Search

Objective: There is emerging evidence that greater cognition is associated with increased risk for suicide among individuals with psychosis. Given this association, concerns have been raised that cognitive interventions might actually increase risk for suicide in this population. Therefore, the present study investigated the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationship between cognition and suicide risk among individuals with first-episode psychosis. Method: Sixty-five participants completed measures of suicide risk, depression, and cognition at baseline and 6 months. Within-subject mediation analysis was used to examine the indirect effect of cognition on suicide risk. Within-subject moderation analysis was used to examine whether participation in cognitive enhancing intervention (e.g., computerized drill-and-practice cognitive remediation and metacognitive remediation therapy) moderated changes in suicide risk. Results: Consistent with prior studies, our cross-sectional results suggest that greater cognition is associated with increased risk for suicide. However, this effect was limited in scope, as we found that verbal learning was the only cognitive domain associated with suicide risk in our sample. Results from our longitudinal analyses show that changes in depressive symptoms, but not changes verbal learning, mediate changes in suicide risk during the first 6 months of treatment. In addition, participation in cognitive enhancing interventions did not moderate changes in suicide risk. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Our results suggest that cognition is a correlate, or a proxy risk factor, rather than a causal risk factor for suicide. Although these findings contradict previously raised concerns that cognitive interventions might unintentionally increase risk for suicide, ongoing assessment is warranted and additional research is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective: Psychotic disorders are serious illnesses that are most amenable to early intervention. Though inpatient units are typically the first care setting for young people with psychosis, almost all early intervention work has been limited to outpatient settings. Social difficulties are a core feature of psychotic illnesses, and despite need for empirically supported social-skills treatments there are few interventions intended specifically for the developmental phase during which psychosis manifests (i.e., late teenage to early adult years). Method: Our group implemented an adapted social-skills training intervention (SST) designed for young adults on a psychiatric inpatient unit. Nineteen young adult inpatients (aged 18-35) with psychosis participated. Psychiatric symptoms and aspects of social functioning, including reported social self-efficacy and performance on social skills role-plays, were assessed before and after SST participation. Results: Preliminary data demonstrate improvements in both self-report and performance-based measures of social functioning after SST participation. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: These findings, though preliminary, support additional, larger-scale investigations of this SST among young adults with psychosis. Further, multidisciplinary collaborations are valuable in providing specialized care for young adults with psychosis who are receiving inpatient psychiatric care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective: Schizophrenia researchers have focused on phenomenological aspects of the disorder to better understand its underlying nature. In particular, development of personal narratives-that is, the complexity with which people form, organize, and articulate their "life stories"-has recently been investigated in individuals with schizophrenia. However, less is known about how aspects of narrative relate to indicators of neurocognitive and social functioning. The objective of the present study was to investigate the association of linguistic complexity of life-story narratives to measures of cognitive and social problem-solving abilities among people with schizophrenia., Method: Thirty-two individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia completed a research battery consisting of clinical interviews, a life-story narrative, neurocognitive testing, and a measure assessing multiple aspects of social problem solving. Narrative interviews were assessed for linguistic complexity using computerized technology., Results: The results indicate differential relationships of linguistic complexity and neurocognition to domains of social problem-solving skills. More specifically, although neurocognition predicted how well one could both describe and enact a solution to a social problem, linguistic complexity alone was associated with accurately recognizing that a social problem had occurred. In addition, linguistic complexity appears to be a cognitive factor that is discernible from other broader measures of neurocognition., Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Linguistic complexity may be more relevant in understanding earlier steps of the social problem-solving process than more traditional, broad measures of cognition, and thus is relevant in conceptualizing treatment targets. These findings also support the relevance of developing narrative-focused psychotherapies. (PsycINFO Database Record, ((c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).)