Search

Supplementary Figure from EML4-ALK Variant 3 Promotes Mitotic Errors and Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Deficiency Leading to Increased Microtubule Poison Sensitivity

Figure S2 shows Hsp70 inhibition does not block clustering of acentrosomal spindle poles.

Figure S1 shows protein expression of Hsp72, Hsc70, Nek6 and Nek7 in different cell types following different treatments.

Supplementary figure legends

Cancer cells frequently possess extra amplified centrosomes clustered into two poles whose pseudo-bipolar spindles exhibit reduced fidelity of chromosome segregation and promote genetic instability. Inhibition of centrosome clustering triggers multipolar spindle formation and mitotic catastrophe, offering an attractive therapeutic approach to selectively kill cells with amplified centrosomes. However, mechanisms of centrosome clustering remain poorly understood. Here, we identify a new pathway that acts through NIMA-related kinase 6 (Nek6) and Hsp72 to promote centrosome clustering. Nek6, as well as its upstream activators polo-like kinase 1 and Aurora-A, targeted Hsp72 to the poles of cells with amplified centrosomes. Unlike some centrosome declustering agents, blocking Hsp72 or Nek6 function did not induce formation of acentrosomal poles, meaning that multipolar spindles were observable only in cells with amplified centrosomes. Inhibition of Hsp72 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells resulted in increased multipolar spindle frequency that correlated with centrosome amplification, while loss of Hsp72 or Nek6 function in noncancer-derived cells disturbs neither spindle formation nor mitotic progression. Hence, the Nek6–Hsp72 module represents a novel actionable pathway for selective targeting of cancer cells with amplified centrosomes. Cancer Res; 77(18); 4785–96. ©2017 AACR.

EML4-ALK is an oncogenic fusion protein present in approximately 5% of non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Alternative breakpoints in the gene encoding EML4 result in distinct variants that are linked to markedly different patient outcomes. Patients with EML4-ALK variant 3 (V3) respond poorly to ALK inhibitors and have lower survival rates compared with patients with other common variants, such as V1. Here, we use isogenic Beas-2B bronchial epithelial cell lines expressing EML4-ALK V1 or V3, as well as ALK-positive NSCLC patient cells that express V1 (H3122 cells) or V3 (H2228 cells), to show that EML4-ALK V3 but not V1 leads to hyperstabilized K-fibers in mitosis, as well as errors in chromosome congression and segregation. This is consistent with our observation that EML4-ALK V3 but not V1 localizes to spindle microtubules and that wild-type EML4 is a microtubule stabilizing protein. In addition, cells expressing EML4-ALK V3 exhibit loss of spindle assembly checkpoint control that is at least in part dependent on ALK catalytic activity. Finally, we demonstrate that cells expressing EML4-ALK V3 have increased sensitivity to microtubule poisons that interfere with mitotic spindle assembly, whereas combination treatment with paclitaxel and clinically approved ALK inhibitors leads to a synergistic response in terms of reduced survival of H2228 cells. Implications: This study suggests that combining the microtubule poison, paclitaxel, with targeted ALK inhibitors may provide an effective new treatment option for patients with NSCLC with tumors that express the EML4-ALK V3 oncogenic fusion.

Effective treatment of pediatric solid tumors has been hampered by the predominance of currently “undruggable” driver transcription factors. Improving outcomes while decreasing the toxicity of treatment necessitates the development of novel agents that can directly inhibit or degrade these elusive targets. MYCN in pediatric neural-derived tumors, including neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma, is a paradigmatic example of this problem. Attempts to directly and specifically target MYCN have failed due to its similarity to MYC, the unstructured nature of MYC family proteins in their monomeric form, the lack of an understanding of MYCN-interacting proteins and ability to test their relevance in vivo, the inability to obtain structural information on MYCN protein complexes, and the challenges of using traditional small molecules to inhibit protein–protein or protein–DNA interactions. However, there is now promise for directly targeting MYCN based on scientific and technological advances on all of these fronts. Here, we discuss prior challenges and the reasons for renewed optimism in directly targeting this “undruggable” transcription factor, which we hope will lead to improved outcomes for patients with pediatric cancer and create a framework for targeting driver oncoproteins regulating gene transcription.

Cancer cells frequently possess extra amplified centrosomes clustered into two poles whose pseudo-bipolar spindles exhibit reduced fidelity of chromosome segregation and promote genetic instability. Inhibition of centrosome clustering triggers multipolar spindle formation and mitotic catastrophe, offering an attractive therapeutic approach to selectively kill cells with amplified centrosomes. However, mechanisms of centrosome clustering remain poorly understood. Here, we identify a new pathway that acts through NIMA-related kinase 6 (Nek6) and Hsp72 to promote centrosome clustering. Nek6, as well as its upstream activators polo-like kinase 1 and Aurora-A, targeted Hsp72 to the poles of cells with amplified centrosomes. Unlike some centrosome declustering agents, blocking Hsp72 or Nek6 function did not induce formation of acentrosomal poles, meaning that multipolar spindles were observable only in cells with amplified centrosomes. Inhibition of Hsp72 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells resulted in increased multipolar spindle frequency that correlated with centrosome amplification, while loss of Hsp72 or Nek6 function in noncancer-derived cells disturbs neither spindle formation nor mitotic progression. Hence, the Nek6–Hsp72 module represents a novel actionable pathway for selective targeting of cancer cells with amplified centrosomes. Cancer Res; 77(18); 4785–96. ©2017 AACR.

Activating gene fusions in the RET receptor tyrosine kinase have been found to drive 1-2% of lung adenocarcinomas and therefore offer an attractive target for targeted therapy. Whilst non-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors with RET activity are efficacious in this setting, their use is generally limited by dose limiting toxicity associated with their more potent activity versus other targets, specifically KDR (VEGFR2) in the case of cabozantinib and vandetanib. Given this limitation, there is considerable interest in developing more selective inhibitors of RET kinase. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are prone to early clinical failure due to mutations in the kinase ATPase binding domain, which render the kinase catalytically active but no longer sensitive to drug treatment. Such mutations often occur in the so-called “gatekeeper” region and in this specific case, resistance is predicted to arise from a Val-Met or Val-Leu mutation at residue 804. Through a combination of computational methods, structural biology and drug design, we have identified and further optimized a series of inhibitors of the V804M mutant RET kinase which show sub-micromolar cellular activity in cells driven by V804M RET. Moreover, these agents show excellent selectivity against the wtRET kinase and KDR. As such, these agents may offer valuable start-points for second-generation RET inhibitors for use in patents who relapse after treatment with first generation selective RET inhibitors. Citation Format: Allan M. Jordan, Rebecca Newton, Bohdan Waszkowycz, Richard Bayliss, Habiba Begum, Daniel Burschowsky, Aude Echalier, Samantha Hitchin, Colin Hutton, Shaun Johns, Stuart Jones, Li-Ying Lin, Mark Richards, Chitra Seewooruthun, Alex Stowell, Ian Waddell, Mandy Watson, Donald Ogilvie. Delivering selective and cell-active inhibitors of V804M mutant RET kinase through structure-guided drug discovery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3236. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3236