The compound 3,3′-diindolylmethane (DIM) is a major in vivo product of digestion of indole-3-carbinol (I3C) (phytochemical from Brassicaceae family plants) and a main mediator of its chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic effects. In our previous paper, we have reported the impact of structural differences between DIM and I3C on their biological activity. In this paper, the coinfluence of two factors: polymorphism and temperature, on the topology, nature (Coulombic/polarization/dispersion/repulsion), and strength of interaction pattern in DIM are in our area of interest. Upon polymorph screening it has been found that DIM crystallizes in two polymorphic forms, form I (already known) and form II (newly obtained). differential scanning calorimetry indicated a slightly lower melting point for form I than for form II (436 versus 440 K) and the lack of phase transitions in both polymorphs. The crystal and molecular structures of both polymorphs have been determined as a function of temperature by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The structure of polymorph I is monoclinic, space group C2/c, while polymorph II is orthorhombic, space group P212121. The DIM molecule adopts a twisted (both 1H-indole rings are aligned along the same direction, but they are twisted by about 61.5°) and a half-chair (the molecule is bent, and both 1H-indole rings make an angle of 68.9°) conformation, respectively, in forms I and II, which remain almost unaffected by temperature changes. Despite different relative orientations of both 1H-indole moieties in forms I and II, the differences in the interaction patterns revealed by quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), reduced density gradient (RDS), Hirshfeld surfaces (3D HS), and two-dimensional molecular fingerprints (2D MF) are relatively small. The distribution of intermolecular interactions in the crystal of form II is by 5% less balanced than in that of form I. The Manhattan and Euclidean distances between the interactions do not exceed 3.76% and 2.21%, respectively, while the Bhattacharaya coefficient does not exceed 0.35. Solid state PDB/DPN calculations have revealed that in solid the twisted conformation of the molecule is less stable by 118.7 kJ/mol than that of the half-hair one, but despite this, polymorph I is more stable due to a greater number of weak intermolecular interactions stabilizing the crystalline packing. (In the gas phase the half-hair conformation of the molecule is less stable by 0.788 kJ/mol than the twisted one, which may be attributed to the existence of many weak interactions and crystal packing effects in the solid state, which are absent in the gas phase.) The key interaction stabilizing the twisted versus chair conformation and determining crystalline packing in both polymorphs of DIM is the NH···π one. The factor responsible for the locked conformation of DIM in both forms is the electrostatic potential complementarity of the regions of N-H···π, linking neighboring molecules, which permits easy overcoming of any repulsive interactions that may force rotation of the molecule. The commercial sample of DIM was found to contain approximately 50% of form I and 50% of form II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]