Search

We previously showed a prolonged inhibition of current-induced vasodilation (CIV) after a single oral high dose of aspirin. In this study, we tested the hypothesis of platelet involvement in CIV. Nine healthy volunteers took 75 mg aspirin/day, 98 mg of clopidogrel bisulfate/day, or placebo for 4 days. CIV was induced by two consecutive 1-min anodal current applications (0.08 mA/[cm.sup.2]) through deionized water with a 10-min interval. CIV was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry and expressed as a percentage of baseline cutaneous vascular conductance: %[C.sub.b]. In a second experiment in 10 volunteers, aspirin and placebo were given as in experiment 1, but a 26-h delay from the last aspirin intake elapsed before ACh iontophoresis and postocclusive hyperemia were studied in parallel to CIV. In experiment 1, the means [+ or -] SE amplitude of CIV was 822 [+ or -] 314, 313 [+ or -] 144, and 746 [+ or -] 397% [C.sub.b] with placebo, aspirin (P < 0.05 from placebo and clopidogrel), and clopidogrel (NS from placebo), respectively. In experiment 2, CIV impairment with aspirin was confirmed: CIV amplitudes were 300 [+ or -] 99, and 916 [+ or -] 528%[C.sub.b] under aspirin and placebo, respectively (P < 0.05), whereas vasodilation to ACh iontophoresis (322 [+ or -] 74 and 365 [+ or -] 104%Cb) and peak postocclusive hyperemia (491 [+ or -] 137 and 661 [+ or -] 248%Cb) were not different between aspirin and placebo, respectively. Low-dose aspirin, even 26 h after oral administration, impairs CIV, while ACh-mediated vasodilation and postocclusive hyperemia are preserved. If platelets are involved in the neurovascular mechanism triggered by galvanic current application in humans, it is likely to occur through the cyclooxygenase but not the ADP pathway. microcirculation; axon reflex; platelets; skin

We previously reported that forearm vasodilation to a delivered all-at-once over 5 min or a 1-min repeated monopolar anodal 0.10-mA current application is aspirin sensitive and that a single high-dose aspirin exerts a long-lived effect in the former case. We hypothesized that 1) in the latter case, the effect of aspirin would also be long lived and 2) the time required to resupply nerve endings with unblocked cyclooxygenase through axonal transport could explain this phenomenon. We studied the time course for the recovery of vasodilation to repeated current application after placebo or 1-g aspirin treatment. We then searched for a difference at a proximal vs. distal site in the recovery of the response. Aspirin abolished current-induced vasodilation at 2 h, 10 h, and 3 days, with a progressive recovery thereafter, but no difference between distal and proximal site was observed for the recovery of the response. This suggests that, although neural cyclooxygenase could participate in the response, the time course of aspirin inhibition of current-induced cutaneous vasodilation is not due to the time required through neural transport to resupply nerve endings with unblocked proteins. skin blood flow; laser Doppler; prostaglandin; iontophoresis; axonal transport

It is generally acknowledged that cutaneous vasodilatation in response to monopolar galvanic current application would result from an axon reflex in primary afferent fibers and the neurogenic inflammation resulting from neuropeptide release. Previous studies suggested participation of prostaglandin (PG) in anodal current-induced cutaneous vasodilatation. Thus the inducible cyclooxygenase (COX) isoform (COX-2), assumed to play a key role in inflammation, should be involved in the synthesis of the PG that is released. Skin blood flow (SkBF) variations induced by 5 min of 0.1-mA monopolar anodal current application were evaluated with laser-Doppler flowmetry on the forearm of healthy volunteers treated with indomethacin (COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor), celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor), or placebo. SkBF was indexed as cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC), expressed as percentage of heat-induced maximal CVC (%MVC). Urinalyses were performed to test celecoxib treatment efficiency. No difference was found in CVC values at rest: 14.3 +/- 4.0, 11.9 +/- 3.2, and 10.9 +/- 2.0% MVC after indomethacin, celecoxib, and placebo treatment, respectively. At 10 min after the onset of anodal current application, CVC values were 22.2 +/- 4.9% MVC (not significantly different from rest) with indomethacin, 85.7 +/- 15.3% MVC (P < 0.001 vs. rest) with celecoxib, and 70.4 +/- 13.1% MVC (P < 0.001 vs. rest) with placebo. Celecoxib significantly depressed the urinary prostacyclin metabolite 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) (P < 0.05 vs. placebo). Indomethacin, but not celecoxib, significantly inhibited the anodal current-induced vasodilatation. Thus, although they are assumed to result from an axon reflex in primary afferent fibers and neurogenic inflammation, these results suggest that the early anodal current-induced vasodilatation is mainly dependent on COX-1-induced PG synthesis.