Search

Context: International guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy for patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, but the optimal timing of intervention is uncertain.Objective: To determine whether immediate intervention on admission can result in a reduction of myocardial infarction compared with a delayed intervention.Design, Setting, and Patients: The Angioplasty to Blunt the Rise of Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized for an Immediate or Delayed Intervention (ABOARD) study, a randomized clinical trial that assigned, from August 2006 through September 2008 at 13 centers in France, 352 patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation and a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score of 3 or more to receive intervention either immediately or on the next working day (between 8 and 60 hours after enrollment).Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was the peak troponin value during hospitalization; the key secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 1-month follow-up.Results: Time from randomization to sheath insertion was 70 minutes with immediate intervention vs 21 hours with delayed intervention. The primary end point did not differ between the 2 strategies (median [interquartile range] troponin I value, 2.1 [0.3-7.1] ng/mL vs 1.7 [0.3-7.2] ng/mL in the immediate and delayed intervention groups, respectively; P = .70). The key secondary end point was observed in 13.7% (95% confidence interval, 8.6%-18.8%) of the group assigned to receive immediate intervention and 10.2% (95% confidence interval, 5.7%-14.6%) of the group assigned to receive delayed intervention (P = .31). The other end points, as well as major bleeding, did not differ between the 2 strategies.Conclusion: In patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, a strategy of immediate intervention compared with a strategy of intervention deferred to the next working day (mean, 21 hours) did not result in a difference in myocardial infarction as defined by peak troponin level.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00442949. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (Gp IIb/IIIa) inhibitors improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but optimal timing of administration remains unclear. No systematic reviews have comprehensively examined the effects of early vs delayed administration of these agents., Objective: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials of early (prior to transfer to the catheterization laboratory) vs late (at the time of PCI) intravenous administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Data Sources: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register search of the literature over the past 10 years; papers presented at major cardiac conferences; consultation with national and international colleagues as well as Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor drug manufacturers; and text and journal article bibliographies., Study Selection and Data Extraction: We examined trials of randomized comparisons between early administration at the point of initial contact (emergency department or ambulance) and late administration (catheterization laboratory) of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI. Outcome data had to be available on both culprit artery patency evaluated by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades on admission and mortality. Two authors independently reviewed abstracts or complete articles. Six studies met inclusion criteria. Independent data extraction was performed by 2 reviewers and confirmed by consensus., Data Synthesis: The 6 trials enrolled 931 STEMI patients treated with abciximab (3 trials) or tirofiban (3 trials) in combination with primary PCI. TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow (41.7% [194/465 vs 29.8% [139/466]) as well as TIMI grade 3 flow (20.3% [84/413] vs 12.2% [51/418]) were significantly more frequent in the early group compared with the late group (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.22; P<.001; and OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.26-2.71; P<.001, respectively). The early administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors was associated with a 28% reduction of mortality from 4.7% to 3.4%, which was not significant but consistent with similar trends for reinfarction and the composite ischemic end point., Conclusions: In a meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials, early administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI appeared to improve coronary patency with favorable trends for clinical outcomes. These findings are supportive of a strategy of facilitated PCI. Further evaluations in adequately powered large trials are awaited to confirm the clinical benefit of this strategy.