Search

Purpose To determine whether alpha-interferon is effective in terminating viral replication and in eradicating the carrier state in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Data sources Randomized controlled studies published in the English literature between January 1966 and June 1992 were identified through a MEDLINE computer search. Study selection Fifteen randomized controlled studies with a total of 837 adult chronic HBV carriers who were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) were identified. Studies were included if patients were treated for at least 3 months and followed for at least 6 months after cessation of therapy. Results Overall, the loss of HBsAg occurred 6% more often in interferon-treated patients than the natural seroconversion seen in controls (7.8% compared with 1.8%, P = 0.001), and the loss of viral replication occurred approximately 20% more often in treated patients than in controls (33% compared with 12% for loss of HBeAg and 37% compared with 17% for the loss of HBV DNA, P = 0.0001) if patients received interferon for 3 to 6 months and were followed for 6 to 12 months. Interferon also had a significant treatment effect on the development of antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs), antibodies to HBeAg (anti-HBe), and on the normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels. Conclusions Alpha-interferon is effective in terminating viral replication and in eradicating the carrier state in patients with chronic HBV infection who are HBeAg positive when these patients are treated for 3 to 6 months and followed for 6 to 12 months after cessation of therapy. Follow-up studies are required to determine whether interferon reduces the risk for developing cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma.

To appraise the measurement properties of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification of stable angina pectoris.Relevant articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1976 to November 1991). Bibliographies of retrieved articles were also reviewed.Studies chosen directly addressed the validity and reliability of the CCS scale. Recent studies and reviews of related topics (for example, silent ischemia) are selectively cited.No data address the scale's applicability, that is, how clinicians typically assign angina grades in practice. Comprehensiveness would be improved by coverage of the patient's perceptions of symptom burden; mixed exertional and rest symptoms; episodic or changing symptoms; and modifying factors. Reliability was assessed in one study with two clinicians; the interobserver, chance-corrected agreement on patient grading was 60%. Content validity (the ability of the scale to measure what it claims) is threatened by the unproven assumption of symptomatic or physiologic equivalence among diverse levels of different activities within any given grade of angina. Construct validity is uncertain, given weak relations between angina grade and noninvasive markers of ischemia, anatomical disease, or prognosis. The scale's responsiveness (the ability to detect the smallest clinically important changes) is limited by the reliance on four coarse gradations based on only ambulation or stair-climbing.The CCS scale for stable angina might be made more useful by developing measurements for patients' self-rated symptom burden and the changes they deem important; by adding items on clinical instability (that is, progressive symptoms or pain at rest); and by empirically testing the current scale to eliminate redundant or inconsistent elements.