Search

Introduction/Background: Atypical lung carcinoids and lung neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are currently incurable. Most of these cancers express the C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), making CXCR4 an attractive target for cancer diagnosis and treatment using radioligand therapy (RLT) with nuclides such as alpha emitter Pb212 conjugated to Pentixather (Pent). Alpha particles produce dense ionization tracks and damage cytosolic structures such as mitochondria, leading to the generation of reactive oxygen species such as superoxide (O2 ●−) and hydroperoxides (H2O2 and ROOH) in targeted cancer cells. The FDA approved thioredoxin reductase inhibitor, auranofin (Aur), inhibits peroxiredoxin-mediated hydroperoxide metabolism increasing cell killing in targeted cancer cells. Hypothesis: Inhibition of hydroperoxide metabolism using Aur can enhance therapeutic efficacy of alpha particle emitting 212Pb-Pent in preclinical models of lung carcinoids and NECs. Results: Clinically, IHC revealed greater than 75% of atypical carcinoids and NECs tested had moderate to high CXCR4. qRT-PCR, flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry performed on different lung carcinoid and NEC lung cell lines, determined that the majority moderately or highly express CXCR4. The minimal non-toxic dose of Aur that inhibits 50-70% of thioredoxin reductase activity was 4 mg/kg (intraperitoneal once a day) in DMS273 (small cell lung cancer) xenografts 212Pb-Pent given IV (1 and 3 µCu/g) was effective at increasing the survival of mice with DMS273 xenografts. Mice were then treated with 1.5, 3 or 6 µCu/g 212Pb-Pent w/wo Aur 4 mg/kg/day. A trend test showed that both increasing dose of 212Pb-Pent and the addition of Aur, caused a significant (p Conclusion: The use of 212Pb-Pent therapy to target CXCR4 on NECs showed pre-clinical efficacy in a dose dependent manner that was enhanced by Aur without significant normal tissue toxicity supporting the hypothesis that CXCR4 can be successfully targeted with the radionuclide theragnostic pair, Pb212/Pb203-pentixather. Citation Format: Melissa A. Fath, Dijie Liu, Claudia Robles-Planells, Jordan T. Ewald, Keegan A. Christensen, Spenser S. Johnson, Stephen A. Graves, Douglas R. Spitz, Yusuf Menda, M. Sue O’Dorisio. Targeting CXCR4 and thioredoxin reductase in high grade neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5034.

Purpose: Although gliomas predominate among central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms in adulthood, embryonal tumors are the most common malignant brain tumors in children. Despite novel treatment approaches, including improved radiotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy, survival rates remain unsatisfactory. The timely diagnosis of residual or recurrent embryonal CNS tumors and thus the earliest possible time point for intervention is often hampered by inaccuracies of conventional imaging techniques. Novel and refined imaging methodologies are urgently needed. Experimental Design: We have previously demonstrated the use of somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) in the diagnosis of recurrent and residual medulloblastomas. Here, we evaluated somatostatin receptor type 2 (sst2) expression using an antibody in an array of CNS tumors of childhood. Eight high-grade gliomas, 4 atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors, 7 supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors (stPNET), 1 medulloepithelioma (ME), and 8 ependymomas were screened. Tumors positive in vitro were additionally analyzed in vivo using SRI. Results: Abundant expression of somatostatin receptor type 2 in stPNET, a ME, and ependymomas warranted in vivo imaging of 7 stPNET, 1 rhabdomyosarcoma, 3 ependymomas, 1 ME, and 1 glioblastoma. Although SRI was positive in 6/7 stPNET, 1 rhabdomyosarcoma, and 1 ME, none of the ependymomas nor the glioblastoma could be imaged using SRI. In selected cases SRI was more sensitive in the detection of relapse than conventional imaging by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Conclusions: SRI should be considered in the evaluation of residual or recurrent embryonal CNS tumors, especially stPNET. The strengths of SRI lie in the differentiation of reactive tissue changes versus residual or recurrent tumor, the detection of small lesions, and possibly in the distinction of stPNET from gliomas.