Search

Objective: In this retrospective study, the authors aimed to establish the stereotactically defined probability distribution for speech (i.e., anarthria, speech arrest) and lexico-semantic errors (i.e., anomia) through direct cortical stimulation (DCS) by using two tasks: action naming and object naming. They also analyzed the patterns of interindividual variability in the localization of the language sites involved, and investigated whether any patient or lesion location factors were associated with greater variability., Methods: Eighty-one Italian-speaking patients who underwent awake surgery between 2010 and 2021 for low- and high-grade gliomas in eloquent areas of the language-dominant hemisphere were entered in the analyses. The intraoperative DCS protocol included automatic speech tasks, object naming, and action naming. The position of the tags, as depicted on the intraoperative video or photograph, was transposed into Montreal Neurological Institute space. Subsequently, a 2D scatterplot and cluster analysis were performed. Associations between various clinical and radiological characteristics and the quantity of positive stimulated sites were determined by univariate analyses using binary logistic regression. Associated variables (p < 0.2) were included in stepwise multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination (p < 0.05)., Results: A total of 1380 cortical sites were stimulated, with a positive response in 511 cases (37%). Most anarthric errors were triggered when stimulating the left precentral gyrus, and most speech arrest errors were elicited when stimulating the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus. Anomias were found in the left inferior frontal gyrus and in the posterior part of the left temporal lobe for object naming. DCS to the left dorsal premotor cortex elicited anomic errors for action naming. Anomias were also elicited during DCS to the left posterior temporal lobe, with both object and action naming., Conclusions: The distribution of speech and lexico-semantic errors is in line with the current literature. The action-naming results are new and mostly involve the dorsal premotor cortex. These findings stress the importance of maximizing the use of different language tasks during surgery, because even when looking for the same type of errors, different tasks may be better suited to map specific brain regions. DCS with action and object naming identifies more positive sites than object naming alone.

Objective: Surgical skills laboratories augment educational training by deepening one's understanding of anatomy and allowing the safe practice of technical skills. Novel, high-fidelity, cadaver-free simulators provide an opportunity to increase access to skills laboratory training. The neurosurgical field has historically evaluated skill by subjective assessment or outcome measures, as opposed to process measures with objective, quantitative indicators of technical skill and progression. The authors conducted a pilot training module with spaced repetition learning concepts to evaluate its feasibility and impact on proficiency., Methods: The 6-week module used a simulator of a pterional approach representing skull, dura mater, cranial nerves, and arteries (UpSurgeOn S.r.l.). Neurosurgery residents at an academic tertiary hospital completed a video-recorded baseline examination, performing supraorbital and pterional craniotomies, dural opening, suturing, and anatomical identification under a microscope. Participation in the full 6-week module was voluntary, which precluded randomizing by class year. The intervention group participated in four additional faculty-guided trainings. In the 6th week, all residents (intervention and control) repeated the initial examination with video recording. Videos were evaluated by three neurosurgical attendings who were not affiliated with the institution and who were blinded to participant grouping and year. Scores were assigned via Global Rating Scales (GRSs) and Task-based Specific Checklists (TSCs) previously built for craniotomy (cGRS, cTSC) and microsurgical exploration (mGRS, mTSC)., Results: Fifteen residents participated (8 intervention, 7 control). The intervention group included a greater number of junior residents (postgraduate years 1-3; 7/8) compared to the control group (1/7). External evaluators had internal consistency within 0.5% (kappa probability > Z of 0.00001). The total average time improved by 5:42 minutes (p < 0.003; intervention, 6:05, p = 0.07; control, 5:15, p = 0.001). The intervention group began with lower scores in all categories and surpassed the comparison group in cGRS (10.93 to 13.6/16) and cTSC (4.0 to 7.4/10). Percent improvements for the intervention group were cGRS 25% (p = 0.02), cTSC 84% (p = 0.002), mGRS 18% (p = 0.003), and mTSC 52% (p = 0.037). For controls, improvements were cGRS 4% (p = 0.19), cTSC 0.0% (p > 0.99), mGRS 6% (p = 0.07), and mTSC 31% (p = 0.029)., Conclusions: Participants who underwent a 6-week simulation course showed significant objective improvement in technical indicators, particularly individuals who were early in their training. Small, nonrandomized grouping limits generalizability regarding degree of impact; however, introducing objective performance metrics during spaced repetition simulation would undoubtedly improve training. A larger multiinstitutional randomized controlled study will help elucidate the value of this educational method.

Objective: Infradiaphragmatic craniopharyngiomas (ICs) represent a distinct subtype, harboring a sellar-suprasellar origin and generally growing in the extra-arachnoidal space contained by the diaphragma sellae. They have been considered ideal for surgical removal through the transsphenoidal approach since the 1960s. The authors present a multicentric national study, intending to selectively analyze IC behavior and the impact of the transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) on surgical outcomes., Methods: Craniopharyngiomas that were intraoperatively recognized as infradiaphragmatic and removed with standard EEA between 2000 and 2021 at 6 Italian neurosurgical departments were included in the study. Clinical, radiological, and surgical findings and outcomes were evaluated and reviewed., Results: In total, 84 patients were included, with 45.23% identified as pediatric cases and 39.28% as having recurrent tumors. The most common presenting symptoms were endocrine (75%), visual (59.52%), and hypothalamic (26.19%) disorders. ICs were classified as extending below (6 intrasellar and 41 occupying the suprasellar cistern) or above (26 obliterating the anterior recesses of the third ventricle and 11 extending up to the foramina of Monro) the chiasmatic cistern. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 54 cases (64.28%). Tumor extension above the chiasmatic cistern and calcifications were associated with lower likelihood of GTR. The cumulative rate of postoperative complications was 34.53%, with CSF leak being the most common (14.28%). Endocrine, visual, and hypothalamic functions deteriorated postoperatively in 41/78 patients (52.56%), 5/84 (5.95%), and 14/84 (16.67%), respectively. Twenty-eight patients (33.33%) had recurrence during follow-up (mean 63.51 months), with a mean 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 58%. PFS was greater in patients who achieved GTR than patients with other extent of resection., Conclusions: This is the largest series in the literature to describe ICs removed with standard EEA, without the need for additional bone and dural opening over the planum sphenoidale. EEA provides a direct route to ICs, the opportunity to manage lesions extending up to the third ventricle without breaching the diaphragma, and high rates of GTR and satisfactory clinical outcomes. Increased surgical complexity and morbidity should be expected in patients with extensive suprasellar extension and involvement of the surrounding vital neurovascular structures.

Objective: Approximately half of glioblastoma (GBM) cases develop in geriatric patients, and this trend is destined to increase with the aging of the population. The optimal strategy for management of GBM in elderly patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the role of surgery in the elderly (≥ 65 years old) based on clinical, molecular, and imaging data routinely available in neurosurgical departments and to assess a prognostic survival score that could be helpful in stratifying the prognosis for elderly GBM patients., Methods: Clinical, radiological, surgical, and molecular data were retrospectively analyzed in 322 patients with GBM from 9 neurosurgical centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival. A random forest approach (classification and regression tree [CART] analysis) was utilized to create the prognostic survival score., Results: Survival analysis showed that overall survival (OS) was influenced by age as a continuous variable (p = 0.018), MGMT (p = 0.012), extent of resection (EOR; p = 0.002), and preoperative tumor growth pattern (evaluated with the preoperative T1/T2 MRI index; p = 0.002). CART analysis was used to create the prognostic survival score, forming six different survival groups on the basis of tumor volumetric, surgical, and molecular features. Terminal nodes with similar hazard ratios were grouped together to form a final diagram composed of five classes with different OSs (p < 0.0001). EOR was the most robust influencing factor in the algorithm hierarchy, while age appeared at the third node of the CART algorithm. The ability of the prognostic survival score to predict death was determined by a Harrell's c-index of 0.75 (95% CI 0.76-0.81)., Conclusions: The CART algorithm provided a promising, thorough, and new clinical prognostic survival score for elderly surgical patients with GBM. The prognostic survival score can be useful to stratify survival risk in elderly GBM patients with different surgical, radiological, and molecular profiles, thus assisting physicians in daily clinical management. The preliminary model, however, requires validation with future prospective investigations. Practical recommendations for clinicians/surgeons would strengthen the quality of the study; e.g., surgery can be considered as a first therapeutic option in the workflow of elderly patients with GBM, especially when the preoperative estimated EOR is greater than 80%.