Search

OBJECTIVERenin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors decrease the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) but are ineffective in up to 40% of patients. We hypothesized that rotation through different drug classes overcomes RAS inhibitor resistance and tested this in a randomized crossover trial.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe assigned 26 adults with type 1 diabetes and 37 with type 2 diabetes and UACR between 30 and 500 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate >45 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 4-week treatment periods with telmisartan 80 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg, linagliptin 5 mg, and baricitinib 2 mg in random order, separated by 4-week washout periods. Each participant was then re-exposed for 4 weeks to the drug that induced that individual’s largest UACR reduction. Primary outcome was the difference in UACR response to the best-performing drug during the confirmation period versus UACR response to the other three drugs.RESULTSThere was substantial variation in the best-performing drug. Telmisartan was best performing for 33 participants (52%), empagliflozin and linagliptin in 11 (17%), and baricitinib in 8 participants (13%). The individuals’ best-performing drug changed UACR from baseline during the first and confirmatory exposures by a mean of −39.6% (95% CI −44.8, −33.8; P < 0.001) and −22.4% (95% CI −29.7, −12.5; P < 0.001), respectively. The Pearson correlation for first versus confirmatory exposure was 0.39 (P = 0.017). The mean change in UACR with the other three drugs was +1.6% (95% CI −4.3%, 8.0%; P = 0.593 versus baseline; difference versus individuals’ best-performing drug at confirmation, 30.9% [95% CI 18.0, 45.3]; P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSWe demonstrated a large and reproducible variation in participants’ responses to different UACR-lowering drug classes. These data support systematic rotation through different drug classes to overcome therapy resistance to RAS inhibition.

OBJECTIVE Advances in diabetes technology have transformed the treatment paradigm for type 1 diabetes, yet the burden of disease is significant. We report on a pivotal safety study of the first tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system with customizable glycemic targets. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This single-arm, multicenter, prospective study enrolled 112 children (age 6–13.9 years) and 129 adults (age 14–70 years). A 2-week standard therapy phase (usual insulin regimen) was followed by 3 months of automated insulin delivery. Primary safety outcomes were incidence of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis. Primary effectiveness outcomes were change in HbA1c and percent time in sensor glucose range 70–180 mg/dL (“time in range”). RESULTS A total of 235 participants (98% of enrolled, including 111 children and 124 adults) completed the study. HbA1c was significantly reduced in children by 0.71% (7.8 mmol/mol) (mean ± SD: 7.67 ± 0.95% to 6.99 ± 0.63% [60 ± 10.4 mmol/mol to 53 ± 6.9 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001) and in adults by 0.38% (4.2 mmol/mol) (7.16 ± 0.86% to 6.78 ± 0.68% [55 ± 9.4 mmol/mol to 51 ± 7.4 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001). Time in range was improved from standard therapy by 15.6 ± 11.5% or 3.7 h/day in children and 9.3 ± 11.8% or 2.2 h/day in adults (both P < 0.0001). This was accomplished with a reduction in time in hypoglycemia CONCLUSIONS This tubeless automated insulin delivery system was safe and allowed participants to significantly improve HbA1c levels and time in target glucose range with a very low occurrence of hypoglycemia.

Objective: Very young children with type 1 diabetes often struggle to achieve glycemic targets, putting them at risk of long-term complications and creating an immense management burden for caregivers. We conducted the first evaluation of the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System in this population. Research Design and Methods: Eighty children aged 2-5.9 years used the investigational system in a single-arm study for 13 weeks following 14 days of baseline data collection with their usual therapy. Results: There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia (SH) or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). By study end, HbA1c decreased by 0.55% (6.0mmol/mol) (p Conclusions: Use of the AID system was safe, and participants experienced improved glycemic measures and reduced hypoglycemia during the study phase compared with baseline.

Background: Fecal calprotectin, a marker of inflammation, is increased in persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and kidney disease. This may be explained by a reduction of butyrate-producing bacterial species in the gut. Butyrate supplementation has beneficial effects on intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease but has never been tested in persons with T1D. Objective: To assess the effect of sodium butyrate on fecal calprotectin and other inflammatory markers, kidney parameters, hba1c and gastrointestinal symptoms in persons with T1D and intestinal inflammation. Methods: Randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel clinical study including 53 participants with T1D, albuminuria and intestinal inflammation (elevated fecal calprotectin) . Participants were assigned to receive 3.6 g sodium butyrate daily (n=28) or placebo (n=25) for 12 weeks. Primary endpoint was fecal calprotectin changes, and additional outcomes were fecal short chain fatty acids, intestinal alkaline phosphatase activity and immunoglobulins; serum lipopolysaccharide, serum C-reactive protein, albuminuria, kidney function, hba1c and gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: Mean age of the participants was 54±13 years, 43% were women, diabetes duration was 30±15 years and median [Q1:Q3] urinary albumin excretion was 46 [14:121] mg/g. Median fecal calprotectin in the butyrate group was 48 [26:100] μg/g at baseline and change was -1.0 [-20:10] μg/g, the median in the placebo group was 61 [25:139] μg/g at baseline and change was -12 [-95:1] μg/g. Difference in change between groups was not significant (p=0.24) . Neither did we find an effect of butyrate compared to placebo on the other fecal and circulating inflammatory markers, kidney parameters, hba1c or gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusion: Oral butyrate supplementation for 12 weeks did not reduce fecal calprotectin in persons with T1D and intestinal inflammation. Disclosure N.H.Tougaard: None. P.Groop: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Other Relationship; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mundipharma, Speaker's Bureau; Medscape. M.Lehto: None. P.Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. M.Frimodt-moeller: None. H.Salmenkari: None. E.Buur stougaard: Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. I.Mattila: None. T.W.Hansen: Stock/Shareholder; Novo Nordisk A/S. C.Legido-quigley: None. S.Hörkkö: None. C.Forsblom: None.

Introduction: Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors decrease urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) and are guideline recommended drugs for kidney protection but are ineffective in lowering UACR in up to 40% of cases. We hypothesized that rotation to another drug class overcomes resistance to RAS inhibition and tested this hypothesis in a randomized cross-over trial. Methods: We assigned 26 adults with type 1 diabetes and 37 with type 2 diabetes and UACR ≥30 and ≤500 mg/g to 4-week treatment periods with telmisartan 80 mg, empagliflozin mg, linagliptin 5 mg, and baricitinib 2 mg in random order, separated by 4-week wash-out periods. Participants were then re-exposed for 4-weeks to the individual drug that induced the largest UACR reduction. Primary outcome was the difference in UACR response between the first and second exposure to the best performing drug, versus the difference in UACR response between the best performing drug and the other three drugs. Results: There was substantial between person variation in the best performing drug: telmisartan was best performing in 33 (52%) participants, followed by empagliflozin and linagliptin in (17%) participants each, and baricitinib in 8 (13%) participants. The individual best performing drug changed UACR during the first exposure by -39.6% (95%CI -44.8, -33.8, p Conclusion: We demonstrated a large and reproducible variation in UACR lowering responses to different drug classes reinforcing the need for personalized therapy approaches to overcome therapy resistance to guideline recommended treatment. Disclosure V.Rotbain curovic: None. P.Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. H.L.Heerspink: Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Chinook Therapeutics Inc., CSL Behring, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Goldfinch Bio, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Mundipharma, Traveere Pharmaceuticals, Research Support; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S. M.Y.A.Kroonen: None. N.Jongs: None. T.Sen: None. E.Zobel: Employee; Novo Nordisk. T.W.Hansen: Stock/Shareholder; Novo Nordisk A/S. G.D.Laverman: Advisory Panel; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly Diabetes, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Research Support; AstraZeneca, Lilly Diabetes, Sanofi, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. A.Kooy: Advisory Panel; Bayer AG, Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Speaker's Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mundipharma, Novo Nordisk. F.Persson: Advisory Panel; Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S, Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi.

Background: The indication for treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D) with the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) dapagliflozin has been withdrawn from the European market likely because of concern for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) . We aimed to calculate the incidence of DKA in people with T1D treated with SGLT2i in Denmark. Methods: The study is based on clinical data from adults with T1D in Denmark, diagnosed according to the treating specialist and carefully selected for treatment with SGLT2i. Data were collected from nine outpatient clinics. Our National electronic health record system makes it is possible to search for a specific diagnosis both in an outpatient setting and during hospitalization, which makes the search for DKA accurate. Results: From a population of 10.500 adults with T1D followed at the nine sites, we observed 134 people treated with SGLT2i over a total period of 222 patient years. Of them 72% were female, mean age (SD) was 51.4 (13.6) years and median duration of treatment (median, IQR) with an SGLT2i were 12.0 (6.0-29.0) months. The incidence of DKA was 0%. Conclusion: In this retrospective observational study based on reported data from nine participating centers in Denmark in 134 people with T1D treated with SGLT2i we found that none of the participants developed DKA during the treatment. Disclosure E.Buur stougaard: Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. K.W.Hansen: Advisory Panel; Abbott Diagnostics. H.H.Thomsen: Other Relationship; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. T.Al-imari: None. M.Røder: None. P.Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. F.Persson: Advisory Panel; Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S, Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. P.L.Kristensen: Speaker's Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. U.Kielgast: Advisory Panel; Abbott, Eli Lilly and Company, Mundipharma, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Other Relationship; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk. H.U.Andersen: Advisory Panel; Abbott Diabetes, Stock/Shareholder; Novo Nordisk A/S. Y.H.Hamid: n/a. P.Gæde: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Research Support; Novo Nordisk. E.Søndergaard: None. G.Dørflinger: None. K.K.Fjeldborg: Other Relationship; AstraZeneca.

OBJECTIVE Few studies have compared midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). We compared their value as risk markers for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) and renal complications in individuals with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were measured in 664 individuals. Hazard ratios (HRs) were assessed per doubling of NT-proBNP or MR-proANP for risk of a composite of ischemic events, heart failure (HF), a combined renal end point of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30%, and all-cause mortality or individual end points. Adjustments included CV risk factors and addition of MR-proANP or NT-proBNP. RESULTS Median follow-up was 5.1–6.2 years. MR-proANP was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality (n = 57; HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.7), combined CV end point (n = 94; 1.6, 1.1–2.2), HF (n = 27; 2.8, 1.5–5.2), combined renal end point (n = 123; 1.6, 1.2–2.1), and ESKD (n = 21; 3.1, 1.2–7.8) independent of CV risk factors (P ≤ 0.02). After addition of NT-proBNP, significance for all end points was lost. A doubling of NT-proBNP was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.8), the combined CV end point (1.3, 1.1–1.5), HF (1.7, 1.3–2.1), and the combined renal end point (1.3, 1.1–1.4) independent of CV risk factors (model 2 [P < 0.001]) and MR-proANP (model 3 [P ≤ 0.03]). There was no association with decline in eGFR ≥30% (n = 93). CONCLUSIONS Higher NT-proBNP was independently associated with all-cause mortality, CV disease, HF, and the combined renal end point. MR-proANP was associated with all end points but decline in eGFR, although not independent of NT-proBNP. MR-proANP may contribute to the predictive value of NT-proBNP for risk stratification in type 1 diabetes.

In diabetes, increasing albuminuria and decreasing glomerular filtration rate are hallmarks of chronic kidney disease in diabetes and increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events and mortality as well as the risk for end-stage kidney disease. For two decades, standard of care has been controlling risk factors, such as glucose, blood pressure, lipids, and lifestyle factors, and specifically use of agents blocking the renin-angiotensin system. This has improved outcome, but a large unmet need has been obvious. After many failed attempts to advance the therapeutic options, the past few years have provided several new promising treatment options such as sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists, glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists, and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The benefits and side effects of these agents demonstrate the link between kidney and heart; some have beneficial effects on both, whereas for other potentially renoprotective agents, development of heart failure has been a limiting factor. They work on different pathways such as hemodynamic, metabolic, inflammatory, and fibrotic targets. We propose that treatment may be personalized if biomarkers or physiological investigations assessing activity in these pathways are applied. This could potentially pave the way for precision medicine, where treatment is optimized for maximal benefit and minimal adverse outcomes. At least it may help prioritizing agents for an individual subject.

OBJECTIVE Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) is suggested as an independent gut microbiota–derived risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease. We investigated associations between plasma TMAO concentrations and cardio-renal outcomes in a prospective study of individuals with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Plasma TMAO was measured at baseline in 1,159 individuals with type 1 diabetes (58% male, mean ± SD age 46 ± 13 years). End points were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and renal events tracked from national registries. Associations between TMAO and end points were tested using Cox regression models. RESULTS After 15.0 (6.7–19.3) (median [interquartile range]) years of follow-up, we recorded all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (n = 363 and 120, respectively), combined CVD (n = 406), coronary outcome (myocardial infarction and coronary intervention) (n = 163), stroke (n = 115), hospitalization for heart failure (n = 81), and end-stage renal disease (n = 144). In univariate analyses, higher TMAO concentrations were associated with all end points (P ≤ 0.005). Except for stroke and heart failure, all end points remained significantly associated with higher TMAO concentrations after adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (P ≤ 0.003). After further adjustment for baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), results became insignificant for all end points. TMAO was inversely associated with baseline eGFR (R2 = 0.29; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In individuals with type 1 diabetes, higher concentrations of plasma TMAO were associated with mortality, CVD events, and poor renal outcome, independent of conventional risk factors. However, the association became insignificant after further adjustment for baseline eGFR. This could reflect TMAO as a renal function marker or a risk factor for micro- and macrovascular complications mediated through impaired renal function.

OBJECTIVE Previous studies have provided inconclusive results on the role of uric acid (UA) in risk prediction. Here we aimed to improve the power and precision of the predictive value of UA for the risk of decline in kidney function, cardiovascular events (CVEs), and mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Plasma UA was measured in 670 patients with T1D and various degrees of albuminuria, ranging from normoalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria. Associations of UA with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline of ≥30%, CVEs, and mortality were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 5.3 years [interquartile range (IQR) 2.7–6.2 years] for a decline in eGFR of ≥30%, 5.8 years (2.5–6.4 years) for progression in albuminuria status, 5.1 years (4.7–5.6 years) for CVE, and 6.2 years (5.8–6.7 years) for mortality. Both univariable and multivariable associations of UA with relevant outcomes and variables were reported. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated per doubling of the UA level. RESULTS A doubling in UA level was associated with a higher risk of decline in eGFR of ≥30% (n = 89) (HR 3.18 [IQR 1.71–5.93]; P < 0.001), CVE (n = 94) (HR 2.25 [IQR 1.20–4.21]; P = 0.011), and mortality (n = 58) (HR 2.58 [IQR 1.12–5.90]; P = 0.025) in adjusted analyses. Adding UA to the adjusted model including conventional risk factors improved the relative integrated discrimination index by 12.6% for a decline in eGFR of ≥30% (P < 0.001), 6.5% for CVE (P = 0.010), and 11.8% (P = 0.003) for mortality. A doubling in UA level was also associated with a steeper decline in eGFR (P < 0.0026) and a steeper increase in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (P < 0.0027) in adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS In individuals with T1D, a higher UA level is associated with a higher risk of decline in kidney function, CVE, and mortality, independently of other risk factors. Our results suggest that UA has a promising role in risk stratification among individuals with T1D.

The link between cardiac autonomic neuropathy and risk of cardiovascular disease is highlighted as an area in which research is needed. This study was undertaken to evaluate the association between measures of cardiac autonomic function and cardiac vascular function in type 1 diabetes using new and sensitive methods. This was a cross-sectional study in patients with type 1 diabetes, stratified by normoalbuminuria (n = 30) and macroalbuminuria (n = 30), and in healthy control subjects (n = 30). Cardiac autonomic function was evaluated using heart rate variability (HRV) indices, cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs), and cardiac 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging. Cardiac vascular function was assessed as myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured by cardiac 82Rb-positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The measures of cardiac autonomic function (except low frequency–to–high frequency ratio and the Valsalva test ratio) were positively correlated to MFR in unadjusted analysis. All the HRV indices lost significance after adjustment for age and heart rate. After further adjustment for relevant cardiovascular risk factors, the late heart-to-mediastinum ratio directly measuring the function of adrenergic receptors and sympathetic integrity (from the MIBG scintigraphy) and the 30-to-15 ratio (a CART), remained positively associated with MFR (P ≤ 0.04). Cardiac autonomic dysfunction, including loss of cardiac sympathetic integrity in type 1 diabetes, is associated with and may contribute to impaired myocardial blood flow regulation.

Background: Given the association of diabetic retinopathy (DR) to diabetic kidney disease, we investigated the urinary proteome to the presence and deterioration of DR in type 1 and type 2 diabetes in a post-hoc analysis of studies investigating the effect of candesartan on the progression of DR. Methods: Baseline urinary proteomic analysis was performed in 783 and 792 randomly chosen subjects from two RCTs: DIRECT-Protect 1 and 2. Endpoints were two-step and three-step change in DR score according to the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. Peptide levels were correlated to baseline DR score, using Spearman rank correlation (association presented as Rho), in a discovery set of 2/3 of participants in DIRECT-Protect 1. Identified peptide fragments were then tested cross-sectionally in a validation set of the remaining 1/3 in DIRECT-Protect 1. Thereafter, peptides identified in the discovery set were assessed in the entire DIRECT-Protect 1 and 2 cohorts in relation to baseline DR. Finally, peptides validated in the entire cohorts were tested longitudinally. Adjustment included sex, age, diabetes duration, smoking, total cholesterol, HbA1c, SBP, UAER, serum creatinine, and randomization group. Results: Follow-up ranged from 4.0-4.7 years. 24 out of 427 investigated peptide fragments were associated with baseline DR in the discovery set after adjustment for multiple testing. Two of these (COL3A1 (seq: NTG~) and COL4A1 (seq: DGA~) were also associated to baseline DR in the validation set (Rho: -0.22, p Conclusions: Several urinary peptide fragments (mainly collagen) were associated with the presence of DR, however, they were not conclusively associated with worsening of DR. Disclosure V. Rotbain curovic: None. P. Magalhães: None. T. He: Employee; Self; Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH. T. W. Hansen: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. H. Mischak: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Mosaiques Diagnostics. P. Rossing: Advisory Panel; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd.

Background: The glycocalyx lines the inner surface of the capillary endothelium. Capillaroscopy enables visualization of the sublingual capillaries and measurement of the perfused boundary region (PBR) as an estimate of the glycocalyx. Novel software enables assessment of the PBR estimated at a fixed high flow level (PBR-hf) and the microvascularity by the MicroVascular Health Score (MVHS). Damaged glycocalyx may represent microvascular damage in diabetes and assessment of its dimension might improve early cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification. Aim: To assess the associations between PBR, PBR-hf and MVHS and CV risk factors in persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D); and to compare PBR, PBR-hf and MVHS in persons with T1D and healthy controls. Methods: Cross-sectional study including 161 persons with T1D stratified by stage of diabetic kidney disease according to level of albuminuria and 50 healthy controls without diabetes. The PBR, PBR-hf and MVHS were assessed by the GlucoCheck device (valid measurements were available in 136 (84.5%) with T1D and in all the controls). Higher PBR and PBR-hf indicate smaller glycocalyx width and lower MVHS represents a worse microvascular health. Results: There were no associations between PBR, PBR-hf or MVHS and the CV risk factors in persons with T1D, except for a higher PBR-hf and a lower MVHS in females (p = 0.01 for both). There was no difference in PBR, PBR-hf or MVHS in persons with normo-, micro- or macroalbuminuria (p ≥ 0.34). PBR was higher and MVHS was lower in persons with T1D as compared to the healthy controls (p ≤ 0.02). After adjustment for CV risk factors the difference in PBR remained significant (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The endothelial glycocalyx dimension was impaired in persons with T1D compared to healthy controls. We found no association between the endothelial glycocalyx dimension and the level of albuminuria or CV risk factors among persons with T1D. The use of the GlucoCheck device in T1D may not contribute to CV risk stratification. Disclosure E. Buur stougaard: Employee; Spouse/Partner; Novo Nordisk, Stock/Shareholder; Spouse/Partner; Novo Nordisk. S. Winther: None. H. Amadid: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. M. Frimodt-moeller: None. F. Persson: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Mundipharma International, Novo Nordisk, Advisory Panel; Spouse/Partner; AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Research Support; Self; Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Mundipharma International, Novo Nordisk. T. W. Hansen: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. P. Rossing: Advisory Panel; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. Funding Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF14SA0003)

The Omnipod 5 System is a novel hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system with full on-body operation. A tubeless insulin pump containing a personalized MPC algorithm communicates directly with a Dexcom G6 CGM to automate insulin delivery. Following demonstration of positive safety and efficacy in older children (≥6y) and adults, we evaluated the system in very young children (2-5.9y) with T1D. Preschoolers with T1D often have erratic eating behaviors and may dislike being tethered to devices, and parental concern may lead to permissive hyperglycemia. This HCL system may be ideal for young children, given its customizable glucose targets from 110-150mg/dL, wireless system interaction through a mobile application, and bolus calculator that incorporates CGM trend information. Also, the system has no minimum weight or total daily dose (TDD) requirement. Participants with T1D and A1C180mg/dL was 39.4±16.5%, and ≥250mg/dL was 14.7±12.0%. The same efficacy analysis is planned for the 3-month HCL phase upon its completion in January 2021. This multi-center pivotal study has, to date, demonstrated safety of the Omnipod 5 System in very young children with T1D. At completion, this will be the largest study of HCL in this age group reported to date. Disclosure J. Sherr: Advisory Panel; Self; Cecelia Health, Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Consultant; Self; Insulet Corporation, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Lilly Diabetes. D. W. Hansen: None. T. T. Ly: Employee; Self; Insulet Corporation. Omnipod 5 in preschoolers study group: n/a. B. W. Bode: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Consultant; Self; Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., Companion Medical, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Abvance Therapeutics, Dexcom, Inc., Diasome Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Dompe, Eli Lilly and Company, Eyenuk, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Jaeb Center for Health Research, Medtronic, Nova Biomedical, Novo Nordisk, Provention Bio, Inc., REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Senseonics, Viacyte, Inc., vTv Therapeutics, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Stock/Shareholder; Self; AgaMatrix, Aseko, Inc., Glytec, LLC. G. P. Forlenza: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Consultant; Self; Beta Bionics, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Tandem Diabetes Care, Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Tandem Diabetes Care. L. M. Laffel: Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Dexcom, Inc., Dompe, Insulogic LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Laxmi Therapeutic Devices, LifeScan, Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, Provention Bio, Inc. S. A. Brown: Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Roche Diabetes Care, Tandem Diabetes Care, Tolerion, Inc. B. A. Buckingham: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Tolerion, Inc., Research Support; Self; Beta Bionics, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Tandem Diabetes Care. A. B. Criego: Consultant; Self; Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., Other Relationship; Self; Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, Medtronic. D. Desalvo: Consultant; Self; Insulet Corporation, Research Support; Self; Insulet Corporation, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Dexcom, Inc. S. A. Macleish: Advisory Panel; Self; Insulet Corporation. Funding Insulet Corporation

Safe and effective use of the Omnipod 5 System was demonstrated in adults and children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) during a 3-month pivotal study. Longer studies are needed to evaluate durability of glycemic benefit. Those completing the pivotal study were invited to continue system use for an additional 12 months, with 95% enrolling in the extension. We present results from the first 3-month follow-up. Participants aged 6-70y with T1D≥6 months and A1C Disclosure A. L. Carlson: Board Member; Self; JDRF, Other Relationship; Self; Medtronic, Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Omnipod, Sanofi, UnitedHealth Group. J. Sherr: Advisory Panel; Self; Cecelia Health, Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Consultant; Self; Insulet Corporation, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Lilly Diabetes. S. N. Mehta: None. L. M. Laffel: Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Dexcom, Inc., Dompe, Insulogic LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Laxmi Therapeutic Devices, LifeScan, Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, Provention Bio, Inc. V. Shah: Advisory Panel; Self; Medscape, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, vTv Therapeutics. A. Bhargava: Research Support; Self; Abbott, AbbVie Inc., Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston Therapeutics, Inc., Covance Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Insulet Corporation, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Merck & Co., Inc., Mylan N. V., Novo Nordisk, Poxel SA, Quintiles, Sanofi, Senseonics, Tolerion, Inc., Viking Therapeutics. R. S. Weinstock: Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Diasome Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Medtronic, Tolerion, Inc. S. A. Macleish: Advisory Panel; Self; Insulet Corporation. D. Desalvo: Consultant; Self; Insulet Corporation, Research Support; Self; Insulet Corporation, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Dexcom, Inc. T. C. Jones: None. G. Aleppo: Consultant; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, Novo Nordisk. A. B. Criego: Consultant; Self; Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., Other Relationship; Self; Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, Medtronic. B. A. Buckingham: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Tolerion, Inc., Research Support; Self; Beta Bionics, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Tandem Diabetes Care. T. T. Ly: Employee; Self; Insulet Corporation. Omnipod 5 research group: n/a. G. P. Forlenza: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Consultant; Self; Beta Bionics, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Tandem Diabetes Care, Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Tandem Diabetes Care. B. W. Bode: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Consultant; Self; Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., Companion Medical, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Abvance Therapeutics, Dexcom, Inc., Diasome Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Dompe, Eli Lilly and Company, Eyenuk, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Jaeb Center for Health Research, Medtro Funding Insulet Corporation

Objective Few studies have compared Midregional Proatrial Natriuretic Peptide (MR-proANP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). We compared their value as risk markers for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) and renal complications in persons with type 1 diabetes.Research design and methods MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were measured in 664 individuals. Hazard ratios (HR) were assessed per doubling of NT-proBNP or MR-proANP for risk of a composite of ischemic events, heart failure (HF), a combined renal endpoint of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30% and all-cause mortality or individual endpoints. Adjustments included CV risk factors and addition of MR-proANP or NT-proBNP.Results Median follow-up was 5.1-6.2 years. MR-proANP was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality n=57; HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.7, combined CV endpoint (n=94; 1.6(1.1-2.2)), HF (n=27; 2.8(1.5-5.2)), combined renal endpoint (n=123; 1.6(1.2-2.1)) and ESKD (n=21; 3.1(1.2-7.8)) independent of CV risk factors (p≤0.02). After addition of NT-proBNP significance for all endpoints was lost. A doubling of NT-proBNP was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality (1.5(1.2-1.8)), the combined CV endpoint (1.3(1.1-1.5)), HF (1.7(1.3-2.1)) and the combined renal endpoint (1.3(1.1-1.4)) independent of CV risk factors (model 2;pConclusions Higher NT-proBNP was independently associated with all-cause mortality, CV disease, HF and the combined renal endpoint. MR-proANP was associated with all endpoints but decline in eGFR, although not independent of NT-proBNP. MR-proANP may contribute to the predictive value of NT-proBNP for risk-stratification in type 1 diabetes.

Aim: To investigate the association between treatment-induced change in continuous glucose monitored (CGM) time-in-range (TIR) and albuminuria in persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with sensor-augmented-pumps (SAP). Methods: Twenty-six of fifty-five participants with albuminuria and multiple daily injection-therapy (25% females, 51 (46-63) years, HbA1c 75 (68-88) mmol/mol [9.0 (8.4-10.4)%], UACR 89 (37-250) mg/g) were in a randomized-controlled trial assigned to SAP-therapy for one year. Anthropometrics, CGM-data, blood and urine samples were collected every three months. Results: Mean change (95%-CI) in %TIR was +13.2 (6.2;20.2)%, HbA1C was -14.4 (-17.4;-10.5) mmol/mol [-1.3 (-1.6;-1.0)%] and urinary albumin-creatinine-ratio (UACR) was -15 (-38;17)%, all p1C (p=0.07), and 31% per 10 mmHg decrease in mean arterial pressure (p Conclusion: In this longitudinal study, treatment-induced increase in %TIR was significantly associated with decrease in albuminuria in T1D.

Omics-based methods may provide new markers associated to diabetic retinopathy (DR). We investigated a wide omics panel of metabolites and lipids related to DR in type 1 diabetes. Metabolomic analyses were performed using two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry and lipidomic analyses using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography quadruple time-of-flight mass spectrometry method in 648 individuals with type 1 diabetes. Subjects were subdivided into no DR, mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR), moderate NPDR, proliferative DR, and proliferative DR with fibrosis. End points were any progression of DR, onset of DR, and progression from mild to severe DR tracked from standard ambulatory care and investigated using Cox models. The cohort consisted of 648 participants aged a mean of 54.4 ± 12.8 years, 55.5% were men, and follow-up was 5.1–5.5 years. Cross-sectionally, 2,4-dihydroxybutyric acid (DHBA), 3,4-DHBA, ribonic acid, ribitol, and the triglycerides 50:1 and 50:2 significantly correlated (P < 0.042) to DR stage. Longitudinally, higher 3,4-DHBA was a risk marker for progression of DR (n = 133) after adjustment (P = 0.033). We demonstrated multiple metabolites being positively correlated to a higher grade of DR in type 1 diabetes and several triglycerides being negatively correlated. Furthermore, higher 3,4-DHBA was an independent risk marker for progression of DR; however, confirmation is required.

Objective: To investigate the association between treatment induced change in continuous glucose monitored (CGM) time in range (TIR) and microalbuminuria in persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with sensor-augmented pumps (SAP). Methods: In an open labelled controlled trial, 60 participants with T1D treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) and history of albuminuria were randomised to MDI- or SAP-therapy for 1 year. During the study, the SAP group wore a CGM (Enlite®, Medtronic). The MDI group wore blinded CGMs (Ipro2®, Medtronic) for 6 days at baseline and study end. Anthropometrics, CGM data, blood and urine samples were collected at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12-month visits. Based on CGM data collected between each visit, the percentage of time spent within 3.9-10.0 mmol/l (%TIR) was calculated. Urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) was measured in 3 samples at all visits. Only CGM data for the SAP group were included in the analysis. A linear mixed model with a participant-specific random intercept was used to analyse the effect of %TIR during 1 year after start of SAP on UACR, adjusting for changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), HbA1c and body mass index. Results: Twenty-six participants were assigned to the SAP group and had a baseline median (interquartile range) age of 51.5 (45.9; 62.1) years, HbA1c of 66 (58; 77) mmol/mol, UACR of 78.8 (37; 205) mg/g and 51Cr-EDTA-GFR 85.0 (73.0; 96.5) ml/min/1.73m2. From baseline to study end, the mean improvement (95% CI) in %TIR was 11.3 (6.0; 16.6) %, HbA1C was -14.4 (-17.5; -11.2) mmol/mol and UACR was -13 (-33; -22) %; all p Conclusion: In this longitudinal study, treatment induced increase in CGM-derived %TIR were significantly associated with decrease in albuminuria in T1D. Disclosure A. Ranjan: None. S. Rosenlund: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. T.W. Hansen: None. P. Rossing: Advisory Panel; Self; Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S. Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. S. Andersen: None. K. Nørgaard: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, Medtronic. Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc. Funding Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF17SA0031406); Medtronic A/S

Cardiac autonomic dysfunction and cardiac microvascular dysfunction are diabetic complications associated with increased mortality, but the association between these has been difficult to assess. We applied new and sensitive methods to assess this in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In a cross-sectional design, coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessed by cardiac 82Rb-positron emission tomography/computed tomography, cardiac autonomic reflex tests, and heart rate variability indices were performed in 55 patients with T2DM, without cardiovascular disease, and in 28 control subjects. Cardiac 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy was conducted in a subgroup of 29 patients and 14 control subjects and evaluated as the late heart-to-mediastinum ratio and washout rate. Impaired function of all the cardiac autonomic measures (except the washout rate) was associated with reduced CFR. A heart rate variability index, reflecting sympathetic and parasympathetic function (low-frequency power), and the late heart-to-mediastinum ratio, reflecting the function of adrenergic receptors and sympathetic activity, were positively correlated with CFR after adjustment for age and heart rate. The late heart-to- mediastinum ratio remained correlated with CFR after further adjustment. In patients with T2DM without cardiovascular disease, we demonstrate an independent association between cardiac autonomic function and CFR. We suggest that a reduced cardiac autonomic function and damage to the adrenergic receptors may contribute to the development of cardiac microvascular dysfunction.

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) analog co-formulated with the absorption enhancer, sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC), to allow oral administration. The effect of oral semaglutide on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the combined oral contraceptive (OC) ethinylestradiol (EE; 0.03 mg)/levonorgestrel (LN; 0.15 mg) was assessed in an open-label, one sequence crossover trial. Healthy post-menopausal females (n=25) received 8 days of OC alone and 8 days of OC with oral semaglutide (dose escalated to steady state at week 6: 1 week at 3 mg dose, 1 week at 7 mg dose, 4 weeks at 14 mg dose). Primary endpoints were the areas under the plasma concentration−time curve for EE and LN during a dosing interval (0−24 h) at steady state (AUC0−24h,SS). Secondary endpoints included other PK parameters, safety and tolerability. Total exposure of EE and LN were similar for OC alone vs. OC with oral semaglutide, and oral semaglutide did not affect the maximum plasma exposure (Cmax,SS) of EE or LN. AUC0−24h,SS and Cmax,SS ratios for EE and LN were within the predefined no effect interval (0.8−1.25) (Figure). Adverse events with oral semaglutide were consistent with previous trials and expected GLP-1 receptor agonist class effects. These data indicate that oral semaglutide did not affect the bioavailability of the combined OC. Disclosure A. Bôrsting Jordy: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. A. Breitschaft: None. E. Christiansen: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. C. Granhall: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. C.W. Hansen: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. A. Houshmand-Oregaard: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. T.A. Baekdal: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S.