1. Risk Assessment in Patients With Diabetes With the TIMI Risk Score for Atherothrombotic Disease.
- Author
-
Bergmark BA, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, Morrow DA, Steg PG, Gurmu Y, Cahn A, Mosenzon O, Raz I, Bohula E, and Scirica BM
- Subjects
- Adamantane analogs & derivatives, Adamantane therapeutic use, Aged, Body Mass Index, Calibration, Cohort Studies, Coronary Artery Disease epidemiology, Coronary Artery Disease prevention & control, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 complications, Diet, Dipeptides therapeutic use, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors therapeutic use, Double-Blind Method, Endpoint Determination, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction epidemiology, Registries, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Secondary Prevention, Stroke epidemiology, Stroke prevention & control, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 drug therapy, Myocardial Infarction prevention & control
- Abstract
Objective: Improved risk assessment for patients with type 2 diabetes and elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk is needed. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) predicts a gradient of risk in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) but has not been evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes., Research Design and Methods: CV event rates were compared by baseline TRS 2°P in 16,488 patients enrolled in SAVOR-TIMI 53 (Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53) with type 2 diabetes and high CV risk or established CV disease. Calibration was tested in the diabetes cohort from the REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) Registry., Results: TRS 2°P revealed a robust risk gradient for the composite of CV death, MI, and ischemic stroke in the full trial population, with 2-year event rates of 0.9% in the lowest- and 19.8% in the highest-risk groups ( P
trend < 0.001). A clear risk gradient was present within the subgroups of all coronary artery disease (CAD), CAD without prior MI, CAD with prior MI, peripheral artery disease, and prior stroke ( Ptrend < 0.001 for each), with consistent risk relationships across subgroups. The C-statistic (0.71 for CV death and 0.66 for the composite end point) was consistent in each subgroup. There was close calibration with the type 2 diabetes cohort from the REACH Registry (goodness-of-fit P = 0.78)., Conclusions: The expanded TRS 2°P provides a practical and well-calibrated risk prediction tool for patients with type 2 diabetes., (© 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF