Search

To understand and dissect the mechanisms driving human NK cell proliferation, we exploited the methodology used in cell therapy to numerically expand NK cells in the presence of K562-derived artificial APC (aAPCs) and cytokines. For four consecutive weeks, high expression of CD137L by a K562-derived aAPC cell line could sustain NK cell expansion by 3 × 10 5 -fold, whereas low expression of CD137L by the parental K562 cell line only supported the expansion by 2 × 10 3 -fold. The level of expression of CD137L, however, did not modulate the sensitivity of K562 cells to the intrinsic cytotoxicity of NK cells. Similarly, the low NK cell proliferation in the presence of the parental K562 cell line and cytokines was increased by adding agonistic anti-CD137 Abs to levels similar to CD137L-expressing K562-derived aAPCs. Finally, synergy between IL-15 and IL-21 was observed only upon CD137 engagement and the presence of aAPCs. Therefore, we conclude that NK cell proliferation requires cell-to-cell contact, activation of the CD137 axis, and presence of IL-15 (or its membranous form) and IL-21. By analogy with the three-signal model required to activate T cells, we speculate that the cell-to-cell contact represents "signal 1," CD137 represents "signal 2," and cytokines represent "signal 3." The precise nature of signal 1 remains to be defined., (Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.)

To generate Ab responses to most protein Ags, B cells must first degrade proteins in endocytic compartments and then display antigenic peptides bound to MHC class II molecules. T helper lymphocytes recognize these complexes and stimulate the B cell to synthesize Ab. Although Ab play a key role in host defense against bacteria, it is believed that B cells are incapable of internalizing particulate Ags. However, we find that B lymphoblastoid cell lines and LPS-activated B lymphocytes can present particulate Ag up to 10(5)-fold more efficiently compared with soluble Ag. Moreover, particulate Ags are presented efficiently by unstimulated B cells when they bind to surface Ig. In comparison to B cells, macrophages in general presented particulate Ags 10- to 1000-fold more efficiently and could also present Ag from particles of a much wider range of sizes. We document by ultrastructural and immunofluorescence analysis that B lymphoblastoid cell lines bind and internalize these particles. The internalization and presentation of the particulate Ag is inhibited by cytochalasin B. In contrast, a similar morphologic analysis of normal lymphocytes demonstrated that while Ag beads are bound to the cell surface, they are internalized only rarely. These results suggest there may be both surface and intracellular pathways for the presentation of particulate Ags by B cells. Interestingly, for both macrophages and B cells, the epitopes generated from particulate and soluble Ags were not identical quantitatively or qualitatively, indicating that there are differences in how these forms of Ag are processed and presented.

The ability of normal B cells, peritoneal macrophages, and splenic APC to process and present OVA to a panel of T-T hybridomas with different specificities was investigated. In all cases, B cells were less efficient than unfractionated splenocytes in presenting OVA or its peptides. However, when the presentation of native Ag was compared to the presentation of peptides, it was obvious that there were marked differences in the ability of these two APC populations to generate different epitopes from OVA. Leupeptin inhibits the processing of selected epitopes from native OVA differently when it was presented by spleen cells or B cells, suggesting that these two APC populations differ in their protease content. The effect of in vitro culture on the ability of splenic and peritoneal APC to process OVA was also investigated. Native OVA presentation by macrophages and spleen cells was affected by in vitro culture, more for some epitopes than for other epitopes. In contrast, presentation of exogenous peptides by paraformaldehyde-fixed APC was either not affected by previous culturing for 3 days, or very much improved. Altogether, these data demonstrate that different epitopes on the same protein may be independently and differentially processed by B cells and spleen cells. Furthermore, the precise peptides that are produced may vary with the physiologic state of the APC.

It is generally accepted that a limited number of T cell epitopes are generated by APC from an immunogenic protein. To ascertain the number of determinants on OVA recognized in the context of the H-2s haplotype, we generated 19 T-T hybridomas against OVA and H-2s and we synthesized 46 overlapping peptides spanning the entire protein. Eighteen T-T hybrids were stimulated by eight different peptides. The peptide recognized by one T cell hybrid was not identified. The effect of four protease inhibitors on the processing and presentation of OVA by the LS.102.9 B cell hybridoma seemed to implicate several groups of proteases in the processing of this Ag. Alkylation of cysteine residues with iodoacetic acid showed in a few cases a dramatic decrease in the capacity of OVA to stimulate T-T hybrids recognizing cysteine-free peptides. In contrast, two T-T hybrids recognizing cysteine containing peptides were not affected by the alkylation, suggesting that alkylation inhibited the processing of OVA without affecting peptide interaction with class II MHC molecules. These data demonstrate that the repertoire of peptides generated by APC from OVA is not limited to one or few immunodominant peptides, and results from the activity of several endopeptidases and/or exopeptidases. In addition, the structure of the Ag (native or denatured) was shown to affect the efficiency with which different epitopes are generated.

The ability of splenic APC and a B cell hybridoma (LS.102.9) to process and present OVA to a panel of T-T hybridomas with different fine specificities was investigated. Splenic APC process and present OVA to all the T-T hybrids. The B cell hybridoma could similarly process and present OVA to some T-T hybrids but was very inefficient in stimulating two of the T cell hybridomas. The presentation of native OVA to these two T-T hybrids was significantly increased by leupeptin. Pulsing experiments demonstrated that leupeptin acted on the APC at a step before the processed Ag was displayed on the cell surface in association with MHC molecules. Leupeptin has no effect on the presentation of OVA peptides by LS.102.9 to the T-T hybrids. Leupeptin inhibits the generation of the epitopes of OVA that LS.102.9 produces under basal conditions. We also surveyed the effect of other protease inhibitors and observed similar augmenting and inhibitory effects on the presentation of selected OVA epitopes. The augmentation of processing by a protease inhibitor indicates that in the lysosomal/endosomal compartment proteases have capacity to both generate and destroy immunogenic peptides. Our data suggest that protease inhibitors could potentially be used as immunomodulators and are discussed in terms of physiology of the lysosomal/endosomal compartment.