Search

Our data reveal for the first time that associations between aerobic fitness and resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity are sex and age specific; inverse relationships are evident in younger males (

Elevated large-artery stiffness is recognized as an independent predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The mechanisms responsible for such stiffening are incompletely understood. Several recent cross-sectional and acute experimental studies have examined whether sympathetic outflow, quantified by microneurographic measures of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), can modulate large-artery stiffness in humans. A major methodological challenge of this research has been the capacity to evaluate the independent neural contribution without influencing the dynamic blood pressure dependence of arterial stiffness. The focus of this review is to summarize the evidence examining 1) the relationship between resting MSNA and large-artery stiffness, as determined by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity or pulse wave reflection characteristics (i.e., augmentation index) in men and women; 2) the effects of acute sympathoexcitatory or sympathoinhibitory maneuvers on carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and augmentation index; and 3) the influence of sustained increases or decreases in sympathetic neurotransmitter release or circulating catecholamines on large-artery stiffness. The present results highlight the growing evidence that the sympathetic nervous system is capable of modulating arterial stiffness independent of prevailing hemodynamics and vasomotor tone.

Fluid that shifts out of the legs and into the neck when supine can contribute to upper-airway narrowing. The present study investigates the relative contributions of vascular and extravascular fluid to the total accumulation of neck fluid volume (NFV). In 22 healthy awake participants (8 women), aged 42 ± 9 yr, we measured NFV with bioelectrical impedance, internal jugular vein volume (IJVV) with ultrasound, and extravascular NFV (NFVEV) as the difference between NFV and IJVV. Participants were randomly allocated to control and intervention, both of which were conducted on the same day. Measurements were made at baseline and every 5 min thereafter during control and intervention. During intervention, participants received 40 mmHg lower-body positive pressure (LBPP) when supine, followed by LBPP plus 10° Trendelenburg position, then LBPP when supine again, followed by recovery. During control, participants lay supine for equal time. LBPP and LBPP plus Trendelenburg position both increased NFV from baseline compared with control ( P < 0.001), with significant contributions from IJVV ( P < 0.001). Returning to supine with LBPP, IJVV returned to baseline, but NFV remained elevated because of accumulation of NFVEV. These findings suggest that contributions of IJVV to NFV are immediate but transient, whereas sustained elevation in NFV when supine is likely a result of NFVEV. These findings add new insights into the mechanism by which fluid accumulates in the neck by rostral fluid shift. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study demonstrates that lying supine for 30 min as well as increased fluid shift out of the legs to simulate nocturnal rostral fluid shift causes fluid to accumulate mainly in the extravascular space of the neck rather than in the internal jugular veins. Therefore, in subjects without fluid-retaining states, extravascular neck fluid accumulation overnight might play a more significant role in the pathophysiology of upper-airway narrowing than intravascular fluid accumulation.

The beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor antagonists in patients with heart failure secondary to reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are felt to result from prevention of the adverse effects of ANG II on systemic afterload and renal homeostasis. However, ANG II can activate the sympathetic nervous system, and part of the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors and ANG II antagonists may result from their ability to inhibit such activation. We examined the acute effects of the ACE inhibitor captopril (25 mg, n = 9) and the ANG II receptor antagonist losartan (50 mg, n = 10) on hemodynamics as well as total body and cardiac norepinephrine spillover in patients with chronic HFrEF. Hemodynamic and neurochemical measurements were made at baseline and at 1, 2, and 4 h after oral dosing. Administration of both drugs caused significant reductions in systemic arterial, cardiac filling, and pulmonary artery pressures ( P < 0.05 vs. baseline). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of those hemodynamic effects. Plasma concentrations of ANG II were significantly decreased by captopril and increased by losartan ( P < 0.05 vs. baseline for both). Total body sympathetic activity increased in response to both captopril and losartan ( P < 0.05 vs. baseline for both); however, there was no change in cardiac sympathetic activity in response to either drug. The results of the present study do not support the hypothesis that the acute inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system has sympathoinhibitory effects in patients with chronic HFrEF.

Abnormal renal function is common in acute and chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) and is related to the severity of congestion. However, treatment of congestion often leads to worsening renal function. Our objective was to explore basal determinants of renal function and their response to hemodynamic interventions. Thirty-seven patients without CHF and 59 patients with chronic CHF (ejection fraction; 23 ± 8%) underwent right heart catheterization, measurements of glomerular filtration rate (GFR; inulin) and renal plasma flow (RPF; para-aminohippurate), and radiotracer estimates of renal sympathetic activity. A subset (26 without, 36 with CHF) underwent acute pharmacological intervention with dobutamine or nitroprusside. We explored the relationship between baseline and drug-induced hemodynamic changes and changes in renal function. In CHF, there was an inverse relationship among right atrial mean pressure (RAM) pressure, RPF, and GFR. By contrast, mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), and measures of renal sympathetic activity were not significant predictors. In those with CHF there was also an inverse relationship among the drug-induced changes in RAM as well as pulmonary artery mean pressure and the change in GFR. Changes in MAP and CI did not predict the change in GFR in those with CHF. Baseline values and changes in RAM pressure did not correlate with GFR in those without CHF. In the CHF group there was a positive correlation between RAM pressure and renal sympathetic activity. There was also an inverse relationship among RAM pressure, GFR, and RPF in patients with chronic CHF. The observation that acute reductions in RAM pressure is associated with an increase in GFR in patients with CHF has important clinical implications.

Atrial mechanoreceptors, stimulated by increased pressure or volume, elicit in healthy humans a net sympathoinhibitory response. The co-existence of an atrial reflex eliciting muscle sympathoexcitation has been postulated but undetected by conventional multi-unit muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). We hypothesized that in response to a selective increase in atrial pressure, single-unit MSNA would reveal a subpopulation of efferent sympathetic neurons with firing patterns opposite to the integrated multi-unit MSNA envelope. Multi- and single-unit MSNA recordings were acquired in eight healthy middle-aged subjects (age, 57 ± 8 years; body mass index, 25 ± 2 kg/m2) submitted to selective decreases or increases in atrial pressure by nonhypotensive lower body negative pressure (LBNP; −10 mmHg) or nonhypertensive lower body positive pressure (LBPP; +10 mmHg), respectively. Single-unit MSNA firing responses were classified as anticipated if spike frequency and incidence increased with LBNP or decreased with LBPP and paradoxical if they decreased with LBNP or increased with LBPP. LBNP decreased (3.2 ± 2.8 to 1.4 ± 3.1 mmHg, P < 0.01) and LBPP increased (3.3 ± 2.7 to 4.9 ± 2.8 mmHg, P < 0.01) estimated central venous pressure without affecting stroke volume, systemic pressure, or resistance. Multi-unit MSNA increased with LBNP (31 ± 17 to 38 ± 19 bursts/min, P < 0.01) and diminished with LBPP (33 ± 15 to 28 ± 15 bursts/min, P < 0.01). Of 21 single-units identified, 76% exhibited firing responses to both LBNP and LBPP concordant with multi-unit MSNA, whereas 24% demonstrated discordant or paradoxical responses. The detection of two subpopulations of single-units within the multi-unit MSNA recording, exhibiting opposite firing characteristics, establishes the first evidence in humans for the existence of an excitatory cardiac-muscle sympathetic reflex activated by increasing atrial pressure.

It is unknown whether ventricular fibrillation (VF) studied in experimental models represents in vivo human VF. First, we examined closed chest in vivo VF induced at defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) in four patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy pretransplantation. We examined VF in these same four hearts in an ex vivo human Langendorff posttransplantation. VF from DFT was compared with VF from the electrodes from a similar region in the right ventricular endocardium in the Langendorff using two parameters: the scale distribution width (extracted from continuous wavelet transform) and VF mean cycle length (CL). In a second substudy group where multielectrode phase mapping could be performed, we examined early VF intraoperatively (in vivo open chest condition) in three patients with left ventricular cardiomyopathy. We investigated early VF in the hearts of three patients in an ex vivo Langendorff and compared findings with intraoperative VF using two metrics: dominant frequency (DF) assessed by the Welch periodogram and the number of phase singularities (lasting >480 ms). Wavelet analysis ( P = 0.9) and VF CL were similar between the Langendorff and the DFT groups (225 ± 13, 218 ± 24 ms; P = 0.9), indicating that wave characteristics and activation rate of VF was comparable between the two models. Intraoperative DF was slower but comparable with the Langendorff DF over the endocardium (4.6 ± 0.1, 5.0 ± 0.4 Hz; P = 0.9) and the epicardium (4.5 ± 0.2, 5.2 ± 0.4 Hz; P = 0.9). Endocardial phase singularity number (9.6 ± 5, 12.1 ± 1; P = 0.6) was lesser in number but comparable between in vivo and ex vivo VF. VF dynamics in the limited experimental human studies approximates human in vivo VF.

Many heart failure (HF) patients exhibit paradoxical forearm vasodilation when central blood volume is reduced by lower body negative pressure (LBNP). We tested the hypothesis that this response results from reflex sympathetic withdrawal. We recorded simultaneously forearm blood flow, muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), and plasma norepinephrine (PNE) during four random applications of LBNP, −5, −10, −20, and −40 mmHg, in 12 men with HF (mean left ventricular ejection fraction = 24 ± 2%) and 10 healthy, normal, age-matched men (N). Compared with N, MSNA burst frequency ( P = 0.001) and PNE ( P = 0.005) were significantly higher in the HF group, both at rest and during LBNP. As anticipated in N, LBNP −40 mmHg significantly increased MSNA (+14.2 ± 2.5 bursts/min; P < 0.05) and PNE (+0.83 ± 0.22 nmol/l; P < 0.05) and decreased forearm vascular conductance (FVC) (−11.7 ± 3.2 ml·min−1·mmHg−1; P < 0.05). In the HF group, LBNP elicited similar increases in MSNA (+11.5 ± 2.0; P < 0.05) and PNE (+0.85 ± 0.12; P < 0.05), without affecting FVC significantly (−4.1 ± 2.4; P = 0.01 vs. N, interaction P = 0.03). However, within the HF group, responses were bimodal: LBNP −40 mmHg increased MSNA in all subjects ( P < 0.001), yet the six patients with nonischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) exhibited significant vasoconstriction (decrease in FVC; P = 0.001), whereas the six patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) exhibited significant vasodilation (increase in FVC; P < 0.02 vs. DCM and N; interaction P = 0.02). Cold pressor testing increased MSNA and decreased FVC in ICM ( n = 4). Thus paradoxical forearm vasodilator responses to LBNP in HF are not mediated by reflex sympathetic withdrawal. ICM and DCM patients differ qualitatively in their vascular responses to hypotensive LBNP.

The cardiovascular benefits of light to moderate red wine consumption often have been attributed to its polyphenol constituents. However, the acute dose-related hemodynamic, vasodilator, and sympathetic neural effects of ethanol and red wine have not been characterized and compared in the same individual. We sought to test the hypotheses that responses to one and two alcoholic drinks differ and that red wine with high polyphenol content elicits a greater effect than ethanol alone. Thirteen volunteers (24–47 yr; 7 men, 6 women) drank wine, ethanol, and water in a randomized, single-blind trial on three occasions 2 wk apart. One drink of wine and ethanol increased blood alcohol to 38 ± 2 and 39 ± 2 mg/dl, respectively, and two drinks to 72 ± 4 and 83 ± 3 mg/dl, respectively. Wine quadrupled plasma resveratrol ( P < 0.001) and increased catechin ( P < 0.03). No intervention affected blood pressure. One drink had no heart rate effect, but two drinks of wine increased heart rate by 5.7 ± 1.6 beats/min; P < 0.001). Cardiac output fell 0.8 ± 0.3 l/min after one drink of ethanol and wine (both P < 0.02) but increased after two drinks of ethanol (+0.8 ± 0.3 l/min) and wine (+1.2 ± 0.3 l/min) ( P < 0.01). One alcoholic drink did not alter muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), while two drinks increased MSNA by 9–10 bursts/min ( P < 0.001). Brachial artery diameter increased after both one and two alcoholic drinks ( P < 0.001). No beverage augmented, and the second wine dose attenuated ( P = 0.02), flow-mediated vasodilation. One drink of ethanol dilates the brachial artery without activating sympathetic outflow, whereas two drinks increase MSNA, heart rate, and cardiac output. These acute effects, which exhibit a narrow dose response, are not modified by red wine polyphenols.

In subjects with sinus rhythm, respiration has a profound effect on heart rate variability (HRV) at high frequencies (HF). Because this HF respiratory arrhythmia is lost in atrial fibrillation (AF), it has been assumed that respiration does not influence the ventricular response. However, previous investigations have not considered the possibility that respiration might influence HRV at lower frequencies. We hypothesized that Cheyne-Stokes respiration with central sleep apnea (CSR-CSA) would entrain HRV at very low frequency (VLF) in AF by modulating atrioventricular (AV) nodal refractory period and concealed conduction. Power spectral analysis of R-wave-to-R-wave (R-R) intervals and respiration during sleep were performed in 13 subjects with AF and CSR-CSA. As anticipated, no modulation of HRV was detected at HF during regular breathing. In contrast, VLF HRV was entrained by CSR-CSA [coherence between respiration and HRV of 0.69 (SD 0.22) at VLF during CSR-CSA vs. 0.20 (SD 0.19) at HF during regular breathing, P < 0.001]. Comparison of R-R intervals during CSR-CSA demonstrated a shorter AV node refractory period during hyperpnea than apnea [minimum R-R of 684 (SD 126) vs. 735 ms (SD 147), P < 0.001] and a lesser degree of concealed conduction [scatter of 178 (SD 56) vs. 246 ms (SD 72), P = 0.001]. We conclude that CSR-CSA entrains the ventricular response to AF, even in the absence of HF respiratory arrhythmia, by inducing rhythmic oscillations in AV node refractoriness and the degree of concealed conduction that may be a function of autonomic modulation of the AV node.

Lower body negative pressure (LBNP; −5 and −15 mmHg) was applied to 14 men (mean age 44 yr) to test the hypothesis that reductions in preload without effect on stroke volume or blood pressure increase selectively muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), but not the ratio of low- to high-frequency harmonic component of spectral power (PL/PH), a coarse-graining power spectral estimate of sympathetic heart rate (HR) modulation. LBNP at −5 mmHg lowered central venous pressure and had no effect on stroke volume (Doppler) or systolic blood pressure but reduced vagal HR modulation. This latter finding, a manifestation of arterial baroreceptor unloading, refutes the concept that low levels of LBNP interrogate, selectively, cardiopulmonary reflexes. MSNA increased, whereas PL/PH and HR were unchanged. This discordance is consistent with selectivity of efferent sympathetic responses to nonhypotensive LBNP and with unloading of tonically active sympathoexcitatory atrial reflexes in some subjects. Hypotensive LBNP (−15 mmHg) increased MSNA and PL/PH, but there was no correlation between these changes within subjects. Therefore, HR variability has limited utility as an estimate of the magnitude of orthostatic changes in sympathetic discharge to muscle.

Plasma atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) concentrations are increased in subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). A potential contribution of ANF to the maintenance of abnormalities in renal hemodynamic function has been considered but not proven in human diabetic subjects. The aim of these experiments was to determine the response of renal blood flow (RBF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), filtration fraction (FF), and urinary sodium excretion (UNaV) to a reduction of plasma ANF concentrations induced by application of nonhypotensive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in a group of subjects with early, uncomplicated, well-controlled IDDM compared with control subjects. Baseline supine measurements before LBNP revealed the diabetic subjects to have a significantly higher plasma ANF (31 +/- 2 vs. 24 +/- 2 pg/ml, P = 0.05). GFR tended to be higher (118 +/- 11 vs. 104 +/- 9 ml/min) and UNaV tended to be depressed (188 +/- 25 vs. 240 +/- 25 mumol/min) despite equal sodium intake, but not significantly so. In addition IDDM subjects exhibited significantly lower baseline plasma norepinephrine (PNE) concentrations (0.91 +/- 0.20 vs. 1.60 +/- 0.2 nmol/l, P = 0.03). Forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was not significantly different between the two groups (29 +/- 5 vs. 33 +/- 5 units). LBNP induced comparable decreases in ANF and central venous pressure (CVP) in both groups. The anticipated renal response to ANF reduction (declines in GFR, FF, and UNaV) occurred only in the normal control group. The percent decline in GFR (11% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.01) was markedly attenuated in IDDM subjects. The expected reflexive increase in PNE and FVR also did not occur in IDDM subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The renal and neurohumoral effects of prolonged cardiopulmonary baroreflex unloading and the relationship of these changes to urinary sodium excretion have not been well documented in humans. In this study, 12 normal males underwent lower body negative pressure at -15 mmHg for 90 min, a maneuver that deactivates cardiopulmonary baroreceptors. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), and filtration fraction (FF) were measured in eight of these subjects using inulin and p-aminohippuric acid clearance techniques. During reduction of central venous pressure, arterial blood pressure and heart rate did not change. Plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) decreased markedly (22 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 1 pg/ml, P = 0.0001) as did the second messenger of ANF's biological action, guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate, whereas renin and vasopressin were not significantly altered. There was a significant rise in plasma norepinephrine (1.6 +/- 0.2 to 2.4 +/- 0.4 nmol/l, P = 0.03). GFR (104 +/- 9 to 68 +/- 6 ml/min, P = 0.007) and FF (0.18 +/- 0.01 to 0.14 +/- 0.01, P = 0.007) decreased significantly, with maintenance of ERPF. There was a significant antinatriuresis without an antikaliuresis and a significant reduction in free water clearance. These changes in renal hemodynamics are unlike the known effects of renal vasoconstrictors, and the alterations in solute and free water clearance are consistent with the removal of the known actions of ANF from tubular target sites. Taken together, our findings suggest that a mechanism other than activation of vasoconstrictors, possibly the diminution of the influence of ANF on the kidney, may be operative in the renal adjustments to cardiopulmonary baroreflex deactivation in humans.

The following letter is in response to Point:Counterpoint “Cardiovascular variability is/is not an index of autonomic control of circulation” that appeared in the August issue (vol. 101, pages 676–682, 2006). To the Editor : Changes in heart rate variability (HRV) or blood pressure

The following letter is in response to the Point:Counterpoint “Increased mechanoreceptor/metaboreceptor stimulation explains the exaggerated exercise pressor reflex seen in heart failure”. To the Editor : Debate, by its nature, serves to polarize rather than seek truth or consensus ([3][1], [6