therapy. None was lethal. These data suggest that cefamandole is effective in treatment of most anaerobic infections.

Cefamandole nafate (CM) and cephalothin sodium (CP) were administered as prophylaxis in a randomized, prospective study to 30 consecutive patients undergoing prosthetic cardiac valve insertion. A single dose of 20 mg/kg was given intramuscularly during anesthesia induction, and serial plasma antibiotic concentrations, atrial muscle and cardiac valve tissue antibiotic levels, plasma bactericidal activity against pathogenic staphylococci, and infectious complications were determined and compared for the two drugs. Both antibiotics produced high plasma levels (>20 mug/ml 30 min after injection) which fell less than 25% during the period of cardiopulmonary bypass. However, CM levels were significantly higher at most time periods (P<0.05) than CP levels. CP levels were undetectable in atrial muscle from 14 of 15 patients and in valves from 10 of 15 patients. In contrast, CM bioactivity was found in all tissues. Differences in tissue antibiotic concentration could not be accounted for by differences in plasma concentrations or by CP tissue binding and were assumed to be caused by differences in penetration. Plasma bactericidal activity against staphylococci was equal for the two drugs (median titer, 1:16). No infections were seen in either group. CM appeared to be an effective and perhaps preferable prophylactic antibiotic for use during cardiac surgery.

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous penicillin and cefamandole in the therapy of pneumococcal pneumonia. Patients received either 1 g of cefamandole or 600,000 U of aqueous penicillin G every 6 h. Of the 100 patients entered into the study, 96 had clinical and radiographic evidence of pneumonia. Microbial etiology was determined from the results of sputum and blood cultures and/or sputum Gram stains. Streptococcus pneumoniae was pathogenic in 49 patients, of whom 24 received cefamandole and 25 received penicillin. There was no statistically significant difference in the response or cure rate. Of the 100 patients, 93 were treated for 3 days or more and were evaluated for adverse effects and toxicity. There was no significant difference between cefamandole-treated and pencillin-treated patients in the incidence of colonization, superinfection, phlebitis, thrombocytosis, decrease in hematocrit, or elevated liver function tests. Eosinophilia occurred more frequently in patients treated with penicillin (20 of 42) than in those treated with cefamandole (11 of 42 (chi square, P < 0.05). Only one patient receiving cefamandole developed a positive direct Coombs test. No patient in either group developed meningitis. We conclude that, with the doses and route of administration employed in this study, cefamandole is as effective as penicillin in the therapy of pneumococcal pneumonia without an increased incidence of colonization, superinfection, or adverse effects.

To assess the possibility that non-aminoglycoside antibiotics may adversely affect the nephrotoxicity of the new semisynthetic aminoglycoside netilmicin, we gave ampicillin, carbenicillin, methicillin, cefamandole, and clindamycin, either singly or in combination with netilmicin, at two dose concentrations in rats. Results were compared as to the effect of netilmicin given singly and to saline-injected and noninjected controls. Antibiotic combinations resulted in no greater nephrotoxicity than did netilmicin alone. Netilmicin concentrations in renal tissue were high, and these levels were not consistently affected by the other drugs. The data suggest that in rats the nephrotoxicity of netilmicin is not affected adversely by the presence of non-aminoglycoside antibiotics.

The pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone, a new beta-lactam antibiotic, were studied in normal volunteers and compared with the pharmacokinetics of cefamandole. After a 30-min infusion of 2 g of cefoperazone, the mean serum level was 256 micrograms/ml; at 4 h, the serum level was 20 micrograms/ml, and at 24 h, the level was 1.25 micrograms/ml, compared with levels of cefamandole of 188 micrograms/ml at the end of infusion, 1.8 micrograms/ml at 4 h, and none detected thereafter. The mean half-life of cefoperazone was 1.6 h, compared with 0.7 h for cefamandole. The area under the curve was 356 micrograms/ml per h for cefoperazone, which was three times that for cefamandole. The apparent volume of distribution for cefoperazone was 9.9 liters/1.73 m2 compared with 12.5 liters/1.73 m2 for cefamandole. Serum clearance of cefoperazone was 85 ml/min, and renal clearance was 25 ml/min, compared with a serum clearance of 224 ml/min and a renal clearance of 213 ml/min for cefamandole. Urine levels exceeded 25 micrograms/ml in the first 8 h after injection. Renal recovery of cefoperazone was only 29%.

Cefamandole, a new parenteral cephalosporin antibiotic, was administered to 23 newborn infants with pustular skin infection due to Staphylococcus aureus for an average duration of 7.5 days. All the patients improved clinically. Elevation of serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase and eosinophilia were observed in nine infants each transiently during treatment. There were no abnormalities of renal functions and Coombs' test results remained negative. The levels of cefamandole in serum after either intravenous or intramuscular administration were higher and the mean life was longer than those previously reported in older infants, children, and adults.

Forty-seven infants and children with a variety of infections including bacteremia, ethmoiditis, and periorbital cellulitis, soft tissue infection, pneumonia, and lymphadenitis were treated with intravenous cefamandole. The infections were due to Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae. The clinical response was prompt, and, with the exception of two cases who developed skin rash, significant side effects were not noted. In vitro cefamandole was very effective in inhibiting the growth of H. influenzae, including ampicillin-resistant isolates.

Thirty-five patients with cellulitis were treated with ceforanide, 1 g every 12 h, intramuscularly. A good clinical response was observed in 33 cases. Drug failure in the remaining two patients was thought to be due to the lack of surgical debridement. Drug concentrations well in excess of inhibitory levels for Streptococcus pyogenes were generally present throughout the treatment period; although this was not true of ceforanide concentrations relative to inhibitory levels for Staphylococcus aureus, the clinical response in patients with staphylococcal infection still appeared to be entirely satisfactory. Killing of S. pyogenes by 5, 50, and 500X the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceforanide proceeded at the same rate in vitro as did killing by 5, 50, and 500X the minimum inhibitory concentration of penicillin.