Search

PDF file - 118KB, Supplementary Table 1. number of patients for each observed clusters with 4 autoantibodies. Supplementary Table 2. Number of patients for each observed clusters with 5 autoantibodies.

Objective: Breast density notification laws aim to increase women’s awareness and knowledge about breast density (BD). This study’s aim was to compare BD knowledge and awareness in two Hispanic populations: a safety-net clinic serving Latina population in Maricopa County, Arizona (AZ) and a national sample of Hispanic women participating in an online research panel. Materials/Methods: Women ages 40-74 were recruited at the AZ clinic from 2016-2019 at a screening mammography appointment as part of a larger clinical trial (AZ cohort). Surveys were completed in person (English or Spanish) at enrollment to assess awareness of BD, understanding of BD risk, and mammography history. The same questions were asked in a nationally representative online panel survey conducted in 2017. All data from the national survey were weighted to adjust for probability of selection into the panel and post-stratified to match known U.S. Hispanic population distributions (NS cohort). Univariate comparisons between the clinic and the national panel were performed using Rao-Scott chi-square tests. Associations with awareness and correct knowledge were examined with multivariable logistic regression. All summaries and analyses are weighted, and were performed with SAS version 9.4 SURVEY procedures (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results: The analysis included 1332 Hispanic women from the AZ clinic and 152 Hispanic women who completed the national survey. The AZ cohort was younger (mean age: 48.5 vs 52.8), had less education (less than high school: 68.7% vs 34.8% less than high school), more likely to prefer Spanish (92.3% vs 53.1%) and less likely to have had a prior mammogram as compared NS cohort (82.8% vs 90.4%) (all p≤ 0.03). NS cohort was more likely to have awareness of BD (32.6% vs 20.7%); correct understanding of the masking effect of BD, (67.8% vs 37.0%,) and breast cancer risk (72.2% vs 32.6%,), compared to the AZ cohort (all p < 0.004). When adjusted for differences in education, age, language, and screening mammography history, BD awareness was similar between the two cohorts (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 0.95, p=0.83). Awareness was positively associated with more education, previous mammogram history, and English language. However, differences in BD knowledge remained (ORadj=2.8 [p=0.03] and 7.2 [P Citation Format: Jillian Leaver, Bhavika K. Patel, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Sarah Jenkins, Vera Suman, Deborah J. Rhodes, Aaron Norman, Karthik Ghosh, Bijan Borah, Carrie Hruska, Edna Ramos, Davinder Singh, Matt Jewett, Carmen Radecki-Breitkof, Celine Vachon. Breast density knowledge and awareness among Latinas in a low-resource setting: A comparison nationally-representative sample of Latinas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-238.

Background: Several studies have suggested that vitamin D may have antiproliferative and anticarcinogenic properties and a protective effect against breast cancer. Alaskan Natives have demonstrated high rates of vitamin D deficiency, particularly in young individuals. Hence, high breast density has been associated with increased breast cancer risk. Therefore, we examined the association between serum vitamin D levels and mammographic breast density in a population of Alaskan Native women. Methods: Patients seen in the Mayo Clinic-Alaska Native Medical Center telemedicine program from December 2014 to December 2017 were offered to enroll in the study. Consent was obtained by a study coordinator in Minnesota using a telemedicine platform. Participants were asked to complete the Breast Cancer Risk Questionnaire, which includes questions on hormonal, lifestyle factors and family history. Serum vitamin D levels (25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and D3) were obtained and later correlated with mammographic breast density (percent density). Data were summarized with frequencies and percentages or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), as appropriate. Pearson correlation was used to estimate the association between breast density and vitamin D levels. Results: 33 women were included; median age was 53 years (IQR 45-58), 70% self-identified as American Indian/Alaskan Native, 12% as White, 6% as Native Hawaiian/Pacific islander and 12% as other. Median BMI was 31 kg/m² (IQR 26.4-34.3), menarche was at age 12 or older for 23 (70%) of the participants and 20 women were postmenopausal at the time enrollment. 10 participants had a hysterectomy, of whom 60% also had oophorectomy. 76% reported history of hormonal birth control use and 23% postmenopausal hormonal supplementation. Median number of pregnancies was 3 (IQR 2-5), and 20 women reported breastfeeding. Fifteen women were current or former smokers (>100 cigarettes) and 19 reported none or low alcohol consumption. Median serum vitamin D level was 39 ng/mL (IQR 30-52) and 9 (27%) women had low vitamin D levels. In regard to breast density, median percentage (average of images) was 15% (IQR 7.5-24.9) with a median dense area of 21.8 cm² (IQR 16.4-34.2). Median time from blood draw to mammogram was 110 days (IQR 41-172) and 19 (58%) participants were taking vitamin D supplementation at the time of study enrollment; doses ranged from 400 to 50,000 units. No correlation was identified between breast density and serum vitamin D levels (correlation=0.02). Conclusion: In this cohort, no association between serum vitamin D levels and breast density was observed. More than half of the participants were on vitamin D supplementation and this could have obscured our observations. Larger studies controlling for vitamin supplementation are needed, as this association could potentially impact breast cancer rates in populations at risk for vitamin D deficiency. Citation Format: Narjust Duma, Ivana Croghan, Sarah Jenkins, Loni Neal, Karthik Ghosh, Sandhya Pruthi. Assessing vitamin D and mammographic breast density in a population of Alaskan Native women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr C088.

Purpose: Clustering of neural autoantibodies in patients with paraneoplastic neurologic disorders may predict tumor type. A mathematical analysis of neural autoantibody clusters was performed in 78,889 patients undergoing evaluation for a suspected paraneoplastic autoimmune neurologic disorder. Tumor predictive autoantibody profiles were confirmed in sera from patients with histologically proven tonsillar cancer, thymoma, and lung cancer. Patients and Methods: Of note, 78,889 patient sera were tested for 15 defined neural autoantibodies (1.2 million tests). The observed and hypothesized frequencies of autoantibody clusters were compared and their tumor associations defined. A tumor validation study comprised serum from 368 patients with a variety of tumors (thymoma, lung, or tonsil). Results: Informative oncological associations included (i) thymoma in 85% of patients with muscle striational, acetylcholine receptor antibodies plus CRMP5 autoantibodies; (ii) lung carcinoma in 80% with both P/Q-type and N-type calcium channel antibodies plus SOX1-IgG; and (iii) in men, prostate carcinoma frequency more than doubled when striational and muscle AChR specificities were accompanied by ganglionic AChR antibody. In women, amphiphysin-IgG alone was associated commonly with breast carcinoma, but amphiphysin-IgG, coexisting with antineuronal nuclear autoantibody-type 1 or CRMP5-IgG, was associated with lung cancer (P < 0.0001). In the validation cohorts, many tumor-associated profiles were encountered that matched the clusters identified in the screening study (e.g., 15% of thymoma patients had striational, acetylcholine receptor antibodies plus collapsin response-mediator protein-5 autoantibodies). Conclusions: Neural autoantibodies commonly coexist in specific clusters that are identifiable by comprehensive screening. Signature autoantibody clusters may predict a patient's cancer risk and type. Clin Cancer Res; 20(14); 3862–9. ©2014 AACR.

Background: Racial disparities in breast cancer (BC) outcomes are well-documented. As guidelines for BC screening change, it is particularly important that women have accurate knowledge of risk factors in order to meaningfully participate in screening decisions. We examined knowledge of risk factors for BC among a nationally representative sample of women for whom mammography screening is routinely recommended. Method: Non-Hispanic black (B), non-Hispanic white (W), Hispanic (H), and women of other/multiple races (O) were surveyed using a probability-based web panel weighted to match the known U.S. population of females aged 40-74 years. A total of 17 items were presented in English or Spanish; response options included: “does not put you at increased risk,” “puts you at a small increased risk,” and “puts you at a large increased risk.” For scoring, the latter two categories were combined to reflect “increased risk.” Items included 9 established risk factors: having mammographically dense breasts, first-degree relative diagnosed with BC, second-degree relative diagnosed with BC, drinking alcohol in excess, history of a breast biopsy, having a first child after age 30, use of hormone therapy for postmenopausal symptoms, BRCA gene mutation, late onset of menopause; 5 protective factors: menarche after age 15, having children, breastfeeding, having a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, exercising or being active; one factor with no clear association: being a smoker (correct response was no increased risk); and 2 distractors (beliefs for which there is no evidence, correct response was no increased risk): using antiperspirant/talc under your arms, experiencing injury/trauma to the breast. The survey cooperation rate was 65% (1,506 responders out of 2,311). Items were scored correct if the respondent's answer matched the actual risk profile (either does/does not put you at increased risk). Percent correct was calculated for each item overall and by race/ethnicity. All reported percentages and analyses are weighted to be nationally representative and compared for differences based on race/ethnicity using logistic regression models. P-values represent differences in percent correct between the racial/ethnic groups. Results: Knowledge of risk factors varied across items (range >90% to 20% correct). Percent correct was high overall for classifying a first-degree relative with BC as a risk factor and differed by race/ethnicity, with 86% B, 98% W, 92% H and 92% O recognizing this risk factor (p Conclusions: Among U.S. women, there is wide variation in knowledge across several established BC risk factors and only moderate knowledge of breast density as an important risk factor. Differences in knowledge by race/ethnicity for several risk factors highlight the need for targeted education. Citation Format: Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Deborah J. Rhodes, Sarah M. Jenkins, Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss, Celine M. Vachon. Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge of risk factors for breast cancer: Findings from a recent national survey. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AACR Conference: The Science of Cancer Health Disparities; Dec 6–9, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B42. doi:10.1158/1538-7755.DISP13-B42