Search

Background: Targeted therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic drivers have caused a paradigm shift in care. Biomarker testing is needed to assess eligibility for these therapies. Pulmonologists often perform bronchoscopy, providing tissue for both pathologic diagnosis and biomarker analysis. We performed this survey to define the existing knowledge and practices regarding the pulmonologists' role in biomarker testing for advanced NSCLC.Research Question: What is the current knowledge and practice of pulmonologists regarding biomarker testing and targeted therapies in advanced NSCLC?Study Design and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed using an electronic survey of a random sample of 7,238 pulmonologists. Questions focused on diagnostic steps and biomarker analyses for NSCLC.Results: A total of 453 pulmonologists responded. Respondents vary by reported lung cancer patient volume, ranging from 51% evaluating one to four new cases per month to 19% evaluating > 10 cases per month. Interventional training, academic practice setting, and higher volume of endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) were associated with increased knowledge of practice guidelines for the number of recommended passes during EBUS-TBNA (P < .05). Academic pulmonologists more commonly performed or referred for EBUS-TBNA than community pulmonologists (96% and 83%, respectively; P < .0005). Higher testing rates were associated with interventional training, academic setting, and the presence of an institutional policy, whereas lower testing rates were associated with general pulmonologists, practice in community settings, and lack of a guiding institutional policy (P < .05).Interpretation: Substantial differences among pulmonologists' evaluation of advanced NSCLC, variation in knowledge of available biomarkers and the importance of targeted therapies, and differences in institutional coordination likely lead to underutilization of biomarker testing. Interventional training appears to drive improved knowledge and practice for biomarker testing more than practice setting. Improvements are needed in tissue acquisition and interdisciplinary coordination to ensure universal and comprehensive testing for eligible patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An integrated proteomic biomarker combining two plasma proteins (LG3BP and C163A) with five clinical/imaging factors (age, smoking status, nodule size, edge, and location) was previously shown to be potentially useful in nodule patients with a pretest probability of malignancy of 50% or less. The biomarker was more accurate than physician and risk calculator assessments.[4] Here we report the 2-year follow-up results of the PulmonAry NOdule Plasma proTeomIc Classifier (PANOPTIC) trial and an extended analysis to those with multiple pulmonary nodules. To the Editor: Pulmonary nodules pose a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians and patients.[1] Guidelines for nodule management emphasize assessment of pretest probability for malignancy (pCA) in determining next steps.[2] SP , sp [3] The goal for nodule management is to avoid diagnostic procedures in those with benign disease and expedite diagnosis and treatment in those with malignancy. [Extracted from the article]

Background: In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small biopsy specimens from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are often the only available material from cancer tissue for the analysis of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. We aim to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of PD-L1 expression at ≥ 1% and ≥ 50% on EBUS-TBNA samples compared with their corresponding surgically resected tumor.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA followed by surgical resection of NSCLC between July 2006 and September 2016. Demographic information and periprocedural/surgical data were collected. The archived specimens were retrieved and assessed for PD-L1. A positive PD-L1 stain was defined using two separate cutoff points: ≥ 1% and ≥ 50% of tumor cell positivity. EBUS-TBNA aspirates were compared with the surgically resected specimen to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV.Results: Sixty-one patients were included. For PD-L1 ≥ 1%, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 72%, 100%, 100%, and 80%, respectively. For PD-L1 ≥ 50%, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 47%, 93%, 70%, and 84%, respectively. The concordance rates for PD-L1 ≥ 1% and ≥ 50% were 87% and 82%, respectively.Conclusions: A PD-L1 cutoff of ≥ 1% on EBUS-TBNA has a strong correlation with resected tumor specimen. For PD-L1 ≥ 50%, there is a significant decrease in the sensitivity and PPV of EBUS-TBNA specimen when compared with resected tumor. When analyzing for PD-L1 expression using a cutoff of ≥ 50%, EBUS-TBNA specimens may misclassify the status of PD-L1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article compares the efficiency of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detection of lung cancer in bronchoscopic specimens. FISH and cytology have been performed on 123 washing and 78 brushing specimens. FISH and cytology for patients with negative results at the time of initial bronchoscopy are 83% and 100%. This outcome suggests that FISH is significantly more sensitive than conventional cytology for identifying lung cancer.

Background: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the world. Nonetheless, public policy organizations have consistently recommended against screening for lung cancer, with the result that screening is not widely practiced. The Como Conference was undertaken to consider the need for a change in the existing recommendations against screening. Purpose: The primary objective of the Como Conference was to consider whether there is sufficient scientific evidence to advise screening for lung cancer among asymptomatic individuals outside the context of a clinical trial. Methodological issues that are relevant to the proper interpretation of early detection trials were carefully considered. Advantages and problems associated with technological advances in CT scans and digital chest radiographs (CXRs) were fully explored. Economic issues relevant to screening were also considered. Recommendations: It is recommended that physicians assume responsibility for informing high-risk individuals regarding options for screening for lung cancer. Targeted high-risk individuals include middle-aged or elderly men and women who are current or former cigarette smokers of > 20 to 30 pack-years without serious medical comorbidities. It is recommended that such persons be informed that symptomatic lung cancer is usually advanced and incurable, while surgery for early lung cancer offers a far better chance of cure. They should also be informed about advances in imaging technology, as they relate to CT scans and CXRs. Conclusions: Whenever possible, high-risk individuals should be encouraged to enroll in ongoing trials. For subjects who, though eligible, do not have access to such trials, a process of shared decision-making between physicians and at-risk individuals is strongly recommended. After discussion of the existing state of knowledge, high-risk individuals should be made aware that it is reasonable for them to choose to undergo testing for lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer is the number one cancer killer in North America. Currently, screening for lung cancer is not recommended. Therefore, patients will not receive a diagnosis until they present with symptomatic disease, which is usually advanced stage disease. Previous trials of screening with chest roentgenograms and sputum cytology have failed to show a decrease in lung cancer mortality. Some reports of screening with low-dose spiral CT scans have detected lung cancers at a smaller size (average size, 1.5 cm) than those usually detected by chest radiographs (mean size, 3.0 cm). Spiral CT scanning has been shown to detect between 58% and 85% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) while they are in stage IA, and this compares favorably to the current medical practice, in which only 15% are detected as localized disease (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results study data). This article summarizes the spiral CT screening data, and reviews some of the data related to screening with sputum cytology, sputum methylation, and autofluorescence bronchoscopy. Last, there is a brief discussion of some promising future strategies, with emphasis and data from studies presented at this Aspen Lung Conference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stage IIIB includes patients with T4, any N, M0, and any T, N3, M0. Surgery may be indicated only for carefully selected T4N0M0 patients with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Patients with N3 lymph node involvement are not considered as surgical candidates. For patients with unresectable disease, good performance score, and minimal weight loss, treatment with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy has resulted in better survival than treatment with radiotherapy alone. Multiple daily fractions of radiotherapy have not resulted in improved survival compared with standard fractionation once daily. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy appears to be associated with improved survival compared with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Treatment of stage IIIB due to malignant pleural effusion is addressed in the section that deals with stage IV disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study objective: Typical pulmonary carcinoid tumors are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors that are associated with good patient survival rates, while atypical carcinoid tumors are more aggressive and have worse patient survival rates. Because these tumors rarely involve the thoracic lymph nodes at presentation, it is currently unknown to what extent the presence of thoracic lymph node metastases at the time of diagnosis influences patient survival. Methods: A computerized search of the medical records for pulmonary carcinoid tumor at the Mayo Clinic from 1976 to 1997 revealed 517 patients, from which we identified 36 patients with pulmonary carcinoid tumors involving regional thoracic lymph nodes but without distant disease. For each patient, we reviewed the tumor histology, stage, and outcome. In addition, because the histologic criteria for the diagnosis of carcinoid tumors had changed significantly during the time of the study, we reexamined all of the histologic specimens using the current World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for classifying pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. Results: After reclassification with the WHO criteria for neuroendocrine tumors, 23 patients had typical carcinoid tumors with thoracic lymph node involvement. At the last follow-up, 19 patients had no evidence of disease (NED), 2 patients had developed systemic metastases (SM) and are still alive, and 2 patients had died. Eleven patients had atypical carcinoid tumors with thoracic lymph node involvement. At the last follow-up, four patients had NED, seven patients had developed SM within a median time of 17 months, and six patients with SM died shortly thereafter (median survival time, 25.5 months), while one is still alive. Two patients had been reclassified with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma at the time of this review; both of these patients had developed SM (at 4 months and 21 months after diagnosis) and had died (at 15 months and 21 months after diagnosis,... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Are Airflow Obstruction and Radiographic Evidence of Emphysema Risk Factors for Lung Cancer? A Nested Case-Control Study Using Quantitative Emphysema Analysis," by F. Maldonado and colleagues which appeared in the December 2010 issue of the periodical.

Background Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a lethal disease for which there have been only small advances in diagnosis and treatment in the past decade. Our goal was to revise the evidence-based guidelines on staging and best available treatment options. Methods A comprehensive literature search covering 2004 to 2011 was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and five Cochrane databases using SCLC terms. This was cross-checked with the authors' own literature searches and knowledge of the literature. Results were limited to research in humans and articles written in English. Results The staging classification should include both the old Veterans Administration staging classification of limited stage (LS) and extensive stage (ES), as well as the new seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging by TNM. The use of PET scanning is likely to improve the accuracy of staging. Surgery is indicated for carefully selected stage I SCLC. LS disease should be treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with good performance status. Thoracic radiotherapy should be administered early in the course of treatment, preferably beginning with cycle 1 or 2 of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy should consist of four cycles of a platinum agent and etoposide. ES disease should be treated primarily with chemotherapy consisting of a platinum agent plus etoposide or irinotecan. Prophylactic cranial irradiation prolongs survival in those individuals with both LS and ES disease who achieve a complete or partial response to initial therapy. To date, no molecularly targeted therapy agent has demonstrated proven efficacy against SCLC. Conclusion Evidence-based guidelines are provided for the staging and treatment of SCLC. LS-SCLC is treated with curative intent with 20% to 25% 5-year survival. ES-SCLC is initially responsive to standard treatment, but almost always relapses, with virtually no patients surviving for 5 years. Targeted therapies have no proven efficacy against SCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]