Search

Background: Volume-reduced platelets can minimize circulatory overload, allergic transfusion reactions, or out-of-group plasma infusion. Our center adopted a volume reduction protocol that includes acidification with acid citrate dextrose solution A (ACD-A) before centrifugation and without any rest period prior to resuspension allowing a better turnaround time for platelet issue., Study Design and Methods: This report compares corrected count increments (CCIs) from full-volume and ACD-A acidified volume-reduced human platelets in a retrospective study at a single hospital and in a mouse model., Results: At a pediatric tertiary care hospital, 530 patients received conventional apheresis platelets during the 20-month study period. Among all patients, the expected 4-h mean CCI was 9.8 (95% CI: 8.7, 10.9) for full-volume platelets, and 8.8 (95% CI: 7.3, 10.6) for ACD-acidified volume-reduced platelets (p = .29). A statistically significant difference (p = .01) was identified in the expected 24-h mean CCI: 6.3 (95% CI: 5.5-7.0) with full-volume platelet, 4.7 (95% CI: 3.6-6.0) with ACD-acidified volume-reduced platelet. Limiting CCI calculations to patients with Hematology/Oncology/Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplant diagnosis (n = 296, 56%) indicated a statistically significant difference in both 4- and 24-h predicted CCIs, showing lower CCIs in ACD-acidified volume-reduced platelet, although these were still similar to the CCIs observed in all patients and considered to be clinically acceptable responses similar to other volume reduction protocols. The recovery of count-adjusted, volume-reduced platelets was significantly lower in mice, suggesting a procedure-related defect., Discussion: ACD-A acidification of platelets before volume reduction decreases turnaround time for platelet issue and provides clinically allowable 4-h and 24-h platelet increments., (© 2024 AABB.)

Background: The first coronavirus (COVID-19) case was reported in United States in the state of Washington, approximately 3 months after the outbreak in Wuhan, China. Three weeks later, the US federal government declared the pandemic a national emergency. The number of confirmed COVID-19 positive cases increased rather rapidly and changed routine daily activities of the community., Study Design and Methods: This brief report describes the response from the hospital, the regional blood center, and the hospital-based transfusion services to the events that took place in the community during the initial phases of the pandemic., Results: In Washington State, the first week of March started with four confirmed cases and ended with 150; by the end of the second week of March there were more than 700 cases of confirmed COVID-19. During the first week, blood donations dropped significantly. Blood units provided from blood centers of nonaffected areas of the country helped keep inventory stable and allow for routine hospital operations. The hospital-based transfusion service began prospective triaging of blood orders to monitor and prioritize blood usage. In the second week, blood donations recovered, and the hospital postponed elective procedures to ensure staff and personal protective equipment were appropriate for the care of critical patients., Conclusion: As community activities are disrupted and hospital activities switch from routine operations to pandemic focused and urgent care oriented, the blood supply and usage requires a number of transformations., (© 2020 AABB.)

Background: Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD) is a rare, nearly universally fatal complication from transfusion of nonirradiated cellular blood components, occurring when a recipient's immune system is unable to recognize and destroy transfused T lymphocytes. Irradiation of cellular components eliminates this risk. We present an unusual case of a liver transplant recipient developing TA-GVHD 13 weeks after transfusion of a random unit of nonirradiated red blood cells (RBCs) that happened to be from a donor homozygous for an HLA haplotype shared by the patient., Study Design and Methods: This study was a single case review of a liver transplant recipient who developed skin GVHD and marrow aplasia. Clinical course and the chimerism studies involving the patient, the liver donor, and the blood donor are detailed., Results: The patient presented 3 months posttransplant with GVHD of his skin and marrow aplasia. In addition to standard antigraft immunosuppression, this patient had started the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra on Posttransplant Day 13 for an acute gout flare. Chimerism studies on the patient's peripheral blood identified a population of CD3 cells that did not originate with either the patient or his liver donor. HLA studies and microsatellite profiling of the unknown CD3 population identified the source of the patient's TA-GVHD, a unit of nonirradiated, nonleukoreduced apheresis RBCs., Conclusion: Use of an immunomodulating agent may have contributed to the development of TA-GVHD in a liver transplant patient who received a random unit of nonirradiated RBCs by chance from an unrelated haploidentical donor., (© 2012 American Association of Blood Banks.)

The metropolitan Seattle area has utilized a centralized transfusion service model throughout the modern era of blood banking. This approach has used four laboratories to serve over 20 hospitals and clinics, providing greater capabilities for all at a lower consumption of resources than if each depended on its own laboratory and staff for these functions. In addition, this centralized model has facilitated wider use of the medical capabilities of the blood center's physicians, and a county-wide network of transfusion safety officers is now being developed to increase the impact of the blood center's transfusion expertise at the patient's bedside. Medical expectations and traffic have led the blood center to evolve the centralized model to include on-site laboratories at facilities with complex transfusion requirements (e.g., a children's hospital) and to implement in all the others a system of remote allocation. This new capability places a refrigerator stocked with uncrossmatched units in the hospital but retains control over the dispensing of these through the blood center's computer system; the correct unit can be electronically cross-matched and released on demand, obviating the need for transportation to the hospital and thus speeding transfusion. This centralized transfusion model has withstood the test of time and continues to evolve to meet new situations and ensure optimal patient care., (© 2011 American Association of Blood Banks.)

Background: Although young women who are D- occasionally receive unintentional transfusions with D+ red blood cells (RBCs), there are little data to assist with management of such an event. Two cases of D- girls transfused with D+ RBCs are reported. In an effort to prevent formation of anti-D, RBC exchange followed by administration of intravenous (IV) Rh immune globulin (RhIg) was used., Case Reports: Patient 1, a 56-kg, 16-year-old D- girl, was involved in a motor vehicle crash. She received 4 units of Group O uncrossmatched D+ RBCs. Thirty-six hours after admission, she underwent RBC exchange with 10 units of D- RBCs, followed by a total of 2718 microg of IV RhIg over 32 hours. Six months later, her antibody screen was negative. Patient 2, a 39-kg, 10-year-old D- girl with aplastic anemia, received 1 unit of D+ RBCs. She underwent RBC exchange on the same day with 5 units of D- RBCs, followed by a total of 900 microg of IV RhIg over 8 hours. Six months later her antibody screen was negative., Conclusion: RBC exchange followed by a calculated dose of IV RhIg was successful in preventing allo-immunization to D. Several small studies suggest that both trauma and hematology patients may be less capable of becoming immunized with the transfusion of D+ blood components. Until these findings are more clearly defined, there will be times when prevention of immunization of any D- girl is desired. RBC exchange followed by RhIg appears to be one way to achieve this goal.