Search

Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) efficacy for rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function was suggested to depend on recruitment of Ia afferents. However, selectivity and excitability of motor activation with different electrode configurations remain unclear. In this study, activation of upper-limb motor pools was examined with different cathode and anode configurations during cervical tSCS in 10 able-bodied individuals. Muscle responses were measured from six upper-limb muscles simultaneously. First, postactivation depression was confirmed with tSCS paired pulses (50-ms interval) for each cathode configuration (C6, C7, and T1 vertebral levels), with anode on the anterior neck. Selectivity and excitability of activation of the upperlimb motor pools were examined by comparing the recruitment curves (10-100 mA) of first evoked responses across muscles and cathode configurations. Our results showed that hand muscles were preferentially activated when the cathode was placed over T1 compared with the other vertebral levels, whereas there was no selectivity for proximal arm muscles. Furthermore, higher stimulation intensities were required to activate distal hand muscles than proximal arm muscles, suggesting different excitability thresholds between muscles. In a separate protocol, responses were compared between anode configurations (anterior neck, shoulders, iliac crests, and back), with one selected cathode configuration. The level of discomfort was also assessed. Largest muscle responses were elicited with the anode configuration over the anterior neck, whereas there were no differences in the discomfort. Our results therefore inform methodological considerations for electrode configuration to help optimize recruitment of Ia afferents during cervical tSCS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interlimb neural interactions in corticospinal and spinal reflex circuits during preparation and execution of isometric elbow flexion. J Neurophysiol 124: 652-667, 2020. First published July 22, 2020; doi: 10.1152/jn.00705.2019.--Although coordinated and simultaneous movement of upper and lower limb muscles is required for activities of daily living, interlimb neural interaction mechanisms and their nature are yet to be fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of motor preparation and execution of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral upper limb muscle contractions on the excitability of corticospinal and spinal reflex circuits of the lower limb muscles. Fourteen able-bodied individuals were recruited in each study. Experiments were conducted to investigate 1) corticospinal excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation applied on the primary motor cortex to evoke motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and 2) spinal reflex excitability with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation applied at the lumbothoracic level to evoke spinal reflexes. Measurements were recorded from multiple right lower limb muscles simultaneously during 1) ipsilateral (right), 2) contralateral (left), and 3) bilateral (right and left) elbow flexion. The results indicate that MEPs in lower limb muscles were facilitated during both preparation and execution of elbow flexion, whereas spinal reflexes were facilitated only during motor execution. Moreover, the extent of facilitation did not differ between right, left, and bilateral contractions. In conclusion, motor preparation for upper limb muscle contractions did not affect spinal circuits but seemed to affect the supraspinal networks controlling lower limb muscles. However, actual contraction (motor execution) of upper limb muscles is required to facilitate spinal reflex circuits controlling the lower limb muscles. Moreover, interlimb remote facilitation in corticospinal and spinal reflex circuits did not depend on whether contralateral or ipsilateral hands were contracted or if they were contracted bilaterally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcutaneous and epidural electrical spinal cord stimulation techniques are becoming more valuable as electrophysiological and clinical tools. Recently, remarkable recovery of the upper limb sensorimotor function during cervical spinal stimulation was demonstrated. In the present study, we sought to elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying the effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) of the cervical spine. We hypothesized that cervical tSCS can be used to selectively activate the sensory route entering the spinal cord and transsynaptically converge on upper limb motor pools. To test this hypothesis, we applied cervical tSCS using paired stimuli (homosynaptic depression) and during passive muscle stretching of the wrist flexor (presynaptic inhibition via Ia afferents), voluntary hand muscle contraction (descending facilitation of motoneuron pool), and muscletendon vibration of the wrist (presynaptic inhibition via afferent occlusion). Our results demonstrate significant inhibition of the second evoked response during paired stimulus delivery, inhibition of responses during passive muscle stretching and muscle-tendon vibration, and facilitation during voluntary muscle contraction, which share similarities with responses evoked during lumbosacral tSCS. These results indicate that the route of the stimulation current transmission passes via afferents in the dorsal roots through the spinal cord to activate the motor pools and potentially interneuronal networks projecting to upper limb muscles. Using a novel stimulation paradigm, our study is the first to present evidence of the sensory neuronal pathway of the cervical tSCS propagation. Overall, our work demonstrates the utility and sensitivity of cervical tSCS to engage the sensory pathway projecting to the upper limbs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]