1. The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties
- Author
-
Titia Gebuis and Bert Reynvoet
- Subjects
Adult ,Single variable ,Communication ,Visual perception ,genetic structures ,business.industry ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,Mathematical Concepts ,Neuropsychological Tests ,eye diseases ,Judgment ,Young Adult ,Pattern Recognition, Visual ,Developmental Neuroscience ,Space Perception ,Humans ,Approximate number system ,Cues ,business ,Psychology ,Sensory cue ,General Psychology ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
To date, researchers investigating nonsymbolic number processes devoted little attention to the visual properties of their stimuli. This is unexpected, as nonsymbolic number is defined by its visual characteristics. When number changes, its visual properties change accordingly. In this study, we investigated the influence of different visual properties on nonsymbolic number processes and show that the current assumptions about the relation between number and its visual characteristics are incorrect. Similar to previous studies, we controlled the visual cues: Each visual cue was not predictive of number. Nevertheless, participants showed congruency effects induced by the visual properties of the stimuli. These congruency effects scaled with the number of visual cues manipulated, implicating that people do not extract number from a visual scene independent of its visual cues. Instead, number judgments are based on the integration of information from multiple visual cues. Consequently, current ways to control the visual cues of the number stimuli are insufficient, as they control only a single variable at the time. And, more important, the existence of an approximate number system that can extract number independent of the visual cues appears unlikely. We therefore propose that number judgment is the result of the weighing of several distinct visual cues.
- Published
- 2012