1. Intramuscular pressure and electromyography as indexes of force during isokinetic exercise.
- Author
-
Aratow M, Ballard RE, Crenshaw AG, Styf J, Watenpaugh DE, Kahan NJ, and Hargens AR
- Subjects
- Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Electrodes, Electromyography instrumentation, Humans, Isometric Contraction physiology, Male, Middle Aged, Muscles anatomy & histology, Muscles physiology, Pressure, Exercise physiology, Muscle Contraction physiology
- Abstract
A direct method for measuring force production of specific muscles during dynamic exercise is presently unavailable. Previous studies indicate that both intramuscular pressure (IMP) and electromyography (EMG) correlate linearly with muscle contraction force during isometric exercise. The objective of this study was to compare IMP and EMG as linear assessors of muscle contraction force during dynamic exercise. IMP and surface EMG activity were recorded during concentric and eccentric isokinetic plantarflexion and dorsiflexion of the ankle joint from the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) muscles of nine male volunteers (28-54 yr). Ankle torque was measured using a dynamometer, and IMP was measured via catheterization. IMP exhibited better linear correlation than EMG with ankle joint torque during concentric contractions of the SOL (IMP R2 = 0.97, EMG R2 = 0.81) and the TA (IMP R2 = 0.97, EMG R2 = 0.90), as well as during eccentric contractions (SOL: IMP R2 = 0.91, EMG R2 = 0.51; TA: IMP R2 = 0.94, EMG R2 = 0.73). IMP provides a better index of muscle contraction force than EMG during concentric and eccentric exercise through the entire range of torque. IMP reflects intrinsic mechanical properties of individual muscles, such as length-tension relationships, which EMG is unable to assess.
- Published
- 1993
- Full Text
- View/download PDF