3 results on '"Ibrahim, Tareq"'
Search Results
2. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial.
- Author
-
Schulz-Schüpke, Stefanie, Helde, Sandra, Gewalt, Senta, Ibrahim, Tareq, Linhardt, Maryam, Haas, Katharina, Hoppe, Katharina, Böttiger, Corinna, Groha, Philip, Bradaric, Christian, Schmidt, Roland, Bott-Flügel, Lorenz, Ott, Ilka, Goedel, Julia, Byrne, Robert A, Schneider, Simon, Burgdorf, Christof, Morath, Tanja, Kufner, Sebastian, and Joner, Michael
- Abstract
Importance: The role of vascular closure devices (VCD) for the achievement of hemostasis in patients undergoing transfemoral coronary angiography remains controversial.Objective: To compare outcomes with the use of 2 hemostasis strategies after diagnostic coronary angiography performed via transfemoral access-a VCD-based strategy with 2 types of devices, an intravascular device and an extravascular device, vs standard manual compression. The primary hypothesis to be tested was that femoral hemostasis achieved through VCD is noninferior to manual compression in terms of vascular access-site complications. A secondary objective was the comparison of the 2 types of VCD.Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, large-scale, multicenter, open-label clinical trial. We enrolled 4524 patients undergoing coronary angiography with a 6 French sheath via the common femoral artery from April 2011 through May 2014 in 4 centers in Germany. Last 30-day follow-up was performed in July 2014.Interventions: After angiography of the access site, patients were randomized to hemostasis with an intravascular VCD, extravascular VCD, or manual compression in a 1:1:1 ratio.Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end point: the composite of access site-related vascular complications at 30 days after randomization with a 2% noninferiority margin. Secondary end points: time to hemostasis, repeat manual compression, and VCD failure. An α-level of .025 was chosen for primary and secondary comparisons.Results: Of the 4524 enrolled patients, 3015 were randomly assigned to a VCD group (1509 received intravascular VCD and 1506 received extravascular VCD) and 1509 patients were randomly assigned to the manual compression group. Before hospital discharge, duplex sonography of the access site was performed in 4231 (94%) patients. The primary end point was observed in 208 patients (6.9%) assigned to receive a VCD and 119 patients (7.9%) assigned to manual compression (difference, -1.0% [1-sided 97.5% CI, 0.7%]; P for noninferiority<.001). Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in patients with VCD (1 minute [interquartile range {IQR}, 0.5-2.0]), vs manual compression (10 minutes [IQR, 10-15]; P < .001). Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter among patients with intravascular VCD (0.5 minute [IQR, 0.2-1.0]), vs extravascular VCD (2.0 minutes [IQR, 1.0-2.0]; P <.001) and closure device failure was also significantly lower among those with intravascular vs extravascular VCD (80 patients [5.3%], vs 184 patients [12.2%]; P < .001).Conclusions and Relevance: In patients undergoing transfemoral coronary angiography, VCDs were noninferior to manual compression in terms of vascular access-site complications and reduced time to hemostasis.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01389375. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Stem Cell Mobilization by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.
- Author
-
Zohlnhöfer, Dietland, Ott, Ilka, Mehilli, Julina, Schömig, Kathrin, Ibrahim, Tareq, Meietschläger, Güther, Von Wedel, Jasper, Bollwein, Hildegard, Seyfarth, Melchior, Dirschinger, Josef, Schmitt, Claus, Schwaiger, Markus, Kastrati, Adnan, Schömig, Albert, and Michalk, Fabian
- Subjects
STEM cell treatment ,MYOCARDIAL infarction treatment ,GRANULOCYTE-colony stimulating factor ,PLACEBOS ,CLINICAL trials ,MEDICAL research ,CORONARY restenosis ,HEART diseases ,THERAPEUTICS ,BONE marrow cells - Abstract
Context Experimental studies and early phase clinical trials suggest that transplantation of blood-derived or bone marrow-derived stem cells may improve cardiac regeneration and neovascularization after acute myocardial infarction. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induces mobilization of bone marrow stem cells. Objective To assess the value of stem cell mobilization by G-CSF therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Design, Setting, and Patients Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients diagnosed with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction who had successful reperfusion by percutaneous coronary intervention within 12 hours after onset of symptoms in Germany between February 24, 2004, and February 2, 2005. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneously either a daily dose of 10 μg/kg of G-CSF or placebo for 5 days. Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was reduction of left ventricular infarct size according to technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scintigraphy performed at baseline and at 4 to 6 months after randomization. Secondary end points included improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction measured by magnetic resonance imaging and the incidence of angiographic restenosis. Results Of the 114 patients, 56 were assigned to receive treatment with G-CSF and 58 were assigned to receive placebo. Treatment with G-CSF produced a significant mobilization of stem cells. Between baseline and follow-up, left ventricular infarct size according to scintigraphy was reduced by a mean (SD) of 6.2% (9.1%) in the G-CSF group and 4.9% (8.9%) in the placebo group (P = .56) and left ventricular ejection fraction was improved by 0.5% (3.8%) in the G-CSF group and 2.0% (4.9%) in the placebo group (P = .14). Angiographic restenosis occurred in 19 (35.2%) of 54 patients in the G-CSF group and in 17 (30.9%) of 55 patients in the placebo group (P = .79). The most common adverse event among patients assigned to G-CSF was mild to moderate bone pain and muscle discomfort. Conclusion Stem cell mobilization by G-CSF therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and successful mechanical reperfusion has no influence on infarct size, left ventricular function, or coronary restenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2006
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.