Search

Clinical inertia is a widespread reason for suboptimal control of patients with diabetes (DM). One approach to addressing clinical inertia is to include non-physician providers in DM management. Evidence suggests that intervention by pharmacists improves glycemic control more than usual care. There is little data, however, on the effect of pharmacist care delivered by phone as an adjunct to DM care provided by an Endocrinologist. We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the effect of phone-based DM management by a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) on glycemic control among patients seen by an Endocrinologist. Between 02/2018-12/2018, 65 adult DM patients were referred by their Endocrinologists to a PharmD for phone intervention at an urban academic medical center. The intervention included medication reconciliation, education on medication self-administration, coordination with pharmacies to dispense medications, and adjustment of DM medications. A total of 41 patients (INT) received 1+ intervention phone call (median [iQR] 3 [2-5] calls), and 24 patients (NoINT) were referred but could not be contacted (n=20) or required no intervention (n=4). At baseline, all INT patients and 96% of NoINT patients were on insulin, 41% and 21% were on a GLP-1RA, and 56% and 46% were on oral medication(s). In the INT group, mean A1C decreased significantly 1.9 ± 2.2% from 10.2 ± 2.4% before the first call to 8.3 ± 1.7% (p Phone-based DM management of Endocrinology patients by a PharmD may lead to better glycemic control than management by an Endocrinologist alone. These data should encourage the conduct of an RCT to test this promising strategy for addressing clinical inertia in DM patients. Disclosure D.J. Rubin: Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. J. Wu: None. D. Patel: None. U. Hajari: None. M. Barros: None.