Search

The fields of psychiatry and mental health are increasingly recognizing the importance of social determinants of health (SDOH) and their impact on mental health outcomes. In this overview, the authors discuss the recent research, from the past 5 years, on advances made in SDOH work. SDOH frameworks and theories have expanded to include more social conditions, from traumas associated with immigration to psychosocial and community strengths, that impact mental health and well-being. Research has consistently shown the pervasive deleterious impacts of inequitable social conditions (e.g., food insecurity, housing instability) on minoritized populations' physical and mental health. Social systems of oppression (e.g., racism, minoritization) have also been shown to confer higher risk for psychiatric and mental disorders. The COVID-19 pandemic illuminated the inequitable impact of the social determinants of health outcomes. More efforts have been made in recent years to intervene on the social determinants through interventions at the individual, community, and policy levels, which have shown promise in improving mental health outcomes in marginalized populations. However, major gaps remain. Attention should be paid to developing guiding frameworks that incorporate equity and antiracism when designing SDOH interventions and improving methodological approaches for evaluating these interventions. In addition, structural-level and policy-level SDOH efforts are critical for making long-lasting and impactful advances toward mental health equity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study examined the interaction of race-ethnicity and gender in depression screening, receipt of any mental health care, and receipt of adequate care. Methods: Data from electronic health records (2010-2012) of adult primary care patients from a New England urban health care system were used (N=65,079). Multivariate logit regression models were estimated to assess associations between race-ethnicity, gender, and other covariates and depression screening, any depression care among those with a positive screen, and adequate depression care. To measure disparities in utilization, we controlled for need variables but not for non-need variables, including insurance, marital status, and socioeconomic status. Results: Among males and females, blacks and Asians were less likely and Latinos were more likely to be screened for depression compared with whites. Among those with moderate or severe depression, black males and females, Latino males, and Asian males and females were less likely than whites to receive any mental health care. The disparity in screening between blacks and whites was greater among females compared with males. The disparity between Latinos and whites in receipt of any mental health care and of adequate care was greater among males than females. Conclusions: This approach underscored the importance of identifying disparities at each step of depression care by both race-ethnicity and gender. Targeting certain groups in specific stages of care, for example, screening of black females or providing any mental health care and adequate care for Latino males, would be more effective than a blanket approach to disparities reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study examined whether there are service disparities among homeless adults with severe mental illnesses, a vulnerable population with a high level of unmet need. Methods: Data were collected at baseline for 6,829 black, Latino, and non-Latino white participants in the Access to Community Care and Effective Services and Support study. Outcome variables were measures of utilization of psychiatric outpatient, housing, and case management services in the previous 60 days. The sample was divided into white-black and white-Latino horts. Within each cohort, participants were stratified into comparable groups by propensity scores that estimated log-odds of being black or Latino as a function of several confounding variables. White-black and white-Latino differences in mean number of visits (a measure of intensity) and in the mean probability of at least one visit (a measure of access) were subsequently estimated for each of the three services. Results: The composition of the sample was 50% black, 6% Latino, and 44% white. Service utilization was low for the three services regardless of race-ethnicity. On multivariate analyses of service utilization in the previous 60 days, blacks made fewer psychiatric outpatient visits than whites (mean difference=.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]=.10 to .81]), yet Latinos had more case management visits than whites (mean difference=-.51, CI=-1.03 to -.05]). Analyses of access did not reveal racial-ethnic disparities. Conclusions: Whereas blacks used psychiatric outpatient services less frequently than whites, hence experiencing a service disparity, Latinos used case management services more than whites did. Possible contributors and clinical and methodological implications of these results are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]