A large difference in the rate of flux flow in YBa2Cu307 — ~ superconductors is observed between flux expulsion (field cooling then removing the field) and fiux penetration' (zero-field cooling then switching on a field). The mean activation energy and the width of its distribution for fiux expulsion are 14 and 28 meV and for flux penetration are 34 and 67 meV. The smaller activation barrier for flux expulsion relative to flux penetration can be explained quantitatively in terms of flux pinning at the surface image potential and is also consistent with a model of randomly coupled superconducting grains. Hard superconductors show time-dependent changes in their magnetization (diamagnetic susceptibility) under a magnetic field gradient. These changes, typically logarithmic in time, can be modeled as thermally activated Auxon motions over a distribution of pinning barriers where the apparent activation energy increases as equilibrium is reached. The driving force is the Lorentz force associated with the field gradient. Miiller, Takashige, and Bednorz stirred renewed interest in Aux creep when their report of large time-dependent effects in Laz(Sr)Cu03 reached the wide community now attracted to the field of high-T, superconductivity. They interpreted the flux creep as evidence of a superconducting-glass (SCG) state with a random local-order parameter associated with the phase difference between the superconducting wave functions in adjacent coherent superconducting regions. Moreover, they identified the ergodic limit on the SCG H-T phase diagram as a de Almeida- Thouless glass transition beyond which the system is Auidlike, i.e., the time scale for relaxation is very short on a laboratory scale. Critical to the understanding of the time-dependent 'eAects, whether as conventional Aux creep or as manifestations of an SCG state, is an appreciation of the preparation of the initial magnetization states. The initial magnetization can be set by zero-field cooling (ZFC) then suddenly switching the field on, MzFC(T, tp), or by field cooling (FC) then suddenly removing the field, M„(T,tp) (Both of these magnetizations are also functions of the field involved but that dependence will not be explicitly expressed because its effects are not discussed here. ) In the former case the time dependence describes Aux penetration, in the latter case, Aux expulsion. It is of interest to compare these two processes. It is known that in the absence of an applied field, the coherent superconducting region in Y 1:2:3is the macroscopic specimen, whether it is a single crystal or a Josephson-coupled polycrystalline sample. However, in the presence of a relatively weak field, not only are the grains of a polycrystal decoupled (Hq (100 Oe), s but the coherent superconducting regions may become much smaller than the grain size. Our Aux-creep experiments were done at fields of 1 kOe and greater and, therefore, probe the intragranular pinning processes, not those of the weak links between the grains. We have studied flux flow in a variety of polycrystalline high-T, superconductors and observed a significant difference between flux expulsion and penetration in several of these. Here we report the results for YBa2Cus07 — s (Y 1:2:3). Flux expulsion is found to be a much easier process, penetration more difficult, in terms of the activation energies derived. In Y 1:2:3 flux expulsion is characterized by a mean activation energy of 14 meV, Aux penetration by 34 meV. It is not possible to interpret this difference in terms of a simple flux-creep model in which the same pinning barriers are encountered by Auxons entering or leaving the material. We show that it is possible to explain the data quantitatively by extending the simple flux-creep model to include surface-pinning efrects. '